This week, an organization that does not exist accused a journalist of failing to disclose her political speech. The organization is called Washingtonians For Ethical Government (WFEG). It is worth knowing who they are. /1
WFEG's complaint against Brandi Kruse argues that when a commentator repeatedly advocates for a ballot measure on her platform, that activity should be reported as an in-kind campaign contribution. They put a number on it: $1.25 million across 150+ instances. /2
Take WFEG's theory at face value. Apply it consistently. Start with: who is WFEG? Here is what I found:
• Not in the IRS exempt organizations database
• No Washington Secretary of State registration
• 'Does not accept financial contributions from the public'
• Mailing address is a law firm /3
WFEG's president is Andrew Villeneuve. He simultaneously runs NPI, an explicitly progressive 501(c)(4), and sits on the Washington State Democratic Central Committee.
He has been a DNC delegate three times: Obama, Sanders, Harris. /4
In ten years, WFEG has filed nine public enforcement actions. Here is the complete list.
Targets against Democrats, unions, or progressive organizations in ten years: zero. /5
WFEG's primary law firm has received $839,556 from Democratic and labor PACs over the same period.
These are the same coalition organizations that coordinate filings with WFEG against the same conservative targets. /6
So here is the issue:
Either Kruse's commentary is an undisclosed in-kind contribution. In which case WFEG has been the largest undisclosed in-kind contributor in Washington for a decade.
Or it isn't. And the complaint should be dismissed.
WFEG cannot have both. /fin
Correction to /3: WFEG IS registered with the WA Secretary of State as a nonprofit corporation (UBI 603555192). Live CCFS shows the entity active ().
Today, @seattletimes introduced us to Seattleite Adriana: 33, $60K at a catering job, seven roommates in a Green Lake boardinghouse. Sympathetic. Specific. But the piece is quiet on the structure. Let's think about those costs not mentioned, shall we? /1
Start with what disappears before she sees a check. She was told $60K. She takes home $42K. Federal tax and FICA take ~16%. The rest of the gap is the 'depending on how many hours she gets' problem of hourly service work. The headline is not the wage. /2
Her rent is $830 for a room in a boardinghouse, utilities included. That's the floor in Seattle. The next rung up, a $1,600 studio she's saving for, would be 46% of her take-home before she eats. 'Rent is too high' is true. It is also incomplete. /3
Out-of-state political committees that spend in Washington must file C-5 reports with the PDC.
From 2018 through 2025, 141 different out-of-state committees filed C-5 expenditures here.
One of them, by itself, is 43% of the total. /2
That committee is the SEIU Political Education and Action Fund — the national political arm of the Service Employees International Union, headquartered in Washington DC.
C-5 expenditures, 2018-2025: $18.98M.
The other 140 out-of-state committees combined: $25.19M. /3
A forensic audit of the King County Regional Homelessness Authority dropped this week. Most coverage is leading with $13 million in unaccounted public funds.
That number matters. But the audit itself says something more important, and worse. /1
KCRHA received $533.9 million in public funding from 2021 through July 2025. Most of it from Seattle and King County.
The audit's central finding is not that some of it went missing. It is that the agency could not produce a reliable accounting of where most of it went. /2
From the auditor: records 'especially related to receivables, invoicing, and advance funds' were 'not functionally traceable or reconcilable prior to late 2024.'
Clark Nuber, the firm hired to do the work, on three years the city and county can no longer audit cleanly. /3
SEIU alone outspent Microsoft + Amazon + Boeing combined by ~2x. /2
Where does $30M go?
• No on 2124 (WA Cares defense): $12M
• Dem party infrastructure: $7.2M
• Other ballot measures + PACs: $4.6M
• SEIU WA Council PAC: $2.2M
• Direct to candidates: $883K (just 3%)
For every $1 in a candidate's hand, $33 on infrastructure voters never see. /3
Your property tax bill has a lot of line items. Most people don't read them closely. You probably should, because the Seattle City Council just voted to add another one, and the math is starting to get interesting.
Let's walk through what you're actually paying, and what's coming next. /1
The council just sent a $479.7 million library levy to the August ballot. That's a 124% increase over the current levy. Your cost goes from roughly $85/year to $191/year on a median-assessed home.
But the library levy isn't the story. The story is the levy stack underneath it, and the cliff the city is driving toward. /2
How we got here. @MayorofSeattle proposed a $410 million library levy in March. The council added $69.7 million through 13 amendments. Councilwoman Rivera, who chaired the levy committee, voted against every one of those amendments but ultimately voted to send the package to voters.
Her words: "It is 70% more even after counting for inflation." /3
(Source: Center Square, 4/14/26; Council Blog, 4/8/26)
Yesterday I asked UFCW 3000 Secretary-Treasurer @joe_miz three direct questions about his union's connection to the group that derailed WinCo's first Seattle store. He hasn't answered.
While we wait, let's talk about the mayor his union put in office. /1
In August 2025, @MayorofSeattle accepted the UFCW 3000 endorsement outside the closing Lake City Fred Meyer. She pledged to fight food deserts and explore a "public option" grocery store. UFCW 3000 launched their "Fresh Food for All" campaign at the same event.
(Source: The Urbanist, 9/25/25; KNKX, 9/25/25) /2
Seven months later, a Portland-based entity called "Lake Washington Working Families" derailed a 24-hour, employee-owned discount grocer from opening 3 miles away in the same council district. The Hearing Examiner sent the project back to Wilson's own SDCI for further review. Her administration now controls the timeline and scope of that review.