クリシュナ ☀️🦚 Profile picture
May 13 44 tweets 11 min read Read on X
Project 18: The Making of a Super Destroyer.

A 🧵 on Project 18. Image
1) P18 is expected to be the next generation of destroyers being designed for the Indian Navy. One of few projects in the Indian Defence space that actually excites me. It’ll be close to a 13000-ton class vessel with significant layered capabilities for both offence and defence.
2) Basics:
Weight: approx. 13,000 tons
VLS cells: 128 - 144, plus 8 slant launchers for HCM
Radar: DRDO S band LRMFR with range >500km
Space for two multirole helicopters
Engine: IEP (Integrated Electric Propulsion) Image
3) The Radar (LRMFR):
(Undergoing trials)
It is likely to field the LRMFR radar developed by DRDO. It has a 6m Dia antenna array and 36m2 aperture. It is significantly bigger than the current ELTA’s MF-STAR. It is one of the biggest ship-based radars in the world. 2400 TR
modules per face. It has a detection range of 500km+. Uses S band that gives a good balance between long range detection and signal-to-noise. It is currently undergoing trials on INS Anvesh. Image
4) The destroyer is expected to field everything from hypersonic strike weapons to short-range defence interceptors, enabling roles from BM defence to carrier escort and maritime A2/AD. Now I will lay these missile systems out one by one and explain their roles and capabilities.
4) Layered Defence:

a) Ballistic Missile Defence Layer AAD, AD-1, AD-2:
(In trials)
The outermost defensive layer of P18 appears to revolve around naval ballistic missile defence interceptors. The missiles are AAD, AD-1 and AD-2. AAD is designed to intercept BMs ranges up to Image
2000km. It has a hit to kill mechanism. Means it uses pure kinetic energy to hit the target inside the atmosphere. A Naval version of the AAD has been tested from INS Anvesh (A41). Image
AD-1 and AD-2 missiles will have greater range (3000 and 5000km respectively) with endo and exo-atmospheric interceptions. DRDO S band LRMFR with detection and targeting range >500km
is expected to be deployed on this class. Combine these with targeting data from long-range tracking ships such as INS Dhruv, and you get a powerful BMD node, not merely a destroyer. Image
b) Long Range Area Defence (Kusha M2 and M1):
(M1 tested, M2 in development)

Once the outermost layer is bypassed, the engagement envelope passes to this system. It has two interceptors M1 and M2.

M2 (250km) engages high value targets such as AEW&C, aircraft, cruise missiles. Image
M1(150km) will engage targets such as aircrafts and cruise missiles. It can be used for saturation defence. These two layers are critical for fleet wide protection and maritime air denial especially during carrier operations.
c) Medium Range Fleet Defence (VL-SRSAM):
(Nearing induction on current vessels)
The available reaction time gets drastically reduced if targets such as aircraft or cruise missiles bypass the area defence layer. This is why this layer becomes so important. VL-SRSAM has a faster Image
reaction time to engage faster incoming threats such as aircraft and sea skimming cruise missiles. It has a range up to 80km. An important layer of the larger layered defence.
d) Innermost Point Defence (VSHORAD):
(Tests done)
The last layer of the missile defence system. It is designed to engage helicopters, UAVs, drones, low flying threats. Very important for defence against drone saturation attacks. Image
As of today, several tests of VSHORAD have been successfully completed with CROSSHAIR-N by Adani Defence especially designed for naval platforms.
e) DEW:
(Systems from 2KW to 100KW have been tested)
This could be one of the most important parts of layered defence against drone saturation attacks, especially when cost asymmetry is considered. Shipborne DEW systems have already been tested from naval platforms Image
from as low as 2KW. New DEW systems of 10KW, 20KW, 50KW and 100KW classes are being tested. This layer will reduce the use of VSHORAD against Shahed class drones.
f) CIWS (AK630):
If all previous layers fail this is the final wall before incoming threats reach the ship. The last line of defence with a high rate of fire. Image
5) Layered Offence:

a) Strategic Strike Layer (ET-LDHCM or Project Vishnu):
(Scramjet engine tested for 1200sec)
This is expected to be the primary strategic weapon of the P18 class. Hypersonic cruise missile with a range 1500km+ will act against carrier strike groups, Image
hardened strategic infrastructure, high value maritime targets. The missile maintains a sustained speed between Mach 6-8 throughout its flight path. This reduces the enemy reaction time, Image
significantly improving the survivability of the missile. The role of the missile is strategic and is not meant for saturation purposes.
b) Long-Range Saturation Strike Layer (LR-LACM/ Nirbhay/ ITCM):
(Tests done)
Subsonic, 1500km range. It is perfect for long range saturation strikes. Lower production cost and shorter production time. It provides operational sustainability, flexibility and volume to carry out Image
roles such as long-range coastal attacks, saturation of enemy air defences and long-range land targets. This preserves the strategically important missiles such as HCM or Brahmos ER for their respective roles.
c) Long-Range Maritime Strike Layer (BrahMos-ER):
(Induction on current warships soon)
BrahMos-ER will be the primary anti-ship weapon of the P18. Image
800km range with sustained supersonic flight at Mach 3+ with a sea skimming profile is a major threat for destroyers, cruisers, coastal targets, high value maritime targets.
d) Long-Range Stealth Strike Layer (LRASM equivalent):
(Doesn’t exist. Although one should be developed)
This one is speculative. LRASM is a subsonic anti-ship missile with stealth features designed to operate in a heavily contested EW environment while retaining target autonomy Image
and survivability. It has a range of 1000km. Official range classified. We currently do not have such a missile and from my understanding are not working on something similar. If we ever develop such missile then it’d improve the operational flexibility of the future P18 class.
e) Medium-Range Strike Layer (NASM-MR):
(Undergoing trials)
The Naval anti-ship missile medium range has a range 100 - 350km. It is subsonic. It can be used to engage smaller targets such as patrol boats, missile boats, targets of opportunity, corvettes, etc. Image
Using it instead of relying on the more expensive BrahMos-ER improves engagement economics.
f) Short-Range Strike Layer (NASM-SR):
(Undergoing trials)
Short range anti-ship missile with 55km of range. Helicopter launched. Can engage fast attack craft, littoral threats etc. Image
6) Anti-Submarine Strike Layer:
a) SMART:
(Undergoing trials)
Supersonic Missile Assisted Release of Torpedo (I love these acronyms) is designed to deliver a torpedo over longer distances. It is both a missile and a torpedo. The delivery vehicle has a range of 643Km Image
while the torpedo has a range of 20km post-release. This could drastically improve the ASW capability of the current and future ships such as P18.
b) Helicopter Based Anti-Submarine Layer:
Each ship likely to have two multirole helicopters capable of anti-sub warfare equipped with lightweight torpedoes. This fits in the medium range anti sub engagement envelope. Image
As shown in the render naval IMRH will have a maritime surveillance radar and a dipping sonar that will assist in anti-sub warfare. Image
c)Ship Based Anti-Submarine layer:
Varunastra heavyweight torpedo is capable of engaging underwater threats at a max range of 50km. It can be considered the last layer of the anti-sub strike envelope. Varunastra becomes necessary for targets that have made it past the prev layer
So the anti-submarine kill chain would most likely be:
SMART for long range.
Helicopter-based torpedoes for medium range.
Ship-launched Varunastra as the final layer.
[*One caveat: engaging submarines is one thing, but detecting and tracking them at that range is difficult.]
7) Autonomous Underwater Capabilities:
The Indian Navy has tested the HEAUV (High Endurance Autonomous Underwater Vehicle) in March 2025. This AUV is capable of handling ISR, mine countermeasures (MCM) and mine-laying and potential strike roles. Image
MPAUV(Man portable autonomous underwater vehicle) has also been tested for the Indian Navy. These are smaller, hence the term man-portable. Role is mine detection and countermeasures. Because of the smaller size, these can be deployed from any surface vessel giving it MCM ability Image
8) Limitations:
At present, the P18 is in design phase. Most of the subsystems and missiles are either under development or undergoing trials. Integrating this many systems on a single platform is going to be a challenging engineering endeavour. Integration of sensors,
power generation, cooling, combat management, Unmanned underwater systems will pose a significant challenge in the development of the class. Once these challenges are addressed, P18 could become the most advanced and complex combat vessel ever built by the country.
9) In this thread, I have tried to highlight the future potential of the Indian Navy and how vessels like the P18 transform the country’s aspirations from regional sea control to global power projection.

Thank you for reading! Image
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with クリシュナ ☀️🦚

クリシュナ ☀️🦚 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ExiledSeraph6

Apr 30
The VLS conundrum of the Indian Navy. A🧵 Image
1) The Kolkata Class and Vishakhapatnam Class (P15/B) destroyers are one of the most formidable combat ships in the world. Armed with Brahmos supersonic cruise anti-ship missiles these ships carry a powerful punch. However, these ships have a key vulnerability. The low VLS count Image
2) P15 A/B class have a fixed loadout of 48 missile cells. 16 Brahmos and 32 Barak 8. The P17 (Nigiri) class frigates have a loadout of 40 cells. For ex, An Arleigh Burke class destroyer has 96 VLS cells and a Type 55 destroyer has 112 VLS cells. Image
Read 25 tweets
Apr 14
DRDO VHF
A 🧵on India’s own anti-stealth radar. Image
Let’s go through the specs first to give you basic info.

• It is a Very High Frequency (VHF) radar designed to detect stealth aircraft.
• It can track 100 targets up to a range of 400 km.
• It has 80 GaN TR modules which function independently.
• Has staring and rotate modes
2) Before jumping into the workings of this radar, we need to understand how RAM (Radar Absorbing Material) works:
a) RAM coating works by absorbing and deflecting incoming radar waves. Part of the energy is absorbed while the rest is deflected away from the receiver. Image
Read 26 tweets
Mar 6
CATS Warrior is an important part of the CATS(Combat Air Teaming System).

Let's explore.

It is a loyal wingman drone being developed by HAL. It will fly alongside fighters like Tejas/Su-30MKI to scout, strike, jam, and take hits, so pilots stay safe. Image
It's a low-observable (stealthy) unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) acting as a "loyal wingman".
Key roles:

🔹Real-time ISR (intelligence, surveillance, recon)
🔹Precision strikes with internal weapons
🔹Electronic warfare / jamming
🔹High-risk decoy to protect manned jets. Image
Weight: ~2 t
Length: ~9 m
Engine: PTAE-W turbojet (~3.7 kN)
Speed: Subsonic (~M0.6–0.8)
Range: ~800–1,200 km (ferry)
Payload: ~650 kg (weapons + sensors)

AESA radar, EO/IR, internal bays for stealth Image
Read 8 tweets
Dec 26, 2025
The U.S. "manufacturing renaissance" everyone talks about? It's almost entirely AI & data centers.
CHIPS Act + IRA poured hundreds of billions into chips/EVs/batteries.
But traditional sectors—steel, autos, building materials, furniture—are barely moving. Weak housing sector.
Every new home built ripples through dozens of industries: plumbing, electrical, furniture, appliances, manual trades, local retail.
High economic multiplier (~3x).
Data centers? Heavy upfront construction jobs, then mostly automation. Few ongoing roles, narrow benefits.
Downside of data centers:
• Massive electricity demand → U.S. residential power prices up 7-13% in 2025, spikes to 20-267% in hot zones.
• Huge water usage for cooling.
• Enormous land grabs.
• Grid can't keep up
• Drives up the cost of copper.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(