🚨Greenhouses can grow food in extreme climates, but they often depend on fossil-derived CO₂ inputs to maximize crop yields.
New study investigates whether Direct Air Capture (#DAC) could replace those emissions-intensive CO₂ sources by capturing C directly from air.🧵1/13
2/ Researchers modeled a 1-ha sealed high-tech greenhouse in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia producing cherry tomatoes & lettuce under hot-arid conditions.
The system maintained ~1000ppm CO₂ conc, which are required to sustain high crop productivity in climate-controlled desert agri.
3/ The study evaluated two adsorption-based DAC systems:
• temperature-vacuum swing adsorption (TVSA)
• moisture-swing adsorption (MSA)
Both were benchmarked against conventional trucked liquid CO₂ enrichment currently used in commercial greenhouse operations
4/ Researchers calculated annual CO₂ demand at:
• 144 tCO₂/yr/ha for lettuce
• 419 tCO₂/yr/ha for cherry tomatoes
Higher CO₂ demand in tomato cultivation created stronger economies of scale, lowering DAC enrichment costs relative to lettuce systems.
5/ The modeled DAC systems achieved remarkably similar economics:
• MSA: US$252/tCO₂ for lettuce and US$240/tCO₂ for tomatoes
• TVSA: within ~2% of MSA costs
Meanwhile, conventional trucked CO₂ was 22% more expensive for lettuce systems under baseline assumptions
6/ One of the paper’s most imp findings is that greenhouse DAC avoids many of the costly requirements associated with conventional CDR systems.
7/ Because the captured CO₂ is immediately used inside the greenhouse, the system avoids:
• compression
• transport infrastructure
• high-purity storage requirements
• pipeline dependence
8/ Energy consumption emerged as the dominant operating cost.
The DAC systems required:
• ~2.2 MWh/tCO₂ for TVSA
• ~2.5 MWh/tCO₂ for MSA
Fan electricity alone accounted for up to 98% of operational energy use in MSA systems
9/ The study also quantified water requirements for moisture-swing DAC systems:
• 1,384 m³/yr for lettuce
• 4,112 m³/yr for tomatoes
Water costs accounted for ~10% of MSA operating expenses, an important consideration for deployment in arid regions.
11/ A ~30% drop in sorbent productivity nearly doubled levelized DAC costs, highlighting how critical material performance is for commercial viability.
12/ The lifecycle assessment found DAC-enabled greenhouse systems can substantially reduce emissions when powered by solar PV.
For lettuce production, emissions fell from:
• 0.50 kgCO₂e/kg crop using grid electricity
to
• 0.076 kgCO₂e/kg crop using PV electricity
The study concludes that low-cost solar power in desert regions could make DAC-enabled greenhouse agriculture both economically viable and lower-carbon than conventional CO₂ supply chains.
🚨Monthly Solar Geoengineering Updates (April'2026)🚨
From EU calls for an #SRM deployment moratorium & WHO-linked health-centered governance report, to Stardust publishing its own SRM rules, key SRM headlines you need to know from past month:
🔗
The private SRM company publishes voluntary rules and safety guidelines, but experts raise concerns over transparency, unknown aerosols, and private control of planetary-scale interventions.
1/12
2️⃣ WHO-linked report calls for health-centered SRM governance:
A pre-print urges SRM governance centred on human health, equity, and Global South inclusion, stressing SRM must never replace emissions cuts (“non-substitution” principle).
🚨Is direct air capture (#DAC) really worth the investment?
A new Nature Climate Change study shows that investing in wind & solar delivers 2-3× greater combined climate + health benefits than direct air capture across most U.S. regions, under the same budget.
Details🧵1/11
2/ DAC is often promoted as essential for net-zero, removing CO₂ directly from the atm. But most studies assess it in isolation, asking: “Does it work?”
This study asks a policy-relevant question:
“What are we giving up by funding DAC instead of alternatives?”
3/ Researchers modelled cost-equivalent investments across 22 U.S. regions (2020–2050), comparing:
Direct Air Capture vs Utility-scale wind & solar
Critically, they evaluated CO₂ reductions + air pollution + health impacts.
🚨What happens to tropical rainforests as CO₂ rises?
New research shows higher CO₂ boosts tree growth & C uptake by pushing roots to aggressively mine scarce phosphorus.
This strengthens the C sink now, but depletes nutrients, ultimately limiting long-term C storage.🧵1/11
2/ Scientists tested this in the Amazon by exposing forest patches to higher CO₂ (future-like conditions) and tracking how trees, roots, and soils responded over time.
3/ Step 1: More CO₂ → faster photosynthesis
Trees produce more sugars, grow faster, and pull more CO₂ out of the air.
🚨Green roofs + enhanced rock weathering (#ERW) could turn cities into carbon sinks.
A new assessment finds Europe’s rooftops could remove tens of millions of tonnes of CO₂ by 2060, with global potential reaching hundreds of MtCO₂/yr under ideal conditions.
Details🧵1/12
2/ The work is a conceptual, literature-based assessment combined with geochemical scaling.
It estimates CO₂ removal using theoretical maximum reactivity (100% mineral conversion) and extrapolates across urban roof availability in Europe and globally.
3/ Roof availability is a key input:
The study uses estimates that roofs cover ~30–32% of urban land area, and up to ~50% of impervious surfaces in dense cities, highlighting a large, currently underused surface for carbon removal deployment.
🚨A new study details that the climate value of algae & cyanobacteria lies not in CO₂ uptake alone, but in their capacity to generate long-lived, chemically recalcitrant C compounds, such as algaenan & carbonates that may contribute to durable sequestration pathways.
🧵1/11
2/ The study adopts a conceptual synthesis framework, integrating biochemical & geochemical evidence to examine carbon fate post-photosynthetic fixation, moving beyond uptake rates to study the thermodynamic and structural persistence of biogenic carbon.
3/ It constructs a functional distinction between:
1) Labile carbon fractions, which are rapidly cycled through microbial respiration
2) Recalcitrant fractions, which resist degradation & contribute to long-term carbon storage across terrestrial & marine systems.
🚨🗞️Monthly Solar Geoengineering Updates (March'26 Edition)🗞️🚨
From UN review of #SRM tech & its human rights impacts, to US organizations resisting SRM bans, plus new tools & research awards – SRM headlines you need to know from the past month:🧵1/13
1️⃣ @OHCHR_MENA seeks input on climate technologies - The UN Human Rights Office is collecting submissions on how SRM & CDR may impact human rights, with a report due later this year.
2/13
2️⃣ US National Security Framing – ACCF report urges federal research and international governance to prevent rivals from gaining strategic advantage.