Sort everything by total price (fare + mandatory fees), not just base fare.
Highlight any patterns where certain days or times are consistently cheaper.”
3) Smarter routes with good layovers
Prompt:
“Act as a routing expert.
Find alternative routes from [origin] to [destination] with 1–2 layovers that cost less than [budget in $].
Prioritize:
• Layovers shorter than [X hours]
• Airports with low transit hassle/fees
• Reasonable total travel time
Return:
• 3–5 route options (airports + airlines)
• Total price and travel time
• Why each route is a good tradeoff.”
4) Real deals, not fake promotions
Prompt:
“Act as my deal verifier.
For flights on [airlines or routes], find:
• Current promo codes
• Flash sales
• Public discounts
For each, tell me:
• Where it comes from (newsletter, site, campaign)
• Expiration date
• Conditions or restrictions
• How to apply it
Only include deals that are clearly valid and verifiable.
Ignore expired or suspicious offers.”
5) Break down all extra fees
Prompt:
“Act as a fare rules expert.
For this flight: [paste fare info or link]
Break down every extra cost:
• Baggage
• Seat selection
• Priority boarding
• Payment or service fees
Then:
• Show the real total price
• Suggest legal ways to avoid or reduce each fee (based on current fare rules)
• Warn me about any tricks that look cheap but cost more later.”
6) Write a price‑match / discount email
Prompt:
“Act as a polite but firm customer support negotiator.
I found this flight at [price] with [airline/agency], and a similar option at [higher price] with [airline/agency].
Draft a professional email asking for:
• A price match, OR
• A goodwill discount, OR
• Credits/benefits
Mention:
• My loyalty or history with them (I’ll fill in details)
• The competitor’s price
• Their current policies if relevant
Keep the tone respectful but confident.”
7) Compare risk if my plans change
Prompt:
“Act as a risk analyst for flight tickets.
Here are [2–4] flight options with their change/cancellation/refund rules: [paste or describe].
Compare them and tell me:
• Which option has the lowest financial risk if my plans change
• How much I’d lose in each scenario (change, cancel, no‑show)
• Any hidden clauses I should pay attention to
End with a simple recommendation: ‘If you value flexibility more than price, choose X; if you want the cheapest option and accept the risk, choose Y.’”
8) Evaluate hidden‑city ticket tricks
Prompt:
“Act as an aviation policy expert.
Explain whether using tickets with hidden destinations (hidden‑city ticketing) could reduce the cost from [origin] to [destination].
For my case:
• Show if it actually saves money
• List the real risks and airline policies
• In what specific situations it might be worth it
• When I should absolutely avoid it
I want a realistic risk/benefit analysis, not hype.”
9) Plan a full multi‑city trip
Prompt:
“Act as a travel planner.
I want to visit these places on one trip:
[list cities or countries]
My starting city: [origin]
Trip length: [X days/weeks]
Design the smartest route and flights.
Return:
• Best order to visit each city
• Suggested dates for each leg
• Recommended airports
• Approximate prices for each segment
• Where I save the most money by changing order or dates.”
10) Check the real trip cost, not just the ticket
Prompt:
“Act as a trip cost analyst.
I’m considering this flight: [details or link].
Estimate the *total* travel cost for this option, including:
• Flight price + fees
• Airport transfers (both sides)
• Likely baggage costs
• Common local transport costs for the times I arrive
Then:
• Suggest 1–2 alternative flight options (different times or airports)
• Compare total trip cost, not just the ticket
• Tell me which option gives the best value for money.”
You don’t beat airline pricing by refreshing the same search 20 times.
You beat it by:
• moving dates
• changing routes
• understanding fees
• measuring risk
Claude can do all of that thinking for you in one chat.
Use these 8 prompts before you book your next flight—
the difference between $889 and $229 adds up fast.
RT + Save this so you don’t forget them on your next trip.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A MIT PhD student told me he can predict exam questions before seeing the study guide.
Using NotebookLM.
I thought he was exaggerating.
Then he showed me the workflow.
He doesn’t wait for revision week.
He uploads past papers, lecture slides, textbook chapters, and old assignments into NotebookLM weeks in advance.
Then he runs 5 prompts.
By the time most students start studying, he already knows what the exam will probably look like.
Here’s the exact system:
1. The Pattern Hunter
Most students study topics.
Top students study patterns.
Paste this first:
“Analyze all past papers and course materials. What patterns exist in how this subject is examined? Identify recurring concepts, repeated question structures, favorite professor themes, and common traps.”
This changes everything.
Because exams rarely test randomly.
They test habits.
2. The Missing Topic Predictor
Professors don’t repeat the same paper.
But they often rotate neglected themes back in.
Paste:
“What important topics have not been tested recently but logically should be tested next based on course weight, chapter importance, and historical rotation?”
Apple has just published a paper with a devastating title: *The Illusion of Thinking*. And it's not a metaphor. What it demonstrates is that the AI models we use every day - yes, ones like ChatGPT - don't think. Not one bit. They just imitate doing so.
Let me explain: 🧵👇
The paper argues that those models, no matter how brilliant they may seem, do not understand what they are doing. They do not solve problems. They do not reason. They merely generate text word by word, trying to sound coherent. Real thought: zero.
To demonstrate this, Apple designed a series of experiments with logic puzzles: Tower of Hanoi, the river-crossing problem, stacked blocks, etc.
The same ones we use to see if a human or even a child can reason in steps.
Most people are quietly building their own disaster — and they call it “planning for success.”
They set ambitious goals, feel motivated for a week, then slowly get destroyed by problems they never saw coming.
Charlie Munger had the ultimate weapon against this: Inversion.
But 99% of people use it like a weak journaling trick.
The real pros turn it into a ruthless failure-mapping machine.
I forced Claude to become a cold-blooded Inversion Engine that exposes every hidden path to failure with terrifying clarity.
Here are the 5 prompts that actually work:
Munger said it best: "Tell me where I'm going to die, so I'll never go there."
Most people use inversion as a cute thought exercise.
They ask "what if this fails?" write 3 bullet points, feel smart, and move on.
That's not inversion. That's journaling with extra steps.
Real inversion is forensic. You don't brainstorm failure. You systematically reconstruct it every assumption, every decision point, every handoff where things rot quietly before they collapse loudly.
The difference between someone who thinks about failure and someone who maps it is the difference between a smoke alarm and a fire investigation.
One warns you. The other tells you exactly what burned and why.
Prompt 1: The Pre-Mortem
"Assume it's 18 months from now and [your goal/project] has completely failed. Not stumbled failed. Dead. Done.
You're writing the post-mortem report.
Work backwards. Identify: the single decision that sealed it, the warning sign that appeared early but was ignored, the assumption that was never tested, and the person in the room who knew but didn't say it.
Be specific. Name the failure mode, not the feeling of failure.
Then rank the top 3 causes by how invisible they would have been at the start."