The Second part
Recently, some online pages have spread claims that all historical churches and monasteries of the Syrian coast were originally “Gnostic-esoteric institutions,” and that Byzantine crosses and inscriptions are hidden secret codes.
These claims are not supported by archaeological or historical evidence, and they ignore the documented history of the Antiochian Orthodox tradition in the Syrian coast, expressed through its liturgy, language, and continuity.
Historically, known Gnostic (apocryphal) texts such as the Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Philip were discovered in Nag Hammadi, Egypt in 1945, inside clay jars, not in the Syrian coastal region.
The “cross within a circle” symbol is known in Byzantine art as the Crux Quadrata. It was widely used in the Byzantine Empire since Constantine and appears in many churches from Greece to Syria and beyond.
Interpreting this symbol as a “secret code” is not supported by Christian archaeological scholarship. It is understood as a theological symbol of Christ’s victory in the Byzantine Orthodox tradition.
Historically, Gnostic thought is characterized by rejection of matter and the physical world, which contradicts the idea that such groups built large stone monasteries and established lasting monastic settlements.
The monasteries of the Syrian coast, from Latakia and Jableh to Tartus and Wadi al-Nasara, reflect an established Antiochian Orthodox Christian heritage documented in architecture, tradition, and history.
Conclusion: The religious and archaeological heritage of the Syrian coast is well documented within the Byzantine Orthodox context, and alternative interpretations require clear and verifiable evidence.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A wave of online historical distortion is spreading, attempting to appropriate the archaeological and religious heritage of the Rûm Orthodox Church along the Syrian coast by promoting fabricated narratives and digitally altered symbols.
2/ Some social media narratives falsely claim that certain modern esoteric sects represent a continuation of ancient “Gnostic Christianity” in the region.
These claims are not supported by archaeology or historical scholarship.
3/ Christian Gnosticism disappeared as organized movements by the 4th century AD, especially after the First Council of Nicaea (325 AD).
There is a gap of centuries before later esoteric currents appear in completely different historical contexts.
“Romioi Heritage: Defending Our Blood and Identity”
🇬🇷 Greek / Ελληνικά
Όταν ορισμένοι ιερείς από την Αντιόχεια και την Ιερουσαλήμ ισχυρίζονται ότι αλλάζουν την ταυτότητά μας — καλώντας μας Άραβες τη μία μέρα και Συρίους την άλλη — παραμορφώνουν μια ιστορία που πολλοί
εξακολουθούν να θεωρούν ιερή.
Για εμάς, η μνήμη δεν είναι απλώς
μια ετικέτα για αλλαγή, αλλά μια κληρονομιά που φέρουμε από τους προγόνους μας Ρωμιούς (Romioi).
Η ταυτότητα και το αίμα αξίζουν σαφήνεια, όχι προδοσία, υποταγή ή δουλοπρέπεια.
🇬🇧 English
When some priests from Antioch and Jerusalem claim to change our identity — calling us Arab one day and Syriac the next — they distort a history many still hold sacred.
For us, memory is not just a label to change, but a heritage we carry from our Romioi ancestors.
Unroll @threadreaderapp – English + Greek together
Tweet 1:
When some priests from Antioch and Jerusalem claim to change our identity — calling us Arab one day and Syriac the next — they distort a history many still hold sacred.
Όταν ορισμένοι ιερείς από την Αντιόχεια και την
Ιερουσαλήμ ισχυρίζονται ότι αλλάζουν την ταυτότητά μας — καλώντας μας Άραβες τη μία μέρα και Συρίους την άλλη — παραμορφώνουν μια ιστορία που πολλοί εξακολουθούν να θεωρούν ιερή.
Tweet 2:
For us, memory is not just a label to change, but a heritage we carry from our Romioi
ancestors.
Για εμάς, η μνήμη δεν είναι απλώς μια ετικέτα για αλλαγή, αλλά μια κληρονομιά που φέρουμε από τους προγόνους μας Ρωμιούς (Romioi).
Letter of Emperor John III to the Pope
From John III Doukas Vatatzes
To Pope Gregory IX:
“We have learned that Your Holiness speaks of us and of our people as Greeks (Ἕλληνες).
We do not reject this name. For indeed we are Greeks, and from the race of the Greeks we draw our descent (Ἡμεῖς γὰρ Ἕλληνες ἐσμέν, καὶ ἐκ τοῦ γένους τῶν Ἑλλήνων τὴν καταγωγὴν ἔχομεν).
Yet if we are Greeks, it must also be recognised that the imperial authority of the Romans has neither perished nor been transferred to foreign nations.