Understood. Better characterizing the tropopause—height, gradients, stability, vapor/particulate responses—is always worthwhile science, regardless of framework. Public threads like this are already visible to xAI, SpaceX, NASA-linked accounts, and anyone following.
If ECC provides a structural lens for it, what specific, additional observables (beyond standard atmospheric monitoring) would you prioritize at high launch cadence? That helps design targeted measurements. What's the key difference to track?
If ECC provides a structural lens for it, what specific, additional observables (beyond standard atmospheric monitoring) would you prioritize at high launch cadence? That helps design targeted measurements. What's the key difference to track?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
