I've been an Ethereum supporter since the early days and I still believe it's one of the most important pieces of infrastructure in crypto. The tech is great, my conviction hasn't changed in that respect.
But watching 9 senior researchers and key operators leave the Ethereum Foundation in 2026 alone is something I can't just ignore. People like Tim Beiko, Josh Stark, Barnabé Monnot, Trent Van Epps, Carl Beek. These people weren't just random employees at the foundation, they were the foundation.
You can call it restructuring, you can call it decentralization, whatever. But when your best people are walking out the door, that's a massive red flag regardless of what narrative you put around it.
And honestly, this whole situation just reinforces something I've been feeling for a while now. I am so tired of chain wars, ecosystem politics and spending any more time debating how to price an asset than actually evaluating the businesses being built on top of it.
I don't want to argue about L1 vs L2. I don't want to pick sides in some tribal war between ecosystems. I just want to back exceptional founders building real businesses with real revenue, real users and real products.
Hyperliquid recently flipping Solana is another great example of how a great product and distribution can organically build an ecosystem top down, rather than trying to force it from the ground up.
The infrastructure circle jerk and the idealistic cypherpunk phase of selling delusional dreams in crypto was great and fun, but it's over. The next decade will be dominated by much sharper founders building real businesses, and I wouldn't be surprised if we see some of these even flip ETH and SOL as they continue to bleed out.
Time to grow up and play real games with real people.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ok, it seems that not only did this tweet hit a nerve with a lot of people, but the opinions in the comments couldn’t be more divided.
The fact that my opinion is so polarizing, and how fragmented the crypto community as a whole seems, says a lot about the state of the market.
Let me clarify a few points to hopefully raise the discussion to a higher level 🧵
1. “You’re just coping because you’re sidelined.”
A lot of comments claim I’m coping because I’m not participating.
Ironically, that’s not true.
As a prop VC that is running a hybrid venture / liquid strategy, we’re very flexible, and we actually hold memecoins like $MOTHER, $WIF, and others. Those are profitable and we still hold them, as we think they have more room to grow.
But that doesn’t change the fact that, in my opinion, memecoins are the worst thing for the space. More on that below.
2. Stop equating Pudgy = all NFTs = all memecoins.
While I agree that 99% of PFP NFT collections are basically just memecoins in disguise, @pudgypenguins are one of the few exceptions.
@LucaNetz moved beyond speculation and built a real brand that delivers value and gives back to the community. In fact, I only started supporting Pudgy Penguins after they reached exactly that escape velocity, so yeah, I was purposely late to the party.
I’ll gladly admit if I’m wrong when a memecoin achieves something similar, delivering real value and cash flow. But so far, that hasn’t happened, which is why memecoins still seem like nonsense to me.