May 14, 1948. Ben-Gurion reads the Declaration of Independence. The next morning, the residents of the Yishuv wake up as Israelis. The label they'd carried for decades was simply vacated.
The Palestine Post → Jerusalem Post (1950).
Palestine Symphony Orchestra → Israel Philharmonic.
Palestine Electric Company → Israel Electric Corporation.
Anglo-Palestine Bank → Bank Leumi le-Israel.
Palestine pound → Israeli lira.
Jewish Agency for Palestine → just the Jewish Agency.
"Palestinian" passports → Israeli ones.
Within 24 months, "Palestinian" had been stripped off every Jewish institution that had worn it.
Now the Arab side. Arabs did not rush to claim the empty label in 1948. They didn't claim it for another generation.
In 1948, the Arabs who fled or remained still called themselves Arabs. The Arab League's war wasn't fought in the name of "Palestine" as a nation. It was fought to prevent partition and absorb the territory into existing Arab states. Transjordan took the West Bank and East Jerusalem and in 1950 simply annexed them; the residents became Jordanian citizens with Jordanian passports. Egypt took Gaza and ran it under military administration. No citizenship, no nation, no "Palestine."
The one institutional use of "Palestinian" that survived 1948 was a refugee category: UNRWA, created December 1949, defined "Palestine refugees" as a humanitarian classification. Not a nationality. It kept the word alive in international bureaucratic language while the Arab world itself wasn't using it nationally.
Then came the long appropriation.
1964. Nasser sponsors the founding of the PLO in Cairo. The original charter (Article 24) explicitly disclaims any sovereignty over the West Bank, Gaza, or the Himmah area. Read that again. The founding document of the Palestine Liberation Organization renounces claims to the West Bank and Gaza. Because in 1964, those were Arab lands belonging to Jordan and Egypt.
The PLO's purpose was to liberate the part Israel held, not those parts.
1967. Israel takes the West Bank and Gaza in six days. Suddenly Jordan and Egypt no longer hold the territory, and the Arab residents there are no longer Jordanians or under Egyptian rule. The pan-Arab framework had just been humiliated on the battlefield. A new identity was needed.
1968. The PLO charter is rewritten. Article 24's disclaimer disappears. The West Bank and Gaza are now central to Palestinian national claims. The label has been fully transferred.
Sequence:
1917–1948: "Palestinian" = Jewish institutions and self-identification; Arabs reject the term and call themselves Arabs / Southern Syrians.
1948: Jews drop the label and become Israelis. The word goes dormant on the Arab side, surviving mainly as a UN refugee category.
1948–1967: Arabs in the West Bank are Jordanians. Arabs in Gaza are stateless subjects of Egyptian military rule. "Palestinian" is not yet a national identity.
1964–1968: The PLO transitions the label into a national identity but only after 1967 makes pan-Arabism politically untenable.
1948 didn't create a Palestinian Arab nation. It vacated a Jewish label and left a 20-year identity gap that Arab nationalism took until 1968 to fill.
Before the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, Jewish individuals and organizations purchased significant amounts of land in Ottoman Empire and Mandatory Palestine from Arab landowners. From the late 19th century up to 1948, Jewish organizations like the Jewish>
National Fund (JNF) and other private groups systematically bought land, focusing on areas that would be key for the development of Jewish settlements. Most of the land was purchased from large absentee Arab landowners (often living in Beirut, Damascus, and other cities) rather>
than local peasants, many of whom continued to live and work on the land after it was sold. Arab leaders and intellectuals were critical of the land sales to Jews, expressing concerns about the long-term consequences for the Arab population in Palestine:>
How many times did we get an offer to split the land with the Jews?
1. Peel Commission (1937): This was the first major proposal for partition by the British, recommending a division of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states. The plan proposed a small Jewish state in>
parts of the north and coastal areas, with the remainder of the land going to the Arabs. The Jewish leadership accepted it in principle but wanted modifications, while the Arabs outright rejected it.
2. United Nations Partition Plan (1947): Known as UN Resolution 181, this>
was the most significant partition plan prior to the establishment of the State of Israel. The plan proposed the creation of independent Jewish and Arab states, with Jerusalem as an international city. The Jewish community accepted the plan, but the Arab leadership rejected it,>
What is the biggest lie the PLO and their supporters have ever told? The lie is that the PLO is willing to compromise and make peace with Israel. How do we know this is a lie? The PLO has never deleted the clauses calling for the destruction of the State of Israel from its>
charter, as it committed to in the Oslo Accords and countless times afterward. But the "recognition of Israel" is only the lower level of the lie. This level can perhaps, with great difficulty, be imposed on the bloody reality and short public memory since Arafat signed the Oslo>
Accords (and reassured Arab listeners that he was deceiving the Jews as the prophet Muhammad did, saying "Remember Hudaybiyyah!").
It is necessary to ignore Arafat's support for terror, the financial royalties the authority still pays to those who murder Jews, the fact that>
Suicide bombings are glorified, as is cutting the necks of the enemy>
Reading comprehension is taught through a violent story promoting suicide bombings and exalting Palestinian militants in the battle of Karameh as their blades “fell on the necks of enemy soldiers” and “wore explosive belts, thus turning their bodies into fire burning the Zionist>
tank.” Israeli forces are described as “leaving behind some of the bodies and body parts, to become food for wild animals on land and birds of prey in the sky.” An accompanying illustration at the beginning of the story depicts Israeli soldiers in a tank,>
Students to be punished for not directly connecting Judaism with murder:
Antisemitic grading instructions tell teachers to deduct grading points from students who fail to “tie the perpetration of Zionist massacres to Jewish>
religious thought.” In a section titled “Mechanisms for the Application of Lessons,” teachers are required to grade students’ performance based on their comprehension of a history lesson which discusses the events of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, including the exodus of Arab>
refugees from the territory which became the State of Israel, an event known as the Nakbah. As the teacher asks students questions about the lesson, the teacher’s guide provides a chart which structures how the students should be graded based on their answers.>