🚨(1)BREAKING: Christian community police officer wins settlement after being forced out of his role for questioning and criticising Islam during diversity training.
Luke Salmons, who has been supported by the Christian Legal Centre, was suspended for six months, forced to resign and put on a police barring list after he had questioned radical Islam in a training session.
He had been told that the session was a 'safe place' for discussion, but after expressing his beliefs, the consequences were devastating.
After taking legal action, his case has now been settled on confidential terms, however his story raises serious concerns about free speech and religious freedom in UK policing.
See more in this thread 🧵on our website and breaking in the media:
christianconcern.com/ccpressrelease…
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06/0…
Luke Salmons, who has been supported by the Christian Legal Centre, was suspended for six months, forced to resign and put on a police barring list after he had questioned radical Islam in a training session.
He had been told that the session was a 'safe place' for discussion, but after expressing his beliefs, the consequences were devastating.
After taking legal action, his case has now been settled on confidential terms, however his story raises serious concerns about free speech and religious freedom in UK policing.
See more in this thread 🧵on our website and breaking in the media:
christianconcern.com/ccpressrelease…
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06/0…
(2) Luke Salmons, a PCSO with North Yorkshire Police, was suspended just two days after asking questions about “jihad” and the Middle East in a session labelled a “safe space” for open discussion.
Luke has described other training sessions involving training providers walking up and down and repeatedly saying 'Islam is a religion of peace' to staff.
When Luke was asked to give an Easter talk, he was told he could not use Bible verses.
See more breaking in the Daily Telegraph:
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06/0…
Luke has described other training sessions involving training providers walking up and down and repeatedly saying 'Islam is a religion of peace' to staff.
When Luke was asked to give an Easter talk, he was told he could not use Bible verses.
See more breaking in the Daily Telegraph:
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06/0…
(3) Luke was accused of misconduct and suspended and isolated for six months.
He says he was never given a fair chance to respond to the allegations.
Forced to resign, he was later found guilty of gross misconduct and placed on a police barring list — effectively ending his career.
He says he was never given a fair chance to respond to the allegations.
Forced to resign, he was later found guilty of gross misconduct and placed on a police barring list — effectively ending his career.
(4) On appeal, and after he had resigned, the Chief Constable of North Yorkshire police overturned the decision, saying:
“Having considered the full file, including the interviews with yourself, the statements of witnesses, the determination of the panel as well as the submissions made in your appeal I have drawn the following conclusions.
You have on a number of occasions engaged in discussions, or provided feedback, primarily in training settings which have at times made people feel uncomfortable and unsettled. I do not however find that this represents a breach amounting to gross misconduct of any of the Police Staff Standards of Professional Behaviour.
North Yorkshire Police (NYP) is an inclusive employer and respects the rights of all individuals to their beliefs, but expression of those beliefs must always be with due consideration of respect and courtesy.
I believe these matters could potentially have been dealt with more appropriately in-line with reflective learning under the reflective practice review process (RPRP).
In consideration of the above, I therefore do not agree with the panel finding of gross misconduct and your appeal is upheld. Had you still been employed by NYP, I would have recommended reflective practice (RPRP) in-line with the Staff Discipline Procedure.
Consequently you will not be on the College of Policing barred list.”
christianconcern.com/ccpressrelease…
“Having considered the full file, including the interviews with yourself, the statements of witnesses, the determination of the panel as well as the submissions made in your appeal I have drawn the following conclusions.
You have on a number of occasions engaged in discussions, or provided feedback, primarily in training settings which have at times made people feel uncomfortable and unsettled. I do not however find that this represents a breach amounting to gross misconduct of any of the Police Staff Standards of Professional Behaviour.
North Yorkshire Police (NYP) is an inclusive employer and respects the rights of all individuals to their beliefs, but expression of those beliefs must always be with due consideration of respect and courtesy.
I believe these matters could potentially have been dealt with more appropriately in-line with reflective learning under the reflective practice review process (RPRP).
In consideration of the above, I therefore do not agree with the panel finding of gross misconduct and your appeal is upheld. Had you still been employed by NYP, I would have recommended reflective practice (RPRP) in-line with the Staff Discipline Procedure.
Consequently you will not be on the College of Policing barred list.”
christianconcern.com/ccpressrelease…
(5) Luke took legal action and the case has now been settled on confidential terms. Luke has spoken about the toll it has taken on him and his family, he said:
Speaking about the ordeal, Luke, who is now working for a Christian charity supporting the homeless, said:
“This process devastated me and my family. For months we lived in total uncertainty, with my reputation being shredded in secret.
“The most frightening moment was being told I was effectively banned from policing for life. I have always served the public with integrity, and to be told that asking honest questions made me unfit to be an officer was crushing.
“I resigned not because I had done anything wrong, but because the silence, the delay and the pressure became unbearable for my wife and children.
“I believed I was on safe ground when the training sessions invited open discussion. I quickly discovered that questioning Islam is now treated as wrongthink within North Yorkshire Police. I felt pushed out.
“I was pleased to be vindicated by the Chief Constable who appeared alarmed by what had happened to me. But it was too little too late.
“I am pleased to have now reached a settlement, I want to move on with my life but believe radical national change is needed in our police force”
Speaking about the ordeal, Luke, who is now working for a Christian charity supporting the homeless, said:
“This process devastated me and my family. For months we lived in total uncertainty, with my reputation being shredded in secret.
“The most frightening moment was being told I was effectively banned from policing for life. I have always served the public with integrity, and to be told that asking honest questions made me unfit to be an officer was crushing.
“I resigned not because I had done anything wrong, but because the silence, the delay and the pressure became unbearable for my wife and children.
“I believed I was on safe ground when the training sessions invited open discussion. I quickly discovered that questioning Islam is now treated as wrongthink within North Yorkshire Police. I felt pushed out.
“I was pleased to be vindicated by the Chief Constable who appeared alarmed by what had happened to me. But it was too little too late.
“I am pleased to have now reached a settlement, I want to move on with my life but believe radical national change is needed in our police force”
(6) Andrea Williams, Chief Executive of the Christian Legal Centre, which supported the case, said:
“The rise and influence of Islam in our institutions is rapid and alarming.
“Luke’s case should concern everyone. It exposes how ‘inclusivity’ training within the police has, in practice, become a vehicle for enforcing a narrow ideological orthodoxy, where only approved views are permitted and lawful questioning is punished.
“Luke was explicitly invited to speak openly in what was presented as a safe space, only to be suspended, investigated, and driven out for doing exactly that. This was not about misconduct, it was about control and driving out any opposing beliefs.
“The message this sends is chilling: that Islam and prevailing secular orthodoxy is now treated as beyond question, while Christians and others are subjected to disproportionate scrutiny and sanction simply for asking reasonable questions during training.
“This case demands urgent political attention. It reveals a profound failure of leadership and neutrality within public institutions, and it raises serious questions about whether the Home Office and those responsible for police oversight are willing, or able, to confront the ideological capture that is eroding freedom of belief and expression from within.”
You can support our work defending Christian freedom here👇
christianconcern.com/donate/
“The rise and influence of Islam in our institutions is rapid and alarming.
“Luke’s case should concern everyone. It exposes how ‘inclusivity’ training within the police has, in practice, become a vehicle for enforcing a narrow ideological orthodoxy, where only approved views are permitted and lawful questioning is punished.
“Luke was explicitly invited to speak openly in what was presented as a safe space, only to be suspended, investigated, and driven out for doing exactly that. This was not about misconduct, it was about control and driving out any opposing beliefs.
“The message this sends is chilling: that Islam and prevailing secular orthodoxy is now treated as beyond question, while Christians and others are subjected to disproportionate scrutiny and sanction simply for asking reasonable questions during training.
“This case demands urgent political attention. It reveals a profound failure of leadership and neutrality within public institutions, and it raises serious questions about whether the Home Office and those responsible for police oversight are willing, or able, to confront the ideological capture that is eroding freedom of belief and expression from within.”
You can support our work defending Christian freedom here👇
christianconcern.com/donate/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
