Thread by @t42592

If election fraud is grounds for invoking the Insurrection Act, the federal government would impose a full perimeter blockade on California until the state holds a transparent recount election.

The pressure would be unbearable—39 million citizens and economic elites (tech, agriculture, ports) would rise up, compel the state government to comply, and align with DC.

Outcome: Within 15-30 days, California complies, holds the recount, and the blockade lifts. No constitutional crisis—economic coercion wins.

10 U.S.C. § 251 to 255
10 U.S.C. § 331 to 334
10 U.S.C. § 124
32 U.S.C. § 502(f)
32 U.S.C. § 501
32 U.S.C. § 503
50 U.S.C. § 1601
50 U.S.C. § 1621
23 U.S.C. § 103
23 U.S.C. § 140
18 U.S.C. § 2383 to 2385

By authority of the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. §§ 251-255) and National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1601), the federal government declares a perimeter blockade of California until transparent election recount is held.

All external states and foreign nations must halt all commerce, air traffic, and energy flow to California. Noncompliance constitutes violation of federal law.

What If: Federal blockade of California under Insurrection Act for election fraud. Citizens and economic elites force state compliance. Transparent recount held within 15-30 days, blockade lifts. No constitutional crisis—economic coercion wins. California aligns with DC.

cc:
.@POTUS
.@VP

If the state of California refuses to contractually uphold US Constitution, then it forfeit interstate commerce, travel, shared energy resources.

Let .@CAgovernor think that over.

" This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof... shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

@threadreaderapp unroll