This is a sexual assault—unknowingly captured by a mom filming her daughter’s wrestling match.
Kallie didn’t know her opponent was male. But she knew something was very wrong.
Today @ADFLegal helped Kallie sue the WA officials who placed gender ideology above her safety. 🧵⬇️
Our lawsuit seeks accountability for what happened to 15-year-old Kallie Keeler on December 6, 2025—and the callous indifference displayed by officials since then.
We’re also seeking an injunction to ensure it never happens again. 2/
The story is deeply troubling. Our complaint lays out the details of the assault. 3/
As our complaint explains, this kind of contact does not happen by accident. This was sexual assault.
In her 12 years of wrestling, Kallie had never experienced anything like it. It left her shaken and crying. 4/
But things were about to get still worse.
The first shock came when Kallie learned that the wrestler who had sexually assaulted her was a male.
Besides the violation, she now felt betrayed by the adults who had allowed her to unknowingly wrestle a boy. 5/
The second shock unfolded slowly, as the district quietly abandoned Kallie.
Her mom reported the assault the next school day. Officials should have reported it to the Title IX coordinator immediately and law enforcement within 48 hours.
Instead they did nothing—for 53 days. 6/
Frustrated by the district’s failure to act—and its continued endangerment of female wrestlers—Kallie and her mom finally told the story to WA-based journalist @BrandiKruse.
That media inquiry prompted the district to report the incident for the first time, the very next day. 7/
Sadly, the media attention also caused harassment & bullying for Kallie at school.
School officials have been unsympathetic and unsupportive.
Because she can no longer trust them to protect her, Kallie has now quit wrestling—a sport she’s loved since she was 4 years old. 8/
Kallie’s story exposes a grim reality about the political and academic establishment in WA.
From the highest level to the lowest, officials have displayed a knowing, callous disregard for the safety and equal opportunity of girls.
It’s unlawful—and they must answer for it. 9/
We’re suing these officials for violating Kallie’s Title IX right to be protected from sex-based discrimination, and her 14th Amendment right to equal protection.
We’re also suing them for violating her mom’s parental rights, citing the recent SCOTUS ruling in Mirabelli. 10/
The bottom line is that Washington state is committed to a lie: the notion that boys can become girls.
And lies hurt people—in this case, girls.
It’s time for the harm to stop. We look forward to representing Kallie and her mom in court. /🧵
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In its SCOTUS case against West Virginia, the ACLU has repeatedly argued that B.P.J.—a 15-year-old male who identifies as a girl—has no athletic advantage over females.
The results show otherwise.
Just this weekend, B.P.J. won the girls’ state title in shot put—as a sophomore.
At the state championships, B.P.J. outthrew the second-place finisher by more than 2 feet.
And this is just the latest in a growing record of wins.
One of B.P.J.’s former teammates, Adaleia Cross, filed a brief with the Supreme Court highlighting how many girls have been knocked down leaderboards and denied medals due to this one male athlete.
The number has only grown since this brief was filed.
THREAD🧵: Last week, SCOTUS ruled 9-0 in favor of @ADFLegal client First Choice, vindicating its right to challenge the NJ AG’s unconstitutional subpoena in federal court.
Despite that, AG Davenport is demanding a state court enforce the subpoena anyway.
Here’s what’s happening. ⬇️
First Choice Women's Resource Centers serve women across New Jersey with free pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, and support.
For more than two years, the NJ AG's office has demanded its donors’ identities, internal communications, and other protected information, citing New Jersey's consumer protection law, but without any consumer complaints. 2/
First Choice asked the federal courts to protect its First Amendment rights. The case reached the Supreme Court.
Last Wednesday, SCOTUS unanimously sided with First Choice, ruling it has the right to challenge NJ's subpoena in federal court—the very right the NJ AG's office spent years fighting to deny.
It also affirmed that NJ’s donor demand burdens First Choice’s exercise of its First Amendment rights. 3/
THREAD🧵: Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 against Colorado’s counseling ban.
Despite that, radical state legislators—seemingly desperate to keep kids on a one-way path toward “transition”—are trying to pass work-around bills.
Here’s why this “loophole” won’t work. ⬇️
In Chiles v. Salazar, SCOTUS said the First Amendment protects counseling conversations. States can’t push counselors to encourage “transition” while forbidding them from helping kids accept their bodies.
So leftist legislators are trying a new tactic. 2/
Bills in Colorado and California are attempting to give states a new way to dictate what happens in the counseling office: weaponized malpractice rules. 3/
Everyone should read this important essay by @jessesingal in the @nytimes.
Then, take a moment to drop a quarter in the “Clarence Thomas was right” jar.
THREAD🧵⬇️
In today’s piece, Singal exposes the faux “medical consensus” on gender drugs & surgeries that influenced countless clinicians . . . but also found its way into court filings.
Don’t forget that one of those cases was litigated by the Biden DOJ and went to the Supreme Court. 2/
In 2025, Justice Thomas wrote a concurrence in U.S. v. Skrmetti, taking aim at the Biden DOJ’s suggestion that the “expert consensus” on gender drugs & surgeries should replace the judgment of legislators.
Today’s article highlights the exact wording Thomas quoted last year. 3/
Gender ideology cases keep coming to the Supreme Court.
But there’s one crisis-level issue SCOTUS has yet to address: schools “transitioning” kids behind parents’ backs.
It’s time to fix that. Two cases the Court could take next week provide that opportunity. 🧵⬇️
The first case is Foote v. Ludlow School Committee.
@ADFLegal and @CPRC_official appealed this case to SCOTUS on behalf of Massachusetts parents whose 11-year-old daughter was transitioned at school without their knowledge or consent.
The story in this case is shocking. 2/
In Foote, the parents obtained mental health care for their daughter, instructing school staff not to interfere.
The school ignored them. They secretly treated the girl as “genderqueer,” pointed her to “queer centered” curriculum, and undermined her trust in her parents. 3/
Thanks to Don Lemon, the FACE Act is suddenly getting the media scrutiny it never received back when the Biden DOJ was using it to target pro-life advocates.
Let’s review a few of the Biden admin’s “greatest hits” in FACE Act weaponization. ⬇️🧵
2/ In September 2022, the FBI sent 20 armed agents to conduct an early morning raid at the home of Mark Houck, a Catholic father who does street preaching near abortion clinics.
A year earlier, Houck had gotten into a brief scuffle with a Planned Parenthood volunteer who was harassing Houck’s 12-year-old son on a sidewalk outside a clinic. Although local law enforcement filed no charges, the Biden admin dramatically arrested Houck, charging him under the FACE Act.
A jury quickly found Houck not guilty, with the judge noting that federal law “seem[ed] to be stretched a little thin here.”
3/ In October 2022, FBI agents came to Paul Vaughn’s home at 7 a.m. and arrested him at gunpoint in front of his 11 children, for an abortion clinic protest he’d attended 18 months earlier.
While some of the pro-life demonstrators had blocked doors, Vaughn merely prayed and sang outside the clinic. Still, the Biden DOJ filed FACE Act and “conspiracy against rights” charges against him, for a maximum possible sentence of 10 ½ years in prison.
Vaughn was convicted and sentenced to three years of supervised release. He was later pardoned by President Trump.