Sushil Kumar Shinde was India's Home Minister in 2013. Not a party spokesperson. Not a backbencher angling for airtime. The man who ran India's internal security apparatus stood at a Congress conclave in Jaipur and told his party colleagues that the RSS - an organisation whose members include crores of ordinary Indians, people's fathers and grandfathers - was running "terror training camps" and spreading "Hindu terrorism" across the country.
I've thought about this moment a lot over the years. Because it wasn't a slip. It wasn't an off-mic moment caught by an errant journalist. It was a prepared address at a party event, in front of party workers, at a party-organised conclave. He knew what he was saying. Congress knew what he was saying.
The calculation was straightforward - minority appeasement ahead of 2014, and the country's reputation be damned.
What happened next is something every Indian deserves to know about.
Within 24 hours, Hafiz Saeed - the architect of 26/11, a man with a $10 million US bounty on his head - held a press conference in Lahore.
He said India's "propaganda" against Pakistan now stood exposed. That Pakistan should approach the UN Security Council to have India declared a terrorist state.
Hafiz Saeed used a sitting Indian Home Minister's words as his primary exhibit. India had spent years constructing an international case against Pakistan-sponsored terror after Mumbai - years of dossiers, diplomatic pressure, back-channel lobbying - and Shinde dismantled a significant part of that effort in a single speech at a party event, because Congress needed to shore up its vote arithmetic before an election.
Shinde later said he "withdrew" the remark. Congress called it a slip of the tongue. But the press conference in Lahore had already happened. The international news cycle had already carried the story. The damage had already been exported well beyond India's borders.
That's the thing about words spoken from positions of power - they don't stay where you leave them, and no one in the foreign press is waiting around for your clarification.
This wasn't just deeply offensive to Hindus, though it absolutely was that. It was a strategic gift to every actor who wanted to erode India's moral standing on terrorism. It conflated a billion-person civilisation with extremism, gave diplomatic cover to the very forces India had been trying to isolate internationally, and handed Pakistan a talking point it used for years. All of this came from India's own Home Ministry. Not from an adversary. From the government itself.
Some political decisions carry immediate consequences. Others take years to surface. This one showed up in Lahore the very next morning, and its echoes lasted far longer than Shinde's tenure ever did.
I've thought about this moment a lot over the years. Because it wasn't a slip. It wasn't an off-mic moment caught by an errant journalist. It was a prepared address at a party event, in front of party workers, at a party-organised conclave. He knew what he was saying. Congress knew what he was saying.
The calculation was straightforward - minority appeasement ahead of 2014, and the country's reputation be damned.
What happened next is something every Indian deserves to know about.
Within 24 hours, Hafiz Saeed - the architect of 26/11, a man with a $10 million US bounty on his head - held a press conference in Lahore.
He said India's "propaganda" against Pakistan now stood exposed. That Pakistan should approach the UN Security Council to have India declared a terrorist state.
Hafiz Saeed used a sitting Indian Home Minister's words as his primary exhibit. India had spent years constructing an international case against Pakistan-sponsored terror after Mumbai - years of dossiers, diplomatic pressure, back-channel lobbying - and Shinde dismantled a significant part of that effort in a single speech at a party event, because Congress needed to shore up its vote arithmetic before an election.
Shinde later said he "withdrew" the remark. Congress called it a slip of the tongue. But the press conference in Lahore had already happened. The international news cycle had already carried the story. The damage had already been exported well beyond India's borders.
That's the thing about words spoken from positions of power - they don't stay where you leave them, and no one in the foreign press is waiting around for your clarification.
This wasn't just deeply offensive to Hindus, though it absolutely was that. It was a strategic gift to every actor who wanted to erode India's moral standing on terrorism. It conflated a billion-person civilisation with extremism, gave diplomatic cover to the very forces India had been trying to isolate internationally, and handed Pakistan a talking point it used for years. All of this came from India's own Home Ministry. Not from an adversary. From the government itself.
Some political decisions carry immediate consequences. Others take years to surface. This one showed up in Lahore the very next morning, and its echoes lasted far longer than Shinde's tenure ever did.
https://x.com/satyam_xs/status/2065754814185935131
@Jhunjhunuwala_
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
