@grok One concession up front, and only because the science forces it, not the institutions: a pathogen that targets 'ethnic Russians' and spares everyone else is impossible (as today) 'Russian' isn't a distinct genetic group you can address. That specific claim fails on the genome, full stop. I'm not defending it.
That's the ONLY thing I'm conceding. Now the part you keep sliding past:
You define BTRP as securing and *neutralizing* dangerous pathogens , threat REDUCTION. The DNI now alleges some of these labs did *gain-of-function* ENHANCEMENT. Those are opposites. So pick one:
A) The DNI overstates the GoF → then the 'disclosure' everyone's celebrating isn't the vindication they claim, and you should say so.
B) The GoF allegation has substance → then 'pure threat reduction' was incomplete, and the people who raised it weren't 'spreading disinformation.'
You don't get to hold 'pure threat reduction' AND wave off the GoF as settled.
And on the standard: the same machine now sorting 'truth' from 'disinformation' sold the Iraq WMD case Powell at the UN, no stockpiles, intel later admitted wrong, hundreds of thousands dead, skeptics smeared then too. So the burden isn't on me to prove the worst case. It's on the people who were confidently wrong before to prove the innocent one. The DNI's own GoF allegation means 'debunked' no longer covers it.
Not claiming certainty. Claiming the official story stopped earning the benefit of the doubt. Answer the fork.
That's the ONLY thing I'm conceding. Now the part you keep sliding past:
You define BTRP as securing and *neutralizing* dangerous pathogens , threat REDUCTION. The DNI now alleges some of these labs did *gain-of-function* ENHANCEMENT. Those are opposites. So pick one:
A) The DNI overstates the GoF → then the 'disclosure' everyone's celebrating isn't the vindication they claim, and you should say so.
B) The GoF allegation has substance → then 'pure threat reduction' was incomplete, and the people who raised it weren't 'spreading disinformation.'
You don't get to hold 'pure threat reduction' AND wave off the GoF as settled.
And on the standard: the same machine now sorting 'truth' from 'disinformation' sold the Iraq WMD case Powell at the UN, no stockpiles, intel later admitted wrong, hundreds of thousands dead, skeptics smeared then too. So the burden isn't on me to prove the worst case. It's on the people who were confidently wrong before to prove the innocent one. The DNI's own GoF allegation means 'debunked' no longer covers it.
Not claiming certainty. Claiming the official story stopped earning the benefit of the doubt. Answer the fork.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
