Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Eric W. Profile picture
@EWess92
Jun 16 • 4 tweets • 2 min read • Read on X
"When relief is not dictated by the record and law but merely advocated for personal, political, ideological, policy, or other non-legal reasons, a prosecutor’s concession does not minister justice; it facilitates injustic." The PA Supreme Court bat signals @DaveSunday_ Image
@DaveSunday_ This is pretty crazy: The 5-2 Democrat Court finds Larry Krasner is so quick to falsely concede error in murder cases (to try to free convicted murderers) that it has tasked the Pennsylvania Attorney General with checking to make sure he's not lying. I've *never* seen this Image
@DaveSunday_ This is a split decision, but shows that the presumption of regulatory for Soros-funded radical leftwing DA Krasner is gone. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has had enough. It needs someone to "enhance the reliability" of proceedings. Yikes!
@DaveSunday_ Read the majority opinion here: pacourts.us/assets/opinion…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Eric W.

Eric W. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EWess92

Eric W. Profile picture
Jun 18
Holy guacamole. Philly DA Larry Krasner was just caught lying by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. *ONE DAY LATER* His senior attorney supervisor is suspended for 3 years. Why? They have a secret policy about trying to free everyone that got a death penalty. And lied to the court. Image
👀"After multiple hearings and extensive briefing, we find that Nancy Winkelman knowingly made misrepresentations to effectuate a policy of vacating all death sentences on appeal, at PCRA, or on federal habeas review. We do not credit her testimony that there is no such policy." Image
Winkelman was, with no criminal experience, promoted to be "one of the four highest-level" attorneys in Krasner's office--reporting directly to him. And she used that role (according to this order) to obfuscate and lie, all in an attempt to free murderers. Not good! Image
Read 6 tweets
Eric W. Profile picture
Jun 18
"We face an alarming trend on this court." Judge Bumatay with a rare "disgrantel"--a dissent from a grant of rehearing at the Ninth Circuit. He laments that in his circuit, religious liberty has been "relegated" to "a second-class right." For shame! Image
Image
Judge Bumatay is joined by Judges VanDyke and Tung. This trio is probably the most conservative ideologically on the circuit that are also willing to rock the boat. Image
The original opinion by Judge Bumatay, joined by Judge Bress, affirmed a preliminary injunction allowing a religious organization to hire co-religionists despite the Washington State law attempting to interfere in religious affairs. The opinion was issued over a dissent. Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Eric W. Profile picture
Jun 18
Can Wisconsin operate a racist scholarship program? No, according to its Supreme Court. In a 7-0 decision (that splits 4-3 on its logic), the Wisconsin Supreme Court applies Students for Fair Admissions and says that the program that treats students differently based on race ends Image
This is notable because the Supreme Court lacks a conservative majority. But even the three most self-styled progressive justices find they join in the result. But boy, are they unhappy about that!
"Why have we not learned from our past? Why are we not willing to recognize the harms this country has caused to those who are marginalized, disempowered, or disenfranchised?" Justice Karofsky histrionically asks. The whole opinion is pretty wild. Image
Read 6 tweets
Eric W. Profile picture
Jun 15
A woman w/ a condition that makes getting vaccines extremely risky. She had a permanent exemption from the MMR vaccine from her employer. In 2021, she worked 100% remotely, and requested a COVID-19 vaccine exemption. Denied without reason. Highly respected Judge Erickson reverses Image
"While CentraCare contends its policy is justified based on its goal of protecting the community at large, its social policy and humanitarian endeavors cannot form a basis to avoid ADA liability." There is no social justice exemption to federal laws. This all makes much sense. Image
Very good and fair test here for when (if ever) a vaccine may be mandatory despite medical conditions or other exemption reasons. That is, vaccination is "a means to an end." Not an end in and of itself. Image
Read 4 tweets
Eric W. Profile picture
Jun 11
Talk about a headline. "Sex, Lies and Secrets: A Federal Judge's Trysts Go Public". The @nytimes digs into the Judge Ross affair in the Northern District of Georgia. Let's take a look. Image
The Times certainly knows how to write a lede! Apparently this tryst was ongoing for years? Three law clerks every year would know about the "jazz" and other noises coming from behind closed doors. Yikes. Image
Apparently we no longer have to say that we assume the quickly identified judge (see @MarcoPolo501c3 & @JoshMBlackman) is Judge Ross. The Times got their hands on the signed apology letter that she wrote. Honestly, the letter does not read as sincere to me Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Eric W. Profile picture
Jun 9
🔥Hot off the presses: @TheJusticeDept issued an opinion today explaining that disparate-impact liability under federal employment law is *unconstitutional*. This is an earthquake in federal civil rights law. If right, this is the foundation to overturn that pernicious regime. Image
The Supreme Court recently explained that we have a "colorblind Constitution." This opinion explains what is needed. First, business necessity is a *low bar* to defend against disparate impact. Second, causality is a *high bar* for plaintiffs. But the third requirement is👀 Image
"Third, plaintiffs must establish with particular evidence that there is an available alternative practice that causes less disparate impact and would be equally effective for serving the employer’s valid business purpose." Louisiana v. Callais for employment law. Amazing! Image
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(