Students For Liberty Profile picture
Jun 19 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
In July 1985, over a billion people watched Live Aid.

Months earlier, Michael Jackson and Lionel Richie had written "We Are the World." All of it was a response to a famine in Ethiopia.

Almost nobody remembers who actually caused the famine. 🧵 Image
What the world saw: on October 23, 1984, the BBC aired a report by correspondent Michael Buerk with footage filmed in the Korem refugee camp by Kenyan photographer Mohamed Amin.

Within weeks, 425 television stations had rebroadcast those images of starving children to roughly 470 million viewers worldwide.Image
The crisis was framed almost entirely as a natural disaster, the work of a catastrophic drought striking a poor country. Television footage showed cracked earth, dying livestock, and skeletal children.

The government in Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia, was barely named in Western coverage. Its policies were not named at all.Image
Bob Geldof started calling musicians. On January 28, 1985, forty-six artists recorded "We Are the World" in a single night in Hollywood. The single sold over 20 million copies. On July 13, Live Aid filled Wembley Stadium in London and JFK Stadium in Philadelphia and raised more than 100 million US dollars for famine relief.

It was the largest humanitarian mobilization in history up to that point.Image
What was actually happening: in September 1974, a Marxist-Leninist military junta called the Derg overthrew Emperor Haile Selassie. By 1977, Colonel Mengistu Haile Mariam had killed his rivals inside the junta and taken sole control.

He built a Soviet-style state. He nationalized all rural land in 1975 and imposed grain quotas that peasants had to deliver to the state at prices below the cost of production.Image
This is the mechanism Stalin had used to engineer famine in Ukraine in 1932. The state destroys the production incentive, then extracts grain by force.

When drought arrived in northern Ethiopia in 1983, there was no surplus and no buffer. Forced collectivization had already destroyed the country's food reserves years before the rain stopped.Image
The drought was real. Droughts had hit that region for centuries without killing a million people.

What turned a drought into a famine that killed roughly one million Ethiopians was the policy decision to keep extracting food from regions that were already starving. Image
Tigray and Eritrea were in armed rebellion against the Derg. Mengistu used food as a weapon of war against the civilian populations in those regions. Blocking grain convoys, bombing markets in rebel-held towns, and burning crops in contested territory were state policy.

Researchers including Alex de Waal and Human Rights Watch documented this in detail.Image
Then came the resettlement program. The regime declared it would move 1.5 million peasants from the rebellious north to the south.

Médecins Sans Frontières documented what followed: people loaded into trucks and aircraft, separated from their families, dumped in regions with no food, water, or shelter.

Deaths during transport and at the destinations are estimated at 50,000 to 100,000.Image
MSF France denounced the program publicly in October 1985. The Ethiopian government expelled them in December. Investigators later established that a large share of the international aid raised in the West was diverted into the resettlement program itself.

The same money raised to save Ethiopians from starvation paid, in part, for the operation that killed between 50,000 and 100,000 of them.Image
In December 2006, an Ethiopian court convicted Mengistu of genocide. In May 2008, the sentence was upgraded to death. He has lived in exile in Zimbabwe since 1991, never extradited and never tried in person. Image
If the cause of the Ethiopian famine had been a right-wing regime, it would probably be in every school curriculum alongside Live Aid.

The famine that produced the most-watched concert in history was caused by forced collectivization, forced grain seizures, and a deliberate policy of using hunger as a weapon against civilians. Four decades later, that half of the story still does not appear in most accounts of Live Aid.Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Students For Liberty

Students For Liberty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfliberty

Jun 16
The Nazis claimed racial science was settled.

The Soviets claimed Marxism was the science of history.

An Austrian refugee debunked both with one word. 🧵 Image
Born in Vienna in 1902, Karl Popper was arguably the most important philosopher of science of the twentieth century.

Trained in mathematics, physics, and psychology, by his early thirties he was already in conversation with the leading scientific minds of Europe, including Albert Einstein.

He spent his life trying to answer one question with the precision of a mathematician: how do we know what we know? That question turned out to be the most politically dangerous question of the twentieth century.Image
By the time Popper fled Austria, he had spent years watching two regimes claim that science was on their side.

Nazi Germany ran "racial biology" departments at major universities, while the Soviet Union built five-year plans on "scientific socialism." Both said the evidence proved them right, and both said anyone who disagreed was anti-science.

Popper had a problem with this. He knew what real science looked like from the inside, and what he was watching was something else wearing science as a costume.Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 15
Modern economics built elaborate mathematical models of how markets work.

Israel Kirzner spent six decades pointing out the same problem with every one of them: the agent that actually makes markets work does not appear in any of them. 🧵 Image
In 1973, Kirzner published "Competition and Entrepreneurship" at the University of Chicago Press. He had earned his PhD at NYU in 1957 under Ludwig von Mises.

The book made a claim mainstream economists found uncomfortable. Image
Neoclassical theory models the economic agent as an optimizer. Given resources, given preferences, given prices, he maximizes.

Kirzner called this figure a "Robbinsian maximizer," after Lionel Robbins. The agent allocates known means to known ends. He calculates, but he does not discover anything.Image
Read 13 tweets
Jun 11
For decades, American politicians cited Sweden as proof that democratic socialism works.

The Wall Street Journal sent a reporter there in 2026 to see for themselves.

The Sweden they found is not the country Bernie Sanders describes on the debate stage. 🧵 Image
The mythical Sweden has high taxes, generous welfare, a big state, and equality enforced by government.

Swedish social spending in 2026 is 23.7% of GDP. That puts Sweden below France, Finland, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Austria, and Denmark. It sits at roughly American levels. Image
Sweden still taxes heavily.

Total tax revenue runs around 42% of GDP, well above America's 27%. But the structure changed.

The top income tax rate fell from nearly 90% in 1980 to around 50% today. The inheritance tax was abolished in 2005. The wealth tax followed in 2007. Sweden funds its state through a flat 25% VAT and broad payroll taxes that hit everyone, not through punitive rates on capital. Public debt is 33% of GDP. America's is 122%.Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 5
In 1992, a 32-year-old historian became Prime Minister of Estonia.

He had read exactly one book on economics: Milton Friedman's Free to Choose.

He used it as a policy manual. Western advisors and Estonian economists told him it would fail. 🧵 Image
After gaining independence from Soviet Union in 1991, Estonia had a destroyed economy.

Inflation over 1,000%. Output falling 30% a year. Massive shortages of fuel and food. 95% of the economy state-owned. 92% of trade locked to a Russia that had stopped paying.

The standard recipe for transition economies was gradualism. Step by step. Protect vulnerable sectors. Let the market adjust slowly.Image
Mart Laar took office in October 1992. Months earlier, Estonia had already broken from the ruble and launched a new currency, the kroon, anchored to a strict currency board.

The IMF had cautioned against the rigid currency board, warning it would leave no room for monetary policy. Laar refused to loosen it and made it the foundation for everything that followed.Image
Read 12 tweets
Jun 2
Marxism's most devastating critic wasn't Hayek, Mises, or any Austrian.

It was Marx himself.

Volume III of Capital, published after his death, destroyed the theory Volume I had built. 🧵 Image
Marx published Volume I of Capital in 1867.

He told the world that a commodity's value comes from the labor time used to produce it, but he admitted in the same book that real prices don't behave that way. He promised the answer was coming in Volume III. Image
Marx died in 1883. Volume III wasn't finished. Engels spent eleven years reassembling the manuscripts.

In 1894 the volume finally appeared, with the promised resolution: "prices of production." Prices diverge from labor values in proportion to the organic composition of capital.Image
Read 13 tweets
May 30
Every American student learns the same story about Standard Oil:

Rockefeller as the villain of unregulated capitalism, Standard Oil as proof that free markets inevitably produce monopolies that crush consumers.

A historian went to the primary records and found the opposite. 🧵Image
In "The Myth of the Robber Barons," Burton Folsom builds the Standard Oil case around one number: between 1870 and 1911, the price of kerosene fell from 26 cents a gallon to under 8 cents. Standard Oil dominated the kerosene market and the price to consumers fell by roughly 70 percent over those forty years.

A predatory monopolist raises prices once it owns the market. Rockefeller kept cutting them.Image
How did he cut prices that aggressively?

Cleaner refining processes that captured byproducts other refiners threw away. Pipelines instead of rail when rail was overpriced. Less waste at every stage of production.

By the early 1880s, Standard could refine a barrel of oil for roughly half the cost of its rivals.Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(