1. 🚨BREAKING: County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust has paid £187,000 in damages, apologised, and committed to separate changing facilities for male and female staff following the Darlington nurses’ legal case.
In January, the Employment Tribunal had found the nurses suffered harassment and indirect sex discrimination over workplace changing-room arrangement.
The case, brought by seven nurses at Darlington Memorial Hospital, Bethany Hutchison, Lisa Lockey, Karen Danson, Tracy Hooper, Annice Grundy, Carly Hoy and Jane Peveller, was supported by the Christian Legal Centre, which has provided the nurses with legal, media and pastoral support from the beginning of their ordeal.
The case has become one of the most significant legal challenges in recent years concerning the freedom of female staff to access single-sex spaces in the workplace, with the nurses being compared to the Ford Dagenham workers and being dubbed ‘The Angels of the North.’
In January, Employment Judge Seamus Sweeney, ruled that the policy, which had been in place at the Trust for years allowing men who identify as women to access the female staff changing room, had amounted to unlawful discrimination.
Following extensive and at times deeply protracted negotiations, the Trust has now paid out £187,000 in damages to the nurses, which does not include legal costs, which are still to be decided at a further hearing.
This figure also does not include the Trust’s own legal costs of £603,000, and counting, spent on defending its position of allowing men into female changing rooms.
See more on our website and in this🧵to see the Trust's apology and commitments on single-sex spaces....
As part of the settlement, the Trust has also formally apologised to the nurses. They said in a letter to each nurse:
“we recognise that we have a responsibility to provide a safe, respectful and inclusive working environment for everyone and the Tribunal’s findings make clear that we did not get this right for you, for which the Trust expresses its sincere apologies.”
Furthermore, they say that:
“We also acknowledge that in our decision making, we did not adequately consider your concerns, formally or informally and we sincerely regret that we were unable to get this right. In light of the judgment, we have reviewed our policies and the changes that have already been put in place and will consider what facilities are required to follow the Tribunal’s findings in a way that is respectful to all of our colleagues.
The Trust is committed to ensuring that we support all colleagues and is committed to doing so through our respective policies, procedures and actions as well as learning from the findings of this judgment.
We know that this has been a difficult and distressing experience for you. We also recognise that, at times, your concerns were not fully heard or addressed in a timely or sensitive manner, and we regret the impact this had on you and colleagues who have been affected by this process and subsequent judgment.”
3. The commitments
As part of the settlement, the Trust has now also agreed to:
Provide changing facilities, washing facilities and sanitary conveniences as separate between biological men and biological women.
Continue to provide suitable and sufficient changing facilities, washing facilities and sanitary conveniences in accordance with its obligations under The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, the Equality Act 2010, the Human Rights Act 1998 and any other legislation and/or guidance that would be applicable at the time.
It has withdrawn its policy known as ‘‘Transitioning in the Workplace policy’’ (v3.0) POL/PD/0060 (and, for the avoidance of doubt, all previous versions of that policy).
Any future policy replacing the “Transitioning in the workplace policy”, or any other policy affecting the Claimants’ right to be provided with single-sex changing, sanitary or washing facilities, will fully comply with the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, the Equality Act 2010, the Human Rights Act 1998 and any other legislation and/or guidance as would be applicable at the time.
It has also agreed to provide suitable training to its management staff based on the lessons learned from the case and the Tribunal judgment, with a view to preventing any repetition of such discrimination or harassment of female staff as the Tribunal has found to have taken place against the Claimants.
The Trust has, however, refused to rule out taking disciplinary action against the nurses for speaking about their case, despite the Tribunal ruling going to the media was ‘a protected act.’
4. Bethany Hutchison, nurse and President of the Darlington Nursing Union, said:
“We have done this, not just for ourselves, but for our colleagues who were too afraid or unable to speak up, and for every woman and girl in the country.
We raised our concerns because we believed something was seriously wrong, not just for us, but for the protection of all women in the NHS. Instead of being listened to, we were ignored, labelled, and subjected to pressure and intimidation.
This outcome is a vindication of our stand for dignity, privacy, and common sense. We hope it ensures that no woman is ever again made to feel unsafe in her workplace for speaking the truth.”
5. Andrea Williams, Chief Executive of the Christian Legal Centre which has supported the nurses from the beginning of their ordeal, said:
“This is a landmark victory for these courageous nurses who refused to back down despite extraordinary pressure from an NHS that has fought with everything it has to allow men into women’s changing rooms and to trample over biological reality.
The evidence exposed during the trial revealed a deeply concerning culture within the Trust, where safeguarding concerns were minimised and women were marginalised.
The law is clear: employers must protect the rights, dignity, and safety of their staff. This case sends a powerful message across the NHS and beyond that ideology cannot override those fundamental duties.”
“We call upon the Health Secretary to ensure the the law on single sex spaces is upheld and policies rolled out across the whole of the NHS to ensure this happens.
“We call upon the Trust to immediately ensure that all NMC disciplinary action against the Darlington nurses for bringing their case is immediately withdrawn.”
🚨(1)BREAKING: Christian community police officer wins settlement after being forced out of his role for questioning and criticising Islam during diversity training.
Luke Salmons, who has been supported by the Christian Legal Centre, was suspended for six months, forced to resign and put on a police barring list after he had questioned radical Islam in a training session.
He had been told that the session was a 'safe place' for discussion, but after expressing his beliefs, the consequences were devastating.
After taking legal action, his case has now been settled on confidential terms, however his story raises serious concerns about free speech and religious freedom in UK policing.
(2) Luke Salmons, a PCSO with North Yorkshire Police, was suspended just two days after asking questions about “jihad” and the Middle East in a session labelled a “safe space” for open discussion.
Luke has described other training sessions involving training providers walking up and down and repeatedly saying 'Islam is a religion of peace' to staff.
When Luke was asked to give an Easter talk, he was told he could not use Bible verses.
(1) BREAKING: The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) and its General Secretary and Chief Executive, Professor Nicola Ranger, are under growing scrutiny for refusing to intervene in the case of Jennifer Melle, a senior Christian nurse suspended after declining to use biologically inaccurate pronouns for a convicted male paedophile patient.
Despite the UK Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in For Women Scotland, which reaffirmed the legal recognition of biological sex, the RCN has stalled on implementing the judgment, citing the need to “await EHRC statutory guidance”, a process already plagued by delay and resistance within government and public institutions.
Jennifer has been suspended on full pay by Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals since April for an alleged “data breach” after speaking to the media about being disciplined for indirectly referring to a male transgender paedophile as “Mr.”
She was disciplined and referred to the Nursing and Midwifery Council as a ‘potential risk’ for not using the preferred gender identity of the paedophile.
She has said previously that in ‘her hour of need’ the RCN abandoned her and suggested that she do ‘a reflection’ to ensure the situation didn’t happen again.
Jennifer said: “I was racially abused in my workplace, and instead of protecting me, the Trust punished me. My Christian faith teaches me that sex is immutable. I should not be forced to deny that truth to keep my job.
“The Supreme Court has spoken clearly: biological sex matters in law. Yet the RCN, an organisation that claims to champion equality, chooses delay over action. Nurses like me are left vulnerable while ideology trumps reality. This is not inclusion; it is discrimination.”
(2) The story is breaking in today's Daily Express where Darlington nurse and President of the Darlington Nursing Union, Bethany Hutchison, said: “Jennifer’s case is not an isolated incident. Across the NHS, women are being told to ‘broaden their mindset’ and accept policies that erase biological reality.
“The Supreme Court has spoken, yet institutions drag their feet. Why is it that the NHS has repeatedly implemented unlawful Stonewall policies, but cannot follow a legal ruling from the highest court in the land? We will not stop fighting for dignity and truth in healthcare.”
Ms Hutchison wrote to Prof Ranger on July 18 asking the RCN boss to use her influence to ensure “nursing does not become a profession where suitability to work is determined by one's acquiescence to particular acceptable’ beliefs”.
Prof Ranger has described equity and inclusion as a “moral imperative”, stating: “Our health and care systems can only thrive when they reflect, respect and actively engage the diversity of the people they serve - and the people who work within them.”
In her reply Ms Hutchison was told: “We await the EHRC statutory code of practice for services, public functions, and associations and the code may provide guidance on how this relates to the provision of health and care services.”
Prof Ranger confirmed the RCN had received inquiries from members following the Supreme Court decision, suggesting Ms Melle’s case is just one example of a wider national picture where institutions are dragging their feet.
(3) Under Nicola Ranger’s leadership, the RCN has embedded LGBTQI+ inclusion as a core principle in its policies and campaigns, including:
- #PrideInNursing Campaign: Celebrating LGBTQ+ diversity through events and resources.
- Advocacy Against Hate Crime: Congress resolutions for better training to support LGBTQ+ victims.
- EDI Conferences and Webinars: Promoting allyship and inclusive care across the profession.
Ranger has described equity and inclusion as a “moral imperative,” stating:
“Our health and care systems can only thrive when they reflect, respect and actively engage the diversity of the people they serve — and the people who work within them.”
Where is her video committing to support nurses like Jennifer Melle and the Darlington nurses and committing to fight for them?
1/ 🚨 Today at Newcastle Employment Tribunal, Rose Henderson gave evidence in the high-profile case brought by eight female nurses against County Durham & Darlington NHS Trust. The hearing has exposed serious safeguarding failures. See some of the explosive evidence that came out in this thread 🧵
2/ The nurses allege the Trust forced them to share intimate changing spaces with an “evidently sexually functional biological male,” violating their dignity and creating a hostile environment. They claim harassment, discrimination & victimisation under the Equality Act.
3/ The Trust’s policy allowed access to female changing rooms based on self-declared gender identity, without consultation or risk assessment. This breached Regulation 24 of Workplace Health & Safety law, which requires separate facilities for men & women.
1/ BREAKING: Church of England says its own teaching on marriage is a ‘safeguarding risk’ as it continues to blacklist chaplain for sermon
Rev. Dr Bernard Randall, who is being supported by the Christian Legal Centre, was labelled a 'risk to children' after a sermon saying pupils didn’t have to accept LGBT ideology, and he remains blacklisted by the @churchofengland .
Despite no action from Prevent, who he was reported to as an potential 'extremist', or other secular bodies, he says he's been left “bewildered and broken” by his continued blacklisting.
The CofE has now started a new safeguarding process against Dr Randall, despite him being vindicated and no evidence provided that he has done anything wrong...
See more breaking in the Mail on Sunday, on our website and on this🧵
2/ Bernard's 2019 sermon followed a visit to Trent College by Educate and Celebrate, a group promoting the idea of “smashing heteronormativity”, even to nursery-aged children.
For preaching Church of England doctrine in a Church of England school, in a Church of England chapel, in response he was:
❌Dismissed from his role
❌Referred to counter-terrorism
❌Denied a licence to preach
❌Labelled a safeguarding risk
Every official body — Prevent, the Teaching Regulation Agency, the DBS, and the local safeguarding officer — found no case to answer.
Yet the CofE continues to treat him as a risk based on what he might say in future sermons....
3/ One of Educate and Celebrate's patrons was recently jailed for child sex offences.
But guess who the CofE want to continue labelling a safeguarding risk to children?
🧵THREAD: Christian preacher vindicated after arrest, prosecution and ‘non-crime hate incident’ threat for questioning Quran
1/ Watch the unbelievable moment police arrest Christian preacher John Steele in Rotherham town centre and say they will record it as a ‘non-crime hate incident’, for asking a question about the Quran and domestic violence.
The story reveals embedded two-tier policing in Rotherham, where over many years South Yorkshire Police have failed to act on the systematic r**e of young girls by predominantly Islamic men, but on this occasion swiftly arrested a Christian preacher for asking a question about the Quran.
2/ John Steele, 60, was arrested after a 30-second conversation with a Muslim woman at a public awareness stall.
He asked how Quran 4:34, which mentions wife-beating, aligns with the stall’s message on domestic abuse. He compared it to what Jesus and St Paul say in Ephesians 5:25
Despite his calm tone and peaceful approach, Steele was surrounded by officers, who threatened him with a “non-crime hate incident,” and arrested under Section 50 of the Police Reform Act.
He was fingerprinted, DNA-swabbed, and held in custody...
3/ The Crown Prosecution Service has now dropped the case, saying prosecution was “not needed in the public interest.”
But the incident has raised serious concerns about free speech, Christian freedom, and two-tier policing in the UK.
(1) BREAKING: In a win for Christian freedom, a West London church has compelled a local authority to reverse a controversial Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) that had effectively criminalised its Christian outreach ministry.
Supported by lawyers at the Christian Legal Centre, the Kingsborough Centre in Uxbridge, pursued a Judicial Review of the London Borough of Hillingdon’s (LBH) decision to create the first ever street preaching and evangelising censorship zone in the UK.
The Pentecostal church, known for founding London’s first food bank in 2009, discovered during a prayer meeting that most of its outreach activities had been banned without warning.
The Church, which is situated within the censorship zone, has undertaken ministry in the community since its inception, and for example, held and organised peace gatherings in the area that is now a PSPO zone following the 7/7 terror attack in London in 2005.
Contributing significantly to the community, the Church has also set up three branches of the ‘Coat of Many Colours’ nursery, plus an affordable childcare service which now serves multiple areas within Hillingdon and Hounslow.
Reading the proposals, however, the church believed they had been ‘criminalised for loving our neighbour’ without proper consultation and had no choice but to pursue legal action.
The few responses there were to the public consultation described the legislation as “extremely worrying”, “an attack on freedom of speech”, and ushering in a “police sate”.
In August 2023, the council went ahead with its plans, nonetheless, with its website stating that: ‘police and specific officers authorised by the council can enforce PSPO conditions and may issue fixed penalty notices of £100 for non-compliance.’
It added that: ‘Non-payment of an FPN may lead to court prosecution with a maximum fine of £1,000 and/or criminal conviction.’
This made it a criminal offence to preach with amplification, distribute Christian leaflets and display Bible verses on posters in Uxbridge town centre.
But now after permission was given for a Judicial Review of the 'unlawful' legislation, the council has been forced into a U-turn with £20,000 legal costs...
See more in this🧵, on our website, and breaking in the @dailytelegraph👇
(2) Tracts and leaflets, like the one pictured, sharing the Christian faith would have been banned and criminalised under the proposed legislation.
The day after the legislation was published, a group of Christians reported that police officers approached them in the town centre as they undertook their regular outreach activities, which included street preaching.
Four posters containing biblical teaching were displayed and they were distributing leaflets to passers-by.
The police warned them that they were in breach of the PSPO and would be fined if they continued their activity.
The police even told the group to turn the signs around so that the biblical messages could not be read. Signs displayed in the zone, for example, include “Jesus Christ is Lord of Lords and King of Kings”, from the Book of Revelation.
Also facing censorship were leaflets entitled ‘How can I know God?’ and ‘What is Christianity: An Introduction to the Story of Jesus.’
(3) Notably, England footballer Bukayo Saka and his family used to attend the Kingsborough Centre before relocating to Hertfordshire to be near Arsenal's training ground.