There are two broad ways this can work:
1. You divide this 5% over all US households, handing each a direct stake.
2. You give the stake directly to the government.
(1) is fine. (2) is probably ruinous, akin to inviting rats to live and reproduce in the walls of your house.
1. You divide this 5% over all US households, handing each a direct stake.
2. You give the stake directly to the government.
(1) is fine. (2) is probably ruinous, akin to inviting rats to live and reproduce in the walls of your house.
https://twitter.com/andrewcurran_/status/2072533453611139332
It will never stop at 5%. It will go on and on and on. The governance will become a nightmare. Political capture will be real. And it will generate precisely no goodwill with the public. None, if they themselves see no direct financial benefit.
“What has the AI industry even done for America.”
“Well, it handed a collective $200b of itself to Donald Trump.”
Half the country instantly hates you, and even a decent chunk of Republicans will assume this is corrupt by default.
“Well, it handed a collective $200b of itself to Donald Trump.”
Half the country instantly hates you, and even a decent chunk of Republicans will assume this is corrupt by default.
No, nobody at OpenAI is discussing a word of this with me. I don’t work there yet. And this rumor may even be importantly untrue or misleading in some way. A vehicle that distributes ownership among the people can make sense. A government stake, however, is the wrong path.
I do however invite all the people who said I have become a corporate marionette to submit their public apology forms at their leisure
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
