People used to avoid certain self-interested behaviors to avoid shame, private and public. Law and customs assumed this.
Now, 38% of Stanford students claim to be disabled. 40% of young women (under 35) claim mental illness, and SSI disability payments have gone up 400% in a single generation.
It isn't good for anyone, least of all people who are actually disabled, when everyone looks the other way as friends and family and peers con the system with a level of shamelessness no architect of our safety net ever imagined could be possible in America. When everyone is disabled, nobody is.
I have talked about this before, but this particular rant is brought to you by a situation where a bunch of exclusive merch at a local anime convention was sold out because a bunch of scalpers registered for ADA compliant disability badges (they don't have to prove anything in California) and walked in ahead of the people who had been camping out since 4 AM.
No shame.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The "But" here is insane. Deadline pressure beyond what is typical in the defense industry? I fucking hope so!
This attitude is pervasive through the whole piece. "Sources say" technicians being asked to work 45 hours a week minimum is counterproductive? Okay WIRED. Make sure you don't mention that the team was rushing to get our technology to Ukrainian soldiers who desperately needed it, but definitely quote the expert who actually believes nu-age bullshit like "Just asking them to do work more doesn’t make them work more"
The same goes for whining about spilled epoxy or aluminum powder, inane stuff that is part of literally any new line setup.
WIRED won't ever mention or even hint at the American lives being saved in the Middle East by rushing critical technology into service as quickly as possible, though, or why it would be morally monstrous to delay production of something that keeps troops from being turned into pink mist on account of minor production hiccups. They are too busy playing pretend OSHA and insinuating that we don't pay or cover treatment for people who burn their hand.
To quote one of our workers at the McHenry, Mississippi facility: "The amount of wrong info in this blows my mind. Every event they discuss is blown so much out of proportion… even completely wrong info about safety incidents. I know I shouldn't take it personally, but this gets me incredibly angry and frustrated."
Roadrunner, a compact VTOL drone powered by twin thrust-vectored turbojet engines with extraordinary speed, range, and payload capacity.
&
Roadrunner-M, a radical new low-cost weapon that allows for unprecedented tactics against powerful threats.
Roadrunner is a modular aircraft with payloads that can execute a wide variety of missions. Firefighting, search and rescue, organ delivery, anything where you need a drone that launches in seconds and moves an order of magnitude faster than the next best option.
Roadrunner-M is a variant model equipped with a high explosive warhead and Anduril seeker capable of intercepting, surveilling, and destroying fast-moving threats. It is effective against a wide range of threats, including full-size aircraft that cost 100x more.
I accepted an invitation to speak at All-In because I wanted to get some truth on the record. After years of lies, personal attacks, and celebrating my firing, Jason Calacanis kept telling people I refused to be on his podcast because of something he said about Oculus. No.
I refused because there is zero upside in rewarding people who spread lies about you. I told Jason so directly the first time he tried to get me on his podcast, right after Anduril hit unicorn status of course. No apology for treating me like shit when it was popular to do so.
The Taylor Lorenz/Washington Post correction scandal isn't the isolated incident apologists claim. When I was fired, her story said I had announced I was leaving Oculus. This was false - it wasn't my choice nor my announcement. Her only source: Facebook PR. WaPo later
published a story claiming I hid political contributions using shell companies and refused to comment. This was also false - it was a single donation from a regular company, and they didn't reach out to me until 5:54 AM, seven minutes before print. When
I publicly called them out for this, they said the note regarding comment was technically true, and that they would only edit the story if I provided WaPo with detailed financials proving my helicopter business isn't a shell corp. Then they deleted everything with no disclosure.
I recently spent two weeks in federal court successfully defending myself from someone who tried to turn my willingness to help out a fellow (pre-Oculus) VR forum member into a billion-dollar payday. You don't know this because nobody is reporting on the unanimous jury verdict.
For 99.99% of even hardcore VR industry followers, this never happened. Hundreds of stories were written when the lawsuit was filed, dozens more covered minutia of the case as it progressed. The verdict got a single paywalled legal newswire entry.
Not even the tech reporters who were literally sitting in the courtroom as the verdict was read wrote anything. One can only conclude that the media apparatus around this case was only interested in reporting an outcome where Palmer/Facebook/Oculus lose.