Sales of data-center operators are on the rise as owners of these firms seek exits and investor interest in owning the physical infrastructure behind advanced AI grows via @WSJwsj.com/finance/invest…
(2) So suddenly many of the owners of legacy (cloud) data centers want to sell their stakes or go public ($CSRQ). Why? I believe much of it has to with the rapidly increasing costs of the maintenance capex on these properties. $DLR $EQIX
(3) And as if on cue, $EQIX’s Chief Business Officer is abruptly leaving the Company.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
More financial nonsense from Saylor to justify paying $1.70 for $1.00 of Bitcoin. Credit Amplification? Not only is $MSTR not very leveraged (net debt + pfd is only 11% of enterprise value), but investors can borrow themselves to buy bitcoin, at rates lower than SMSTR’s 10-12%.
(2) Options Advantage/Passive Flows? Derivatives are already available on Bitcoin, and will increase with time. More importantly, the temporary lack of access to them or inability of certain investors to buy Bitcoin is more a disadvantage to those investors, not a plus for $MSTR.
(3) And Institutional Access? This is his most disingenuous argument. Look at the numbers. They’re absurd. $95T of capital can buy $MSTR securities, but only $700B of “private capital” can buy Bitcoin and/or Bitcoin ETF’s…?! That’s just false.
Has there ever been a private citizen with as much political power in a heavily-indebted global superpower as Elon Musk has today? I can think of one good example…John Law.
(2) The wealthy Scottish-born Law (who was technically a fugitive from justice in Great Britain) was introduced to the Duke of Orleans (who was regent for the young Louis XV) by…wait for it…the Doge of Venice!
(3) Law had been gambling throughout Europe with various kings and princes, while trying to convince them that his paper monetary system could cure their chronic financial difficulties. He finally found fertile ground in France, following the ruinous finances of Louis XIV.
(3) And at the current 3x valuation to NAV, $MSTR would only need to raise $300B in new equity to get to a $1T market cap. That shouldn’t be a problem…