Ralph Baric's interview with @RandPaul shows the dangers of allowing scientists & funders to decide what gain-of-function is permissible.
Baric said Defense Dept announced funding for GOF research & NIH did not consider genetic engineering of animal coronaviruses to be GOF.
@RandPaul Baric claims he does not have unpublished SARS-like virus sequences.
Given that he cannot recall a lot of things like a damning research proposal from 2018 where he was going to put furin cleavage sites into SARS-like viruses, it's better to check his lab records & databases.
@RandPaul There were several US scientists on the 2018 Defuse proposal. Apparently, when news of a novel coronavirus in Wuhan broke, none of them thought to check their emails and shared documents with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. They all could not recall. documentcloud.org/documents/2106…
@RandPaul This seems to apply to the Defense Dept as well. In 2020, it seems no one went back to check the research proposals and communications with EcoHealth and the Wuhan Institute of Virology - in the U.S. gov's possession.
@RandPaul And it seems that Defense Dept rejected their 2018 proposal mainly because it was going to interfere with wild bats... not because it was going to start a pandemic killing tens of millions of people and costing the US trillions in economic damage.
@RandPaul Conversations continued into 2020 between EcoHealth Alliance and Defense Dept on which parts of Defuse to fund.
Surely Peter Daszak could not have "I cannot recall" the Defuse proposal under these circumstances. researchgate.net/publication/39…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reminder: David Morens, who was senior advisor to Anthony Fauci, emailed the Proximal Origin authors and their colleagues in Sep 2021, saying he always tries to use his personal gmail and will delete any emails he doesn't want to see in the New York Times.
Morens is facing indictment for evading Freedom of Information Act requests, which is exactly what he described in email to the Proximal Origin authors and their colleagues.
“These allegations represent a profound abuse of trust at a time when the American people needed it most—during the height of a global pandemic... Dr. Morens and his co-conspirators deliberately concealed information and falsified records in an effort to suppress alternative theories regarding the origins of COVID-19." justice.gov/usao-md/pr/for…
The Proximal Origin authors were working for Fauci on Covid origins. They called David Morens Fauci's right hand man and believed Fauci could convince the Sec of State and CIA to pursue a natural origin of Covid.
Over the years, several virologists have told me they believe a lab origin of Covid is more likely than a natural origin. I worried it might've been selection bias but it seems even virologists doing gain-of-function experiments told Kristian Andersen the same in 2020.
In 2020, many still thought virus experiments had been conducted at top biosafety (BSL4).
By 2021, it became better understood the work had been done outside high containment (BSL2) and the scientists had a plan to put furin cleavage sites into unidentified SARS-like viruses.
For those who haven't worked in BSL2s, there's a wide range of accidental and even intentional biosafety lapses that occur. Mainly because scientists working at BSL2 don't expect any real risk of causing a deadly outbreak or seriously harming themselves.
New Proximal Origin slack messages (till 2022) show, in late 2021, these influential virologists
1⃣Knew it was plausible Wuhan scientists had created Covid-19 (genetically modified origin)
2⃣Were still talking to Anthony Fauci's people about Covid origins
3⃣Joked they would be awarded grants automatically
When the 2018 Defuse proposal leaked, showing Wuhan scientists had been given the idea to put furin cleavage sites into SARS-like viruses, the Proximal Origin authors knew the experiments could've gone ahead and they didn't know what genetic engineering strategy and virus backbone the Wuhan scientists would've used.
They hadn't been sufficiently warned by Peter Daszak about these Covid blueprints from 2018.
"I would just like to discuss what our strategy should be so we don't get associated with these f**kers."
"... it is worse than he was suggesting a few days ago. He's a jacka**."
New York🇺🇸-based MV Hondius cruise passenger who disembarked on Apr 24 went to a Hanoi🇻🇳 conference last week for extreme travelers (150 guests who've visited 100+ countries), potentially passing through Hong Kong🇨🇳 Bangkok🇹🇭. Her current location is unknown @JSweetLI reports...
@JSweetLI ... previous hantavirus outbreaks didn't have this kind of opportunity to race around the world.
"MV Hondius is a pricey, adventurous expedition—costing passengers between $8,500 to $17,000—and so it attracted world travelers crossing bucket list sights" jacquelinesweet.substack.com/p/a-second-wom…
@JSweetLI Hantavirus-exposed cruise passengers going on world tour are not breaking any laws. @WHO had said they were low-risk contacts, only changing to high-risk around May 9 or 10.
Some question the motivations of the whistleblower this morning.
His testimony can be checked by looking at names of experts recommended by Fauci to IC, the 2022 CIA report & 2023 report before it was changed overnight, and a redacted form of the 2,000-page classified report.