It's been caused by biased, lazy media twisting the actual words of financially motivated cybersecurity companies playing into Deep State lies.
Some claim "there's PROOF that there was no hack of the DNC!"
Not true. Let's go over it.
This "there was no hack!" story gained a lot of traction, due in no small part to its advocacy by Roger Stone, who even testified about to Congress.
But Roger is wrong, as I'll explain…
Because this theory is so easily proven incorrect--as I'll show in a moment--this meeting was a complete waste of time
I'm the person who got Roger Stone involved in this entire story in the first place.
In the summer of 2016 I began looking at the claims of "Kremlin hacking" of the DNC. They NEVER made sense.
I wanted to write about it for Breitbart.
But I had a problem.
I couldn't explain the myriad problems with the "Kremlin did it!" theory to him because he was meeting-averse.
So in order to get the story on the front page, I had the idea of breaking it via Roger Stone.
I ghost wrote this…
Seth Rich was killed July 10.
I was communicating with @GUCCIFER_2 a month after that.
Therefore Seth Rich was NOT G2.
Does that mean Seth Rich could not have taken files? No, it does not BUT…
1) The exclusive files I was sent were legit and released when G2 said they would be.
2) No HINT of anything about Seth Rich came up. Nothing.
Now, some people still want to insert Seth Rich here…
And it ignores the obvious…
Assume Seth Rich took the files and then gave them to G2...
It means G2 is KEY to clear up Seth Rich mysteries. Right?
But : crickets.
Continuing on with the problem with "There was no hack!" story that has spread...the biggest single problem isn't technical.
It's much simpler. It has to do with the timeline.