A.R. Moxon 🦋 Profile picture
Feb 10, 2018 18 tweets 5 min read Read on X
This is accurate. The more Democrats show they are willing to fight Republicans, people will understand that they are an actual alternative and will vote for them.

If they won’t, people won’t, so they won’t.

Bipartisanship is death.

theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
This comment misunderstands the problem.

The GOP represents this single greatest threat to human existence on the planet today.

Opposition to them IS the solution to the problem, b/c they ARE the problem. The more zeal, the better. The less, the worse.

Now, to be clear, I am voting for Democrats in this election. I'm not going to be dissuaded by lack of purity.

But a lot of other people aren't looking for anything like purity. They're just looking for someone who will fight. And if they don't get it, they'll despair.
There is a "both sides are the same, maaaan" narrative out there, and it is a lie, and it always favors the worse side. When Democrats work with an existential threat—which is what Republicans are—they play into that narrative.

It makes the lie seem true.

And then you get this.
When I say the Republicans represent a threat to human existence, that's not hyperbole, by the way.

Climate change is increasingly being understood as an existential level threat. Republicans are spitefully dismantling any kind of response in favor of pushing accelerators.
The Republican President is an idle and mean and vainglorious lover of violence who thinks force is strength, who believes only in his own existence, and who likes to muse about the use of nuclear weapons.

The use of nuclear weapons can easily trigger an extinction level event.
So, the Republican Party is also a white supremacist and misogynist organization that represents an existential threat to people of color, women, LGBT people, the disabled, and other vulnerable groups.

But, first, they threaten all human existence.
And, the Republican Party is a fascist organization that favors a cowed press, a militarized police force, the dismantling of free elections, and which represents an existential threat to our democracy.

But first, they threaten all human existence.
This isn't a call for a purity test. It's simply stating the fact that people respond better to those who recognize the problem and fight it.
How did the Republicans gain ground from a minority position w/o compromise?

By presenting an alternative.

Republicans made it very clear to pro-authoritarians, pro-corporatism, religious bigots, and racists, that they were going to fight for them, no matter what.

People who want awful things were very enthusiastic. And they were right to be.
I want to be clear, this is not aspirational. I'm not saying I *want* Democrats to lose voters support and enthusiasm b/c of bipartisanship. I don't.

I'm just saying they will.

That's the equation.

Bipartisanship with an existential threat is electoral death.
Let's go back to this picture.
These people, for whatever reasons, are likely to vote for Democrats in 2018. They are, largely, already captured. But you will want them enthusiastic and engaged and out in numbers.
These people voted for Trump. They will literally prefer a mall-banned molester over any Democrat. Certainly bipartisan compromise will not impress them.

Trying to win them over in any way is foolishness.
These people want an alternative.

An alternative to an existential threat, or to those they perceive as willing to work with an existential threat.

Democrats should, to state the obvious, try to energize them. The more they present an alternative, the more they'll do so.
Put another way: You cannot oppose well from the middle of the teeter-totter.

And we are teetering. We're tottering. We need to fight. So we will need fighters.

The problem is Republicans. The solution is fierce opposition.

It's really that simple.
The good news, though, is that we can be the fighters.

Ultimately we can move the needle, if we work at it.

So, largely ignore the polls. Volunteer. Get involved. Organize. Advocate. Demand change. Demand your reps fight for you. Back candidates who will do so. Win.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with A.R. Moxon 🦋

A.R. Moxon 🦋 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuliusGoat

Jun 16
In the linked essay, I mention Nancy Mace's standard TERF question, asked most recently to Tim Walz: "What is a woman?"

My answer is simple. A woman is not a *what.* A woman is a *who.*

I want to expand from the essay on why I think this matters.

the-reframe.com/shows-of-weakn…
Mace’s question seems like a non sequitur, since the topic was immigration. It’s actually part of a unified supremacist frame of domination.

The question invites us into a frame where a woman must be defined. It's very important to refuse the invitation by rejecting the frame.
In this frame, a woman is a *thing* that must have a definition. Once you accept that premise, all that's left to determine are where the boundaries are and who gets to establish and enforce those boundaries. So, from the fascist frame, it is a border security question of sorts.
Read 12 tweets
Oct 28, 2024
There's a moment in Steven Soderbergh's film Traffic where the newly freed drug boss says to the drug lawyer who had been working behind his back "do you know the difference between a reason and an excuse? Because I don't."

At this point the lawyer knows he is in deep shit. 🧵
(By the way this thread is part of a longer essay, but if I lead off the thread with a link to an outside source, it usually gets crushed by this site's dork owner and his algorithm shenanigans, so here you go.)

the-reframe.com/out-damned-spo…
Anyway the lawyer knows he's in deep shit because "do you know the difference between a reason and an excuse" means "I'm not buying your bullshit," and if newly-freed-drug-lords-behind-whose-back-you've-been-working aren't buying your bullshit, then it is murder goon o'clock.
Read 30 tweets
Oct 24, 2024
One thing I’ve noticed is, the meanest tables are often popular ones. Sometimes they are the most popular. My observation here would be that bullies know that cultivating friendly relationships is useful and necessary for effective bullying.
Any abuser knows they need accomplices. If dad is getting drunk and beating mom up he’s going to need everyone to keep nice and quiet about it, and if anybody squawks then it’s got to be quickly framed as something bad being done to him rather than the other way around.
If it looks as if the truth of the story is about to get around he’s going to need people to stand up for him in that moment and say things like this: “Nooooo! Not him. I know him. He would never. He has never been anything but nice to me.”
Read 15 tweets
Oct 22, 2024
I’d like to talk about what leadership is and what governance is. I’d like to talk about the compass, the navigation, the travel, and the corrections.

the-reframe.com/the-compass-an…
When people decide to leave the place they are and move to a different place, there’s an observable order to it. The order is very important.

So, in movement, there is the moment of arrival at the destination.
But before that moment, there is the actual journey. We began here. We moved until we got there. We put one foot in front of the other. We set sail and kept going until we arrived. The aircraft cut its way across the sky. This is the journey.
Read 35 tweets
Sep 24, 2024
There's so much scandal all the time, it can be hard to remember where we are, much less how we got here. But they say it's important remember the lessons of the past, or else we're fated to do...something, I forget what, I forget, I forget.

Full Essay: the-reframe.com/the-rot-goes-t…
Where we are.

It's really hard to know where to begin when it comes to where we are. There's only so much sheer volume of blatant corruption and noxious hate that a person can stay aware of even if they're trying. Eventually something pushes out.
It came out this week that NC Republican gubernatorial nominee Mark Robinson has in past years spent his time posting pro-slavery and pro-Nazi comments on porn sites, and other things of that nature, many of which are so bad CNN, who broke the story, declined to print them.
Read 14 tweets
Sep 18, 2024
Conservatives keep telling us they're oppressed, and when they define what form the oppression takes, they explain that other kinds of people ... exist.

You know what? Let's do it. Let's actually do it. I think we ought to oppress conservatives.

Other people *should* exist. 🧵
Let's oppress conservatives with a kind and open and generous world that they will hate and fear specifically because it will care for everyone, even them, while it refuses any longer to accommodate the revenge fantasies that they call "self-defense."
At the bottom of it all, it strikes me that conservatives are driven by fear. They're big fraidy-cats, scared specifically of the ongoing danger of good and necessary things, of openness and diversity and peace and plenty.

We should stop accommodating those fears.
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(