On the face of it it seems just like another pointless corporate exercise designed to massage already inflated egos, and reassure investors.
Shared attention: I don't need to Focus my attention on something that someone else is already focused on, unless I choose to do so. If I'm made to do so, that is a deliberate attempt at enforcing conformity
The data will be fed back into shared attention to enforce conformity
However I believe it will be another way for them to inject "varieties" of narratives.
Presumably receptivity can be used as a double edged weapon specifically when talking about topics that seem overly defensive to a specific group of people.
For example what the hell is conversational health?
Is censorship By Any Other Name still censorship?
Or is the term a "better shared reality" more acceptable to you.