1/ Everyone in consumer is trying to figure out how to play emerging CPG (<$15m in revenue). EVERYONE. Every public CPG company, every retailer, every consumer VC and PE firm, every meaningful public investor. EVERYONE.
Here is why.
2/ In almost every category large brands losing market share to small brands b/c 1) consumers are demanding products that meet their unique needs, 2) mktg costs switching from fixed to variable, 3) direct distribution becoming more imp. Net = higher demand & lower barriers.
3/ At the same time, large brands are spending almost nothing on R&D. They don’t have a pipeline of innovation. They have 50-100 years of R&D-less cultures.
4/ Big-CPG spends too much on mtkg. So you have stale incumbents pumping $ into marketing the same products they’ve sold for 50 years. Btw- kudos to @KITKAT for evolving their tagline from "Have a break" (1960's) to "Gimme a Break" (now). Impressive.
5/ BigCPG outsources innovation because they aren’t nimble enough to do it themselves. They buy the innovation. Last year the M&A market was >$310 billion. That’s with a B. Analogy = Big Pharma. pwc.com/us/en/industri…
6/ And did I mention this market is absolutely massive? >$15 trillion. That’s with a T.
7/ Zoom out: So you have one of the largest industries in the world (CPG), with stale incumbents that are losing market share and can't innovate. Hmmmm….
8/ Big-CPG is terrified-as several large CPGs have told me: “If I try to start this co. and it flops, I get fired. If it takes off in a few years, the next person gets credit. Instead I ask corp dev to buy it. If we’re wrong, I don’t get fired.” (real quote from Fortune 200 co)
9/ PE firms are getting crowded out from mid-market. 15 years of amazing returns in consumer have led to massive inflows. The PE firms want to play earlier before the co’s get bid up. Compare avg. returns or standard deviation to tech.
10/ VC firms are frustrated with the crowds in traditional tech. They also see the huge opportunity in CPG.
11/ Larger (public) investors are going one of two ways- they are either shorting or encouraging massive cost cutting (which drives profit in short term but hurts long-term as it exacerbates the problem of low R&D spend). We call that the 3G effect.
12/ Everyone wants to participate but nobody can. There is no Silicon Valley for consumer. There is no @TechCrunch for consumer. There is no @ycombinator for consumer. There is too much friction to find & evaluate the emerging consumer co's.
13/ Try Googling “early stage consumer product funds”. Then click on a few links. You won’t find 10 funds in the country that will reliably do deals in emerging consumer/retail (non-tech). But there are >750 tech VC funds for an industry that is smaller?
14/ It turns out that the cost to invest in emerging CPG is too high as % of check. You spend 6 months to find co, then get on a plane and fly to @NatProdExpo, then fly to CO to visit the brand.. All to invest just $2m. The cost in time & $ just doesn’t work as % of investment.
15/ So what now? Investors, strategics, and retailers are all searching for a solution. Existing data providers can’t capture the long-tail of retailers or companies to have meaningful insights. The search goes on.
16/ I have reason to believe that innovation will meet this demand. As that happens we will see an explosion of action in the long-tail. More investment, M&A, emerging CPG capturing more shelf space, etc. Prediction: The next 10 yrs are the Golden Age of CPG.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Like ~X00m other people, I’m playing around ChatGPT a lot lately and just blown away. I gave it some ideas for the future of plugins and ChatGPT6 and asked it to write a tweetstorm. The quality of the ideas wasn’t my interest, it was more the process of writing with ChatGPT4
2/ I found it to be helpful in starting a conversation. Just to start writing.
To get a first, working draft, I had to give less direction than I would a human. You can see my first prompt here:
1/ In my year off between @CircleUp and joining @DuneAnalytics , I talked to ~100 founders. Exploring joining the company, co-founding something, advising, investing, and sitting on boards.
I was surprised by how many didn’t have a mission articulated. Particularly in crypto.
2/ First some definitions:
-Mission is a company’s “why”.
-Vision– Vision describes what the future will look like if we achieve it. Sometimes a vision statement is implied by the mission and thus redundant.
-Strategy– how we get there.
-Values– who we are along the way.
3/ Without a crisp and consistent understanding of “why” a company will be lost. I’ve only ever seen that articulated and embraced effectively by writing it out and referring to it often.
1/ Leveling (defining roles, responsibilities needed in each position) is key for attracting and retaining talent.
Yet it brings up some strong thoughts and emotions including fear, frustration, anger. What leveling is, how/when to implement and even real life examples. 🧵🌩️
2/ WHAT is leveling: Define the role, responsibilities, skills needed and what excellence looks like for each title in the organization today and often that is likely to exist in the next 12-18 months.
3/ I like to tie a leveling grid with compensation benchmarking surveys (review at least 1x per yr to ensure you’re paying market comp). The description of each level should also be tied to employee reviews and job descriptions for new hires.
1/ Strategy. What it is, why, and how to lay out your strategic plan. It’s taking the plans you think are in your head and exposing it to your team, the world, to refine and pressure test it. 🧵
2/ WHAT: A strategy provides clarity and a roadmap for how you want to achieve your goals over the next 2-3 years. It is built with the company’s goals in mind (either after or in conjunction with developing projected KPIs and financial model).
3/ Critically it must be consistent with the company’s mission, vision and values.
1/ I believe in the power of thinking in public. I’ve made the pitch to countless others to lay out their thoughts publicly- blog posts, Twitter, Substack, etc. I’m drawn to others that think in public. Specifically, those that write. Here is why I love to write publicly.
2/ Clarify my thinking. Writing slows down my brain. It forces me to lay out logical arguments and helps me to identify when there are holes in my arguments. Writing improves my thinking and decision-making.
3/ Sometimes I’m experimenting with new ideas. These ideas might get pushback. They might get others sending me related ideas. But the process of writing and the feedback makes these ideas better.