Profile picture
Matt @matt0999
, 9 tweets, 4 min read Read on Twitter
I have used ESPN3 for streaming rugby. What ESPN has done is taken away (it seems) *all* rugby content. In some cases they've done this somewhat gradually, like cutting out almost all @ChampionsCup @ERChallengeCup to where only a few games were streamed each round. (1/x)
The @top14rugby was dropped completely. They kept @SuperRugby coverage, where all games each round have been streamed. Now I've found that after taking away all rugby coverage from ESPN3, I can now get "additive" and "complementary" coverage of just some of that lost... (2/x)
... coverage for an additional $5 a month on top of the $ I already pay them in a cable TV pkg. Frankly, I find this pretty shitty. Maybe I'm wrong and someone will adequately explain how this is actually a great thing. But for this to make sense to me, you'd have to... (3/x)
... somehow make the standard ESPN cable TV pkg part cheaper, and my cable TV bill should go down. Then maybe I might now feel so cheated with having to pay more each month for something that was included in standard pkg before. I was expecting ESPN+ to be where the... (4/x)
... they still had the current streaming content available (three @ChampionsCup @ERChallengeCup games each round, for instance) then you could opt to get the expanded coverage of the other games in each round. I wasn't expecting to lose all coverage. As it is, with... (5/x)
already paying for cable, I'm not inclined to pay even more $ when I don't really feel I'm getting "additive" content, even if it is just a few $ per month. I frankly feel like I'd be paying even more $ to actually get less content. As I said before, maybe this is.... (6/x)
... really a great thing and I'm mistaken. But count me out, @ESPN_FanCentral. #rugby #DisappointedUSARugbyFan (7/x)
Also, should add that with the troubles ESPN has had with losing customers and revenue (if news is correct), I think they're doing this to bring in more revenue and as necessary change to a system that wasn't sustainable. But another shitty aspect of adding ESPN+ is that.. (8/x)
... that's not what they're saying. They're touting this as expanded coverage, and I don't feel it really is. That's another big reason I seriously dislike this move they've made. (9/9)
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Matt
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!