I get a ton of questions about why I trade on Bitmex.
In this thread I'll give a couple advantages that Bitmex boasts over other exchanges.
First and foremost is liquidity. Due to the amount of leverage offered at
Bitmex and the incentives for market makers to trade on the bitmex platform, bitmex has unrivaled liquidity. You can market sell and buy hundreds up bitcoin with less than 1% slippage.
A big factor to consider are the fees on your platform. Being able to make money for simply using limit orders is a good example. Compare the fees on Bitfinex with Bitmex's. You earn .025% of your trade when you use limit orders on bitmex vs finex, where you get nothing.
Another advantage bitmex has over other exchanges is the leverage offered. Leverage is important because it:
A) Limits your counterparty risk
B) Allows you to hedge without full spot exposure
Since bitmex allows you to trade with no liability leverage is enticing to traders.
Tether speculations aside, one glaring fact stands out between bitmex and bitfinex.
Bitmex has never been hacked, and has multiple advantages over Finex.
Those being: 1) One withdraw time per day 2) compatibility with Yubikey 3) Support response time
Bitmex also offers futures contracts. Which are attractive to market makers who want to quote prices without worrying about funding, or traders who want to hedge or speculate on the price of bitcoin in the future! Depending on the premium/discount there are different arb opps.
Now that I've gone over the advantages, in order to remain objective I also need to go over the problems mex faces.
The most glaring problem bitmex has is the "OVERLOAD" problem. As explained by Bitmex_Sam here, they're obvious aware of the problem and actively trying to fix it.
Additionally I've hypothesized that bitmex has exposure to a prolonged outage along with a massive market move. Consider the insurance fund (used to cover the fees and slippage on liquidated orders) which dropped by 12% on April 11th, due to the massive candle.
If bitmex is down for an extended period of time, and the market moves violently in one direction, once mex returns online there will be a instant liquidation of hundreds of orders, resulting in slippage of the orders liquidated at the bottom of the move.
If a 17.8% move (6800 -> 8000) drained nearly 12% of the insurance fund. A move larger (mostly likely to the downside since longs are liquidated sooner than shorts) could result in a complete wiping of the insurance fund (hypothetically). In this case we refer to the bitmex TOS
Essentially it's a nice way of telling you there are no refunds, but my only question is who would pay the collateral if the slippage and fees on the liquidations exceed the insurance fund? Some food for thought.
If you would like to learn more about bitmex they have contract guides and explanations on their site, but may be confusing for beginning traders. I would recommend reading up on inverse contracts if you want to trade bitcoin on mex.
Anyways have a nice day people of twitter, I'll be talking about market making in my free discord later tonight!
Peace! discord.gg/8S2ka7b
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hyperliquid Fee Increases, Exchange profitability and a thread about the reason we purchased over $1,000,000 of 40/60 Hype Call spreads with a payoff of over $11,000,000+
Hyperliquid fees are increasing around 30% across the board.
This may sound like a lot, however it's still cheaper than most other exchanges, especially when factoring in the staked HYPE discounts.
Let's take a look at some comparisons (Binance, Bybit and Hyperliquid).
Taking a look at the current market leader Binance:
The bottom 3 VIP tiers applicable for most users:
VIP 0: <$15MM in Volume : 0.05% Taker/0.02% Maker
VIP 1: >$15MM in Volume : 0.04% Taker/0.016% Maker
VIP 2: >$50MM in Volume : 0.035% Taker/0.014% Maker
This seems like a good deal, however you'd also need 25 BNB for VIP 1 or $15,000 worth and 100 BNB for VIP 2 which is $60,000. (ref: $600 BNB). If you do not own the necessary amount of BNB you are not eligible for the next VIP tier. This means you are FORCED to own BNB to get VIP perks on Binance.
Max tier VIP9 for HFT/MMs/Whales (we are VIP 9 on Binance)
VIP 9: >$25B in Volume : 0.017% Taker/0.0% Maker
and you would need 5,500 BNB which is $3,300,000.
BNB has some nice positive carry via launchpool/airdrops of around 5-8%, however it's trading at a market cap of over $88 Billion, which brings an important question of what sort of returns you'd see given Binance is already the market leader.
I don't think it's China selling, or a big global player dumping bonds.
Unsure if people in crypto are aware but essentially large TradFi hedge funds are basically long their own version of USDe via synthetic treasury basis trades
Pic related:
from @matt_levine at money stuff
@matt_levine Basically funds in order to generate yield for themselves on their capital base are looping their own basis trades on Treasuries, very similar to what USDe is in Crypto and using this as a yield bearing instrument. This works great until we have moves in rates like right now.
Most traders get rekt on moves like this as their portfolio is all correlated and inflexible.
Whenever you take risk, you should offset the beta with a reciprocal hedge.
When longing an altcoin, consider shorting another altcoin that you think will go down more and up less.
If you are fully allocated and you are deployed with no cash, and no shorts, even if you don't get liquidated you're missing the opportunity of average down high conviction bets or have additional shots on goal to try and close the bottom with your short legs.
Flexibility.
If you're right yes, you will make less money on your longs but you should be able to see if you truly have alpha or not.
Yesterday was a great example where you could have closed some longs on a huge move up and kept some hedges.
Even though you'll be paying more fees, the hedge against your own poor timing is worth it. It enables you to always have optionality and ideally some cash.
One of my funds main holdings this year has been $BNB
BNB is typically regarded as quite a boring asset, but when you take a look at historical performance YTD and a more favorable regulatory landscape under a probably Trump administration it is a braindead core holding.
The chart also looks primed to squeeze upwards.
It's no secret that Binance is one of the most profitable companies on Earth. They had recently posted that they've done $17.3 Trillion in Perpetual Swap volume since 2018. This amounts to around $51B in revenue at assuming a 3bps average monetization per order. Insane.
Most are unfamiliar, but $BNB is a required hold for trading firms in order to be eligible for discounted fee tiers (VIP7+). If US trading firms are able to slink back onto Binance under Trump (very possible) we could see a rapid reaccumulation of spot BNB. Additionally, almost all regulatory action against Binance has been mitigated due their previous massive settlement with the US government. This was an incredible landmark settlement of $4B USD, which just shows how profitable and massive an entity Binance really is,
#1 @Bybit_Official becomes top exchange by volume temporarily and the centralized exchange landscape shifts significantly.
@Bybit_Official #2 Blackrock ETF gets approved and does more volume than expected (5B+ ADV), this results in a blow off top and cannibalization of institutional flow from large Crypto only OTC desks which close down shop.
#3 DEXs gain less market share than expected and some "DEXs" are revealed to be just as centralized as CEXs. Additionally we see an enforcement action brought against a Perp DEX.
A brief history lesson and what we can learn from the past:
The creation of the CFTC and succession of regulatory authority over cash settled futures (which have become the dominant product in global finance) has always been a black eye for the SEC. Let’s flashback to 1974.
In 1969, Leo Melamed, chairman of the CME, decided to challenge a decades-old law classifying Futures trading as gambling. Through Texas Dem W. R. Poage, then chair of the House Agriculture Committee, they created a new futures regulator, the Commodity futures Trading Commission.
Over the course of these hearings it was determined that the CFTC “should have exclusive jurisdiction” over futures trading and “barring the SEC [which regulates share trading] or regulators from separate states from intruding on that jurisdiction”.