Flood Profile picture
Apr 23, 2018 14 tweets 5 min read Read on X
I get a ton of questions about why I trade on Bitmex.

In this thread I'll give a couple advantages that Bitmex boasts over other exchanges.
First and foremost is liquidity. Due to the amount of leverage offered at
Bitmex and the incentives for market makers to trade on the bitmex platform, bitmex has unrivaled liquidity. You can market sell and buy hundreds up bitcoin with less than 1% slippage. Image
A big factor to consider are the fees on your platform. Being able to make money for simply using limit orders is a good example. Compare the fees on Bitfinex with Bitmex's. You earn .025% of your trade when you use limit orders on bitmex vs finex, where you get nothing. ImageImage
Another advantage bitmex has over other exchanges is the leverage offered. Leverage is important because it:

A) Limits your counterparty risk
B) Allows you to hedge without full spot exposure

Since bitmex allows you to trade with no liability leverage is enticing to traders. Image
Tether speculations aside, one glaring fact stands out between bitmex and bitfinex.

Bitmex has never been hacked, and has multiple advantages over Finex.

Those being:
1) One withdraw time per day
2) compatibility with Yubikey
3) Support response time
Bitmex also offers futures contracts. Which are attractive to market makers who want to quote prices without worrying about funding, or traders who want to hedge or speculate on the price of bitcoin in the future! Depending on the premium/discount there are different arb opps. Image
Now that I've gone over the advantages, in order to remain objective I also need to go over the problems mex faces.

The most glaring problem bitmex has is the "OVERLOAD" problem. As explained by Bitmex_Sam here, they're obvious aware of the problem and actively trying to fix it.
Additionally I've hypothesized that bitmex has exposure to a prolonged outage along with a massive market move. Consider the insurance fund (used to cover the fees and slippage on liquidated orders) which dropped by 12% on April 11th, due to the massive candle. ImageImage
If bitmex is down for an extended period of time, and the market moves violently in one direction, once mex returns online there will be a instant liquidation of hundreds of orders, resulting in slippage of the orders liquidated at the bottom of the move.
If a 17.8% move (6800 -> 8000) drained nearly 12% of the insurance fund. A move larger (mostly likely to the downside since longs are liquidated sooner than shorts) could result in a complete wiping of the insurance fund (hypothetically). In this case we refer to the bitmex TOS ImageImage
Essentially it's a nice way of telling you there are no refunds, but my only question is who would pay the collateral if the slippage and fees on the liquidations exceed the insurance fund? Some food for thought.
If you would like to learn more about bitmex they have contract guides and explanations on their site, but may be confusing for beginning traders. I would recommend reading up on inverse contracts if you want to trade bitcoin on mex.
Anyways have a nice day people of twitter, I'll be talking about market making in my free discord later tonight!
Peace!
discord.gg/8S2ka7b Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Flood

Flood Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThinkingUSD

Nov 30, 2023
Prediction thread 2024 (Will add over time):

#1 @Bybit_Official becomes top exchange by volume temporarily and the centralized exchange landscape shifts significantly.
@Bybit_Official #2 Blackrock ETF gets approved and does more volume than expected (5B+ ADV), this results in a blow off top and cannibalization of institutional flow from large Crypto only OTC desks which close down shop.
#3 DEXs gain less market share than expected and some "DEXs" are revealed to be just as centralized as CEXs. Additionally we see an enforcement action brought against a Perp DEX.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 23, 2023
A brief history lesson and what we can learn from the past:

The creation of the CFTC and succession of regulatory authority over cash settled futures (which have become the dominant product in global finance) has always been a black eye for the SEC. Let’s flashback to 1974.
In 1969, Leo Melamed, chairman of the CME, decided to challenge a decades-old law classifying Futures trading as gambling. Through Texas Dem W. R. Poage, then chair of the House Agriculture Committee, they created a new futures regulator, the Commodity futures Trading Commission.
Over the course of these hearings it was determined that the CFTC “should have exclusive jurisdiction” over futures trading and “barring the SEC [which regulates share trading] or regulators from separate states from intruding on that jurisdiction”.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 15, 2023
During 2020 at the start of the bull run, BitMEX was hit with allegations of BSA violations, under past (2017-2019) market dynamics price would have been off by -10%+, but instead the market was actually flat that day and up that week. Feels eerily similar to this nance news.
It was a pivotal day, as the expectation was that we would nuke, and instead went up substantially. We later learned that it was due to Microstrategy buying. Based on price action following the Binance news, could there be a large bidder who regardless of news, wants Bitcoin?
It certainly felt that way we we grinded at the lows post FTX implosion, flow seemed like some large bidder (who had previously been buying higher) decided to absorb a ton of flow at the lows. Then we saw BUSD $BTC CVD be buy only for a few weeks and now we’re around 40% off the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 18, 2023
I see a lot of traders suffering from a psychosis due to this rally that we saw a lot in 2019 during the 3k to 12k rally. Traders constantly index themselves to their high watermark in both USD and Crypto notional which impacts their ability to stay unbiased.
This is due to a combination of losses during the drawdown (which was substantial on most assets) as well as getting robbed by FTX. This makes it very easy to "hope" for crypto assets to go down so you can reach your ATH balance for ETH, Bitcoin or whatever you index against.
It's a convex issue, you're much more likely to root for Crypto to go down when you have Less ETH than you had 6 months ago, conversely you love to see assets rally when you have more than you ever had.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 7, 2023
In future market cycles, whenever we see leadership of large companies (FTX, DCG, Celsius) make horrendous PR blunders, questionable business choices, and hand wave away criticism because we’re all too busy getting rich, we should not point and laugh but instead press for better
It goes without saying and hindsight is always 20/20 but if we’re going to attempt to self regulate, collectively we have to be better about allowing people who are not extraordinarily pro crypto from reaching top level positions in our industry.
It’s sad to think about but we were easy targets, everyone was so complacent and trusting when margins were fat and rich but now that the dust has settled and we’re left to pick up the pieces and move on we have to be able to learn and reflect from this time period.
Read 8 tweets
Nov 9, 2022
I think given the ETHBTC price action it's pretty clear someone had a large ETHBTC position. It's very possible and likely in my opinion that alameda created a massive asset mismatch by borrowing customer assets, selling them and longing ETH.
From the group of people who are stuck on FTX a lot of the withdrawals that were not processing for THREE days were large BTC withdrawals.
This made Alameda have a position where they couldn't unwind their ETH without significant losses which is megafraud and admission they were trading client deposits so things just kinda halted. Eventually it seems like all FTX had left on their books were Sol ecoshitcoins and FTT
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(