Flood Profile picture
Apr 30, 2018 19 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Thread:

What is a Market Maker?

There are a ton of idiots on twitter who believe that every single movement of bitcoin is dictated by one single entity. While this could be true, this is not what a market maker is!
Market Making is the process of quoting continuous passive buy and sell prices to provide liquidity. On BitMEX market makers post two-way quotes on various products. Market makers are DELTA neutral, they don’t have an outright market view.
Traders market make to earn rebates, currently 0.025% or 2.5 basis points. Traders market make to earn their bid / ask spread. If done correctly, can be a source of consistent trading income. Traders can also market take, where they will be paying a taker fee of .075% or 7.5 bps.
Here is a very simple market making bot that you can use. ANYBODY can market make bitcoin, whenever you get a bid "hit" or an ask "lifted" you are market making.

github.com/BitMEX/sample-…
I always wondered when I was first trading was "Why is there always somebody willing to trade with you?". Markets are different than selling a house, where it can take months or even years to make a trade.
That is where MM come in, MM supply liquidity, they are not directional.
Market making is way to provide consistent income by making money off people who want to pay for the privilege to have their trade executed immediately. Market makers are either quoting prices a bit above the current market price or below the current market price.
An ASK side market maker who was market making the ETH/BTC contract on BitMEX they would need:
-To calculate the fair price of the asset their trading
-An automated bot that would continous make the calculation
-Capital
-A lack of testicles since real men take directional trades
Fair price (varies depending on what you're measuring against) according to bitmex is based on where you as a trader can borrow and lend BTC/USD and the rates given. If you're dumb enough to try and MM when you're making less than you would just lending, it's not worth your time
You used to have to calculate fair price by yourself, but now bitmex is nice enough to do it for you.

-Basis is the expected premium the contracts will trade at (Futures - Spot = Basis)

So if I wanted to market make the ETH contract I would determine my Spread: Image
The spread is the most important part of market making, since your spread determines your potential profit.
Spread = ETH/XBT Volatility + Hedging Costs
ETH/XBT Volatility = your estimation of how much the price could move before you hedge or receive a trade in the other direction
Here's the trade walk through:
You quote a market on ETHM18, 1 contract on both the Bid and Offer, of 0.05 XBT / 0.1 XBT
A trader lifts your offer, you are now short 1 ETHM18 contract
To hedge your delta, you buy 1 ETH for BTC on Poloniex at 0.072 BTC
Your market remains 0.05 XBT / 0.1 XBT
A trader hits your bid, you are now flat on ETHM18
To hedge your delta (you are now long 1 ETH on Poloniex), you sell 1 ETH for XBT at 0.072 XBT
This would all be automated by a bot.
MM'ing bitcoin is a bit different.
The goal of market making is to buy low, sell high as quickly as possible, as much as possible.
The more hedging you do, the less money you make.
To attract the other side, market makers will skew their quotes as they receive trades.
General Rule: For each full size transacted, skew your quotes half your spread.
Skew Example:
You are quoting ETHM18 at 0.05 XBT / 0.1 XBT for 1,000 contracts a side.
You are lifted for 1,000 contracts, since your spread is 0.05 XBT, you move your quotes higher 0.025 XBT.
Your new market is 0.075 XBT / 0.125 XBT
You are hit for 1,000 contracts, you now move your quotes down by 0.025 XBT
Your new market is 0.05 XBT / 0.1 XBT
Remember on BitMEX you receive a 0.025% rebate as a market maker
BitMEX Trades:
Sell 1,000 ETHM18 @ 0.1 XBT, rebate 0.025 XBT
Buy 1,000 ETHM18 @ 0.075 XBT, rebate 0.01875 XBT
Market Making Profit: 2.5 XBT
Rebate: 0.04375
Total Profit: 2.9375 XBT
So what conditions do market makers like? What type of market is attractive to a market maker?
Optimal Conditions: Low volatility market, with very active two-way flow
Bad Conditions: High volatility trending market, with one-way flow
Every MM's delta tolerance is different.
As you can see MM's have a neutral outlook on the market. They don't care if it goes up or down only that it moves. They hate markets which trend in one direction for a long period of time. THEY HAVE NO INCENTIVE TO MOVE THE MARKET WITH MARKET ORDERS IT WOULD ONLY REDUCE PROFIT.
MM's aim to take advantage of the volatility of bitcoin by quoting prices above and below the current market price. A market maker that's quoting a one cent spread would get run over very quickly.
Hopefully this clears up a lot of misconceptions people have about MM's.
Peace.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Flood

Flood Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThinkingUSD

Apr 27, 2025
Hyperliquid Fee Increases, Exchange profitability and a thread about the reason we purchased over $1,000,000 of 40/60 Hype Call spreads with a payoff of over $11,000,000+
Hyperliquid fees are increasing around 30% across the board.

This may sound like a lot, however it's still cheaper than most other exchanges, especially when factoring in the staked HYPE discounts.

Let's take a look at some comparisons (Binance, Bybit and Hyperliquid).
Taking a look at the current market leader Binance:

The bottom 3 VIP tiers applicable for most users:

VIP 0: <$15MM in Volume : 0.05% Taker/0.02% Maker
VIP 1: >$15MM in Volume : 0.04% Taker/0.016% Maker
VIP 2: >$50MM in Volume : 0.035% Taker/0.014% Maker

This seems like a good deal, however you'd also need 25 BNB for VIP 1 or $15,000 worth and 100 BNB for VIP 2 which is $60,000. (ref: $600 BNB). If you do not own the necessary amount of BNB you are not eligible for the next VIP tier. This means you are FORCED to own BNB to get VIP perks on Binance.

Max tier VIP9 for HFT/MMs/Whales (we are VIP 9 on Binance)

VIP 9: >$25B in Volume : 0.017% Taker/0.0% Maker
and you would need 5,500 BNB which is $3,300,000.

BNB has some nice positive carry via launchpool/airdrops of around 5-8%, however it's trading at a market cap of over $88 Billion, which brings an important question of what sort of returns you'd see given Binance is already the market leader.
Read 9 tweets
Apr 9, 2025
I don't think it's China selling, or a big global player dumping bonds.

Unsure if people in crypto are aware but essentially large TradFi hedge funds are basically long their own version of USDe via synthetic treasury basis trades

Pic related: Image
from @matt_levine at money stuff Image
@matt_levine Basically funds in order to generate yield for themselves on their capital base are looping their own basis trades on Treasuries, very similar to what USDe is in Crypto and using this as a yield bearing instrument. This works great until we have moves in rates like right now. Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 3, 2025
Most traders get rekt on moves like this as their portfolio is all correlated and inflexible.

Whenever you take risk, you should offset the beta with a reciprocal hedge.

When longing an altcoin, consider shorting another altcoin that you think will go down more and up less.
If you are fully allocated and you are deployed with no cash, and no shorts, even if you don't get liquidated you're missing the opportunity of average down high conviction bets or have additional shots on goal to try and close the bottom with your short legs.

Flexibility.
If you're right yes, you will make less money on your longs but you should be able to see if you truly have alpha or not.

Yesterday was a great example where you could have closed some longs on a huge move up and kept some hedges.

Even though you'll be paying more fees, the hedge against your own poor timing is worth it. It enables you to always have optionality and ideally some cash.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 16, 2024
One of my funds main holdings this year has been $BNB

BNB is typically regarded as quite a boring asset, but when you take a look at historical performance YTD and a more favorable regulatory landscape under a probably Trump administration it is a braindead core holding.

The chart also looks primed to squeeze upwards.Image
It's no secret that Binance is one of the most profitable companies on Earth. They had recently posted that they've done $17.3 Trillion in Perpetual Swap volume since 2018. This amounts to around $51B in revenue at assuming a 3bps average monetization per order. Insane.
Most are unfamiliar, but $BNB is a required hold for trading firms in order to be eligible for discounted fee tiers (VIP7+). If US trading firms are able to slink back onto Binance under Trump (very possible) we could see a rapid reaccumulation of spot BNB. Additionally, almost all regulatory action against Binance has been mitigated due their previous massive settlement with the US government. This was an incredible landmark settlement of $4B USD, which just shows how profitable and massive an entity Binance really is,
Read 5 tweets
Nov 30, 2023
Prediction thread 2024 (Will add over time):

#1 @Bybit_Official becomes top exchange by volume temporarily and the centralized exchange landscape shifts significantly.
@Bybit_Official #2 Blackrock ETF gets approved and does more volume than expected (5B+ ADV), this results in a blow off top and cannibalization of institutional flow from large Crypto only OTC desks which close down shop.
#3 DEXs gain less market share than expected and some "DEXs" are revealed to be just as centralized as CEXs. Additionally we see an enforcement action brought against a Perp DEX.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 23, 2023
A brief history lesson and what we can learn from the past:

The creation of the CFTC and succession of regulatory authority over cash settled futures (which have become the dominant product in global finance) has always been a black eye for the SEC. Let’s flashback to 1974.
In 1969, Leo Melamed, chairman of the CME, decided to challenge a decades-old law classifying Futures trading as gambling. Through Texas Dem W. R. Poage, then chair of the House Agriculture Committee, they created a new futures regulator, the Commodity futures Trading Commission.
Over the course of these hearings it was determined that the CFTC “should have exclusive jurisdiction” over futures trading and “barring the SEC [which regulates share trading] or regulators from separate states from intruding on that jurisdiction”.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(