Profile picture
Ollie Richardson @O_Rich_
, 46 tweets, 10 min read Read on Twitter
Thread on the river of tears flowing from the “pro-Russia” social media club because Uncle Putin hasn’t (and won’t) subject Israel to a “shock and awe” doctrine:

1. Four years ago this club didn’t exist. It came into “existence” after the war in Donbass started.
2. The alleged aim of this club was to support the people of Donetsk and Lugansk whilst they faced extermination at the hands of the Banderist junta in Kiev. But already in 2014 this club changed its mind. Strelkov decided to abandon Slavyansk, and then Ukraine captured it.
3. Then Minsk 1 came along after the UAF was smashed in Ilovaisk. At this time there were some distant rumblings of “Putin betrayed Novorossiya” from Westerners, but it wasn’t yet an earthquake. 5 months later and the UAF were smashed again, this time in Debaltsevo.
4. Merkel (at the demand of Obama) proverbially dashed to Moscow and begged Putin to stop the massacre. It was at this moment that the project of an “independent” Ukraine was liquidated. Minsk 2 was signed, and the US’ Ocraina springboard was neutralised definitively.
5. Over the next 12 months the western “pro-Russia” club would start to lose its marbles because of the "end of war", and Mr Strelkov (along with his pet keyboard warriors El Murid, Mr Cassad, Suchan etc) started to earn his State Department cash.
6. A flow of toxic junk was published on various websites that tried to present the Kremlin as some selfish, “oligarchic” entity that “doesn’t care” about Donbass or “Novorossiya”. All of this was "legitimised” simply because Strelkov once (!) had some “skin in the game”.
7. The actual keyboard warriors themselves were either sat in the West and risked absolutely nothing by promoting the “Russia = traitor” fairytale or were sat in Russia but remained locked in their liberal basements, doing the occasional Youtube interview.
8. At this time some trends couldn’t but jump into the eyes: all the complainers had ZERO experience in high-level politics/international relations; they never left the confines of the Internet or went to the frontline; they attacked everything Putin did abroad & at home.
9. Being frustrated because Putin didn’t give Strelkov what he wanted (self-enrichment), the keyboard warriors moved onto the Syrian theatre when Russian jets arrived in Latakia in September 2015. The 1st reproach: "Russia cares more about Syria than Donbass."
10. The Kommersant newspaper - a disgustingly fifth-column mouthpiece - soon published some “expose” that tried to convince people that Putin is splashing out the cash in Syria, but not at home, where some imaginary financial catastrophe is taking place.
11. From this moment onwards there was a new complaint everyday from the “pro-Russia” club. If America bombed the SAA, it was "Russia’s fault”. If Palmyra was re-captured by ISIS, Putin had to be hung, drawn, and quartered on Red Square.
12. An avalanche arrived when Turkey shot down the Russian jet. I can still remember verbatim some of the tweets I read from prominent “pro-Russia” westerners. Basically, if Putin didn’t nuke the Bosphorus, then the entire Syrian operation was a sham.
13. But Putin didn’t do this. Instead he starved Turkey economically and forced Ankara to take a few more steps away from the NATO bloc. The result was the complete liquidation of the “moderate rebel” multi-headed hydra and the entrance of the S-400.

14. The next tremor arrived when apparently (no proof has ever been presented ) Russia didn’t respond to America bombing the “Wagner” PMCs. This topic was pushed very hard by “Kommersant”, and the liberal Russian press in general wanted to present Russia as a "mercenary” State.
15. The main suggestion from the “pro-Russia” club was to bomb American troops in Syria. After all, Putin at this point had "committed so many sins" that he had to “make up for it” to satisfy the “abandonment” of Novorossiya.
16. At around the same time, Uncle Sam & Co launched Tomahawks at the Shayrat airbase. The “smart” club wanted Russia to respond by bombing…you guessed it… American troops in Syria. Instead, Russia continued to assist the SAA in liberating Syria. Aleppo was taken.
17. Then there was the Deir Ezzor fiasco. @ejmalrai reported that Russia & America had an unofficial agreement whereby the Euphrates river would be a demarcation line. The “pro-Russia” club went nuts. Apparently this was the tipping point - Putin had become the ultimate traitor.
18. At this point, with the pace of the war slowing down, this club started to reflect on the past 5/6 years of war and to stick the knife further into Putin’s “wounds”. Apparently letting Turkey into Syria was a big mistake. Not shooting down enemy jets is "simply wrong"!
19. During this whole time of events of Syria, this “perfect” little “pro-Russia” club seemingly didn’t care about Ukraine/Donbass anymore. The “Novorossiya” Disney-esque romance story was no longer interesting. "If Putin won’t send a Sarmat to Kiev, then why should I care?"
20. It never occur to the “Putin betrayed everyone” club that all theatres of military operations are connected - that we are all connected, as people. A basic comprehension of international reactions was (and still is) completely absent.
21. Now let’s dissect the complaints:

~ “Putin betrayed Novorossiya”

Well, to save myself the pain of being repetitive, please read:

22. ~ “Putin cares more about Syria than Donbass”

When a chess player moves one piece, does that mean that they "don't care" about their other pieces?
23. ~ “The NAF would’ve gone all the way to Kiev if it wasn’t for Minsk”

This is a logical fallacy. It’s like saying that a kicked ball would travel all the way to the moon if it wasn’t for gravity. In fact, the NAF "coming to Kiev" is EXACTLY what Washington wants!
24. ~ "Russia had to bomb Turkey”

Last time I checked, the Middle East needed more peace, not war. Such a frankly sickening act would literally throw the human race into the abyss. Maybe this is what the West’s “pro-Russia” club actually want - pure misanthropy?
25. ~ "Putin not massacring American troops is treason”

Similar to point #24, such a move would be the “swansong" of the Russian nation. This is known as “harakiri” in Japanese culture. How does this help to end the war in Syria? How many more people will die as a result?
26. ~ “Losing Palmyra again showed that Putin is clueless”

Syria is a big country. America tried to make Russia go from East to West & West to East - back and forth - to exhaust Russia and Assad’s forces. ISIS attacked in Deir ezzor, & then Nusra went on the attack in the South.
27. This continued for a long time until Russia liberated Deir Ezzor. Then the US tried to manoeuvre ISIS out of Raqqa and towards the Russian/Syrian forces in DE. Then Iraq liberated the border areas, and US was forced to occupy oil fields in order to have a slice of leverage.
28. “Turkey is occupying Syria & Putin does nothing to stop it”

Yes, Turkey is violating international law. And? Has the UNSC passed any resolution that helps to end the war in Syria? The only thing that can stop Turkey is Russia bombing it? I prefer a more peaceful solution.
29. ~ “Russia allows the USA to steal Syrian oil and occupy territory”

America is a nuclear-armed country. At first they tried to use jihadists to capture Damascus, this failed. Then when Turkey switched camps the USA & Co injected some spec ops to clear out North Raqqa.
30. Then when Russia & Co took Deir Ezzor the US was forced to literally seize the entire NE corner of Syria in order to “stay in the game”. If to revise the chronology of the conflict, American troops were already in Syria before Russia arrived (near Jordan and “Rojava”).
31. Russia firstly removed Turkey from the game (bombing ISIS in Latakia; S-400 response to Sukhoi to shootdown; pressuring Ahrar al-Sham), then Saudi Arabia (liquidating FSA factions, forcing mergers to happen), and now Israel has almost lost its last proxies (Daraa/Quneitra).
32. In other words, when the majority of the enemies units have been destroyed, in order to secure victory the protagonist must herd the remaining units that can’t be immediately finished off towards the deliberately-crafted "escape route".
33. Hence the unofficial Russia-USA agreement about the Euphrates River. Russia likes this situation because it is controlled. The variables of the algorithm are known and the possible outcomes can be accurately formulated.

Here is Russia’s algorithm:

34. ~ “Russia allows Israel to act like the king of the jungle, bombing Syria with impudence”

I already covered this one below, but I will add that Russia’s policy is to make friends from enemies, akin to Sun Tzu’s precepts.

35. ~ “Not giving the S-300 to Damascus shows that Putin wants the SAA to be bombed”

This one is pure comedy. The thread below by @WaelAlRussi is very explicative in this regard. I will add that everything happens (or doesn’t happen) for a reason.

36. ~ “Inviting Netanyahu to the Immortal Regiment in Moscow is State treason and pro-Zionist”

Seriously, who cares? Did his visit change anything in the “great game”? When Putin shakes Bibi’s hand does it mean that he aids and abets violence against Palestinians? Nyet.
37. Putin was also abused on social media because he met with the King of Saud. What is he expected to do? Does this mean that he “betrayed Yemen”? Well, newsflash: Russia has been supporting the Houthis with weapons and intel for a long time. Geopolitics isn’t black & white.
38. There are so many examples of tantrums because Moscow didn’t bomb X or Y. The truth is that this Western "pro-Russia” club doesn't actually care about Russians or Russia. It is superficial sh*t. It’s like attaching yourself to a sports team because it wins a lot.
39. This club's criticism of Moscow and the “advice” thrown in its direction is based on a total lack of any high-level political experience. The members of the club do not risk the same or more as what Kremlin officials risk every single day.
40. The whiners deliver their article, tweet, or post in the most cowardly way. There are no consequences for demanding on social media to bomb country X or Y. Putin is, first and foremost, responsible for the everyday lives of ~145 million Russian citizens.
41. The “Putin is a weak coward” complainers aren’t prepared to send their sons or daughters to any war that may happen as a result of their bullsh*t suggestions. They, like @Charles_Lister, demand toys from mommy and then drop them when they become “unfashionable”.
42. Btw, some are now saying that Russia is losing the info war. When I ask the person claiming this to explain, I don’t receive an answer. Basically, Israel dropped a few bombs (which changed nothing in the “great game) and Armenia got a new PM, and suddenly it is doomsday.
43. The first things the “pro-Russia” complainers in the West should ask themselves before logging into social media: do I have any “skin in the game”? If the answer is no, then please kindly keep quiet. You might think you can do a better job than Putin, but only on the Xbox.
44. Syria is being rebuilt. Life is returning to streets than were once the concrete graves of children. Ukraine comes closer to resolving its 100-year-old problem with each passing day. And Russia and its economy is like a juggernaut. I ask: what is there to be afraid of?
45. Final tweet: I would like to dedicate this thread to the Russian soldiers who sacrificed their lives in Syria. They are real examples that should be followed by everyone who wants their children to grow up in a peaceful world.

Это вам за пацанов!

Here is this thread in article format with a few extras ;)

Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Ollie Richardson
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!