The media is in the throes of an existential crisis. I give you 4 different headlines
a. There was no FBI informant (the now politically correct term for spy in MSM).
b. If there was, he was there to protect Trump.
c. or And if you don't believe that, the individual was investigating collusion.
d. Oh and Mark Warner says that individual must be protected
Most people with functioning brainstems will realize there is deliberate obfuscation at play.
But brainstems are rare in DC.
Why do they want to protect someone who was protecting Trump? He is a hero, no?
Halper has close ties to Bush family and supported George H. W Bush's election.
A CIA operative supported a presidential candidate in 1980
George W. Bush’s CIA and NSA director, Gen. Michael Hayden, pronounced Trump “clear and present danger”
These were predictions based upon publicly available information. not "sources"
The media has now one function it does truly well: Obfuscate, nothing else
The elements plotting to subvert the presidency are politically controlled marionettes on BOTH sides of the political spectrum. Halper, for example had strong republican ties. Others lean left.
Turned out he became the president, he is a disrupter and is looking to disrupt everything that has been held sacrosanct for so long.
They will act to preserve the conventional power architecture.
It is going to get worse and their reward is your panic and discombobulation.
Sometimes things have to unravel just enough for a gleaming new edifice with unshakable foundations to be constructed in its place
And "prediction of warfare" is the title of an Amon Amarth song