@Shem_Infinite's Threads
127 added
Devin Nunes closing statements now. Pointing out the only thing that matters from this hearing, and we already knew it because of his prior testimony. He presumed aid was tied to investigations and was refuted by President Trump. No quid pro quo, no evidence of any crimes, zilch.
Schiff then lies and says that the evidence Sondland brought forward today is devastating 😂😂😂. What evidence?!?!?! What a dummy.
Schiff is now screaming that there was a quid pro quo for military aid because Sondland told them there could be one based on NOTHING but his own presumptions. Schiff is an absolute joke 😂😂😂
Uhh did Zaid just admit Vindman is the second whistleblower? 
"There is certainly enough evidence for someone -- say, the President of the United States -- to conclude that, as Serhiy Leshchenko said, the majority of Ukraine politicians were on Clinton's side and were willing to try to influence an American election" washingtonexaminer.com/news/analysis-…
This is a fantastic article:
"One striking aspect of the Democratic impeachment hearings on Capitol Hill is the number of witnesses -- U.S. diplomats and experts on Ukraine -- who either knew little about the Ukrainians' anti-Trump activities or dismissed them as no big deal."
"One striking aspect of the Democratic impeachment hearings on Capitol Hill is the number of witnesses -- U.S. diplomats and experts on Ukraine -- who either knew little about the Ukrainians' anti-Trump activities or dismissed them as no big deal."
All these so called Ukraine experts either didn't know or didn't care that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election against Trump. Also, the Democrats act like only Russia tried to interfere and that means Ukraine couldn't have. It's why everyone can see this as the charade it is.
All of these lawsuits will go to SCOTUS anyways.
The House Democrats didn't think the Ukraine impeachment hoax was going bad enough for them that they have already decided to hold more Russia impeachment hoax hearings to add on top of it😂.
The public backlash against the left and the media is going to get 100 times louder
The public backlash against the left and the media is going to get 100 times louder
At this rate, they should be sending impeachment to the Senate right around the time of President Trump's second inaugural address.
What in the world?
I'm guessing someone saw my thread about this article yesterday:
In case anyone missed it, the article is insane and laughable.
Wanting a statement from Ukraine saying they were serious about fighting corruption, including 2016 election interference and Burisma isn't illegal in any way, it's not even improper, it's literally just foreign policy and both of those things need investigating.
Volker testifies that he didn't even think it was unusual to request a statement like that.
Volker saw a statement about election interference and Burisma as "very helpful" and not a condition on getting a meeting. He saw it as a positive thing.
A couple of things:
1) Saying you were out of the loop at key moments means you don't have evidence of those moments.
2)"pressure campaign" is most likely NYT spin.
3)There's no more information at her website about it and no link to the source so people can see it in context
1) Saying you were out of the loop at key moments means you don't have evidence of those moments.
2)"pressure campaign" is most likely NYT spin.
3)There's no more information at her website about it and no link to the source so people can see it in context
Oh look here is the actual link: nytimes.com/2019/11/18/us/…
Yup, the actual article is just literally nothing but New York Times spin for literally half of it until they actually get to the part about Volkers testimony. He is just going to say he didn't know Sondland tried to tie the aid money to investigations.
8/31:
Senator Johnson asked President Trump if what Sondland said was true about military aid being on hold until Zelensky made a statement about investigations. President Trump strongly denied it and told Johnson he was reviewing aid and he'd "probably like his final decision"
Senator Johnson asked President Trump if what Sondland said was true about military aid being on hold until Zelensky made a statement about investigations. President Trump strongly denied it and told Johnson he was reviewing aid and he'd "probably like his final decision"
Source: Senator Johnson letter to Rep. Jordan and Rep. Nunes. documentcloud.org/documents/6552…
8/30:
Senator Johnson had asked Sondland about the military hold, and he recalls Sondland saying that if Ukraine showed it was serious about corruption, and helped determine what happened with 2016 election interference the hold would end. Nothing about Biden or Burisma.
Senator Johnson had asked Sondland about the military hold, and he recalls Sondland saying that if Ukraine showed it was serious about corruption, and helped determine what happened with 2016 election interference the hold would end. Nothing about Biden or Burisma.
😂 this has to be one of those deep fakes the left is so afraid of.
😂😂😂 it's real apparently!! I dunno if a production person was having a laugh and added a sound effect and I don't care Swalwell is a giant toddler pretending to be an adult in Congress and I can't stop laughing.
Swalwell lies about farting on live TV
Seriously the article recognizes that people on all sides hate and distrust the media and what do they do? Instead of looking inward and taking responsibility for their own part they ......... blame President Trump and compare him to a Russian "political leader" 😂😂😂
From the Sondland testimony:
The July 26th meeting he took part in with Zelensky was planned weeks in advance and had nothing to do with the Trump/Zelensky call the day before.
The July 26th meeting he took part in with Zelensky was planned weeks in advance and had nothing to do with the Trump/Zelensky call the day before.
Not only that, he testified he didn't see a transcript of the call until it was made public, and heard no mention of investigations being a part of the call at all.
Furthermore, BIll Taylor (C), Tim Morrison (L), and Sondland (R) all testified that the first time anyone mentioned military aid being tied to investigations was Sondland saying that on September 1st, based on what he "presumed" not what he was told by President Trump.
Stefanopoulos straight up lies here and says that Morrison testified that Sondland was acting on behalf of Trump when he spoke to Ukraine on September 1st about military aid. He didn't say that, neither did Sondland, it's just straight up lying.
Morrison testified that Sondland had said he was acting on behalf of the President on Ukraine matters in general. Sondland testified that he "presumed" military aid was tied to investigations not that he was directed or ordered by President Trump to tie the two together.
In fact, Sondland repeatedly testified that when he asked President Trump if there was any quid pro quo he was told there WAS NO QUID PRO QUO at all. Sondland presuming something then being told he was wrong by the President himself is what happened and the media knows that.
Twitter hid this reply to Joe Walsh as "offensive content" meanwhile Joe Walsh has repeatedly tweeted out the N word and he still has a blue checkmark.
Looks like it's not just his tweets, my replies to anyone are showing up under two layers of censorship and hidden under "offensive content" when I literally never tweet profanity ever or post anything offensive. Seeing a lot more of us having our comments buried this way lately.
The White House already released a statement saying that it was for his annual physical, they said that it went great and he is in great health, and this useless fraud knows that just like he knew Melania was never missing.
Morrison testifies that on September 1st Sondland had told Yermak that a statement from the Ukrainian Prosecutor General about a Burisma investigation would help release the hold on military aid. (L)
Taylor testified that on Wednesday he suggested the same thing to Sondland (R)
Taylor testified that on Wednesday he suggested the same thing to Sondland (R)
Here's what's weird about that. Taylors phone call with Sondland where he says he suggested Ukraines Prosecutor General make that statement was AFTER Morrison testified that was what Sondland had already told Yermak.
Taylor was wrong about what Sondland said to Yermak, and his "suggestion" was what Sondland actually said. 🤦♂️ Morrison spoke to Sondland immediately after the meeting. This just further proves how useless Taylor is as a witness to anything.
This is why the left is all over Rep. Stefanik today. She not only caught Yovanovitch perjuring herself she also got her to admit President Obama's White House was concerned about Hunter Biden and Burisma. Game over.
nypost.com/2019/11/15/oba…
nypost.com/2019/11/15/oba…
This is what we call perjury:
“Although I have met former vice president several times over the course of our many years in government service, neither he nor the previous administration ever raised the issue of either Burisma or Hunter Biden with me.”
“Although I have met former vice president several times over the course of our many years in government service, neither he nor the previous administration ever raised the issue of either Burisma or Hunter Biden with me.”
"Yovanovitch later testified that the State Department told her to deflect any questions she might get about Hunter Biden and Burisma by referring Senators’ questions to the vice president’s office."
The opening week of the impeachment circus was a disaster for the Democrats and the corrupt media. Their first three "star" witnesses admitted under oath they had no first hand knowledge of President Trump committing any crimes whatsoever. Americans see this as the sham it is.
The only witness with any first hand knowledge (Sondland) they refused to call this week and do you know why? Because he repeatedly testified under oath that President Trump told him there was no quid pro quo. He won't help their case when he testifies next week either.
The Democrats think that Americans are a bunch of morons. We all already know everything the witnesses will testify to because the Democrats leaked their testimony weeks ago. We know there is nothing tying President Trump to any crimes. But they keep pushing impeachment anyways.
Rosie rocks. Seriously what in the world!??!
That same account. They knew about the phone call, here they are talking about Bolton confirming a Trump/Zelensky meetings (and receipts for Biden) what is this? Seriously this is nuts.
h/t: @almostjingo
h/t: @almostjingo
@almostjingo They don't seem to have realtime information at least not about the first call, which was on April 21st, when they tweeted this out in June that President Trump invited Zelensky to Washington. Whoever this is.
😂 there's literally no way any of this happened. This guy just randomly remembers it last Friday? I'm calling BS on this entire thing.
Sondland is just running around saying "President Trump only cares about Biden investigations that benefit him" you expect me to believe this? 😂😂😂
esquire.com/news-politics/…
esquire.com/news-politics/…
It's really even too ludicrous to play devil's advocate with. There's literally zero chance at all this guy heard President Trump saying on the phone "So he's going to do the investigations?" when the call transcript never even mentions the word investigations the day before.
The left will stop at nothing to try to take down President Trump, even invent fake "campaign finance violations" and "FARA violations" to use to go after Rudy Giuliani. Endless investigations because Hillary Clinton lost.
Probably what AG Barr and Trump talked about today.
Probably what AG Barr and Trump talked about today.
Giuliani investigated Democrat corruption so corrupt Democrats are investigating him.
"...the actions that Trump, Giuliani and other officials took related to Ukraine may be more complicated, and that what appears to be wrongdoing on the surface may be hard to charge as crimes.
"...the actions that Trump, Giuliani and other officials took related to Ukraine may be more complicated, and that what appears to be wrongdoing on the surface may be hard to charge as crimes.
It's literally the same garbage they are pushing to try to impeach President Trump lol. They are floating the possibility of charging Giuliani with extortion for wanting to investigate 2016 election interference. Lock Mueller up then. Can't wait to see his indictment.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 The left wing media conspiracy theorists are forced to try to claim that Horowitz had nothing to do with the report that he has been writing for 18 months because they can't attack his credibility. This is pathetic, and they are terrified.
Hacks like Hennessey know for a fact that Horowitz would inform Congress if he felt like he was being pushed out of the process and they know that Horowitz will be called to testify by the Senate at the very least, and the House if the Democrats allow it. Straight up gaslighting.
Hennessey should stick to making podcasts about the Mueller Report that no one cares about instead of embarrassing herself on twitter with her blatant, delusional, nonsense lol. Seriously, embarrassing.
😂😂😂😂 I can not overstate enough how bad today went for the Democrats impeachment sham. When not even Ben Rhodes or the media are claiming that it was a blockbuster, and are forced to admit it was "dull", they know it was terrible.
The thing that makes it even better is they held all these secret hearings and hand picked Taylor and Kent to lead off the public hearings. These were their star witnesses and they were completely innefective and their testimony irreparably damaged their impeachment chances.
From yesterday 😂😂😂
"I’m told by a source familiar — a Democratic source familiar — that if Americans only tune in to the first hour that they will hear an earful. The first hour I am told is designed to be a blockbuster."
breitbart.com/politics/2019/…
"I’m told by a source familiar — a Democratic source familiar — that if Americans only tune in to the first hour that they will hear an earful. The first hour I am told is designed to be a blockbuster."
breitbart.com/politics/2019/…
This video completely destroys the Democrat argument that Ukraine was desperate for the military aid and that President Trump was putting them in danger. It would have taken an entire YEAR for the aid to reach them in the first place, and they have aid arriving now from last year
This lie has been pushed by multiple Democrats and left wing conspiracy theorists who apparently never watched the hearing because George Kent confirmed it's a lie.
h/t: @tonkawahee
h/t: @tonkawahee
@tonkawahee President Swalwell lied about it too. He was IN the hearing today, he has no excuse for blatantly lying to the public about something that was directly contradicted by one of his "star witnesses". There's no excuse other than he is lying on purpose.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Chris Wallace auditioning for a job at CNN because this is literally the most pathetic description of the awful bumbling hearsay testimony of Taylor I've read all day lol.
