wassielawyer Profile picture
Jun 13 14 tweets 4 min read
1/ Ok just some clarifications because people instantly become insolvency practitioners / lawyers whenever a platform is experiencing difficulties to maximize engagement farming.

Now @CelsiusNetwork is clearly insolvent. The question is what sort of insolvency are they in?
2/ Insolvency is generally defined in law as 'being unable to pay debts as they becoming due'. This means there are two 'types' of insolvency.

The first is 'cash flow insolvency' which means you simply have more outflows than you are able to support.
3/ This does not mean you do not have the assets to meet those outflows, it is simply a question of timing. Imagine if you locked your networth of $1000 in a box for 24 hours but a friend rocks up and asks you to repay a $500 loan today.

You cannot and so you are insolvent.
4/ This is not terrible. Sure you cannot pay your friend $500 now but give it a day and you will be able to pay him $500 and maybe another $50 for his inconvenience.

Worst case scenario, sell the $1000 box for $900 dollars today and pay off the $500 loan today.
5/ Ideally @CelsiusNetwork is in this position and so the halt on withdrawals / transfers is simply to buy time until sufficient assets become liquid again.

If they are cash flow insolvent, it really isn't the end of the world.
6/ Now if they are 'balance sheet insolvent', we are in another world of hurt. Being balance sheet insolvent means you simply do not have enough assets to cover all of your liabilities.

This means that instead of having $1000 locked in a box and owing $500...
7/ you have a net worth of $1000 (in a box or otherwise) but you owe $5000 dollars. There is no way your creditors will be able to recover the amounts owed to them in full because you simply do not have enough!

In this situation, creditors are pretty fucked.
8/ What does this mean for @CelsiusNetwork users if Celsius is in fact balance sheet insolvent? IRL, there would be a managed process to make sure everyone gets a fair share.

In crypto no such thing exists (see @terra_money) so its bank run time! Get out before you get fucked.
9/ But the lack of transparency and accountability in crypto, especially when it comes to executive level decision-making (again - see @stablekwon, @terra_money and @LFG_org) means there is another risk - the risk that the insolvent company tries to trade out of insolvency.
10/ What does 'trying to trade out of insolvency' mean? When a company is insolvent, the controller's interests are no longer aligned with their creditors. Every additional dollar you lose would have gone to your creditors but every dollar you make takes you closer to recovery.
11/ So why wouldn't you YOLO bet whatever you have left on a high-risk play knowing that if you lose its your creditors that get fucked but if it pays off, you get out of your current predicament with upside!

Bet your $1000 and if you get $10000 back, your problems go away!
12/ This behavior attracts very heavy penalties / liabilities on an individual under wrongful trading / fraudulent trading laws which provide that if you are a director (or controller) of an insolvent company and start YOLO trading, you could be personally liable and serve time.
13/ But we are in the crypto world so who knows what will happen?

I'd encourage @CelsiusNetwork to publicly disclose what sort of insolvency they are facing at the moment and the next steps they are intending to take.

Let's hope its not 100x leveraged LUNAC.
14/ As usual, this is neither financial nor legal advice. I am a hentai anime penguin in a suit.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with wassielawyer

wassielawyer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wassielawyer

May 24
1/ Also I will henceforth retire from tweeting about Terra / Luna. I think I have said all I can say as an outside participant and have shared the views I think are valuable to as many of the relevant people as I can.

I don't have much more to add except to add that...
2/ I absolutely feel for every person who has been affected by this and sincerely hope that @terra_money and @stablekwon has it in their mind to help make as many people whole as possible.

If not, I sincerely hope that good actors in the crypto space band together to help them.
3/ I understand emotions are high and I too would be far more emotional if I had lost the sort of savings I have seen some people lose. While we can say that people should have done their own research, it must be said that half-truths or mistruths were certainly marketed at them.
Read 10 tweets
May 20
1/ A thread on why pre-depeg UST holders and post-depeg UST holders should not be separated into different classes. Seriously - it is for everyone's benefit.

There is a perfectly good reason - please read before you send hate.
2/ The TFL-favored proposals have split up stakeholders into the same few classes: (a) the pre-depeg Luna holders, (b) the Luna holders now, (c) the pre-depeg UST holders, (d) the UST holders now and the (e) developers / community pool.
3/ I understand that Luna post-depeg buyers will hate me for saying this but the Luna split is sensible in the circumstances. It would simply not be equitable to have post-depeg Luna buyers in the same class as pre-depeg Luna holders given the hyperinflation that ensued.
Read 10 tweets
May 14
1/ Okay someone tell me if I am tripping here. Why does it have to be the LFG reserves that are used to implement the 'Small Wallet Refund' proposal (the FatMan Proposal).

We initially thought the cost to save the UST peg is over 10bn.

agora.terra.money/t/proposal-tie…
2/ This made the prospect of a VC / emergency financier coming in to save the peg pretty much impossible.

But if this proposal is right that 92% of the Anchor deposits are in the top 100 wallets, the cost to actually make a sizable super-majority whole is far less.
3/ Add this on to the fact that UST holders may well be happy to take 50c on the dollar right now and the funds you are looking at is in the region of 500 - 750m!

Still a sizable amount but its not a ludicrously large one.
Read 6 tweets
May 13
1/ This thread is about the latest proposal and what it actually means for $UST and $LUNA.

Promise I'll stop tweeting about the $LUNA debacle soon and return to hentai anime penguin shitposting soon but watching this play out is enthralling to the finance lawyer nerd in me.
2/ The latest community proposal which seems to have @stablekwon's unfortunate backing is to launch a new LUNA chain. Some aspects of it are good, some are probably suboptimal.

Original proposal linked below.

agora.terra.money/t/luna-go-forw…
3/ This proposal (as endorsed by Do Kwon) envisages a new LUNA with 1bn tokens with distribution as follows:

40% to LUNA holders before de-peg
40% to UST at the time of new network launch (this is important)
10% to LUNA holders when chain halts
10% to fund future dev.
Read 19 tweets
May 13
1/ Another hot take from an insolvency / restructuring lawyer on where the LFG reserves went.

They left the LFG wallet yes - that much we do know. It is incredibly unlikely that they have all been spent rebuying UST though because that would represent incredible incompetence.
2/ Chances are that some of it is still around, floating in the exchange wallets somewhere waiting to be deployed.

"Oh brilliant! - so there is hope!", I hear you say. "We have some collateral!". Well... the bad news is that it probably doesn't play out this way.
3/ Where did this money come from? 3AC, Jump etc put this money into LFG to stabilize UST presumably subject to their agreement with LFG.

These funds aren't charities. They did it to protect their own bags within the Terra ecosystem.
Read 9 tweets
May 11
1/ Thinking about this LUNA-UST debacle from a tradfi boomer insolvency lawyer perspective...

LUNA is basically designed to be your equity and UST are notes payable on demand. LUNA has the upside but risks absorbing the downside which is a massive liability owed to UST holders.
2/ Presumably your UST is also 'guaranteed' by LFG which has deployed monies to 'defend the peg'. Would be interesting to see if there is anything left in the tank.

The Terra ecosystem presumably has some value, even if it never generated the cash flow to pay anchor yields.
3/ From a boomer tradfi restructuring perspective, maybe the play to curb the uncertainty and slowly rebuild the ecosystem is to solve for the UST on-demand debt. Without UST, the ecosystem has no legitimacy - so restoring it should probably be priority.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(