Post

https://twitter.com/thom_wolf/status/1662085371826405377

More from @Thom_Wolf

Thomas Wolf

Feb 25, 2023

Ok friends, it's weekend, we've some time for us. So let me tell you about a possible future for AI where the largest AI spendings, in billions of dollars, in 2-3 years would be on...

... antitrust legal fees

A quick 🧵1/8

let's go back to early 2000 – Microsoft was at that time the archenemy of the free and open source movements and the fight between OSS and private software was going strong

2/8

With smart moves like its partnership with IBM bundling Windows in IBM computers, Microsoft was able to reach a strong market-dominance in the PC world

3/8

Read 8 tweets

Thomas Wolf

@Thom_Wolf

Dec 27, 2021

I read a lot of books this year to broaden my horizons in AI/ML with adjacent or complementary disciplines. It was a great pleasure so I’m sharing some my reading list here with a couple of notes:
[1/12]

P. Miller – Theories of Developmental Psychology
A great introduction to the major theoretical schools of child development
Orienting yourself in a field is easier when you’re familiar with a few important researchers & how each brought new views & approaches to the field
[2/12]

In AI, we have G. Hinton, Y LeCun or J. Pearl, in developmental and child psychology, similar pioneers are Jean Piaget, Lev Vygotsky or Eleanor Gibson (among many others) – most of today's research is build following or against some of their ideas
amazon.com/Theories-Devel…
[3/12]

Read 12 tweets

Thomas Wolf

@Thom_Wolf

Dec 2, 2021

In 2021, we've seen an explosion of grounded Langage Models: from "image/video+text" to more embodied models in "simulation+text"

But, when tested on text benchmarks, these grounded models really struggle to improve over pure text-LM e.g T5/GPT3

Why?

>>

When we, humans, read sentences like "lemons are yellow" or "the dog is barking", we have the impression to recruit visual and auditory experiences.

Why then is it so difficult for grounded models to use multimodal inputs like we do to improve on text processing benchmarks?

>>

One reason might be that multimodal inputs are harder to efficiently use

I want to talk about another option here which is:
*langage is more abstract than we often think*

I'll summarise this fascinating cog. science opinion piece from Lupyan & Winter royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…

>>

Read 9 tweets

Thomas Wolf

@Thom_Wolf

Sep 17, 2021

@huggingface

I'm not sure many people know how easy it is to share a dataset with the new versions of the @huggingface hub and Dataset library

So I make a quick video 📺 about it 👇

This works both for public and for private (within an org) datasets sharing

@qlhoest

More info: huggingface.co/docs/datasets/…
And soon here: github.com/huggingface/da…

And feel free to ping the awesome @qlhoest @avillanovamoral and our new documentation king @stevhliu about this!

You can do exactly the same with models weights by the way!

Read 4 tweets

Thomas Wolf

@Thom_Wolf

Jan 22, 2021

@_KarenHao

I like @_KarenHao's work and I think I can understand her point.

As someone a bit in the field, let me try to offer my angle on this.

I don't usually write complex/nuanced arguments on Twitter but let's try it again for once :-)

[Short thread]

https://twitter.com/_KarenHao/status/1352351447803965441

In my view, this perception of large language models is mostly due to a narrative created by a few teams leveraging large language models as an instrument of power/showcase/business

In my view, these models:

1/ Are interesting artifacts to study and try to understand from a research NLP/Ethics/CL/AI point of view.

We are not talking about creating virus or nuclear stuff here. Releasing a 1T parameters model won't blow up :) it's actually a lot harder/costly/less-usable in practice.

Read 6 tweets

Thomas Wolf

@Thom_Wolf

Jan 14, 2020

I often meet research scientists interested in open-sourcing their code/research and asking for advice.

Here is a thread for you.

First: why should you open-source models along with your paper? Because science is a virtuous circle of knowledge sharing not a zero-sum competition

1. Consider sharing your code as a tool to build on more than a snapshot of your work:
-other will build stuff that you can't imagine => give them easy access to the core elements
-don't over-do it => no need for one-liner abstractions that won't fit other's need – clean & simple

2. Put yourself in the shoes of a master student who has to start from scratch with your code:
- give them a ride up to the end with pre-trained models
- focus examples/code on open-access datasets (not everybody can pay for CoNLL-2003)

Read 8 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Thomas Wolf

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @Thom_Wolf

Thomas Wolf

Thomas Wolf

Thomas Wolf

Thomas Wolf

Thomas Wolf

Thomas Wolf

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!