BREAKING: Another COVID “conspiracy theory” just came true.
A Special HHS Adviser confirmed it, and you could see the pain written all over his face.
This explains why RFK Jr. effectively shut down all mRNA vaccine funding.
🧵 THREAD
HHS Secretary RFK Jr. dropped a mega bombshell on Tuesday when he announced that BARDA will be CANCELING 22 mRNA vaccine development contracts, saving taxpayers about $500 million in the process.
He declared, “mRNA technology poses MORE risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses.”
Now, we have a clearer picture as to why he made that bold statement.
Thursday, on Steve Bannon’s War Room, HHS Special Adviser Dr. Steven Hatfill revealed that RFK Jr. pulled mRNA funding after the data showed getting vaccinated was MORE dangerous than COVID itself.
In other words, the “cure” was WORSE than the disease.
Dr. Hatfill said, “It was more dangerous to take a vaccine than it was to contract COVID-19 and be hospitalized with it.”
He explained that when meta-analyses were conducted, the results would consistently show “NO BENEFIT TO RISK RATIO for taking a messenger RNA vaccine.”
Dr. Hatfill added that the shots send a “sudden flood” of mRNA into the body, which overwhelms the cells and creates “BIOLOGICAL HAVOC.”
With pain written all over his face, he concluded, “IT HAD TO BE STOPPED.”
No one says something that grave unless the data is absolutely damning.
In another series of explosive statements, Dr. Hatfill attested that the vaccine manufacturers never did their due diligence to ensure their shots were safe and “essentially ran the pandemic response.”
“Nobody stood up to them. Nobody questioned them… Pfizer wanted a [75]-year moratorium on the clinical trial data, which from the start showed these never prevented infection or disease transmission,” he explained, adding, “There’s no good clinical data to ever show it reduced the severity of disease.”
“The vaccines have injured hundreds of thousands, and we’re not really sure how many have been killed by it, but a significant amount,” Dr. Hatfill lamented.
“They [mRNA vaccine technology] had to come off the market. There was no choice. You want to make America healthy again? It had to be stopped.”
Dr. Hatfill’s statements are backed up by damning study after study.
In 2022, the same year Dr. Hatfill said the data began piling up, Joseph Fraiman and colleagues published a reanalysis of the Pfizer and Moderna trials, showing that the number of serious post-vaccine adverse events far EXCEEDED the number of hospitalizations prevented.
Pfizer trial:
• Adverse Events of Special Interest: 10.1 extra cases per 10,000 vaccinated compared to placebo.
• Hospitalizations prevented: 2.3 per 10,000.
Moderna trial:
• Adverse Events of Special Interest: 15.1 extra cases per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo.
In fact, Fraiman and colleagues published another study showing that in order to prevent one COVID‑19 hospitalization over a 6‑month period among young adults (18-29), over 30,000 of them would need to receive a third (booster) mRNA dose.
For each hospitalization prevented, the analysis estimated that at least 18.5 serious adverse events would occur.
I turned to epidemiologist @NicHulscher, who lives and breathes this research.
He’s been digging into the data non-stop and basically knows the numbers by heart.
I’ll let him break down the receipts that back up Dr. Hatfill’s claims:
Senior HHS Advisor Dr. Steven Hatfill just said mRNA shots induce “BIOCHEMICAL HAVOC.”
He’s likely referring to the new study that found mRNA shots induce severe, long-lasting genetic disruption linked to cancer and chronic disease.
Using high-resolution RNA sequencing on blood samples, they discovered that COVID-19 “vaccines” SEVERELY disrupt expression of THOUSANDS of genes—triggering mitochondrial failure, immune reprogramming, and oncogenic activation that can persist for MONTHS to YEARS post-injection.
Dr. Hatfill said the data had accumulated to the point where large studies could be conducted. He’s right. The two LARGEST COVID-19 “vaccine” safety studies in HISTORY—covering 184 MILLION people—prove mRNA shots are NOT SAFE for human use.
Dr. Hatfill said, “It was more dangerous to take a vaccine than it was to contract COVID-19 and be hospitalized with it.”
Nearly 1,000 peer-reviewed references across 3 landmark studies (1, 2, 3) by Mead et al. PROVE the catastrophic risks of the COVID-19 “vaccines” FAR outweigh their imaginary, theoretical benefits:
🔻 The shots didn’t save lives — they caused catastrophic harm
Autopsy evidence, reanalyzed trial data & real-world outcomes show no mortality benefit. Early treatment saved lives — not rushed genetic injections.
🔻 The risks far outweigh any theoretical benefits
Central conclusion of all 3 papers: catastrophic harm across multiple systems makes the current risk-benefit calculus indefensible.
🔻 Massive injury: heart, brain, immune system, fertility, cancer
Harms include myocarditis, strokes, immunosuppression, infertility & aggressive tumor progression — driven by spike toxicity, LNP biodistribution & genetic contamination.
🔻 Urgent call for a global moratorium
All modRNA products must be withdrawn immediately, given the scale of harm.
With HHS finally beginning its offensive against deadly mRNA injections, one objective remains: IMMEDIATE MARKET WITHDRAWAL.
A MAJOR peer-reviewed study identified FIVE irrefutable grounds for the immediate market withdrawal of COVID-19 “vaccines”:
📢Widespread & Unified Calls for Market Withdrawal – More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 public health & physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 GOP County Committees, and 6 global studies demand immediate removal.
⚰️ Excess Mortality – More than 12 studies and VAERS confirm mass COVID-19 'vaccination' led to a catastrophic number deaths -- up to 17 million.
⚠️ FDA Class I Recall Indicated – 37,544 VAERS-reported deaths exceed past vaccine recall limits by up to 375,340%.
📉 Negative Efficacy – 7 studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 'vaccination' increases your risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
🧬 DNA Contamination – 11 reports have found DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines, documented across multiple manufacturers, vaccine platforms, and geographic regions, with levels exceeding regulatory thresholds by up to 65,500%.
Nic is right. Immediate market withdrawal is needed. It’s completely unethical to have a “vaccine” on the market that is not only ineffective, but MORE dangerous than the disease it is supposed to protect against.
Kennedy effectively canceled future mRNA vaccines by pulling the plug on government funding. The next logical step is to yank the shots. It will come with political backlash, but it’s the right thing to do.
As Dr. Hatfill said, “They [mRNA vaccine technology] had to come off the market. There was no choice. You want to make America healthy again? It had to be stopped.”
@NicHulscher Thanks for reading!
Huge thanks to @NicHulscher for teaming up with me on this piece. No one breaks down the data like he does.
If you’re not already following him, you’re missing one of the very best COVID truth accounts out there.
—> @NicHulscher
@NicHulscher Would you like to see more threads like this one, where I break down the videos and @NicHulscher backs it up with the raw data?
Maybe we could turn it into a semi-regular thing.
A little bit about me: I spent over a decade working as a licensed healthcare professional. But when the Biden administration rolled out its vaccine mandates, I couldn’t stay silent. My conscience simply wouldn’t let me.
That’s when I started this page.
Since then, I’ve shared thousands of clips featuring doctors and scientists who were brave enough to question the official COVID narrative.
Along the way, we’ve reached billions of views and helped millions of people understand the other side of the COVID story that the government didn’t want out.
If you’re looking for clear, honest information without corporate spin, you’re in the right place. Follow me for straight-to-the-point clips and threads that challenge the narrative.
Follow on 𝕏: @VigilantFox
@NicHulscher I was banned 3 times from Twitter 1.0 for sharing dangerous “COVID misinformation.”
Turns out, my reporting was true.
Sign up for my newsletter to see what other “conspiracy theories” come true next.
We took Erin Brockovich's map of every data center in America. Then we laid the nation's aquifers on top of it.
We noticed they're not building data centers where the land is cheap. They're building them where the water is.
Farmers near these facilities say their livestock have stopped falling pregnant. Residents say the humming never stops.
And the projects arrive under NDAs, so most towns don't know until the ground is already broken.
The question isn’t where they’re building anymore. It’s why they’re building where they’re building. Tonight, we think we can answer that question.
We’ve been covering the data center issue in great detail on this broadcast, and for good reason. It’s a serious problem in America and worldwide, and it’s one that is uniting people from all sides of the political aisle because, guess what, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, you have human rights that enable you to have access to basic survival needs like water, which was given to us by God, not by the state or Big Tech, by the way.
Erin Brockovich joined the data center fight recently. She launched a site including a map that shows data centers either completed, under construction, planned, or community reported, likely due to all those pesky NDAs in place stopping us from knowing they’re coming to our area. But the public isn’t stupid.
So Maria thought she’d do something a little bit different. She created a series of maps using Erin Brockovich’s data center data, then superimposed aquifer maps onto those maps, then superimposed smart city locations onto those maps. What Maria found was pretty mind-blowing and, she says, lends credence to her theory that those in charge are purposely making rural areas unlivable for the purpose of pushing people into smart cities, where they will be under constant surveillance and on a short leash.
The main reason for this continued investigation is because data centers are destroying rural communities by siphoning natural resources, contaminating and consuming water for surrounding communities, driving up power costs, creating noise and light pollution, destroying habitats, wildlife, animal health, human health, and impacting fertility, as discussed in one of the show’s recent reports.
The list goes on. For many, it’s making it impossible to continue living in the rural communities they fled to during COVID because they could see the playbook coming down the pipeline. But if you live in the city, these developments are going to impact you too, possibly in ways you can’t even begin to imagine yet.
Maria’s theory, what she calls a common-sense one, is that there is a direct correlation between data centers and the AI control grid. Furthermore, she believes there is a direct correlation between data centers and smart cities.
Before presenting the evidence, we want to walk you through key information on Erin Brockovich’s website, BrockovichDataCenter.com.
The key concerns include energy consumption, water usage, e-waste, location risks, scalability and efficiency, and noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests the noise itself may be impacting fertility, with farmers near data centers reporting that their livestock are no longer falling pregnant or giving birth.
The website also highlights:
• 15+ moratoria and pauses passed at the local, county, or state level.
• 66% voter approval for Port Washington’s nation-first referendum.
• 4 council members ousted in Festus, Missouri, after a data center vote.
• 19% of community submissions mentioning NDAs, secret deals, meetings, or no public voice.
• 25+ projects canceled due to local opposition in 2025 alone.
• 69 active moratoriums across U.S. jurisdictions as of April 2026.
•$156 billion in investment stalled by community opposition since 2025.
This is where things start to look overwhelming.
According to the data center map, there are currently 33 operational data centers, 67 under construction, and 39 proposed.
A Fox News guest just said out loud what the “conspiracy theorists” have been screaming into the shadowbanned void for years:
The AI Big Tech and Big Government have is distinctly separate from the AI the public gets access to, because the AI they have is a weapons system that will be used against us.
Take a listen. (See clip below)
The only question that remains now is, if it’s being admitted on Fox News at this point, is it already too late to protect ourselves against it? For many people, it is. But not for those listening to this broadcast.
You see, we consider that we have a fairly sound understanding of where this is all heading, we’ve been reporting on it for years. You are talking about not just a social credit system, but something far more sinister, far more pervasive, the type of system that will deny you access to basic needs like food, power, even water, based on your behavior.
And you need not take our word for it; there are countless speeches at the World Economic Forum telling you they will do just that.
So what can we do about it? One of the key things is to cut off the machines food source at its knees. Your data is what the beast needs to grow.
Every single person can take action to end the incessant spying on every inch of their lives today, and they can learn how for free.
Glenn and Eric Meder join us today to discuss. 🧵
You've driven past one this week and probably never noticed it. 100,000 Flock cameras now line America's roads — and thousands more go up every month.
They don’t just film traffic. They read faces. They carry microphones. Once the system knows who you are, everything it captures gets attached to your profile — where you went, when, how often.
“It’s like the Truman show, but if it was 1984,” Eric said.
Want proof? Go to deflock.me and pull up your own city. The map is stunning.
What makes this even more concerning is that people have hacked these cameras on video. So it’s not just the government watching you. It’s potentially anyone.
You’re being spied on constantly. And the home tech is the biggest spy of them all.
Your Alexa, your smart TV, your phone — every one is a microphone you paid for. The WEF was publishing articles back in 2017 about how a single camera lets a computer understand you “on a very deep level.”
Smart city plans in Australia include “street furniture” that monitors public sentiment — AI reading your mood, 24/7. Feel the wrong way in the wrong place, and you get flagged.
Flagged by whom, for what? That’s where it gets dark.
Modern medicine is addicted to the biochemical model of disease because it creates a pipeline for expensive, patentable drugs, and it often leaves patients and their families in the dark, rather than empowered and in control.
It’s not about finding root causes. It’s about finding something you can bill for.
That’s why the industry has spent decades treating Alzheimer’s like a “chemical imbalance” in the brain caused by amyloid plaques—even though hundreds of trials targeting amyloid have failed.
The more the theory collapsed, the harder the system doubled down. Just like cholesterol and heart disease, the medical machine kept pushing the failed model long after it broke.
Tucker Carlson admitted he used to make fun of people who believe vaccines cause autism.
He now describes his behavior as “unthinking, stupid, and reactionary.”
Tucker says people are noticing what Robert De Niro noticed about vaccines before he suddenly abandoned the issue: “There’s something there that people aren’t addressing” with vaccines and autism.
De Niro declared this on “The Today Show” back in 2016. Let the clip roll, and you’ll see it.
Fast forward to today, and it’s hard to believe De Niro actually said what he did on mainstream television.
What’s even harder to believe is just how most of the vaccines used today got approved in the first place.
“Placebo” doesn’t mean what most people think it means when it comes to vaccines.
Once you understand what a vaccine “placebo” is, the way evidence gets buried starts making a lot more sense. 🧵
Something strange happens when people first start looking seriously at vaccine safety data.
They do the research. They find the studies. They bring the evidence carefully into a conversation that feels safe and possible.
But nothing moves.
The other person doesn’t adjust. Doesn’t even get curious. They just double down harder.
Nothing about it feels like a normal disagreement. It feels like something else entirely.
Because it is.
And there’s actually a specific reason for that. A reason that goes much deeper than tribalism.
The reason vaccine orthodoxy functions differently from almost every other medical debate isn’t random.
It’s structural. It was designed and built this way.
To understand why the evidence lands differently here—why the same standards of proof that apply literally everywhere else somehow don’t apply to vaccines—you have to understand what vaccines actually represent in Western medicine.
At the height of COVID, a “crazy” doctor was treating patients with a 99.96% survival rate.
Dr. Zelenko’s protocol was so effective, it sparked a war against HCQ.
They mocked his claims, but they kept coming true. Here’s what he said:
#1 - “Not everyone got the same thing.”
In an interview with Mel K, Dr. Zelenko said, “Some of the lots were 5,000% more lethal than others — or think of it as 50x. So, let’s say one vial killed one person. Another vial killed 50 people.”
“If everyone would have gotten the same thing, it would be a clear correlation that you’re being poisoned, and no one would take it,” Dr. Zelenko concluded. Thus, the answer to why some people took the shot and turned out okay is because “not everyone got the same thing.”
Dr. Zelenko’s bold claim was confirmed in March 2023, when a study performed by Schmeling and colleagues found that 4.2% of the batches accounted for a staggering 71% of adverse events.