BREAKING: Another COVID “conspiracy theory” just came true.
A Special HHS Adviser confirmed it, and you could see the pain written all over his face.
This explains why RFK Jr. effectively shut down all mRNA vaccine funding.
🧵 THREAD
HHS Secretary RFK Jr. dropped a mega bombshell on Tuesday when he announced that BARDA will be CANCELING 22 mRNA vaccine development contracts, saving taxpayers about $500 million in the process.
He declared, “mRNA technology poses MORE risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses.”
Now, we have a clearer picture as to why he made that bold statement.
Thursday, on Steve Bannon’s War Room, HHS Special Adviser Dr. Steven Hatfill revealed that RFK Jr. pulled mRNA funding after the data showed getting vaccinated was MORE dangerous than COVID itself.
In other words, the “cure” was WORSE than the disease.
Dr. Hatfill said, “It was more dangerous to take a vaccine than it was to contract COVID-19 and be hospitalized with it.”
He explained that when meta-analyses were conducted, the results would consistently show “NO BENEFIT TO RISK RATIO for taking a messenger RNA vaccine.”
Dr. Hatfill added that the shots send a “sudden flood” of mRNA into the body, which overwhelms the cells and creates “BIOLOGICAL HAVOC.”
With pain written all over his face, he concluded, “IT HAD TO BE STOPPED.”
No one says something that grave unless the data is absolutely damning.
In another series of explosive statements, Dr. Hatfill attested that the vaccine manufacturers never did their due diligence to ensure their shots were safe and “essentially ran the pandemic response.”
“Nobody stood up to them. Nobody questioned them… Pfizer wanted a [75]-year moratorium on the clinical trial data, which from the start showed these never prevented infection or disease transmission,” he explained, adding, “There’s no good clinical data to ever show it reduced the severity of disease.”
“The vaccines have injured hundreds of thousands, and we’re not really sure how many have been killed by it, but a significant amount,” Dr. Hatfill lamented.
“They [mRNA vaccine technology] had to come off the market. There was no choice. You want to make America healthy again? It had to be stopped.”
Dr. Hatfill’s statements are backed up by damning study after study.
In 2022, the same year Dr. Hatfill said the data began piling up, Joseph Fraiman and colleagues published a reanalysis of the Pfizer and Moderna trials, showing that the number of serious post-vaccine adverse events far EXCEEDED the number of hospitalizations prevented.
Pfizer trial:
• Adverse Events of Special Interest: 10.1 extra cases per 10,000 vaccinated compared to placebo.
• Hospitalizations prevented: 2.3 per 10,000.
Moderna trial:
• Adverse Events of Special Interest: 15.1 extra cases per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo.
In fact, Fraiman and colleagues published another study showing that in order to prevent one COVID‑19 hospitalization over a 6‑month period among young adults (18-29), over 30,000 of them would need to receive a third (booster) mRNA dose.
For each hospitalization prevented, the analysis estimated that at least 18.5 serious adverse events would occur.
I turned to epidemiologist @NicHulscher, who lives and breathes this research.
He’s been digging into the data non-stop and basically knows the numbers by heart.
I’ll let him break down the receipts that back up Dr. Hatfill’s claims:
Senior HHS Advisor Dr. Steven Hatfill just said mRNA shots induce “BIOCHEMICAL HAVOC.”
He’s likely referring to the new study that found mRNA shots induce severe, long-lasting genetic disruption linked to cancer and chronic disease.
Using high-resolution RNA sequencing on blood samples, they discovered that COVID-19 “vaccines” SEVERELY disrupt expression of THOUSANDS of genes—triggering mitochondrial failure, immune reprogramming, and oncogenic activation that can persist for MONTHS to YEARS post-injection.
Dr. Hatfill said the data had accumulated to the point where large studies could be conducted. He’s right. The two LARGEST COVID-19 “vaccine” safety studies in HISTORY—covering 184 MILLION people—prove mRNA shots are NOT SAFE for human use.
Dr. Hatfill said, “It was more dangerous to take a vaccine than it was to contract COVID-19 and be hospitalized with it.”
Nearly 1,000 peer-reviewed references across 3 landmark studies (1, 2, 3) by Mead et al. PROVE the catastrophic risks of the COVID-19 “vaccines” FAR outweigh their imaginary, theoretical benefits:
🔻 The shots didn’t save lives — they caused catastrophic harm
Autopsy evidence, reanalyzed trial data & real-world outcomes show no mortality benefit. Early treatment saved lives — not rushed genetic injections.
🔻 The risks far outweigh any theoretical benefits
Central conclusion of all 3 papers: catastrophic harm across multiple systems makes the current risk-benefit calculus indefensible.
🔻 Massive injury: heart, brain, immune system, fertility, cancer
Harms include myocarditis, strokes, immunosuppression, infertility & aggressive tumor progression — driven by spike toxicity, LNP biodistribution & genetic contamination.
🔻 Urgent call for a global moratorium
All modRNA products must be withdrawn immediately, given the scale of harm.
With HHS finally beginning its offensive against deadly mRNA injections, one objective remains: IMMEDIATE MARKET WITHDRAWAL.
A MAJOR peer-reviewed study identified FIVE irrefutable grounds for the immediate market withdrawal of COVID-19 “vaccines”:
📢Widespread & Unified Calls for Market Withdrawal – More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 public health & physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 GOP County Committees, and 6 global studies demand immediate removal.
⚰️ Excess Mortality – More than 12 studies and VAERS confirm mass COVID-19 'vaccination' led to a catastrophic number deaths -- up to 17 million.
⚠️ FDA Class I Recall Indicated – 37,544 VAERS-reported deaths exceed past vaccine recall limits by up to 375,340%.
📉 Negative Efficacy – 7 studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 'vaccination' increases your risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
🧬 DNA Contamination – 11 reports have found DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines, documented across multiple manufacturers, vaccine platforms, and geographic regions, with levels exceeding regulatory thresholds by up to 65,500%.
Nic is right. Immediate market withdrawal is needed. It’s completely unethical to have a “vaccine” on the market that is not only ineffective, but MORE dangerous than the disease it is supposed to protect against.
Kennedy effectively canceled future mRNA vaccines by pulling the plug on government funding. The next logical step is to yank the shots. It will come with political backlash, but it’s the right thing to do.
As Dr. Hatfill said, “They [mRNA vaccine technology] had to come off the market. There was no choice. You want to make America healthy again? It had to be stopped.”
@NicHulscher Thanks for reading!
Huge thanks to @NicHulscher for teaming up with me on this piece. No one breaks down the data like he does.
If you’re not already following him, you’re missing one of the very best COVID truth accounts out there.
—> @NicHulscher
@NicHulscher Would you like to see more threads like this one, where I break down the videos and @NicHulscher backs it up with the raw data?
Maybe we could turn it into a semi-regular thing.
A little bit about me: I spent over a decade working as a licensed healthcare professional. But when the Biden administration rolled out its vaccine mandates, I couldn’t stay silent. My conscience simply wouldn’t let me.
That’s when I started this page.
Since then, I’ve shared thousands of clips featuring doctors and scientists who were brave enough to question the official COVID narrative.
Along the way, we’ve reached billions of views and helped millions of people understand the other side of the COVID story that the government didn’t want out.
If you’re looking for clear, honest information without corporate spin, you’re in the right place. Follow me for straight-to-the-point clips and threads that challenge the narrative.
Follow on 𝕏: @VigilantFox
@NicHulscher I was banned 3 times from Twitter 1.0 for sharing dangerous “COVID misinformation.”
Turns out, my reporting was true.
Sign up for my newsletter to see what other “conspiracy theories” come true next.
A New York Times reporter did the unthinkable and exposed the “worst test in medicine” — the one that five decades of evidence says doesn’t work.
The research is damning: continuous fetal monitoring raises C-sections by 66% and instrumental deliveries by 16%, with no drop in infant deaths or disability.
It flags a problem that usually isn’t one, and doctors rush to cut the baby out.
It’s not just a false flag problem; it’s a money incentive. Sarah Kliff says the quiet part out loud:
“Nobody gets sued for doing the C-section. You only get sued for not doing the C-section.”
Doctors are so terrified of legal consequences that they’ll push unnecessary surgery on their patients, not for the baby’s health, but to protect their pocketbooks.
That’s how the cascade starts. In a hospital delivery, one intervention triggers the next. It’s like an avalanche that can’t be stopped.
Next thing you know, you’re recovering for weeks from a major surgery you never needed.
If someone you love is about to have their first baby, share this before they ever set foot in a labor and delivery unit.
@MidwesternDoc investigated what hospitals don’t tell you about birth outcomes, and it only gets worse from here. 🧵
For most of human history, childbirth happened at home, guided by a midwife who had already done this hundreds of times.
Today it’s one of the most heavily monitored, medicated, and surgical events in modern medicine.
Something clearly changed, and it’s not women’s bodies. They’re just as capable today as they were thousands of years ago.
But today, most parents walk into a delivery room having no idea what may happen next—or why.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hidden-d…
At 17, Amy Tippins was dying of liver failure. A transplant saved her life.
After the surgery, she noticed “some of my traits had changed.”
Amy suddenly found herself drawn to hands-on home projects she’d never cared about.
“What gives?” she thought. So she tracked down the obituary of the stranger whose liver she’d received and discovered something staggering:
“Not long after surgery, some things about myself and some of my traits had changed… I really started to love projects like replacing flooring on my own. I never saw flooring being put in. I never saw anything like that being done.”
“I knew he was 47 and that he had been killed in a car wreck in Columbus, Georgia. So I went to the library and I started looking up obituaries for that time. And I backed into his obituary.”
“What I discovered is he was a police officer. He was 47, and his name was Mike. His sister told me that he did a lot of his own home renovation. He also liked to work with his hands. He liked to do projects.”
“When I found out who my donor was, it made a lot more sense on why some things about myself and some of my traits had changed after transplant.”
Is a donated organ just an organ? Or can it actually change who you are?
Conventional medicine laughs at the idea. But is it really so crazy?
Let’s take a look at the evidence. 🧵
When organ transplantation became possible, doctors called it a miracle. And it is. Giving someone a second life through another person’s death is incredible.
But the full story isn’t quite so simple.
Oftentimes, something else seems to come with the organ. Something nobody signed up for.
The standard model is pretty straightforward. Your heart is a pump. Your kidney is a filter. Personality and memory live in the brain, and nowhere else.
Swap a failing organ for a healthy one and you’ve simply updated the plumbing, not the person.
But that’s been nothing more than an assumption.
For decades, a significant number of cases has been building up that say otherwise.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
Before the hepatitis B vaccine was mandated for kids to attend school in almost all 50 states, the risk of a baby dying from hepatitis B was 1 in 7 million.
“That means you need to give 7 MILLION hepatitis B vaccines to prevent ONE death,” RFK Jr. says.
When you give 7 million vaccines to save one life, you’d better make damn sure it’s safe.
But is it really? Let’s take a look at the evidence. 🧵
Every newborn in America is pushed toward a Hepatitis B vaccine within hours of being born.
And that sounds completely normal to most people because the policy has been normalized for decades.
But when you take a close look at Hepatitis B, the risk group, the benefit math, and the forgotten safety record, the birth-dose policy becomes very difficult to defend.
Hepatitis B is a real disease.
Chronic infection can damage the liver, lead to liver failure, and increase the risk of liver cancer later in life.
That part is not the dispute.
The dispute is whether every newborn, including babies born to mothers who test negative for Hepatitis B, should receive the vaccine on their very first day of life.
You may have missed this news recently - the health insurance system in America is so broken, that the Trump administration is quietly rewriting the Affordable Care Act and buried deep in a monstrous 1,000+ page document is a ploy to let health insurance companies start lending money to patients to pay for their medical care.
That's right: if you get hit with a devastating diagnosis or an unexpected emergency, your "insurance" company won't just pay the bill... they'll offer you a loan instead. So you can go deeper into debt to the very same industry that's already failing you.
Let me say that again. You pay health insurance so that you'll be insured in a time of a health crisis. Already, health insurers are denying nearly 20% of claims and out of pocket expenses keep rising. So instead of them paying your bill, which is what you pay the insurance for, they'll now be incentivized to deny even more bills or raise out of pocket expenses in order to cash in on the interest they'll be collecting.
A third of American households are already drowning in medical debt — and now insurers get to pile on even more, with interest. While these companies rake in billions in profits, everyday people will be trapped paying back loans for the care they thought was "covered." This isn't fixing healthcare.
This is turning your health insurer into your loan shark — and making an already predatory, dysfunctional system even more financially crushing for ordinary Americans. Classic "you get sick, you go broke" American healthcare — now with extra debt servitude.
On the plus side, there is a company that is providing a solution to this problem. CrowdHealth, a member focused health care company is saving Americans tens of thousands of dollars, and in May of this year 100% of medical bills were funded.
No loans needed. No exorbitant premiums. No crazy out of pocket expenses. A model that is actually working, is not throwing Americans into bankruptcy because of an unexpected health event, is saving people money, and getting them the health care they need.
Andy Schoonover from CrowdHealth joins us now to discuss.
A billionaire recently mused that the ultra-wealthy get the top doctors, the best lawyers, the elite tutors, and wondered aloud what it would take to give every American that kind of access. Andy’s answer is that it already exists, just not the way Reid Hoffman imagines it.
Inside CrowdHealth, your income doesn’t decide your doctor. “Whether you’re making $30,000 a year or $3 million a year, you have access to the same doctors.” Members up and down the economic ladder have walked into Mayo, MD Anderson, Stanford, Cleveland Clinic.
The real threat to that access isn’t money. It’s bureaucracy. As government plans expand, the best doctors are quietly heading for the exits. Mayo Clinic recently dropped a slate of Medicare Advantage plans rather than swallow the government’s reimbursement rates. Andy’s read on the pattern is blunt: “Free markets tend to exit stage left and the government bureaucracy enters as the main character.”
His prediction is that within a decade the top doctors stop taking insurance entirely. CrowdHealth’s bet is that members who already pay doctors directly are built for exactly that world.
But cash-pay only matters if the money actually arrives when you’re the one in the hospital bed. So how does a crowd of strangers guarantee your bill gets paid?
Health insurance in America is broken.
Over 200,000 Americans go bankrupt because of medical bills every year—and many of them already had insurance. On average, 20% of claims are denied, leaving families stuck paying massive out-of-pocket costs after spending thousands on premiums.
But there’s an alternative.
CrowdHealth is a community-powered model that has helped members fund over 40,000 medical bills at a fraction of the cost of traditional insurance.
So far, 30,000+ members have been helped, saving an estimated $73 million in medical costs.
CrowdHealth isn’t insurance. It’s a way to step outside the broken system and take control of your healthcare.
Get started today for $99 per member per month for the first three months.