Tucker Carlson admitted he used to make fun of people who believe vaccines cause autism.

He now describes his behavior as “unthinking, stupid, and reactionary.”

Tucker says people are noticing what Robert De Niro noticed about vaccines before he suddenly abandoned the issue: “There’s something there that people aren’t addressing” with vaccines and autism.

De Niro declared this on “The Today Show” back in 2016. Let the clip roll, and you’ll see it.

Fast forward to today, and it’s hard to believe De Niro actually said what he did on mainstream television.

What’s even harder to believe is just how most of the vaccines used today got approved in the first place.

“Placebo” doesn’t mean what most people think it means when it comes to vaccines.

Once you understand what a vaccine “placebo” is, the way evidence gets buried starts making a lot more sense. 🧵 Something strange happens when people first start looking seriously at vaccine safety data.

They do the research. They find the studies. They bring the evidence carefully into a conversation that feels safe and possible.

But nothing moves.

The other person doesn’t adjust. Doesn’t even get curious. They just double down harder.

Nothing about it feels like a normal disagreement. It feels like something else entirely.

Because it is.

And there’s actually a specific reason for that. A reason that goes much deeper than tribalism.

At the height of COVID, a “crazy” doctor was treating patients with a 99.96% survival rate.

Dr. Zelenko’s protocol was so effective, it sparked a war against HCQ.

They mocked his claims, but they kept coming true. Here’s what he said:

#1 - “Not everyone got the same thing.” In an interview with Mel K, Dr. Zelenko said, “Some of the lots were 5,000% more lethal than others — or think of it as 50x. So, let’s say one vial killed one person. Another vial killed 50 people.”

“If everyone would have gotten the same thing, it would be a clear correlation that you’re being poisoned, and no one would take it,” Dr. Zelenko concluded. Thus, the answer to why some people took the shot and turned out okay is because “not everyone got the same thing.”

In 2015, Scott Adams made a “crazy” prediction that most people thought was impossible.

He said Trump had a 98% chance of becoming president, and he made that call on a single observation.

The winning attribute that made Scott confident in Trump’s victory was his one-of-a-kind persuasion skills.

While political betting markets dismissed Trump’s chances, Adams argued—using his background in persuasion and hypnosis—that Trump was the most psychologically effective candidate in the race and therefore favored to win. He built a massive following by showing how persuasion, not policy, drives political outcomes.

That insight proved correct. But it also revealed something darker. 🧵 After Trump’s victory, Adams pivoted to punditry—and during COVID, even he struggled to see the truth.

Scott strongly endorsed the vaccines, vaccinated himself, and publicly belittled followers who refused. Many later derisively called him “Clot Adams.”

In January 2023, Adams admitted—on video—that he’d been wrong and that the anti-vaxxers were correct. But he framed it as luck: the right people just happened to distrust the government, while “all the data” supposedly pointed intelligent analysts toward vaccination.

That framing matters. It reveals how even skilled observers of persuasion can mistake marketing consensus for truth—and how the same system that manufactures medical certainty also hides the limits of medicine, until reality forces a reckoning.

This 45-second clip with Dr. Peter Hotez is difficult to watch.

A mom from Texas desperately asks him why she keeps getting “really bad” COVID.

She got three COVID shots, took multiple rounds of Paxlovid, but she keeps “getting COVID often.”

Dr. Hotez tells the woman that her repeated COVID infections are basically her fault for skipping boosters.

WOMAN: “I’m getting COVID often. I took Paxlovid the third time, and then a few weeks later I got it again. COVID was really bad on me.”

HOTEZ: “After you had your first two immunizations way back in 2021, did you get boosters regularly?”

WOMAN: “I got one booster, and then after that I stopped getting them.”

HOTEZ: “Yeah. So that’s the reason why you keep up with the boosters.”

The saddest part about this interaction is that the woman was so convinced by Hotez that getting COVID was her fault that she was eager to get another booster shot after the show.

This is an extreme case of medical gaslighting that is easy to spot.

But what about when it’s not?

What about the times you did everything your doctor recommended—only to find yourself worse off than when you started? 🧵 Something seismic has happened to public health in America—and most people haven’t fully processed its scale.

A 2025 JAMA study surveying pregnant mothers and parents of young children found that only 37% fully trusted the CDC vaccine schedule and planned to follow it completely.

Five years ago, a number that low would have been unimaginable.

So what’s causing the drop? And what does it mean?

In the 1930s to the early 60s, Americans were convinced smoking was healthy.

Doctors proudly appeared in cigarette ads. “More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette.”

The public was given a clear message: If physicians smoked themselves, how dangerous could it possibly be?

At its peak, more than 42% of American adults smoked, with rates among men climbing as high as 57%.

Business was booming. But behind the scenes, tobacco companies already knew smoking was linked to deadly disease.

Internal research pointed to the dangers early, yet the industry spent years funding doubt, attacking critics, and delaying public awareness long enough to keep the machine running.

Then came January 11, 1964.

The U.S. Surgeon General released the report that changed everything: smoking causes lung cancer and other deadly illnesses.

Almost overnight, one of the most trusted health narratives in America began to collapse.

And it wasn’t the only one.

In the 1940s and 1950s, lobotomies were celebrated as a revolutionary treatment for mental illness. Walter Freeman traveled the country performing thousands of “ice-pick” procedures, sometimes in minutes, sometimes on children.

The technique even earned a Nobel Prize.

Years later, it was widely condemned as barbaric, after leaving countless patients permanently damaged.

Today, we look back at both eras with disbelief and wonder how entire generations came to trust ideas that later proved so catastrophically wrong.

But the more uncomfortable question is harder to escape:

How many medical “certainties” we trust today will future generations one day look back on the same way? 🧵 We hold thousands of assumptions we never question.

Most of them are fine. The dangerous ones are the unquestioned assumptions that aren’t.

This is about what it actually looks like to prioritize truth over being right.

Including when that means publicly correcting something you’ve believed for decades.

Let’s start with a story.

For decades, a widely repeated narrative has appeared in critiques of Western medicine:

That 19th century surgeon James Marion Sims performed experimental gynecological surgeries on enslaved black women without anesthesia—using them as test subjects before performing the same procedures on white women, with anesthesia.

It felt obviously, viscerally wrong. Most people never questioned it.

They just react to it.

REPORT: Across America, farmers are reporting scenes straight out of a nightmare, mysterious boxes of ticks appearing on rural properties while infestations explode at levels many say they’ve never witnessed before.

Now those reports are colliding with documented Bill Gates-funded research into genetically modified ticks, growing fears over Alpha-Gal Syndrome, and scientific papers openly arguing it could be “morally good” to spread meat allergies through engineered tick populations.

Social media is flooding with horrifying footage of animals overwhelmed by massive tick swarms while officials wave the crisis away as “climate change.” Meanwhile, more than 450,000 Americans are already suffering from Alpha-Gal Syndrome after tick bites, a condition with no cure that can trigger severe allergic reactions to red meat.

Even more alarming, Russian biologists are now warning about so-called “mutant ticks” reportedly resistant to conventional methods and behaving far more aggressively toward humans and animals.

So why is nobody in authority seriously investigating the reports, the research, or where these infestations may really be coming from?

@zeeemedia's new report uncovers the disturbing connections raising alarm bells across rural America. There are two financial systems—one for the connected, and one for everyone else.

While most people struggle to grow their savings, the wealthy have been quietly multiplying theirs through crypto.

Now, that advantage can be yours.

DailyPulseCrypto.com 👈

Animus AI, available through BlockTrust IRA, analyzes market data and executes trades with precision most investors simply can’t match. Since 2022, it has outperformed Bitcoin by 250%.

In 2025 alone, it helped create over 80,000 new millionaires.

Right now, you can get $2,500 in bonus crypto when you open a qualifying account.

Start here: DailyPulseCrypto.com

David and Brenda McDowell got their triplets vaccinated with the pneumococcal shot, only for all three children to “shut off on the SAME DAY.”

The first child to get jabbed was their daughter Claire, who “never really stopped screaming after that.” Within hours post-vax, Claire “shut completely off.”

By 2 p.m., Claire’s brother Richie “shut off,” too. And his raspberry-blowing and furniture walking suddenly disappeared.

“Robbie looked like he was hit by a bus. Robbie, from that moment on, had a stunned look on his face. If you asked or said his name, he still acted deaf and acted like he couldn’t hear.”

All three were later diagnosed with severe autism. Only one, Robbie, showed partial recovery after years of therapy.

These injuries aren’t random. They happen when multiple core systems in the body fail at the same time.

Vaccine injuries make that breakdown visible, pointing to a root cause of disease almost no one is taught to look for. 🧵 Most chronic diseases aren’t mysterious. They’re misunderstood.

When symptoms don’t fit neatly into a known diagnosis, doctors are taught to rule things out, not step back, ask what systems might be failing, and find out why.

When nothing obvious shows up on a scan or lab test, the explanation often shifts toward stress, anxiety, or something “psychological.”

Vaccine injuries quietly expose this flaw, because they don’t damage one system at a time. They disrupt multiple systems at once, making the real problem impossible to ignore.

And when it happens to infant triplets at the exact same time, it couldn’t be more obvious.

If you thought “Ozempic face” was bad, wait till you hear what it’s doing inside the body.

A massive study involving 16 million people found GLP-1 users had a 9.09 times greater risk of pancreatitis, 4.22 times greater risk of bowel obstruction, and a 3.67 times greater risk of stomach paralysis.

And if you’ve ever had pancreatitis, it is “quite a painful experience.”

What you’re hearing on the news about Ozempic is still too little, too late.

Here’s the story you’re not getting about Ozempic, the business model behind it, and why a growing number of researchers believe another pharmaceutical disaster is already unfolding in real time. 🧵 In early 2023, JP Morgan hosted its annual healthcare conference—a private, invitation-only event it describes as “the industry’s biggest gathering.”

The keynote speakers included the chairman of JPMorgan Chase, the CEO of Eli Lilly, and several managing directors of major healthcare venture capital firms.

The fourth keynote was Dr. Robert Califf.

His day job at the time: Commissioner of Food and Drugs for the United States Food and Drug Administration.

Hmm…

The world’s second most published critical care doctor says they’ve been lying to you about the sun for decades.

Dr. Paul Marik says there’s no reason to fear the sun; you should embrace it.

Because when you get adequate levels of vitamin D, your risk of cancer goes down, depression symptoms alleviate, and your immune system functions far better.

What about sunscreens? Dr. Marik advises against it because “it defeats the purpose.”

“There’s some data that sunscreens increase your risk of melanoma — paradoxically.”

Similar to how Big Pharma doesn’t like the “I drug” (Ivermectin) for treating COVID-19, Dr. Marik explained they also don’t like Vitamin D for general health and well-being.

Why? Because if you are in good health and devoid of chronic disease, there’s less money to be made.

Big Pharma played us. They propagandized the masses into fearing an essential component of human life.

Here’s what they don’t want you to know about the sun vs. artificial light—and what happens when your body is cut off from natural light. 🧵 The further north humans migrated away from the equator—and away from the sun—the lighter their skin became.

That’s not cosmetic. It’s a survival adaptation.

The human body, recognizing it wasn’t capturing enough light, made itself more transparent to capture whatever remained.

We evolved to need light the way we need food.

But in our modern lives, we commute in sealed cars, work 8 hour shifts under fluorescent lights, and go home to screens in the comfort of our artificially lit homes.

And we wonder why we’re sick.

This teacher-turned-cognitive scientist shared a disturbing reality that left the room stunned.

“Our kids are LESS cognitively capable than we were at their age.”

Every previous generation outperformed its parents since we began recording in the late 1800s.

So, what happened?

Screens.

Dr. Jared Horvath explained:

“Gen Z is the first generation in modern history to underperform us on basically every cognitive measure we have, from basic attention to memory, to literacy, to numeracy, to executive functioning, to EVEN GENERAL IQ, even though they go to more school than we did.”

“So why? … The answer appears to be the tools we are using within schools to drive that learning (screens).”

“If you look at the data, once countries adopt digital technology widely in schools, performance goes down significantly, to the point where kids who use computers about five hours per day in school for learning purposes will score over two-thirds of a standard deviation LESS than kids who rarely or never touch tech at school. And that’s across 80 countries.”

But screens aren’t just decimating learning and making new generations less intelligent than the ones before them.

They’re doing something far worse. And when you take a closer look, it isn’t pretty. This isn’t a glitch.

Engagement-driven algorithms don’t understand meaning, context, or childhood development. They only understand clicks and watch time driven by dopamine spikes.

So when AI is tasked with churning out videos at scale, it doesn’t filter for innocence—it optimizes for stimulation.

Cartoon imagery masking adult themes, fear cues, violence, and psychological distress is being served to toddlers. Bright colors on the surface. Something very, very wrong underneath.

This content has zero educational or developmental value. No story. No moral arc. No learning. Just rapid-fire novelty engineered to hold attention at all costs—even if that cost is literally the viewer’s brain and nervous system development.

Dopamine-optimized media and AI-generated slop are conditioning our children for addiction, emotional dysregulation, and long-term neurological harm.

We have to stop this before it starts—and before Big Pharma steps in with the “solution.”

RFK Jr. told Tucker Carlson the CDC buried its own internal study showing a 1135% INCREASE in autism risk from hepatitis B vaccination.

The researchers were shocked.

So they covered it up.

How?

“They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who are TOO YOUNG TO BE DIAGNOSED [with autism],” Kennedy explained.

Imagine discovering evidence of catastrophic harm and making sure no one ever found out.

Then, telling everyone it’s “safe.”

If health authorities are willing to keep a signal this alarming hidden from you, what else are they not telling you about vaccines?

Is it possible that your child’s allergies or chronic immune issues didn’t appear organically, but were triggered by vaccination instead? 🧵 The vaccine-autism fight is usually framed as one bad paper versus settled science.

Hands down. No questions.

That framing is emotionally powerful and far too small.

The question is not whether a single case series proved causation. It’s whether modern medicine has built a system that can even detect rare, subgroup-specific neurological injury.

And if it can detect it, is the system even capable of admitting it?

RED ALERT: Former COVID Task Force coordinator Deborah Birx is now calling for “widely available” PCR testing for Hantavirus, including in schools, and many people are noticing the exact same pandemic playbook that preceded the chaos of 2020.

The real red flag is not the virus itself. It’s watching the same fear infrastructure suddenly reactivate in real time—PCR testing, asymptomatic spread warnings, quarantine language, hazmat imagery, and nonstop media coverage telling the public not to panic.

Birx openly argued that viruses should be tracked through PCR testing instead of symptoms, the same testing system that used to inflate COVID case counts and justify lockdowns across the world.

At the exact same time, Fox News is now airing “deadly outbreak” coverage featuring quarantine centers, hazmat suits, and warnings about possible spread, while officials simultaneously insist there is “nothing to worry about.”

@Fynnderella1 pushed back directly, stating: “You can’t spread Hantavirus asymptomatically. Period.”

So why does this suddenly feel so familiar again?

Watch @zeeemedia's report before this escalates any further. Health insurance in America is broken. But it doesn't have to be that way.

Over 200,000 Americans go bankrupt because of medical bills every year—and many of them already had insurance. On average, 20% of claims are denied, leaving families stuck paying massive out-of-pocket costs after spending thousands on premiums.

Now, there’s an alternative.

joincrowdhealth.com/pulse 👈

CrowdHealth is a community-powered model helping members fund nearly 100% of their medical bills at a fraction of the cost.

More than 28,000 members have been helped so far, with a 99.9% funding success rate and over $56 million in medical bills saved.

CrowdHealth isn’t insurance. It’s a way to step outside the broken system and take control of your healthcare.

Get started today for $99 per member per month for the first three months.

Go to joincrowdhealth.com/pulse and use code PULSE.

In 1982, an NBC affiliate station in Washington, D.C., produced a documentary called “DPT: Vaccine Roulette.”

It got such a huge reaction, the station re-aired it twice. The big NBC promoted it. It even won an Emmy.

All because it asked one vital question: Is the DPT vaccine more dangerous than the disease itself?

44 years later, a film like this would never win an Emmy, never be funded by mainstream television, nor receive positive media coverage. You can’t even watch the film on YouTube anymore.

The question we have to ask is: why?

Did the evidence change… or something else? 🧵 There was a time when vaccine injury wasn’t treated as a forbidden topic.

It was treated as news.

NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox, CNBC, local stations, talk shows, and even European broadcasters aired lengthy segments about paralyzed children, neurological injury, conflicts of interest, hot lots, mandates, regulatory failure, and more.

Most people forgot about it or don’t even know that used to be the norm.

Today, a single skeptical segment about vaccine safety can be framed as reckless and even deadly misinformation.

But for decades, mainstream TV interviewed injured families, challenged officials, and aired data the agencies did not want discussed.

The same question gets asked every time another massive AI data center is announced: what exactly are they building this for?

Most people are just using AI to search the internet faster, summarize emails, or generate memes. Yet governments and corporations are racing to build infrastructure that consumes staggering amounts of land, energy, water, and computing power, as if the future depends on it.

The official explanation doesn’t seem proportional to the scale of what’s being built. And once you watch @zeeemedia connect the dots on Digital Twins, it all starts to make sense… 🧵 People already know they’re being tracked.

Your searches, your location, your purchases, your viewing habits, even the amount of time you stop on a video, all of it is constantly being collected. But @zeeemedia's new report highlights something much bigger than ordinary surveillance: the creation of a digital version of society itself.

The report points to the Department of Energy’s new “Genesis Mission,” designed to accelerate the AI computing revolution. Maria immediately noted the symbolism. Genesis is the story of creation, and critics believe these systems are moving toward recreating human behavior inside centralized AI networks.

Digital Twins are publicly marketed as tools for engineering, infrastructure, and disaster prevention. The concern begins when the technology shifts from modeling bridges and cities to modeling people themselves, including their habits, routines, movements, preferences, and decisions.

Maria described futurists openly discussing a world where physical interaction becomes less necessary, where you “hug” family members through holograms while embedded technology simulates touch itself.

Once behavior, movement, emotion, and interaction are being mapped in real time, the technology stops feeling like a simple convenience tool.

Maria tied Digital Twins directly into the wider infrastructure already being built around smart cities, CBDCs, AI surveillance, climate systems, and digital ID.

Once you understand that, the scale of the global data center explosion starts making a lot more sense.

Over 40 million Americans take statins, not realizing they’re depleting the “most vital nutrient for the heart.”

Statins are pushed to reduce cholesterol, but they also severely deplete CoQ10, a critical compound for energy.

And when the body is starved of CoQ10, your cells begin struggling to produce energy. Muscles weaken. Fatigue sets in. And the heart itself can start losing the fuel it depends on to keep beating efficiently.

Dr. Stephen Sinatra was a “choir boy for cholesterol” until a 1993 study exposed the unsettling CoQ10-depleting effects of statins.

“Didn’t make any sense,” he said.

“How could the most vital nutrient for the heart be knocked out of the box? The heart requires COQ10 for survival.”

In his own practice, Dr. Sinatra began to notice that he “wasn’t seeing a correlation of heart problems with higher cholesterol.”

He eventually concluded everything he thought he knew about cholesterol was a “myth.”

“Cholesterol is not the villain of heart health” we’ve been told. 🧵 The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-they-do…

This 75-year-old man, who’s been blind since birth, suddenly regained his eyesight after using DMSO to treat sinusitis.

It cleared his sinuses “instantly,” Murray says, but what it did to his sight was “unbelievable.”

For the first time in his life, he was finally able to see color in his left eye.

And when he kept using DMSO, his vision kept improving: He could make out details and even count fingers, something he “could never do before.”

It might sound like a coincidence, but DMSO has been repeatedly shown to heal eye issues medicine still can’t solve, like blindness, macular degeneration, floaters and cataracts.

It’s Big Pharma’s worst nightmare. And it’s hiding in plain sight for just $20 a bottle. 🧵 This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full report below:

midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-heals-t…

A registered nurse with 30 years of experience treating chronic pain says she saw “TEN TIMES” the positive effects after mixing DMSO with castor oil to treat her peripheral neuropathy.

Castor oil on its own has anti-inflammatory effects, but adding the DMSO is where she says it “got interesting.”

That’s because DMSO “isn’t just a treatment, it’s a carrier,” Danielle Minetti explained.

“It can pull medications and nutrients right through the skin barrier deep into the body.”

That’s why when Danielle mixed DMSO with castor oil, she saw “ten times” the positive results.

Because DMSO acts as the delivery system, carrying the castor oil deeper into the areas where she needs relief most.

DMSO is a naturally occurring compound that is primarily derived as a byproduct of the wood pulp and paper industry, which makes it widely and affordably available.

But that also creates a problem...

Because if a treatment can’t be patented, Big Pharma can’t profit.

And that simple reality is where the DMSO story takes a dark turn.

So what happened to DMSO, and why is a substance that is so medically promising still relatively unknown to this day?

Let’s take a closer look. 🧵 The real story isn’t whether or not DMSO worked.

The real story is how a low-cost, widely available substance became an early case study in medical distrust.

Regulators suddenly restricted it. Doctors dismissed it.

But patients kept using it.

And once that happened, official medicine no longer controlled the story.

The FDA knew the COVID shots would kill and maim countless Americans.

They kept injecting anyway.

One government employee tried to sound the alarm about “49 examples” of deadly side effects that conventional safety analyses weren’t detecting.

She was shut down.

Her name was Dr. Ana Szarfman.

On March 1, 2021, less than three months after the rollout of the COVID-19 injections, Dr. Ana Szarfman, an employee at CDER and safety data mining developer, warned that the FDA’s existing system could hide vaccine safety signals due to a flaw called “masking.”

She proposed a newer method developed by statistician Dr. William DuMouchel that corrected for this issue and, when applied, detected “49 examples of extreme masking” that the standard system did not.

These “49 examples of extreme masking” include not “minor” but serious adverse events:

• Bell’s palsy

• Cardiac failure

• Acute left ventricular failure

• Agonal rhythm (severe end-of-life arrhythmia)

• Pulmonary infarction

• Cerebral artery occlusion

• Aortic stenosis

• Sudden cardiac death

• Hypertensive emergency

• Basal ganglia stroke

When Dr. Szarfman proposed a new method, she was told to “hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses.”

Later, they “made it clear” that she “needs to focus on her assigned work” and “should not be discussing or providing internal analyses externally.”

As Dr. Szarfman puts it, her work became a “pest” for raising concerns about safety signal masking.

In September 2021, Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA's top vaccine official, decided that Dr. Szarfman’s COVID vaccine data-mining days were over.

He informed Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, the then director of CDER, that Dr. Szarfman “has been asked to cease and desist conducting her data analysis.”

Dr. Marks complained that Dr. Szarfman’s work had become “a major distraction” and that her efforts could “create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric.”

Dr. Szarfman went on to retire from the FDA in 2025 after more than 35 years of service.

She raised concerns about safety signal masking. The FDA essentially told her to shut up.

Because in their eyes, “49 examples of extreme masking” could create “erroneous conflicts” and fuel “vaccine hesitancy.”

Unfortunately, this is not a one-off instance. It’s part of a much deeper problem: the gap between what’s known internally and what’s allowed to reach the public. 🧵 For years, Americans were told the COVID vaccines were “safe and effective.”

Not mostly safe.

Not partially effective.

Not still being studied.

Safe. Effective. Full stop.

The message was absolute, repeated by government officials, doctors, media outlets, hospitals, employers, schools, and nearly every major institution in the country.

But internal records now suggest something very different was being discussed behind the scenes.

The story is no longer just about whether the COVID vaccines caused harm.

That debate has been raging for years.

The bigger question is what federal health agencies knew, when they knew it, and why the public was told a much different story than the one officials were discussing behind closed doors.

Senator Ron Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations obtained thousands of pages of subpoenaed HHS records.

The investigation and subpoenaed records suggest that the CDC and FDA were aware of serious safety signals involving myocarditis and strokes, yet continued pushing the vaccines while downplaying the risks.

That’s the part we can’t ignore.

Republicans are once again teaming up with Democrats to ram Digital ID through at the federal level.

The bill they’ve just introduced is, if you can believe it, worse than all the others before it.

HR 8250, deceptively named the Parents Decide Act, doesn’t just force everyone to link their identity to use apps on their phones, it mandates that they must do it to use ANY operating system. That means Apple, iOS, Windows, Google, Android, even Samsung—basically everything.

And once that’s in place, there’s nowhere to step outside of it.

But one brave group is refusing to go along.

GrapheneOS has made a statement saying: GrapheneOS will remain usable by anyone around the world without requiring personal information, identification, or an account.

@glennmeder from PrivacyAcademy.com/Pulse has been working to educate people on how to escape the digital control grid, including how to put GrapheneOS on your phone—for free. And they have a solution to Digital ID right now.

He joins us to discuss. 🧵 You’ve seen this pattern before.

When the same thing starts appearing everywhere at once, it’s usually not random.

A new push for Digital ID laws isn’t happening in just one place. With bills like the Parents Decide Act (HR 8250), it’s now moving directly into the systems we use every day. It’s happening in a very coordinated way across countries, across platforms, and now, at the operating system level.

This isn’t about regulating a few apps anymore. The focus has moved underneath them—to the operating system itself—the software that runs your phone and computer. @GlennMeder described it plainly, they’re trying to “lock it down on an operating system level,” because that’s the one layer you can’t avoid.

Apps can be swapped. Accounts can be deleted.

But if access to the operating system requires Digital ID, there’s nowhere left to step outside of it.

That’s the inflection point.

Glenn called it “the hill to die on,” not because of how it looks today, but because of what it enables once it’s in place. In his words, this isn’t just verification, it’s the foundation for removing privacy and building a system that monitors “everything we say.”

He warned it would “change instantly,” the kind of shift you only recognize after it’s already locked in.

Access to your phone. Your apps. Your accounts. All tied to one digital identity.

And once that becomes the standard, stepping outside of it stops being an option.

For four years, Ron Johnson has wondered how US health officials could ignore “overwhelming evidence of harm” from the COVID vaccine.

“Now I know,” he says.

The truth is, health officials didn’t “ignore” safety signals. They buried them instead.

And now we have the receipts:

The US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigated what federal health officials knew and when they knew it—and dug out a timeline that would make any American furious.

This is not a fringe “conspiracy theory.” It was revealed by the government’s own investigation—and it’s a story they don’t want you to read.

(Post 1 of 7) According to VAERS, the US’s vaccine adverse event reporting system, more adverse events and deaths have been reported following COVID vaccines than from all other vaccines combined over the system’s 30+ year history.

More dangerous than ivermectin. More dangerous than hydroxychloroquine (which turned out not to be so dangerous after all).

It was 55 times more deadly than the flu vaccine (0.46 deaths vs 25.5 deaths per million doses).

And even more dangerous than Remdesivir, which earned the nickname “Run Death Is Near” after it wreaked havoc on the kidneys and livers of tens of thousands of COVID patients in the hospital.

But still the question remains. How did US health officials miss a safety signal this big?

(Post 2 of 7)

Mikhaila Peterson says she went through “two years of pure hell” when she decided to stop taking SSRIs.

She didn’t need the drugs anymore. Her paleo/keto diet had put her depression into remission.

The first few days off the medication, she felt “on top of the world.”

But once week two hit, her life “turned upside down.”

For years, she blamed her “intolerable symptoms” on what she ate.

Little did she know… she was actually experiencing severe antidepressant withdrawal.

One of the symptoms Mikhaila experienced during her own SSRI withdrawal is the same condition her dad is suffering from right now: akathisia.

Akathisia is an extremely distressing neurological condition that makes you feel an unbearable inner restlessness and agitation.

This condition, she describes as “the worst thing I’ve ever seen anyone go through…”

When Mikhaila experienced it, she described it as being “overwhelmed with a sense of impending doom that was stronger than anything you can naturally feel.”

“It felt like I was falling into a volcano while being chased by a bear,” she said.

@MikhailaFuller’s gut-wrenching anti-depressant story is available to read in full here: prescribed-harm.com/stories/story-…

But as bad as her experience was, her dad is currently going through a form of akathisia that’s even worse. 🧵 Last week, Mikhaila shared an emotional update on her father, Jordan Peterson’s health.

He is dealing with a recurrence of akathisia stemming from an old psych med–induced neurological injury.

Mikhaila explained that this is a flare-up of a neurological injury caused by benzodiazepines, primarily clonazepam, that he took around 2019–2020. He has been completely off all psychiatric medications since January 2020.

The recent symptoms intensified last summer after he was diagnosed with Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (CIRS) from mold exposure. About a month later, he developed pneumonia and sepsis, which further worsened the condition and triggered the akathisia.

“Dad’s been suffering from an old neurological injury that’s more recently been causing akathisia,” Mikhaila said.

“Akathisia is the worst thing I’ve ever seen anyone go through… it’s catastrophic.”

She stresses that this is a neurological injury from past psychiatric medication use, not from any current medications. Her dad has been psych med-free for six years.

But for the past 8–9 months, akathisia has taken over his life without warning or relief, making this an extremely difficult time for the entire family.

x.com/mikhailafuller…