@fraxfinance@0xpibblez 2/ $FRAX supply currently sits at only 20% of DAI's supply. With new developments, FRAX demand could surge 400% before breaking even with DAI.
The value and revenue from this growth, of course, would flow to FXS holders
@fraxfinance@0xpibblez 3/ $FXS holders are currently voting on a $20M revenue-fueled buyback.
With a new TWAMM and FraxSwap, Frax stands to earn even more revenue via a 0.3% trading fee on all swaps.
FraxSwap is a permissionless treasury management tool for DeFi projects to conduct monetary policy
@fraxfinance@0xpibblez 4/ Frax introduced plans for real world asset lending AMOs through its new Fraxlend product, which is set to launch within 7 days.
This will serve as a new, composable primitive that permits both under-collateralized and over-collateralized loans for individuals and protocols
@fraxfinance@0xpibblez 5/ Frax's @curvefinance base pool is up for vote. With Frax providing 1/2 of the 3pool liquidity, a FRAXBP could shake up the state of stableswaps on Curve.
Protocols will gain capital efficiency, and Frax will become a supply sink for CRV
Frax's CVX holdings have proven to be beneficial in the recent Frax/CRV voting rounds
@fraxfinance@0xpibblez@CurveFinance@ConvexFinance 7/ Despite the UST meltdown, FRAX's collateralization ratio still sits at ~90% and the peg proved resilient, even with recent liquidation events across DeFi.
All developments will translate to more revenues for Frax and more fuel to benefit FXS holders @fraxbull1
- 1 for bridge week
- 1 for using the decentralized bridge that attracts the highest volume of $ETH
- 14 for weeks 2-8, 2 Dapps per week
- 1 bonus NFT if you acquire 13/16
@smyyguy 2/ The attack stemmed from a bug that was introduced during the v9.0 upgrade that went live just 10 hours before the halt.
The bug allowed users to withdraw more assets from pools than they owned.
@smyyguy 3/ When a user deposited two assets into a pool, the protocol incorrectly double counted one of the assets.
The bugged calculation caused the protocol to distribute approximately 50% more LP tokens than accurate, overstating the user's ownership of the assets in the pool.
However caused, once in progress, running for the exit is a perfectly rational response.
A "fire sale" of assets is rarely going to cover the remaining liabilities.
@r_sale@terra_money@CelsiusNetwork 2/ @Tether_to is another crypto quasi-bank that is at risk of a run. Assets are less liquid than its liabilities ($USDT is expected to be redeemed on demand).
Assets are also more volatile and riskier than the $1 peg, with interest rate, spread, credit and market risk.
MEV affects anyone who has ever made an on-chain swap. When you sign a transaction, it's sent to a node which puts it in a public pool of transactions called the mempool.
Miners then pick transactions from the mempool to create and verify a block.
1/ One convenient way in TradFi is to compare price earnings (P/E) ratios between alternatives. A low P/E could indicate a value investment opportunity. corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/know…
2/ Fast and volatile growth expectations play havoc with such comparisons. A low P/E might simply indicate lower growth prospects.
The Solana network has experienced two major outages over the past 9 months.
In this thread we take a look at the solutions set to be introduced.
🧵 (1/6)
2/ The transition to Google’s QUIC from Solana’s custom raw UPD-based protocol will allow for faster communications between RPC nodes and leader nodes.
3/ Stake-weighted QoS will end the practice of indiscriminately accepting transactions on a first-come-first-serve basis, without regard for source. This will allow nodes to transmit transactions to the leader node on a pro-rata stake basis, without the risk of being washed out.