Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #35A
Most recents (4)
Yesterday, after the breach of security of PM, in Punjab; Home Minister Amit Shah, posted these 2 tweets on the incident.
Soon, many of Modi ji's supporters demanded for, his sacking..Reason was that he asked for an apology from Congress leadership..This demand has been+
1/10
Soon, many of Modi ji's supporters demanded for, his sacking..Reason was that he asked for an apology from Congress leadership..This demand has been+
1/10
+considered as a sign of his weakness as a Home Minister..All those who have demanded his sacking, have overlooked the fact that, Amit Shah isnt only the Home Minister of the country but, at the same time he is a career politician..Many, have overlooked this👇 tweet of his.
2/10
2/10
As the Home Minister of the Country, he has made a categorical statement that accountability will be fixed..
It seems many of the Modiji's supporters' have overlooked this tweet..
Please don't expect Home Minister of country to indulge in war of words on twitter or SM..
3/10
It seems many of the Modiji's supporters' have overlooked this tweet..
Please don't expect Home Minister of country to indulge in war of words on twitter or SM..
3/10
For all those youngsters who were very young or born after 1986, I am offering perspective behind current round of violence indulged into by Jihadists..
1) In 1985, Supreme Court of India, adjudicated a divorce/ maintenance case in favour an elderly Muslim woman; Shah Bano..
1/9
1) In 1985, Supreme Court of India, adjudicated a divorce/ maintenance case in favour an elderly Muslim woman; Shah Bano..
1/9
2) The SC asked her husband to pay her maintenance every month..Her husband was of the view that under Muslim Personnel law, he wasnt required to pay her any maintence beyond iddat period of 3 months and 10 days..
Since, the Supreme Court of India didn't accept his arguments+
2/9
Since, the Supreme Court of India didn't accept his arguments+
2/9
+ Muslim organisations came out on the streets in protest against the SC ruling..Their argument was that the judiciary had no power to rule in the matters of their Personal law..
Many organisations threatened then PM, Rajiv Gandhi that blood will flow on the streets of India+
3/9
Many organisations threatened then PM, Rajiv Gandhi that blood will flow on the streets of India+
3/9
Scrapping #Article370: What does it mean?
What were the ramifications of notifications issued by Kashmir's Maharaja Hari Singh? What are state subjects? What exclusive rights did state subjects hold? How did #35A come into being?
Explains @sarthakraizada Advocate, Supreme Court
What were the ramifications of notifications issued by Kashmir's Maharaja Hari Singh? What are state subjects? What exclusive rights did state subjects hold? How did #35A come into being?
Explains @sarthakraizada Advocate, Supreme Court
What is Article 35A?
#Article35A guaranteed exclusive rights to permanent residents of Jammu & Kashmir like exclusivity in employment, grants, education & property rights. This meant that an ordinary Indian citizen could not buy property in J&K. This was clearly discriminatory.
#Article35A guaranteed exclusive rights to permanent residents of Jammu & Kashmir like exclusivity in employment, grants, education & property rights. This meant that an ordinary Indian citizen could not buy property in J&K. This was clearly discriminatory.
What took so long?
Several deliberations between State & Central govt took place over the years but in vain. A host of petitions were even filed citing the discriminatory nature of #Article35A. On many occasions the Hon. Supreme Court refused to entertain these petitions.
Several deliberations between State & Central govt took place over the years but in vain. A host of petitions were even filed citing the discriminatory nature of #Article35A. On many occasions the Hon. Supreme Court refused to entertain these petitions.
#Article370 and #35A were the root of blatant discrimination, racism and misogyny. They discriminated between Kashmiris on arbitrary lines. They discriminated against women. They excluded India.
Their supporters support racism, misogyny and Sharia.
From @arunjaitley's blog.
Their supporters support racism, misogyny and Sharia.
From @arunjaitley's blog.
@arunjaitley One more ignoramus (or paid shill), not knowing how the existence of these clauses was discriminatory and undemocratic. Were they introduced by democratic process?
@arunjaitley No surprise that the most misogynist communists, who routinely use women as objects in Maoists camps, support the apartheid and racism of #Article370 and #35A.
But they wear niqab of "feminism."
But they wear niqab of "feminism."
