🕵️ The Pulte-Gabbard Offensive: A Structural Breakdown
I've identified the precise fulcrum point here, and it's worth unpacking why this combination of players and information creates genuine leverage.
2/6
🎯 Why Pulte Scares the Machine
Bill Pulte isn't just another wealthy Trump ally. He's the grandson of the guy who literally built the modern American home — and he's taken a very different path with his capital.
- Philanthropy as intelligence gathering: Pulte's Twitter philanthropy operation (dubbed "Pulte Philanthropy") put him in direct contact with tens of thousands of ordinary Americans. That's not charity — that's a distributed intelligence network. He knows what people in every congressional district are actually experiencing and saying, unfiltered by polling or media.
- Operational, not performative: Unlike the donor class that writes checks and expects photo ops, Pulte has demonstrated willingness to move fast, break institutional norms, and name names. The political class doesn't know how to handle someone with money who refuses to play by their access-and-influence rules.
- Post-assassination environment: After Charlie Kirk was killed in September, the political calculus shifted. Senators who thought they were insulated from real-world consequences now understand the stakes aren't abstract. Pulte operates in that charged space without flinching.
The combination — wealth, grassroots intelligence, operational speed, and willingness to confront — is exactly what makes entrenched power nervous.
3/6
📡 What Tulsi Teed Up
Gabbard's positioning as DNI gave her access to raw intelligence most members of Congress never see. What she's signaled publicly follows a pattern.
See the image below.
The key distinction: this isn't about changing vote totals. It's about perception manipulation at scale — making one side's supporters feel their votes don't matter, amplifying chaos, and laundering foreign narratives through domestic-seeming channels. That's harder to detect and harder to prove, which is precisely why it worked.
🚨BREAKING: PEOPLE CAN TELL YOU'RE USING CHATGPT & CLAUDE
The structure, the tone, the polish. It all gives it away.
5 prompts that fix it: 👇
The Real Person Rewrite
"You are an editor with a sharp eye for writing that reads as constructed, not spoken. Rewrite this the way someone who actually lived it would say it: a little rougher, more direct. Cut anything that feels rehearsed, overbuilt, or written to sound impressive. Text: [paste]."
Voice Shaper
"You are building a voice that sounds like it belongs to one real person. Rewrite this so it carries a clear point of view, not the tone of a neutral observer trying to please everyone. Let opinions, small contradictions, and natural shifts in tone come through. Text: [paste]."
gleich aus zwei Gründen ist der 21. Juni in diesem Jahr ein besonderer, ein denkwürdiger Tag.
Am Sonntag sind es auf den Tag 50 Jahre her, seitdem in Deutschland die sogenannte „Indikationslösung“ in
Kraft getreten ist. Eine weitreichende Reform des § 218 StGB, die vorgab, das Leben ungeborener Kinder rechtlich „besser schützen“ zu wollen und gleichzeitig das „Selbstbestimmungsrecht“ der Frau zu stärken.
Seither gelten Abtreibungen zwar als rechtswidrig,
bleiben aber unter bestimmten Bedingungen straffrei. Dann nämlich, wenn medizinische, kriminologische oder „soziale“ Gründe einer Abtreibung zugrunde liegen. Was von den „Reformern“ als „Ausnahme“ deklariert und propagiert worden war, wurde die Regel und hat
In alter, liebgewonnener Tradition folgt die aktualisierte Übersicht mit den klimatisierten Fahrzeugen der Wiener Linien sowie einigen weiteren Tipps, wie man klimatisierte Öffi-Fahrzeuge erkennen kann. #Hitzetipp #DasOriginal
Am Bahnsteig der Linien U1 bis U4 kann man klimatisierte Fahrzeuge bereits an den Bahnsteiganzeigen (so diese stimmen) erkennen und zwar am Unterstrich neben den Minuten.
Der Unterstrich kennzeichnet die V- bzw. X-Wagen mit Klapprampe, die ebenso eine Klimaanlage haben.
In den letzten Jahren hab ich öfter die Rückmeldung bekommen, dass die Fahrzeugnummern, obwohl sie am eindeutigsten bei der Erkennung von klimatisierten Fahrzeugen sind, nicht die beliebteste Erkennungsmethode ist.
Deshalb noch ein paar weitere Erkennungsmerkmale beim ULF ...
A trading bot is a software program that automates buying and selling financial assets like stocks and cryptocurrencies based on pre-defined strategies and rules.
These automated systems can manage portfolios without human intervention, operating 24/7.
➡️Funded dangerous gain-of-function research at Wuhan
➡️Used his relationship with the Intelligence Community to influence COVID origins assessments while concealing his conflict of interest
➡️Made statements to Congress under oath in 2024 that are directly contradicted by declassified government records
And more...
This thread breaks it all down with receipts from the actual documents. Bookmark this and share it.🧵
Let's start with the rigged game. Fauci didn't just fund the Wuhan research. He created a circular reporting loop to cover his tracks:
He hand-picked the scientists who advised the IC, then the IC used them to shape official assessments. Those assessments were then publicly cited as "scientific consensus" to kill the lab-leak theory.
He was referee AND player.
One IC email lays it all out there. When Fauci recommended specific scientists for the IC's own 90-day COVID origins study (the study investigating HIS research) an ODNI official responded:
"Given Dr. Fauci's background we absolutely would like to follow-up on his outreach suggestions… he's not a policymaker… he's a SME who probably knows better than most who the real coronavirus experts are."
They let the man under investigation steer his own investigation.
The ripple effects of SFFA are still occurring in state courts around the country. This was an easy decision because SFFA held you can’t discriminate on the basis of race especially for amorphous reasons such as diversity. The next shoe to drop will likely be workplace DEI under Title VII. Let’s discuss.
If a government is treating someone differently based on race, it must satisfy strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause. This involves a compelling government interest and narrow tailoring to meet it. It used to be that diversity qualified as that compelling interest. Not after SFFA.
The fact that there is no compelling interest effectively ends the analysis but the court here also concluded that this program was not narrowly tailored either. As I noted before post-SFFA this is an easy call but it’s only a matter of time before this hits workplace DEI.
Here is an analysis by Grok (Expert tier) of the four PDFs just released by @TulsiGabbard. @elonmusk interesting both for conclusions and 🦾 comparison with other LLM analyses.
Thread 🧵
(Quoting Grok now.)
Here are the top 8 most explosive findings from the four declassified PDFs released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard on June 18, 2026. I prioritized the most shocking, previously non-public or under-reported items that directly bear on the lab-origin hypothesis, NIH/Fauci funding of high-risk research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), conflicts of interest, and early U.S. government assessments. These stand out from the ~400 pages across the documents (many heavily redacted).
I focused on material that is new, confirmatory in a stronger way than prior leaks, or shows internal U.S. government awareness that contradicts public narratives at the time. Less explosive or already widely discussed items (e.g., general seropositivity data or routine news summaries) were deprioritized.
1. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (May 2020) formally assessed that all necessary conditions for an accidental release of a laboratory-modified, human-adapted coronavirus were present at the WIV in mid-to-late 2019, and placed equal weight on the lab-modification hypothesis.
The Z Program report states explicitly: “We assess all of the necessary conditions for an accidental release of a laboratory-modified coronavirus—specifically a coronavirus adapted to recognize human cell receptors—were present at the Chinese Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in mid-to-late 2019. As a result, we place equal weight on the hypothesis that the COVID-19 virus was a result of laboratory modification, along with that of a natural outbreak or the release from a laboratory of a naturally-occurring virus.”
It lists the four required conditions: (1) precursor viruses with high genetic similarity, (2) laboratory use of reverse genetic systems to modify coronaviruses, (3) laboratory testing to see if the virus can enter human cells and cause disease via ACE2 receptors, and (4) accidents with coronavirus materials. A figure titled “Gain of function framework with bat coronaviruses” shows the full pipeline (targeted mutation/reverse genetics → cell entry/replication assessment → animal pathogenesis/transmission/virulence testing → gain-of-function characterization in humanized mice or equivalent) as having occurred at WIV both circa 2017 and in late 2019. This is one of the earliest, most authoritative U.S. government technical assessments treating lab modification as equally plausible.
2. The NIAID (Fauci’s institute) grant to EcoHealth Alliance/Peter Daszak explicitly funded reverse genetics, creation of spike/receptor-binding mutants to test adaptation to human ACE2, pseudovirus assays, and infection experiments in humanized mice using bat coronaviruses — work conducted with WIV researchers.
The Year 5 interim report for grant R01AI110964 (“Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” active through May 31, 2019) details Specific Aim 3: “We will test our models of host range (i.e. emergence potential) experimentally using reverse genetics, pseudovirus and receptor binding assays, and virus infection experiments in cell culture and humanized mice.”
It continues: “We will do this by sequencing the spike (or other receptor binding/fusion) protein genes from all our bat-CoVs, creating mutants to identify how significantly each would need to evolve to use ACE2... We will then use receptor-mutant pseudovirus binding assays, in vitro studies in bat, primate, human and other species’ cell lines, and with humanized mice where particularly interesting viruses are identified...”
This matches the precise type of “gain-of-function”/directed adaptation research long alleged by lab-leak proponents. The work involved WIV collaborators (Shi Zhengli et al. are named in dissemination sections), and the grant was administered through EcoHealth Alliance with Daszak as PI.
We need international scrutiny on Conrad Black and links to Jeffrey Epstein. Black was in the Trilateral Commission, and neighbours with Donald Trump for years. That may have been strategic. He was bailed out by Trump after the Hollinger Affair. He was friends with Jeffrey Epstein and the Royal Family.
He was a member of the House of Lords with Peter Mandelson, and a members of the White’s Club with the British Royal Family including Andrew and he worked with Les Wexner at Hollinger and served on the board of Brascan which became Brookfield. It was founded by the Bronfmans.
Black was an early supporter of Stephen Harper when he was in the Reform Party. Preston Manning of Reform Party linked to Heritage Foundation and Newt Gingrich. Both Conrad Black and Gingrich served alongside figures like Margaret Thatcher and Henry Kissinger on advisory boards overlapping the years of Operation PIE. @MarkJCarney @ElizabethMay @avilewis @GGCanada @SenateCA @RoyalFamily @INTERPOL_HQ @ICCT_TheHague @HouseJudiciary @RepRobertGarcia @RepLuna @SenWarren @UNDPGAIN @UNHumanRights @UNDPGAIN @AmberWoods100 @guardian @BBC @nytimes @MSNOWNews @democracynow @DemocracyWatchr @TheTyee @pressprogress @Thetrilliumca @thehill @pressfreedom @ICIJorg @OCCRP @TaxJusticeNet @FairTaxCanada @TheTaxcast @UKParliament @HumanRightsCtte
Sir Peter Hayman was a British diplomat who served as Canada's High Commissioner. He engaged in sexual perversion in the 1960's that left him vulnerable to foreign blackmail. He was linked to MI6 and Operation PIE. bbc.com/news/uk-310629…
Archive documents appear to show how the paedophile group PIE managed to influence policy despite being run by people who believed in their right to have sex with young children. theguardian.com/society/2014/f…
Fauci funded the Wuhan research. Then he helped steer the intelligence that cleared it.
Gabbard's final act as DNI was to declassify the proof. And it confirms what a CIA whistleblower had already sworn to Congress weeks earlier.
What the documents actually show. 🧵
Start with the conflict of interest, because everything grows from it.
Fauci ran NIAID, which funded the Wuhan coronavirus work through EcoHealth. He then advised the intelligence community on the virus origins. And he was the public voice calling the lab leak a conspiracy theory.
Funder. Adviser. Spokesman. One man.
He never had to dictate a conclusion. He only had to pick the experts.
The documents show Fauci handing the IC a list of scientists to consult, many funded by his own institute. The IC took the list. Their input became "the assessment." That assessment was then sold to the public as independent consensus.
A closed loop.
America First Legal and @SchaerrJaffeLlp just secured a huge win for parental rights — vindicating the rights of families fighting against California’s radical attempt to hide children’s “gender transitions” from parents.
2/ In City of Huntington Beach v. Newsom, the Ninth Circuit entered a preliminary injunction blocking key provisions of AB 1955.
This law forced schools to keep parents in the dark about their child’s sexual orientation, “gender identity,” or gender expression — unless the child consented. California tried to insert the State between parents and their kids.
3/ The court, reconsidering in light of the Supreme Court’s landmark Mirabelli v. Bonta decision, held that Plaintiff-Parents “very likely have standing” and that parents — not the State — have primary authority over the upbringing and education of their children.
.@TuckerCarlson:
“Isræl attacked the USS Liberty and called it a mistake.
They say Isræl had nothing to do with JFK, while mentions of Isræl remain redacted in the JFK files.
And according to the FBI, Isræli intelligence had foreknowledge of 9/11.”
🧵 In this thread, I will present only visual evidence, declassified files, government records, intelligence reports, and official statements you can examine yourself.
You will see:
1NSA Page 41 — records that Liberty’s identity and American flag were known, and calls the Isræli inquiry “a nice whitewash.”
2LBJ / USS Liberty memo — shows Washington discussed sinking the surviving ship so reporters could not photograph the evidence.
3CIA JFK declassification note — clear to release the file, except the section on Angleton and the Isræli Intelligence Service.
4FBI / Dancing Isrælis file — documents the 9/11 Urban Moving Systems investigation and the “odd circumstances” Fox News later reported.
Purpose of this thread:
We are at a turning point on Isræl.
This is not opinion or slogans. It is a record of documents, facts, and evidence you can use anywhere — evidence so clear even AI cannot dispute it. 1/11🧵
The CIA had “no objection” to declassifying this file — except the part involving James Angleton and the Isræli Intelligence Service.
Angleton ran the CIA’s “Isræli account” for nearly 25 years as a personal channel.
Meir Amit, Moššad chief, called him “the biggest Ziønist of the lot.”
Yitzhak Rabin called him “a friend you could trust on a personal basis.”
Porque não foi a Globo ou SBT que vazaram dados, e sim uma emissora ligada a Ronaldo Tiradentes? A atuação da Rede Tiradentes no caso específico das cotas da UFAM levanta hipóteses de conflito de interesses e direcionamento mediático, baseadas em cruzamento de dados públicos. ⬇️
A primeira hipótese reside no cruzamento da listagem nominal de candidatos do Sisu. Identificou-se no mesmo certame a presença de candidata homônima ao proprietário da emissora, inscrita nas vagas reservadas para pretos, pardos e indígenas de baixa renda (modalidade PP1). ⬇️
Andrei Lebedev has done a study spanning 4 papers establishing: 1) How pythagoreanism & orphism were born 2) What differentiates the 2 sects from each other
The roots of doctrine of reincarnation among Greeks originated in the Aegean islands, not from Orient or Hyperborea. Island of Cyclades/Syros reveals figurines dated 3000-1900 BC, depicting "mother & daughter" where the daughter is a small exact copy emerging from the head.
These were "magic dolls" or rebirth machines designed to provide soul of the deceased with a new body, facilitating reincarnation in this world.
By late 7th to early 6th century BC, these beliefs surfaced in Aegean mythopoetry (oracular hellenism), with an alternative cosmology.
Ana akım tıp ve milyar dolarlık takviye endüstrisi; Omega-3 yağ asitlerini (balık yağlarını) kalp hastalıklarını önleyen, beyni çalıştıran ve iltihabı bitiren nihai bir "mucize" olarak pazarlar.
İnsanlara avuç avuç balık yağı hapı yutmaları veya haftanın her günü yağlı somon ++
yemeleri öğütlenir lakin lipit kimyasının acımasız kurallarına göre; Omega-3 bir mucize değil, insan bedeni (37 derece) gibi sıcak ve oksijenli bir ortamda saniyeler içinde çürüyüp paslanan, tiroidi kilitleyen ve hücreyi "kış uykusuna" sokan kimyasal bir saatli bombadır. ++
Omega-3 yağ asitleri (EPA ve DHA), yapıları gereği "Çoklu Doymamış" formdadır. Yani karbon zincirlerinde birden fazla zayıf çift bağ bulunur.
Bu yağlar, Kuzey Buz Denizi'nde 0 derecede yüzen bir balığın donmamasını ve akışkan kalmasını sağlar.
¿Ha erradicado la vacuna del VPH las muertes por cáncer de cérvix? Un nuevo estudio en Inglaterra grita que sí en titulares, anunciando "cero muertes" en jóvenes de 20-24 años.
Vamos a analizar la parte que no dicen.
Entrando 🧵
VAAAAMOS
El cáncer de cuello uterino NO es una enfermedad común en jóvenes. La edad media de diagnóstico está entre los 35 y 45 años. Que haya "cero muertes" a los 20 años es una buena noticia, pero es una franja donde el riesgo histórico ya era bajísimo y residual.
¿De dónde sale que se han "salvado" vidas? De una estimación matemática, no de vidas reales contadas una a una. Calculan q, sin vacuna, habrían muerto unas 23 jóvenes en toda Inglaterra en 4 años. Se ha evitado ese goteo inicial, pero el gran examen del fármaco aún no ha llegado
The Market Has Changed: The Rise of Leveraged ETFs
The market is always changing. That’s why almost every great money manager eventually retires, underperforms, or starts bending the rules.
Working in New York taught me this lesson better than anything else. People find an edge, get a little lucky, ride a wave, and then convince themselves they’re geniuses. Eventually, the environment changes, and the very strategy that made them successful stops working.
By definition, every system is built for a specific set of conditions. When those conditions change, the system becomes obsolete.
Below is a primer from Jefferies on leveraged ETFs and how they are changing market dynamics.
The market always changes.
Let’s Begin->
For years, we have all been focused on hedge fund positioning, CTAs, and options dealers as the primary amplifiers of market volatility, but there is now a shift toward a different and rapidly growing force: leveraged ETFs. With over $300 billion in AUM and roughly $750 billion in underlying equity exposure, these products now create significant mechanical flows through daily rebalancing. A 1% move in global equities can drive between $12–18 billion of forced buying or selling, introducing a sizable and increasingly systematic source of market impact.While options dealers, often long gamma, have historically helped offset this dynamic, that balance is fragile. Options gamma tends to cluster near spot and is non-linear, meaning it can quickly fade in a selloff, leaving the persistent, linear “short gamma” of leveraged ETFs to dominate and amplify moves in either direction.
This dynamic becomes particularly important in larger market swings. Estimates suggest that the combined gamma exposure flips decisively short on moves of roughly -4% or +3%, at which point rebalancing flows can exacerbate volatility. Importantly, the effect is not just linear in notional terms, declining prices force the sale of an increasing number of shares, meaning a -20% drawdown can generate more than twice the volume of selling compared to a -10% move. The rapid growth of single-stock leveraged ETFs has further intensified these moves, especially in high-beta, high-volatility names, but the influence extends beyond individual stocks. Index-based leveraged ETFs also drive flows into underlying constituents, amplifying moves at the sector level.
.@SecWar delivered a major speech at yesterday’s NATO Defense Ministerial, focused on doubling down and accelerating the shift to NATO 3.0. He also announced an important six-month review of our force and basing posture in Europe. 🧵 1/
“As I said in my first NATO Defense Ministerial last February, and as the Trump Administration has said again and again…our allies must step up. President Trump has been very clear on this point for many years, and over two administrations, and for too long, NATO has been a paper tiger and a one-way street.”
“That’s what defense spending commitments are all about, transforming NATO back into a real military alliance that’s focused on hard power and real deterrence. A NATO 3.0 modeled on the NATO 1.0 that won the Cold War, with our allies actually taking the lead in Europe’s conventional defense.” 3/
In jedem wichtigen Bereich – von Verteidigung, Ukraine, dem Handelskonflikt mit Trump und China, KI, Innovation und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, Klimaschutz, unsere Automobilbranche und Industrie bis hin zum Wirtschaftsstandort 🇩🇪– liegt 🇩🇪 Zukunft stärker in Brüssel als in Berlin.
Wir werden erst dann wieder eine Chance auf die Wahrung unseres Wohlstands, unserer Sicherheit und unseres Friedens haben, wenn wir Deutschen endlich mehr #Verantwortung in #Europa übernehmen und nicht ständig nationale Alleingänge machen.