Most recent unrolls from @ThreadReaderApp
Gedanken zur Tageslosung für Dienstag, den 21.04.2026
Losungswort
Gott, du bleibst, wie du bist, und deine Jahre nehmen kein Ende.
Psalm 102,28
Lehrtext
Dem alleinigen Gott, unserm Heiland durch unsern Herrn Jesus Christus, sei Ehre und Majestät und Gewalt
Losungswort
Gott, du bleibst, wie du bist, und deine Jahre nehmen kein Ende.
Psalm 102,28
Lehrtext
Dem alleinigen Gott, unserm Heiland durch unsern Herrn Jesus Christus, sei Ehre und Majestät und Gewalt
und Macht vor aller Zeit, jetzt und in alle Ewigkeit! Amen.
Judas 1,25
Die Losungen der Herrnhuter Brüdergemeine
Bis in alle Ewigkeit
Vorausgehend zum heutigen Losungswort aus Psalm 102 wird beschrieben, dass Himmel und Erde sowie
Judas 1,25
Die Losungen der Herrnhuter Brüdergemeine
Bis in alle Ewigkeit
Vorausgehend zum heutigen Losungswort aus Psalm 102 wird beschrieben, dass Himmel und Erde sowie
alles Geschaffene einmal vergehen werden. Doch Gott bleibt – und ebenfalls diejenigen, die zu ihm gehören. Gottes ewiges Sein wird also auf die Seinen übertragen. Etwas Ähnliches formulierte einmal Jesus Christus, als er sagte: „Himmel und Erde werden vergehen, aber
Markus 14,22-72
Das Passafest • Jesus im Garten Gethsemane • Die Gefangennahme Jesu • Der Prozess gegen Jesus beginnttwr360.org/programs/view/…
„Durch die Bibel“ ist ein weltweites Bibelprogramm in über 100 Sprachen und Dialekten. Unsere Mission ist einfach und sie ist dieselbe, die Dr. McGee für sich selbst annahm: Das ganze Wort Gottes der ganzen Welt zu verkündigen.
🧵 THREAD: The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he's standing between President Trump and a coup
@PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color revolution planning document cited him as an insider threat.
They didn't go after him because of drinking. They didn't go after him because of women. They went after him because every color revolution manual ever written says the same thing: you cannot topple a government unless the security forces defect. And a loyal Secretary of Defense is the one person who makes sure they don't.
I have the receipts. Their own documents. Their own training sessions. Their own words on camera.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇
@PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color revolution planning document cited him as an insider threat.
They didn't go after him because of drinking. They didn't go after him because of women. They went after him because every color revolution manual ever written says the same thing: you cannot topple a government unless the security forces defect. And a loyal Secretary of Defense is the one person who makes sure they don't.
I have the receipts. Their own documents. Their own training sessions. Their own words on camera.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler This is not my theory. This is theirs.
Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan — the two most cited scholars in the color revolution field — studied 323 regime change campaigns. Their finding:
Security force defections make campaigns FORTY-SIX TIMES more likely to succeed.
Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan — the two most cited scholars in the color revolution field — studied 323 regime change campaigns. Their finding:
Security force defections make campaigns FORTY-SIX TIMES more likely to succeed.
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler So what did co-author Maria Stephan do next?
She became Chief Organizer of the Horizons Project. And on July 16, 2025, she trained New Kings participants on video.
"Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters."
She became Chief Organizer of the Horizons Project. And on July 16, 2025, she trained New Kings participants on video.
"Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters."
There’s a town in America with a population of 1.
No, not a typo.
Monowi, Nebraska has exactly ONE resident… and her name is Elsie.
🧵👇
No, not a typo.
Monowi, Nebraska has exactly ONE resident… and her name is Elsie.
🧵👇
Elsie Eiler isn’t just a resident…
She’s the mayor✔️
The clerk ✔️
The treasurer ✔️
The bartender ✔️
The librarian ✔️
She literally runs the entire town by herself.
She’s the mayor✔️
The clerk ✔️
The treasurer ✔️
The bartender ✔️
The librarian ✔️
She literally runs the entire town by herself.
Every year, Elsie files paperwork to keep Monowi incorporated.
Then she approves her own liquor license…
So she can legally run the town’s only bar.
Yes, she signs both sides of the form.
Then she approves her own liquor license…
So she can legally run the town’s only bar.
Yes, she signs both sides of the form.
México está a punto de aprobar la “Ley General para Regular y Fomentar el Uso de la IA”. Parece inofensiva. Pero he leído los 134 artículos y el glosario. Es un caballo de Troya autoritario. Abro hilo con pruebas. 👇
Primero, lo bueno (poco): La ley reconoce que la IA puede causar daños. Eso es obvio. El problema no es regular, es CÓMO. Y aquí el método es: control previo, supervisión estatal omnímoda y definiciones ambiguas. Eso es receta para el abuso.
El comodín de la “desinformación” (Art. 4, XI)
Definen desinformación como “contenido falso… con el propósito de afectar la opinión pública o procesos electorales”. ¿Quién prueba el “propósito”? ¿Un juez? No. La autoridad administrativa. Adiós a los memes, la sátira y la crítica molesta.
Definen desinformación como “contenido falso… con el propósito de afectar la opinión pública o procesos electorales”. ¿Quién prueba el “propósito”? ¿Un juez? No. La autoridad administrativa. Adiós a los memes, la sátira y la crítica molesta.
Can we add a 240 GB SSD to this Compaq LTE 5400 laptop from 1996 running Windows 95? Yes, yes we can, and it just got easier with a recent breakthrough! Let's talk about it in a 🧵 here!
Okay! So, here we have a proprietary laptop with a proprietary BIOS. But we also have a persistent enthusiast who added XTIDE support to the LTE 5000 series BIOS. Wow! You can read about that here: bachler.se/lte5000xtide/
Alright, let's get started. I thought I had a rather large CF card around that I could use, but I think I gave it away. However, as you saw from the intro shot, I have a 240 GB SSD. I took it out of its shell, and fitted it with a SATA to IDE adapter!
@grokwix @Monty_Brogan69 Oui mais réduction d'impot indexée sur la valeur de l'Oeuvre.
Un "mécène" achète une "merde" (et/ou que des commissaires priseurs lui déclarent une valeur) alors elle est considérée "Oeuvre d'Art" : des "faux" sont ainsi vendus plus chers que le vrai.
1/n
Un "mécène" achète une "merde" (et/ou que des commissaires priseurs lui déclarent une valeur) alors elle est considérée "Oeuvre d'Art" : des "faux" sont ainsi vendus plus chers que le vrai.
1/n
@grokwix @Monty_Brogan69 L'Artiste (=Technicien) cré de l'Art en maitrisant des techniques, styles et en véhiculant des messages intemporel, universels à travers les symboles/codes !
2/n
2/n
@grokwix @Monty_Brogan69 Maintenant, un/une "fils/fille de", acteur ou animateur TV… bidon, est reconnus comme "Artistes" après avoir fait une peinture dite "abstraite" ou une merde dite d'art contemporain* et qu'un "commissaire priseur" lui donne de la valeur et/ou ...
3/n
3/n
ご覧いただいた皆様ありがとうございました。
収録では完全復元修復の意義と日本古来の常若の精神を沢山話したのですが、尺の関係でしょうかカットされてました、、でも仏像修復の現状を広く知っていただける機会になったと思います。
公開に先立ってご理解いただいた諸寺院様に厚く御礼申し上げます
収録では完全復元修復の意義と日本古来の常若の精神を沢山話したのですが、尺の関係でしょうかカットされてました、、でも仏像修復の現状を広く知っていただける機会になったと思います。
公開に先立ってご理解いただいた諸寺院様に厚く御礼申し上げます
補足しますと、現状保存修復は古めかしい状態で保存、新しく補足した箇所は古色で馴染ませます。
一方で完全復元修復は塗装を除去して制作された当初の状態に戻す修復です。
完全復元修復は新たに塗り替えるため、塗師、箔押師、あるいは彩色師や金工師といった専門職の高い技術が必要になります。
▼
一方で完全復元修復は塗装を除去して制作された当初の状態に戻す修復です。
完全復元修復は新たに塗り替えるため、塗師、箔押師、あるいは彩色師や金工師といった専門職の高い技術が必要になります。
▼
式年遷宮も造り替えることで技の継承に寄与している側面もありますが、仏像修復も同じです。
現状保存修復の意義についても理解していますし、日々研鑽を積んでいます。
ただ、少しあっても完全復元修復を選択していただき、新調の技術が継承され、常若の精神が後世に繋がることを私は願っています。
現状保存修復の意義についても理解していますし、日々研鑽を積んでいます。
ただ、少しあっても完全復元修復を選択していただき、新調の技術が継承され、常若の精神が後世に繋がることを私は願っています。
SHOCK SENEDD ELECTION NEWS! 🚨
NOT ALL VOTERS DESERVE REPRESENTATION SAYS CANDIDATE
If you’re a Welsh voter making up your mind who should represent your interests in the Senedd, would you vote for a candidate who says they’ll only represent their “community”, - and who says that doesn’t mean you?
Wherever you are in Wales, before you choose your representative, make sure they’re prepared to represent YOU.
Read on ….
1/
NOT ALL VOTERS DESERVE REPRESENTATION SAYS CANDIDATE
If you’re a Welsh voter making up your mind who should represent your interests in the Senedd, would you vote for a candidate who says they’ll only represent their “community”, - and who says that doesn’t mean you?
Wherever you are in Wales, before you choose your representative, make sure they’re prepared to represent YOU.
Read on ….
1/
Women in every Senedd constituency have written to all the candidates seeking to represent them.
They asked for a simple yes/no response to five key questions raised by Wales WRN.
These are all common-sense questions which relate to the rights of women and girls.
2/
They asked for a simple yes/no response to five key questions raised by Wales WRN.
These are all common-sense questions which relate to the rights of women and girls.
2/
Easy questions, - but this Caerdydd Penarth constituent received a REFUSAL TO ANSWER them.
She was not deterred...
3/
She was not deterred...
3/
4/20 is a day dedicated to making memories hazy.
But support chatbots should be held to a higher standard.
Introducing Greater, an in-browser local LLM that is private by default and trained on whatever knowledge you give it.
But support chatbots should be held to a higher standard.
Introducing Greater, an in-browser local LLM that is private by default and trained on whatever knowledge you give it.
I originally built this for Blockstream during the interview process. That bot is still there, but I've extended it. You can check out the demo here:
greater.pink
greater.pink
For the Bitcoin bot, I trained it on a variety of Blockstream's articles, the Simplicity language, and some of their other products.
I've also trained it (partially) on Bitcoin Core vs Knots.
I've also trained it (partially) on Bitcoin Core vs Knots.
Starmer’s hesitant performance today left many important questions unanswered:
Why did he ignore the advice of his then cabinet secretary, Simon Case, in November 2024 to vet Mandelson before appointing? It would seem wise advice given Mandelson’s dodgy past/reputation.
Yet Starmer’s answer is evasive. He says Case’s successor, Chris Wormald concluded in a review in September 2025 that vetting after appointment is ‘normal/usual’.
But Starmer obviously didn’t have that review when he rejected Case, Wormald just says it was normal, not necessarily right — and since Wormald succeeded Case amid Mandelson’s appointment and went along with the Starmer timeline, he was hardly likely to contradict himself in a subsequent review.
So, again, why did Starmer reject Case’s sound advice? If he had accepted it he wouldn’t be in his current pickle /1
Why did he ignore the advice of his then cabinet secretary, Simon Case, in November 2024 to vet Mandelson before appointing? It would seem wise advice given Mandelson’s dodgy past/reputation.
Yet Starmer’s answer is evasive. He says Case’s successor, Chris Wormald concluded in a review in September 2025 that vetting after appointment is ‘normal/usual’.
But Starmer obviously didn’t have that review when he rejected Case, Wormald just says it was normal, not necessarily right — and since Wormald succeeded Case amid Mandelson’s appointment and went along with the Starmer timeline, he was hardly likely to contradict himself in a subsequent review.
So, again, why did Starmer reject Case’s sound advice? If he had accepted it he wouldn’t be in his current pickle /1
Why was Starmer so sure the vetting process had included Mandelson’s connection with the unspeakable Epstein if he claims not to have seen the vetting report? He now claims he was referring to the Cabinet Office due diligence report, which preceded the security vetting and which he had seen. But he was asked specifically at the time about the security vetting work and Epstein. Why was he again evasive? /2
On that due diligence report, which highlighted Mandelson’s relations with dodgy Russian and Chinese clients, why did Starmer not take any of that more seriously. Sure these connections alone would have indicated vetting before appointing? Why didn’t he see it that way? Did he not think that Mandelson’s serving on the board of a Russian company riddled with Kremlin spies, for example, was grounds alone for caution? Why was he totally unforthcoming when asked about Sistema (the Russian company)? /3
I picked up some interface cards at VCF East, and also found a CD-ROM drive on the free pile. Let's give them a test! We'll use one of my 486 DX2/66 systems. Let's go! Time for a 🧵
We'll start out with the CD-ROM. Looks like this was in a Compaq originally (allegedly a Presario). It's a model CR-581-KCQ, which I think makes it a 4X Panasonic drive. Anyway, I popped in my GCW Companion CD, and the drive passed! Hooray!!
Next we have a DTC 2278E VLB controller. I have one of these, but the HDD pins are broken. It still works, but for $5 I was glad to have another 😂. I booted up Windows 98, I have a mouse, the HDD works, and the FDD works, calling it good!
1) A good sign that Trump is just about to crush it in every single way is the nutjob attack that he was going to use nukes or that Kash was some sort of drunk.
These demonic dicknipples can read maps. They see that Trump just solidified control over every major choke point . .
These demonic dicknipples can read maps. They see that Trump just solidified control over every major choke point . .
1) contd . . . in the world, save two, the Dardanelles (meaningless if we control the Persian Gulf and Gibraltar's passage) and the Skaggerat/Kattegat strait, which even a weakened Norway/Denmark could contain with a few reservists and a drone.
2) The demons are awaking and are, as the Bible says, the "heathens are raging" because they see that the Iran stuff was window dressing---in part---for the larger strategic gains we have made in must two weeks.
3) I'm not sure Trump cares if the Iranians reach a "deal."
3) I'm not sure Trump cares if the Iranians reach a "deal."
🚨URGENTÍSSIMO: Novo golpe Bolsonarista
Entenda como Caiado ajudou a VENDER hoje a ÚNICA mineradora de terras raras do Brasil para os EUA por US$ 2,8 bilhões.
E o governo brasileiro não pôde fazer nada. Entenda o que aconteceu nos bastidores. Segue o🧵
Entenda como Caiado ajudou a VENDER hoje a ÚNICA mineradora de terras raras do Brasil para os EUA por US$ 2,8 bilhões.
E o governo brasileiro não pôde fazer nada. Entenda o que aconteceu nos bastidores. Segue o🧵
1 - A Serra Verde, dona da mina Pela Ema (GO), único produtor fora da Ásia dos 4 elementos magnéticos de terras raras, foi comprada pela americana USA Rare Earth. São minerais usados em carros elétricos, drones, armas de defesa e semicondutores.
2 - Os EUA agiram nos bastidores com maestria. Primeiro injetaram US$ 565 milhões direto na Serra Verde em 2025. Depois, o governo Trump colocou mais US$ 1,6 bilhão na USA Rare Earth e ficou com 10% da empresa. A armadilha financeira já estava montada antes do anúncio.
Ante los recientes hallazgos de más de mil restos y fragmentos óseos en las lagunas de La Habana, Tláhuac, por parte de Colectivos de familiares de personas desaparecidas, Amnistía Internacional se suma a su exigencia al Gobierno de la Ciudad de México para:
1) continuación de las labores de búsqueda en la zona, con mayores recursos humanos y técnicos, así como personal pericial de la Comisión de Búsqueda;
2) identificación digna y pronta de cada resto humano, 3) protección del perímetro donde se encontraron los restos
4) protección a las familias buscadoras,
4) protección a las familias buscadoras,
Cela fait plus de 2 mois que je vis un enfer.
Ma mère hospitalisée en psychiatrie pour épuisement, burnout, dépression, fin janvier.
Depuis cette date, j’ai la charge de mon père schizophrène, 77 ans, et de mon petit-frère, lourdement handicapé car retardé psychomoteur, 30 ans.
Ma mère hospitalisée en psychiatrie pour épuisement, burnout, dépression, fin janvier.
Depuis cette date, j’ai la charge de mon père schizophrène, 77 ans, et de mon petit-frère, lourdement handicapé car retardé psychomoteur, 30 ans.
Après avoir hospitalisé ma mère, ma sœur infirmière en psychiatrie, dans un grain de folie, est revenue 4 jours plus tard, traversant la France, pour hospitaliser – quasi de force – mon frère.
J’ai toujours vécu dans une famille déséquilibrée, mais jamais autant.
J’ai toujours vécu dans une famille déséquilibrée, mais jamais autant.
Voir ma propre sœur, en qui j’ai une extrême confiance, sans me prévenir, faire 450 kilomètres pour forcer l’hospitalisation de mon frère avec qui je vis depuis 1 an…
L’impression de vivre un mauvais divorce, des parents qui se disputent la garde d’enfants.
L’impression de vivre un mauvais divorce, des parents qui se disputent la garde d’enfants.
1. Boy, Amazon is in a heap of trouble. Evidence made public today by California AG @AGRobBonta shows blatant price fixing. And there are so many examples. Here's Amazon scheming with a pet food supplier to get Chewy to raise its prices.
2. Here's Levi's serving as go-between so Walmart and Amazon could cooperate to raise prices on khakis. "In response, Amazon acknowledged that Walmart raised its price and confirmed it had matched that higher price: 'the updated pricing of $29.99 is now showing up on [Amazon].'"
3. An Amazon employee responds with, We're "good now" after a lamp company gets Walmart to raise its prices.
התוכנית הייתה מארב ארטישוק בלילה, בבוקר כניסה למוצב צד״ל, ובצהריים על האש לכבוד ראש השנה. נידם הרס״פ שם לנו בשרים וסלטים בתוך חופיות (פלסטיקים ירוקים גדולים ששמרו על אוכל), שהוכנסו אחר כבוד לנגמ״חון לצד שק גחלים ומנגל.
אם חייבים מארב 72 שעות בחג, שיהיה בסטייל: אנחנו מסייעת.
>>>
אם חייבים מארב 72 שעות בחג, שיהיה בסטייל: אנחנו מסייעת.
>>>
יצאנו ממוצב תורמוס בערב, התמקמנו באיזו תצפית, השריונרים עשו את מה ששריונרים עושים במארבים, ואנחנו אבטחנו אותם. בלילה כבר קר בלבנון בספטמבר-אוקטובר, אבל לא קפוא כמו בשיא החורף. לקראת 4:30 התחלנו להתקפל, לפי התוכנית.
>>>
>>>
הגענו למוצב של צד״ל, המ״מ חבר למפקד שלהם, הטנק חנה ליד הש״ג ונכנסנו פנימה. הכלל היה שכשכוח צה״ל נכנס למוצב צד״ל, הוא תופס את כל עמדות השמירה פרט לש״ג. הם אמנם בעלי ברית, אבל הנרטיב היה שאנחנו סומכים רק על עצמנו. סידרתי רשימת שמירה עד הערב באחת העמדות, תוך כדי הכוננות עם שחר.
>>>
>>>
Matt seems fundamentally ignorant of a bunch of stuff that's gone on since 2009.
Netanyahu accepted the Two-State Solution in 2009 in his famous Bar-Ilan Speech.
It was the conclusion of the Obama Administration and of Hussein Agha (Abbas's top informal negotiator) that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas sunk talks in 2014 as soon as Netanyahu was getting really flexible.
Under the 2013 Molcho-Agha Framework for negotiations, Netanyahu agreed to final status talks based on the following principles:
[1] "Palestine" would be "an independent and sovereign state in a sustainable territory which will correspond to the size of the territory controlled by Egypt and Jordan before the 4th of June 1967,”
[2] “[A]ny solution must take into account the historical, social, cultural and emotional connections of the two peoples to the city, as well as protect the holy sites.”
[3] "There will be a complete withdrawal in stages of Israeli forces from the territory of Palestine. The last Israeli forces will evacuate when the final stage of the agreement comes into effect"
[4] "Israelis who choose to remain in their homes in the state of Palestine will live under Palestinian law"
[5] Some sort of limited Palestinian 'right of return' on an individualized basis would be up for future discussion
Both sides reserved the right to oppose certain clauses, but as reported Netanyahu accepted what his top negotiator put together.
This basically lines up with the book "The Last Palestinian" reporting that Netanyahu told Obama and Kerry that he could agree to evacuate large parts of the West Bank so that a Palestinian State could be established, so long as he was able to do it slowly and gradually over a number of years (perhaps up to a decade). The main reason the Obama Administration was unhappy with this was domestic American politics (Obama wanting credit). It was after this that Kerry got the Molcho-Agha channel going for framework negotiations.
And "The Last Palestinian" (a biography of Mahmoud Abbas) says that Kerry got Netanyahu to agree in 2013 that "[t]he new secure and recognized border between Israel and Palestine will be negotiated based on the 1967 lines with mutual agreed land swaps." Where Netanyahu was unwilling to budge was on a continued IDF presence in the Jordan Valley for 10 to 15 years and authority to conduct raids and operations against terrorism there. Netanyahu was also unwilling to accept a Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem, though he was willing to accept Palestinian "aspirations" regarding East Jerusalem, and [separate from the book the Last Palestinian" Netanyahu agreed to the Palestinians getting certain East Jerusalem neighborhoods like Shuafat, Beit Hanina, and Kafr Aqab. And Netanyahu accepted a limited Palestinian right of return to Israel.
According to the Last Palestinian, Obama took the Kerry framework and added express language about a Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem in order to satisfy the Palestinians. Abbas balked, asked for more time to think, and then never responded.
...
Also reported from the period is that Netanyahu instructed aides to draft plans to dismantle West Bank settlements and isolated settlements like Yitzhar.
On the Jordan Valley specifically, Moshe Ya'alon (Deputy Prime Minister, later Defense Minister) said as early as 2011 that Netanyahu was looking at dismantling Jordan Valley settlements as part of a final status agreement. He later said that Netanyahu ordered him to draft plans to dismantle the settlements.
And peace negotiator Yossi Beilin (Labor, Peace Camp, big Oslo process guy; an architect of the Geneva Initiative which @mattyglesias has thought was a good idea) in 2013 said that even in the absence of a final status agreement, Netanyahu was willing to accept a Palestinian State on provisional borders. Beilin was skeptical that Netanyahu or Abbas were willing to pay the price of what would be required for full peace, but he said he'd heard Netanyahu himself say that he was ready to establish a provisional border with the Palestinians.
...
In 2015 after elections Netanyahu said he accepted the general idea of the Arab Peace Initiative (agreement with Moderate Arab States, though resistant on ideas of Palestinian return and ceding the Golan specifically). He said he told the Arab States then that he was not opposed to a demilitarized Palestinian State in principle if it recognized Israel as the nation state of the Jews alongside Palestine as the nation state of the Palestinians and the Palestinians put up with the IDF remaining in parts of the West Bank "for an extended period of time".
In 2017, the Washington Post reported that Netanyahu told the incoming Trump Administration that he still favored the two state solution, but believed that the Palestinians were not ready for a deal.
Netanyahu accepted the 2020 Trump-Kushner Plan, for what that's worth. That involved a Palestinian State, albeit a pretty ugly one. But according to Jared Kushner, the proposal was put out as a basis for negotiations in order to give Abbas room to make a bunch of demands to ask for more ("meat on the bone", as Kushner characterized it).
Yair Lapid as the sitting Prime Minister in 2022 said at the United Nations that he accepted a Two State Solution.
In early 2023 Netanyahu said on the Lex Friedman Podcast that he'd accept a Palestinian State if he didn't really have to call it one
Friedman interview at 45:55 - "So people say, ah, but it's not a perfect state. I say, okay, call it what you will ... call it, I don't know, limited sovereignty, call it autonomy plus, call it whatever you want to call it, but that's the reality."
Friedman interview at 46:15 -
"Lex: So a two state solution where Israel controls the security of the entire region."
"Netanyahu: We don't call it quite that. I mean there are different names. But the idea is yes, Israel controls security [in] the entire area ... It's this tiny area between the Jordan River and the Sea."
January 18, 2024. Reuters wrote Netanyahu said "I clarify that in any arrangement in the foreseeable future, with an accord or without an accord, Israel must have security control over the entire territory west of the Jordan River. That's a necessary condition. It clashes with the principle of sovereignty but what can you do."
January 19, 2024. Reuters wrote "Biden said Netanyahu [on their call] was not opposed to all two-state solutions, and there were a number of types possible, noting that some United Nations members do not have military forces."
...
Netanyahu in accepting the Trump Plan in 2025 agreed to points 9, 18, 19, and 20, which had a bunch of references to an eventual Palestinian State once Gaza was rebuilt and the Palestinian Authority completed a reform program.
This was a pretty easy thing for him to do though because he fundamentally thinks the Palestinian Authority is too corrupt and dysfunctional to adopt and implement an institutional reform program.
Netanyahu accepted the Two-State Solution in 2009 in his famous Bar-Ilan Speech.
It was the conclusion of the Obama Administration and of Hussein Agha (Abbas's top informal negotiator) that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas sunk talks in 2014 as soon as Netanyahu was getting really flexible.
Under the 2013 Molcho-Agha Framework for negotiations, Netanyahu agreed to final status talks based on the following principles:
[1] "Palestine" would be "an independent and sovereign state in a sustainable territory which will correspond to the size of the territory controlled by Egypt and Jordan before the 4th of June 1967,”
[2] “[A]ny solution must take into account the historical, social, cultural and emotional connections of the two peoples to the city, as well as protect the holy sites.”
[3] "There will be a complete withdrawal in stages of Israeli forces from the territory of Palestine. The last Israeli forces will evacuate when the final stage of the agreement comes into effect"
[4] "Israelis who choose to remain in their homes in the state of Palestine will live under Palestinian law"
[5] Some sort of limited Palestinian 'right of return' on an individualized basis would be up for future discussion
Both sides reserved the right to oppose certain clauses, but as reported Netanyahu accepted what his top negotiator put together.
This basically lines up with the book "The Last Palestinian" reporting that Netanyahu told Obama and Kerry that he could agree to evacuate large parts of the West Bank so that a Palestinian State could be established, so long as he was able to do it slowly and gradually over a number of years (perhaps up to a decade). The main reason the Obama Administration was unhappy with this was domestic American politics (Obama wanting credit). It was after this that Kerry got the Molcho-Agha channel going for framework negotiations.
And "The Last Palestinian" (a biography of Mahmoud Abbas) says that Kerry got Netanyahu to agree in 2013 that "[t]he new secure and recognized border between Israel and Palestine will be negotiated based on the 1967 lines with mutual agreed land swaps." Where Netanyahu was unwilling to budge was on a continued IDF presence in the Jordan Valley for 10 to 15 years and authority to conduct raids and operations against terrorism there. Netanyahu was also unwilling to accept a Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem, though he was willing to accept Palestinian "aspirations" regarding East Jerusalem, and [separate from the book the Last Palestinian" Netanyahu agreed to the Palestinians getting certain East Jerusalem neighborhoods like Shuafat, Beit Hanina, and Kafr Aqab. And Netanyahu accepted a limited Palestinian right of return to Israel.
According to the Last Palestinian, Obama took the Kerry framework and added express language about a Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem in order to satisfy the Palestinians. Abbas balked, asked for more time to think, and then never responded.
...
Also reported from the period is that Netanyahu instructed aides to draft plans to dismantle West Bank settlements and isolated settlements like Yitzhar.
On the Jordan Valley specifically, Moshe Ya'alon (Deputy Prime Minister, later Defense Minister) said as early as 2011 that Netanyahu was looking at dismantling Jordan Valley settlements as part of a final status agreement. He later said that Netanyahu ordered him to draft plans to dismantle the settlements.
And peace negotiator Yossi Beilin (Labor, Peace Camp, big Oslo process guy; an architect of the Geneva Initiative which @mattyglesias has thought was a good idea) in 2013 said that even in the absence of a final status agreement, Netanyahu was willing to accept a Palestinian State on provisional borders. Beilin was skeptical that Netanyahu or Abbas were willing to pay the price of what would be required for full peace, but he said he'd heard Netanyahu himself say that he was ready to establish a provisional border with the Palestinians.
...
In 2015 after elections Netanyahu said he accepted the general idea of the Arab Peace Initiative (agreement with Moderate Arab States, though resistant on ideas of Palestinian return and ceding the Golan specifically). He said he told the Arab States then that he was not opposed to a demilitarized Palestinian State in principle if it recognized Israel as the nation state of the Jews alongside Palestine as the nation state of the Palestinians and the Palestinians put up with the IDF remaining in parts of the West Bank "for an extended period of time".
In 2017, the Washington Post reported that Netanyahu told the incoming Trump Administration that he still favored the two state solution, but believed that the Palestinians were not ready for a deal.
Netanyahu accepted the 2020 Trump-Kushner Plan, for what that's worth. That involved a Palestinian State, albeit a pretty ugly one. But according to Jared Kushner, the proposal was put out as a basis for negotiations in order to give Abbas room to make a bunch of demands to ask for more ("meat on the bone", as Kushner characterized it).
Yair Lapid as the sitting Prime Minister in 2022 said at the United Nations that he accepted a Two State Solution.
In early 2023 Netanyahu said on the Lex Friedman Podcast that he'd accept a Palestinian State if he didn't really have to call it one
Friedman interview at 45:55 - "So people say, ah, but it's not a perfect state. I say, okay, call it what you will ... call it, I don't know, limited sovereignty, call it autonomy plus, call it whatever you want to call it, but that's the reality."
Friedman interview at 46:15 -
"Lex: So a two state solution where Israel controls the security of the entire region."
"Netanyahu: We don't call it quite that. I mean there are different names. But the idea is yes, Israel controls security [in] the entire area ... It's this tiny area between the Jordan River and the Sea."
January 18, 2024. Reuters wrote Netanyahu said "I clarify that in any arrangement in the foreseeable future, with an accord or without an accord, Israel must have security control over the entire territory west of the Jordan River. That's a necessary condition. It clashes with the principle of sovereignty but what can you do."
January 19, 2024. Reuters wrote "Biden said Netanyahu [on their call] was not opposed to all two-state solutions, and there were a number of types possible, noting that some United Nations members do not have military forces."
...
Netanyahu in accepting the Trump Plan in 2025 agreed to points 9, 18, 19, and 20, which had a bunch of references to an eventual Palestinian State once Gaza was rebuilt and the Palestinian Authority completed a reform program.
This was a pretty easy thing for him to do though because he fundamentally thinks the Palestinian Authority is too corrupt and dysfunctional to adopt and implement an institutional reform program.
@havivrettiggur
@RachelGur
@noam_dworman
@RachelGur
@noam_dworman
@havivrettiggur @RachelGur @noam_dworman @SethAMandel
Acabaram-se as festas em Miami. Ao menos para o delegado Marcelo Ivo.
Segue algumas infos de bastidor!
Segundo fontes, Marcelo Ivo queria muito continuar aqui nos EUA e já estava trabalhando num processo para tirar o seu visto. Ele já havia ultrapassado em 8 meses o prazo de 2 anos do cargo.
Segundo apuração do site Direita Ativa, Marcelo Ivo mantinha em Miami um padrão de vida que, ao menos em aparência, destoava da imagem esperada de um representante da PF no exterior.
Uma das reportagens afirma que ele viveria em um apart-hotel de alto luxo em Brickell (que nós confirmamos), centro financeiro da cidade — a mesma região onde foram instalados escritórios ligados a Daniel Vorcaro e ao Banco Master —, com aluguel estimado em US$ 9.350 mensais, algo em torno de R$ 50 mil na cotação da época.
O portal também descreve Marcelo Ivo como presença frequente na vida noturna de Miami, circulando por ambientes exclusivos de alto padrão, com bebidas caras e convívio social em espaços frequentados por empresários, artistas e celebridades, como o Club Mila.
Eu também apurei. Segundo fontes Marcelo Ivo costumava convidar integrantes da alta sociedade e autoridades para festas privadas, com presença de mulheres bonitas e ambiente "mais solto".
A informação teria vindo do próprio Marcelo Ivo que teria contado vantagem após beber além da conta. (hey Ivo, se beber não dirija!)
Só eu que acho semelhante ao que apareceu em apurações sobre o círculo de Daniel Vorcaro?
ainvestigacao.com/p/conheca-marc…
Segue algumas infos de bastidor!
Segundo fontes, Marcelo Ivo queria muito continuar aqui nos EUA e já estava trabalhando num processo para tirar o seu visto. Ele já havia ultrapassado em 8 meses o prazo de 2 anos do cargo.
Segundo apuração do site Direita Ativa, Marcelo Ivo mantinha em Miami um padrão de vida que, ao menos em aparência, destoava da imagem esperada de um representante da PF no exterior.
Uma das reportagens afirma que ele viveria em um apart-hotel de alto luxo em Brickell (que nós confirmamos), centro financeiro da cidade — a mesma região onde foram instalados escritórios ligados a Daniel Vorcaro e ao Banco Master —, com aluguel estimado em US$ 9.350 mensais, algo em torno de R$ 50 mil na cotação da época.
O portal também descreve Marcelo Ivo como presença frequente na vida noturna de Miami, circulando por ambientes exclusivos de alto padrão, com bebidas caras e convívio social em espaços frequentados por empresários, artistas e celebridades, como o Club Mila.
Eu também apurei. Segundo fontes Marcelo Ivo costumava convidar integrantes da alta sociedade e autoridades para festas privadas, com presença de mulheres bonitas e ambiente "mais solto".
A informação teria vindo do próprio Marcelo Ivo que teria contado vantagem após beber além da conta. (hey Ivo, se beber não dirija!)
Só eu que acho semelhante ao que apareceu em apurações sobre o círculo de Daniel Vorcaro?
ainvestigacao.com/p/conheca-marc…
A @Saray_sandrac traz um desses flagras.