Most recent unrolls from @ThreadReaderApp
UN ANÁLISIS DE LA GUERRA DE UCRANIA DESDE UNA PERSPECTIVA PERONISTA - ACTUALIZACIÓN SEMANAL: 12 - 19/04/2026 - CAMPAÑA RUSA DE VERANO 2026
Rusia busca derrotar a la OTAN en ucrania
Resúmenes anteriores:
Respecto a la campaña de verano y con los pocos
Rusia busca derrotar a la OTAN en ucrania
Resúmenes anteriores:
Respecto a la campaña de verano y con los pocos
elementos de juicio que tengo, puedo ver dos modos de acción Modos de Acción (MMA) rusos uno el más lógico y el otro, favorito de la prensa y demás aguantaderos atlantistas, pueden guardar el tuit, pero es poco menos que ejercer el arte de la adivinación.
MA #1 Fase 1 Operaciones de Configuración durante la primavera/ verano boreal: 1 - a liberar Orekov y amenazar Zaporizia para aferrar fuerzas y crear una posición relativa favorable para continuar el ataque a Odesa (2027).
Comparativas de frames entre Dragon Ball Super y Dragon Ball Super: Beerus
1/6
1/6
2/6
3/6
3 Steps for Empowered Dialogue
how to never get stuck when trying to talk to someone about something difficult
how to never get stuck when trying to talk to someone about something difficult
3 Steps for Empowered Dialogue, explained all in one breath standing on one foot
link to text: malcolmocean.com/2025/11/3sed-3…
x.com/visakanv/statu…
link to text: malcolmocean.com/2025/11/3sed-3…
x.com/visakanv/statu…
I developed the imagery here by going back and forth with chattyg. it did a thing with a puzzle piece just based on a vague prompt to "illustrate this post" and I liked the metaphor so made it way more precise
a callback to my mindset choice piece
malcolmocean.com/2021/11/mindse…
a callback to my mindset choice piece
malcolmocean.com/2021/11/mindse…
Stephen Jen氏の最新ロイターコラム（4/17）で「不動産バブル」乗り越えた中国、傷浅く 地政学的混乱も好機にと述べている
先日のM2投稿でも指摘した通り、349兆元のマネーが「腐った不動産担保」に凍結されたまま、実体経済に回っていないこの状況で、本当に「転換点」を越えたと言えるのでしょうか？
※長文になります
jp.reuters.com/markets/japan/…
先日のM2投稿でも指摘した通り、349兆元のマネーが「腐った不動産担保」に凍結されたまま、実体経済に回っていないこの状況で、本当に「転換点」を越えたと言えるのでしょうか？
※長文になります
jp.reuters.com/markets/japan/…
まとめ
Stephen Jen氏の「中国は大きな転換点を越えた」「傷は日本より浅い」「5%成長を維持」「地政学的混乱も好機」という楽観論は実証的根拠が極めて薄弱であり、むしろポジショントークに近い
※図は中国住宅価格の長期下落トレンド（Reuters 2025年11月データ）
2021年以降のYoY/MoMともに継続的下落を鮮明に示している。
Stephen Jen氏の「中国は大きな転換点を越えた」「傷は日本より浅い」「5%成長を維持」「地政学的混乱も好機」という楽観論は実証的根拠が極めて薄弱であり、むしろポジショントークに近い
※図は中国住宅価格の長期下落トレンド（Reuters 2025年11月データ）
2021年以降のYoY/MoMともに継続的下落を鮮明に示している。
以下の通り各スレッド構成で解説してゆきます
I. 「転換点を越えた」論の根拠薄弱性
II. 日中比較の構造的欠陥（3つの致命的ミス）
III. 「5%成長維持」論の欺瞞性
IV. BYD「海外利益3000ドル」論の危険な単純化
V. 「80:20戦略」＆DeepSeek論の過大評価
VI. 「地政学的混乱が好機」論の誤謬
VII. 総括：政治経済学的背景
I. 「転換点を越えた」論の根拠薄弱性
II. 日中比較の構造的欠陥（3つの致命的ミス）
III. 「5%成長維持」論の欺瞞性
IV. BYD「海外利益3000ドル」論の危険な単純化
V. 「80:20戦略」＆DeepSeek論の過大評価
VI. 「地政学的混乱が好機」論の誤謬
VII. 総括：政治経済学的背景
MINHA CASA ESTAVA DESORGANIZADA HÁ MESES.
Então mostrei ao Claude fotos de cada cômodo.
48 horas depois, o espaço estava organizado e minha mente muito mais tranquila.
Sem comprar móveis novos, sem contratar decorador, apenas 8 prompts que mudaram completamente o meu espaço:
Então mostrei ao Claude fotos de cada cômodo.
48 horas depois, o espaço estava organizado e minha mente muito mais tranquila.
Sem comprar móveis novos, sem contratar decorador, apenas 8 prompts que mudaram completamente o meu espaço:
1. Mentor Minimalista
Prompt: Com base nesta foto, crie uma lista para eliminar a desordem com cada objeto visível, indicando o que manter, doar ou descartar.
Prompt: Com base nesta foto, crie uma lista para eliminar a desordem com cada objeto visível, indicando o que manter, doar ou descartar.
2. Harmonizador de Ambiente
Prompt: Crie uma paleta de cores e um estilo de iluminação para o meu quarto com base na decoração atual.
Prompt: Crie uma paleta de cores e um estilo de iluminação para o meu quarto com base na decoração atual.
🚨 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗣𝗢𝗣𝗘 𝗜𝗦 𝗪𝗔𝗥𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗟𝗗 𝗔𝗕𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗘 𝗚𝗟𝗢𝗕𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧 𝗔𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗔
He didn't name Carney.
He didn't have to.
---
For 5 months, Pope Leo XIV has described — in speech after speech, letter after letter — the exact framework being executed Mark Carney.
📌 All sources linked in the comments below.
Every word is from the Pope himself.
Every receipt is public record.
You make the call.
🇨🇦
---
FIRST — HOW WE GOT HERE.
In 2010, the World Economic Forum published a 600-page report called the Global Redesign Initiative.
It listed the stakeholders needed to restructure the global economy.
One of them was faith leaders.
The report created a "Global Agenda Council on Faith" — chaired by the President of Georgetown University.
Its job, in plain language?
Mobilize religious communities as a "grass roots movement" to pressure G20 governments into structural economic changes.
Use faith to change how money, power, and policy work globally.
That was the blueprint.
---
THEN — THE EXECUTION.
In 2016, Lynn Forester de Rothschild met Pope Francis at a Vatican forum.
In November 2019, a private Vatican audience founded the Council for Inclusive Capitalism.
On December 8, 2020, it launched publicly.
Pope Francis blessed it.
🔹 27 CEOs named as "Guardians"
🔹 $10.5 trillion in assets under management
🔹 200 million workers across 163 countries
🔹 Officially a member organization of the World Economic Forum
One of the founding Guardians?
Mark Carney.
Sandwiched between Lady de Rothschild and Brian Moynihan (Bank of America) in the group photo.
The 2010 WEF blueprint → the 2020 Vatican execution.
10 years. Plan to reality. Documented.
---
THEN — THE SUCCESSION.
April 21, 2025: Pope Francis dies.
Same week: Mark Carney becomes Prime Minister of Canada.
May 10, 2025: The new Pope speaks for the first time.
His first public act is explaining why he chose the name Leo XIV.
From the Vatican's website, his own words:
He chose it because Pope Leo XIII wrote Rerum Novarum in 1891 — the Catholic Church's foundational text against "a small number of very rich men" consolidating industrial power over workers.
Leo XIV publicly signaled he is the successor for today's version of that fight.
Then he got to work.
---
THE TIMING.
April 13, 2026 — night: Marilyn Gladu crosses the floor. Mark Carney becomes the first Prime Minister in Canadian history to secure a majority through floor-crossings instead of an election.
April 14, 2026 — 11:27 AM ET: Pope Leo XIV releases a letter to the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.
The plenary theme, chosen in advance, on the Vatican's own website:
"The Uses of Power: Legitimacy, Democracy and the Rewriting of the International Order."
What Leo wrote in that letter — and in 5 months of speeches before and after — reads like a point-by-point description of the government now ruling Canada.
Here's what he said.
Here's what it matches.
You decide.
🧵👇 (1/3)
He didn't name Carney.
He didn't have to.
---
For 5 months, Pope Leo XIV has described — in speech after speech, letter after letter — the exact framework being executed Mark Carney.
📌 All sources linked in the comments below.
Every word is from the Pope himself.
Every receipt is public record.
You make the call.
🇨🇦
---
FIRST — HOW WE GOT HERE.
In 2010, the World Economic Forum published a 600-page report called the Global Redesign Initiative.
It listed the stakeholders needed to restructure the global economy.
One of them was faith leaders.
The report created a "Global Agenda Council on Faith" — chaired by the President of Georgetown University.
Its job, in plain language?
Mobilize religious communities as a "grass roots movement" to pressure G20 governments into structural economic changes.
Use faith to change how money, power, and policy work globally.
That was the blueprint.
---
THEN — THE EXECUTION.
In 2016, Lynn Forester de Rothschild met Pope Francis at a Vatican forum.
In November 2019, a private Vatican audience founded the Council for Inclusive Capitalism.
On December 8, 2020, it launched publicly.
Pope Francis blessed it.
🔹 27 CEOs named as "Guardians"
🔹 $10.5 trillion in assets under management
🔹 200 million workers across 163 countries
🔹 Officially a member organization of the World Economic Forum
One of the founding Guardians?
Mark Carney.
Sandwiched between Lady de Rothschild and Brian Moynihan (Bank of America) in the group photo.
The 2010 WEF blueprint → the 2020 Vatican execution.
10 years. Plan to reality. Documented.
---
THEN — THE SUCCESSION.
April 21, 2025: Pope Francis dies.
Same week: Mark Carney becomes Prime Minister of Canada.
May 10, 2025: The new Pope speaks for the first time.
His first public act is explaining why he chose the name Leo XIV.
From the Vatican's website, his own words:
He chose it because Pope Leo XIII wrote Rerum Novarum in 1891 — the Catholic Church's foundational text against "a small number of very rich men" consolidating industrial power over workers.
Leo XIV publicly signaled he is the successor for today's version of that fight.
Then he got to work.
---
THE TIMING.
April 13, 2026 — night: Marilyn Gladu crosses the floor. Mark Carney becomes the first Prime Minister in Canadian history to secure a majority through floor-crossings instead of an election.
April 14, 2026 — 11:27 AM ET: Pope Leo XIV releases a letter to the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.
The plenary theme, chosen in advance, on the Vatican's own website:
"The Uses of Power: Legitimacy, Democracy and the Rewriting of the International Order."
What Leo wrote in that letter — and in 5 months of speeches before and after — reads like a point-by-point description of the government now ruling Canada.
Here's what he said.
Here's what it matches.
You decide.
🧵👇 (1/3)
1️⃣ DEMOCRACY AT RISK
POPE LEO XIV, April 14, 2026:
🔹 "Democracy remains healthy only when rooted in the moral law and a true vision of the human person. Lacking this foundation, it risks becoming either a majoritarian tyranny or a mask for the dominance of economic and technological elites."
🔹 "The legitimacy of authority depends not on the accumulation of economic or technological strength, but on the wisdom and virtue with which it is exercised."
🔹 Quoting John Paul II: democracy means "the possibility both of electing and holding accountable those who govern them, and of replacing them through peaceful means when appropriate."
🔹 "The same principles that guide the exercise of authority within nations must likewise inform the international order — a truth that is particularly important to recall at a time when strategic rivalries and shifting alliances are reshaping global relations."
NOW LOOK AT THE RECEIPTS:
🔶 Carney is the first Prime Minister in Canadian history with ZERO prior elected experience. Not a seat. Not a cabinet post. Nothing.
🔶 He was chosen Liberal leader by 151,899 people — 0.38% of Canada.
🔶 Trudeau prorogued Parliament to avoid a non-confidence vote all 3 opposition parties committed to. Then advised the Governor General to appoint Carney.
🔶 Liberals won only 169 seats in the 2025 election — short of a majority.
🔶 So in the 5 months that followed, 5 MPs crossed the floor — d'Entremont, Ma, Jeneroux, Idlout, Gladu. No by-elections.
🔶 74% of Canadians oppose floor-crossing without a by-election (Angus Reid). They did it anyway.
🔶 Carney is the first PM in Canadian history to reach majority through floor-crossings.
🔶 He still holds $6.8 million in Brookfield stock options. The Ethics Commissioner testified under oath: "future compensation is tied to Brookfield's success."
🔶 His ethics screen covers 103 of Brookfield's ~2,000 companies. That's 5%. The co-administrator, Privy Council Clerk Michael Sabia, held Brookfield shares himself until September 2025.
🔶 The current Governor General is preparing to leave. Carney will personally choose her replacement — the person who signs every bill into law.
The Pope wrote about democracy becoming "a mask for the dominance of economic and technological elites."
He wrote it the morning a former central banker, former Goldman MD, founding Guardian of the 27-CEO/$10.5T Council for Inclusive Capitalism, officially secured a majority he never won at the ballot box.
---
2️⃣ HUMAN + NATURAL RESOURCES EXPLOITED
Before Pope Leo XIV's Africa trip, the Vatican itself announced the themes he would raise:
🔹 "The Vatican has said that some of the themes Leo will raise in Africa are the exploitation of natural and human resources, corruption and authoritarianism."
🔹 "Themes Leo is expected to raise include Christian-Muslim coexistence, the over-exploitation of the region's natural and human resources, corruption and migration."
Then came the words themselves.
POPE LEO XIV — June 30, 2025, World Day of Prayer for Creation Message:
🔹 "Nature itself is reduced at times to a bargaining chip, a commodity to be bartered for economic or political gain. As a result, God's creation turns into a battleground for the control of vital resources."
POPE LEO XIV — April 16, 2026, Cameroon:
🔹 "Those who rob your land of its resources generally invest much of the profit in weapons, thus perpetuating an endless cycle of destabilization and death."
🔹 "Woe to those who manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military, economic and political gain."
POPE LEO XIV — April 18, 2026, Angola:
🔹 "The Church seeks to foster a just model of coexistence, free from the various forms of slavery imposed by the elite who are laden with much wealth but false joys."
🔹 "How much suffering, how many deaths, how many social and environmental disasters are brought about by this logic of extractivism!"
---
NOW LOOK AT THE RECEIPTS:
🔶 AFRICA — THE CONGO. Brookfield's own 2020 SEC filing declared its Clarios battery products "DRC conflict undeterminable" — in a region where 40,000 children mine cobalt for under $2 a day.
🔶 AFRICA — SOLAR SUPPLY CHAIN. Brookfield Renewable scored 0% on responsible mineral sourcing in the 2025 Human Rights Benchmark — while Carney built the $130 trillion GFANZ framework driving demand for African-mined cobalt, lithium, and mica.
🔶 BRAZIL — SLAVE LABOUR. Brookfield paid a R$800,000 (~$163K CAD) slave labour fine upheld December 2021 by a Brazilian regional labour court.
🔶 BRAZIL — DEFORESTATION. Brookfield cleared 9,000 hectares on 8 farms in the Cerrado (2012–2021). Only 1 of 8 had legal permits. The farms were sold off late 2021 — "slash and sell." Carney was promoted from Vice Chair to Chair in December 2022.
🔶 INDIGENOUS RIGHTS — 4 COUNTRIES. CBC Indigenous (April 2025) documented Brookfield breaching Indigenous rights in Brazil, Canada, Colombia, and the United States. Mississauga First Nation is currently suing Brookfield for $100 million.
🔶 XINJIANG. Canadian imports from Xinjiang grew from $59M (2023) → $231M (2024) → $601M (2025). Canada blocked 2 shipments. The US blocked over 1,000.
🔶 HIDDEN EMISSIONS. Brookfield's true emissions were estimated up to 13x higher than reported (Investors for Paris Compliance, December 2023).
🔶 EXTRACTION → WEAPONS. Carney announced $35 BILLION for Arctic military upgrades in March 2026, hit NATO's 2% defence spending target 5 years early, and is now building a new "Defence, Security and Resilience Bank" to mobilize private capital into global defence supply chains (CBC, PMO, Bloomberg). Leo's warning — word for word.
🔶 PERSONAL STAKE. Throughout all of it, Carney still holds $6.8M in unvested Brookfield stock options.
---
The Pope named slavery, extraction, and destruction as the work of elites "laden with much wealth but false joys."
These are the receipts.
---
3️⃣ FREEDOM OF SPEECH + CONSCIENCE DISAPPEARING
This is where Leo's warning gets most direct.
(2/3)👇
POPE LEO XIV, April 14, 2026:
🔹 "Democracy remains healthy only when rooted in the moral law and a true vision of the human person. Lacking this foundation, it risks becoming either a majoritarian tyranny or a mask for the dominance of economic and technological elites."
🔹 "The legitimacy of authority depends not on the accumulation of economic or technological strength, but on the wisdom and virtue with which it is exercised."
🔹 Quoting John Paul II: democracy means "the possibility both of electing and holding accountable those who govern them, and of replacing them through peaceful means when appropriate."
🔹 "The same principles that guide the exercise of authority within nations must likewise inform the international order — a truth that is particularly important to recall at a time when strategic rivalries and shifting alliances are reshaping global relations."
NOW LOOK AT THE RECEIPTS:
🔶 Carney is the first Prime Minister in Canadian history with ZERO prior elected experience. Not a seat. Not a cabinet post. Nothing.
🔶 He was chosen Liberal leader by 151,899 people — 0.38% of Canada.
🔶 Trudeau prorogued Parliament to avoid a non-confidence vote all 3 opposition parties committed to. Then advised the Governor General to appoint Carney.
🔶 Liberals won only 169 seats in the 2025 election — short of a majority.
🔶 So in the 5 months that followed, 5 MPs crossed the floor — d'Entremont, Ma, Jeneroux, Idlout, Gladu. No by-elections.
🔶 74% of Canadians oppose floor-crossing without a by-election (Angus Reid). They did it anyway.
🔶 Carney is the first PM in Canadian history to reach majority through floor-crossings.
🔶 He still holds $6.8 million in Brookfield stock options. The Ethics Commissioner testified under oath: "future compensation is tied to Brookfield's success."
🔶 His ethics screen covers 103 of Brookfield's ~2,000 companies. That's 5%. The co-administrator, Privy Council Clerk Michael Sabia, held Brookfield shares himself until September 2025.
🔶 The current Governor General is preparing to leave. Carney will personally choose her replacement — the person who signs every bill into law.
The Pope wrote about democracy becoming "a mask for the dominance of economic and technological elites."
He wrote it the morning a former central banker, former Goldman MD, founding Guardian of the 27-CEO/$10.5T Council for Inclusive Capitalism, officially secured a majority he never won at the ballot box.
---
2️⃣ HUMAN + NATURAL RESOURCES EXPLOITED
Before Pope Leo XIV's Africa trip, the Vatican itself announced the themes he would raise:
🔹 "The Vatican has said that some of the themes Leo will raise in Africa are the exploitation of natural and human resources, corruption and authoritarianism."
🔹 "Themes Leo is expected to raise include Christian-Muslim coexistence, the over-exploitation of the region's natural and human resources, corruption and migration."
Then came the words themselves.
POPE LEO XIV — June 30, 2025, World Day of Prayer for Creation Message:
🔹 "Nature itself is reduced at times to a bargaining chip, a commodity to be bartered for economic or political gain. As a result, God's creation turns into a battleground for the control of vital resources."
POPE LEO XIV — April 16, 2026, Cameroon:
🔹 "Those who rob your land of its resources generally invest much of the profit in weapons, thus perpetuating an endless cycle of destabilization and death."
🔹 "Woe to those who manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military, economic and political gain."
POPE LEO XIV — April 18, 2026, Angola:
🔹 "The Church seeks to foster a just model of coexistence, free from the various forms of slavery imposed by the elite who are laden with much wealth but false joys."
🔹 "How much suffering, how many deaths, how many social and environmental disasters are brought about by this logic of extractivism!"
---
NOW LOOK AT THE RECEIPTS:
🔶 AFRICA — THE CONGO. Brookfield's own 2020 SEC filing declared its Clarios battery products "DRC conflict undeterminable" — in a region where 40,000 children mine cobalt for under $2 a day.
🔶 AFRICA — SOLAR SUPPLY CHAIN. Brookfield Renewable scored 0% on responsible mineral sourcing in the 2025 Human Rights Benchmark — while Carney built the $130 trillion GFANZ framework driving demand for African-mined cobalt, lithium, and mica.
🔶 BRAZIL — SLAVE LABOUR. Brookfield paid a R$800,000 (~$163K CAD) slave labour fine upheld December 2021 by a Brazilian regional labour court.
🔶 BRAZIL — DEFORESTATION. Brookfield cleared 9,000 hectares on 8 farms in the Cerrado (2012–2021). Only 1 of 8 had legal permits. The farms were sold off late 2021 — "slash and sell." Carney was promoted from Vice Chair to Chair in December 2022.
🔶 INDIGENOUS RIGHTS — 4 COUNTRIES. CBC Indigenous (April 2025) documented Brookfield breaching Indigenous rights in Brazil, Canada, Colombia, and the United States. Mississauga First Nation is currently suing Brookfield for $100 million.
🔶 XINJIANG. Canadian imports from Xinjiang grew from $59M (2023) → $231M (2024) → $601M (2025). Canada blocked 2 shipments. The US blocked over 1,000.
🔶 HIDDEN EMISSIONS. Brookfield's true emissions were estimated up to 13x higher than reported (Investors for Paris Compliance, December 2023).
🔶 EXTRACTION → WEAPONS. Carney announced $35 BILLION for Arctic military upgrades in March 2026, hit NATO's 2% defence spending target 5 years early, and is now building a new "Defence, Security and Resilience Bank" to mobilize private capital into global defence supply chains (CBC, PMO, Bloomberg). Leo's warning — word for word.
🔶 PERSONAL STAKE. Throughout all of it, Carney still holds $6.8M in unvested Brookfield stock options.
---
The Pope named slavery, extraction, and destruction as the work of elites "laden with much wealth but false joys."
These are the receipts.
---
3️⃣ FREEDOM OF SPEECH + CONSCIENCE DISAPPEARING
This is where Leo's warning gets most direct.
(2/3)👇
3️⃣ FREEDOM OF SPEECH + CONSCIENCE DISAPPEARING
This is where Leo's warning gets most direct.
POPE LEO XIV, January 9, 2026 — State of the World Address to Diplomatic Corps:
🔹 "It is painful to see how, especially in the West, the space for genuine freedom of expression is rapidly shrinking."
🔹 "A new Orwellian-style language is developing which, in an attempt to be increasingly inclusive, ends up excluding those who do not conform to the ideologies that are fueling it."
🔹 "At this moment in history, freedom of conscience seems increasingly to be questioned by States, even those that claim to be based on democracy and human rights."
🔹 "We are seeing an actual 'short circuit' of human rights… creating space for force and oppression."
🔹 He warned specifically of "authoritarian tendencies."
NOW LOOK AT WHAT CANADA IS PASSING RIGHT NOW:
🔶 BILL C-9 — "COMBATTING HATE ACT."
Strips the good-faith religious speech defence that protected the Bible, Quran, Torah, and every sacred text since 1970.
Creates a new standalone "hate crime" offence — any Criminal Code violation deemed "motivated by hatred" now carries MUCH higher maximum penalties:
⚡ Uttering threats: 5 years → 10 years
⚡ Assault: 10 years → 14 years
⚡ Any underlying offence carrying 14+ years → UP TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT
And the new "hate-motivated" offence does NOT require the Attorney General's consent.
That means any police officer can lay the charge — without the traditional political-oversight safeguard that existed for decades.
"Hatred" is defined as "detestation or vilification" — vague enough that it "could encompass strong criticism or disagreement." (Canadian Constitution Foundation)
Passed the House 186-137 on March 25, 2026. Only Liberals + Bloc voted yes.
Over 350 Muslim organizations, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, Orthodox Jewish leaders, and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association all opposed it.
The government passed it anyway.
---
🔶 BILL C-22 — "LAWFUL ACCESS ACT."
Mandatory metadata retention on EVERY Canadian for up to 1 year.
Who you called. When. For how long. Where you were.
Every website you visited. Every person you messaged.
No suspicion. No warrant. No cause.
Secret ministerial orders. No judicial oversight.
Gag orders preventing your telecom from even telling you.
Priority bill when Parliament returned from Easter recess April 14, 2026.
That's not law enforcement.
That's surveillance infrastructure.
---
🔶 BILL C-15 — STABLECOIN ACT.
Received Royal Assent March 26, 2026.
Creates Canada's first national stablecoin framework.
Within days, Deloitte + Stablecorp launched QCAD — Canada's first official digital dollar.
Regulated by the Bank of Canada.
Every single transaction traceable. By design.
---
🔶 BILL S-206 — UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME FRAMEWORK.
Would create a national framework for Guaranteed Livable Basic Income for every Canadian over 17.
Estimated cost: $107 BILLION.
Payable in digital currency the state fully controls.
---
NOW CONNECT THE TRAP:
🔶 C-9 — Hate speech charges without AG consent + life imprisonment penalties
🔶 C-22 — They track every Canadian's communications for a year, no warrant
🔶 C-15 / QCAD — Every transaction traceable by design
🔶 S-206 — Your basic income paid in state-controlled digital currency
🔶 Emergencies Act precedent — they've already proven they'll freeze $50 donors without a court order
Combined, this system allows the government to:
📍 See every transaction you make
📍 Read every communication's metadata
📍 Freeze any wallet instantly
📍 Burn any tokens
📍 Charge you with hate speech without Crown oversight
📍 Jail you for up to life if the charge is upgraded to "hate-motivated"
That's not a safety net.
That's a leash.
The Pope spent 5 months describing exactly this architecture.
---
🕊️ THE QUESTION
Pope Leo XIV didn't name Mark Carney.
He didn't name Canada.
He didn't need to.
He described:
– A democracy becoming a mask for economic and technological elites ✅
– Authority built on accumulation of economic power rather than wisdom ✅
– Voters who can no longer hold their leaders accountable or replace them ✅
– Slavery imposed by the elite "laden with much wealth but false joys" ✅
– Extractivism causing social and environmental disasters ✅
– Freedom of expression shrinking in the West ✅
– Orwellian-style language excluding non-conformists ✅
– States "claiming to be based on democracy" questioning freedom of conscience ✅
– A "short circuit of human rights creating space for force and oppression" ✅
Every box is checked by documented receipts in Canada.
The same week Mark Carney secured a majority without ever having been elected to public office before becoming PM — the new Pope released a letter warning the world about the exact arrangement his Council helped build.
15 years ago, the WEF said the plan required mobilizing faith leaders.
Then one Pope blessed the Council.
Now his successor is warning the world about where it leads.
---
This isn't liberal vs conservative.
This isn't left vs right.
This is every Canadian — holding the same receipts.
Division is what got us here.
Receipts are how we get out.
When every Canadian holds the same truth, we can't be split — not by party lines, not by media narratives, not by the people profiting from our confusion.
That's the only way this ends.
So send this to ONE person who hasn't seen it yet.
Your parents. Your coworker. The friend who voted differently than you.
Not to argue. Not to convert.
Just to put the same receipts in their hands.
🇨🇦 Because the only fight that matters now — is the one we fight together.
#StandOnGuard #StandOnGuardCanada
This is where Leo's warning gets most direct.
POPE LEO XIV, January 9, 2026 — State of the World Address to Diplomatic Corps:
🔹 "It is painful to see how, especially in the West, the space for genuine freedom of expression is rapidly shrinking."
🔹 "A new Orwellian-style language is developing which, in an attempt to be increasingly inclusive, ends up excluding those who do not conform to the ideologies that are fueling it."
🔹 "At this moment in history, freedom of conscience seems increasingly to be questioned by States, even those that claim to be based on democracy and human rights."
🔹 "We are seeing an actual 'short circuit' of human rights… creating space for force and oppression."
🔹 He warned specifically of "authoritarian tendencies."
NOW LOOK AT WHAT CANADA IS PASSING RIGHT NOW:
🔶 BILL C-9 — "COMBATTING HATE ACT."
Strips the good-faith religious speech defence that protected the Bible, Quran, Torah, and every sacred text since 1970.
Creates a new standalone "hate crime" offence — any Criminal Code violation deemed "motivated by hatred" now carries MUCH higher maximum penalties:
⚡ Uttering threats: 5 years → 10 years
⚡ Assault: 10 years → 14 years
⚡ Any underlying offence carrying 14+ years → UP TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT
And the new "hate-motivated" offence does NOT require the Attorney General's consent.
That means any police officer can lay the charge — without the traditional political-oversight safeguard that existed for decades.
"Hatred" is defined as "detestation or vilification" — vague enough that it "could encompass strong criticism or disagreement." (Canadian Constitution Foundation)
Passed the House 186-137 on March 25, 2026. Only Liberals + Bloc voted yes.
Over 350 Muslim organizations, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, Orthodox Jewish leaders, and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association all opposed it.
The government passed it anyway.
---
🔶 BILL C-22 — "LAWFUL ACCESS ACT."
Mandatory metadata retention on EVERY Canadian for up to 1 year.
Who you called. When. For how long. Where you were.
Every website you visited. Every person you messaged.
No suspicion. No warrant. No cause.
Secret ministerial orders. No judicial oversight.
Gag orders preventing your telecom from even telling you.
Priority bill when Parliament returned from Easter recess April 14, 2026.
That's not law enforcement.
That's surveillance infrastructure.
---
🔶 BILL C-15 — STABLECOIN ACT.
Received Royal Assent March 26, 2026.
Creates Canada's first national stablecoin framework.
Within days, Deloitte + Stablecorp launched QCAD — Canada's first official digital dollar.
Regulated by the Bank of Canada.
Every single transaction traceable. By design.
---
🔶 BILL S-206 — UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME FRAMEWORK.
Would create a national framework for Guaranteed Livable Basic Income for every Canadian over 17.
Estimated cost: $107 BILLION.
Payable in digital currency the state fully controls.
---
NOW CONNECT THE TRAP:
🔶 C-9 — Hate speech charges without AG consent + life imprisonment penalties
🔶 C-22 — They track every Canadian's communications for a year, no warrant
🔶 C-15 / QCAD — Every transaction traceable by design
🔶 S-206 — Your basic income paid in state-controlled digital currency
🔶 Emergencies Act precedent — they've already proven they'll freeze $50 donors without a court order
Combined, this system allows the government to:
📍 See every transaction you make
📍 Read every communication's metadata
📍 Freeze any wallet instantly
📍 Burn any tokens
📍 Charge you with hate speech without Crown oversight
📍 Jail you for up to life if the charge is upgraded to "hate-motivated"
That's not a safety net.
That's a leash.
The Pope spent 5 months describing exactly this architecture.
---
🕊️ THE QUESTION
Pope Leo XIV didn't name Mark Carney.
He didn't name Canada.
He didn't need to.
He described:
– A democracy becoming a mask for economic and technological elites ✅
– Authority built on accumulation of economic power rather than wisdom ✅
– Voters who can no longer hold their leaders accountable or replace them ✅
– Slavery imposed by the elite "laden with much wealth but false joys" ✅
– Extractivism causing social and environmental disasters ✅
– Freedom of expression shrinking in the West ✅
– Orwellian-style language excluding non-conformists ✅
– States "claiming to be based on democracy" questioning freedom of conscience ✅
– A "short circuit of human rights creating space for force and oppression" ✅
Every box is checked by documented receipts in Canada.
The same week Mark Carney secured a majority without ever having been elected to public office before becoming PM — the new Pope released a letter warning the world about the exact arrangement his Council helped build.
15 years ago, the WEF said the plan required mobilizing faith leaders.
Then one Pope blessed the Council.
Now his successor is warning the world about where it leads.
---
This isn't liberal vs conservative.
This isn't left vs right.
This is every Canadian — holding the same receipts.
Division is what got us here.
Receipts are how we get out.
When every Canadian holds the same truth, we can't be split — not by party lines, not by media narratives, not by the people profiting from our confusion.
That's the only way this ends.
So send this to ONE person who hasn't seen it yet.
Your parents. Your coworker. The friend who voted differently than you.
Not to argue. Not to convert.
Just to put the same receipts in their hands.
🇨🇦 Because the only fight that matters now — is the one we fight together.
#StandOnGuard #StandOnGuardCanada
#2 Como vemos las perras de @youtube no solo le bajaron la cuenta a este 4 de copas, sino también a los iraníes que hacían videitos de lego
france24.com/en/live-news/2…
france24.com/en/live-news/2…
#1 Esta semana hubo pocas acciones militares, así que mejor lean a los que realmente saben de política exterior: @lucianoanzelini @_atila_e_1 @SebaZ3 o a @sergioeissa. Yo por mi parte rescato algunos artículos como este bochorno de pete hegseth recitando un un texto de Pulp
Fiction de Tarantino como si fuera de la biblia, el nivel de mesianismo de ignorancia de esta gente va a la par de nivel de mesianismo e ignorancia de nuestros libervirgos newsweek.com/people-ask-pet…
🚨Why should one huge LLM know and solve everything? - No single human does, yet our civilization does endless innovation.
Introducing AC/DC - it continually coevolves a population of small expert LLMs that collectively outperform GPT-4o.
(ICLR 2026 w/ @SakanaAILabs) 👇🧵
Introducing AC/DC - it continually coevolves a population of small expert LLMs that collectively outperform GPT-4o.
(ICLR 2026 w/ @SakanaAILabs) 👇🧵
Assessment Coevolving w/ Diverse Capabilities (AC/DC) grows populations of both synthetic tasks and small LLMs, pursuing an open-ended process that discovers divergent expertise in LLM populations with increasingly novel & challenging tasks to push LLMs further towards beating GPT-4o.
AC/DC discovers multiple small 7B/14B LLM task forces that can surpass test-time knowledge coverage of large LLM family counterparts, GPT-4o, and other multi-response baselines.
Notably, our task forces use far fewer combined parameters than the large models!
Notably, our task forces use far fewer combined parameters than the large models!
🧵Ha pasado un poco desapercibida la noticia del martirio de Maha Abu Khalil, que hace dos días fue asesinada en el bombardeo israelí en Tiro. Casi 60 años de lucha y de Maha, que algunos llamaron la luchadora elegante, no hay ni una nota en la wikipedia. Tampoco es facilísimo ⬇
[2] encontrar fotos d ella; casi solo la del proceso en Atenas, donde llegó haciendo el signo de la victoria. Es de recibo rendirle memoria.
La libanesa Maha Abu Khalil es una figura importante de la lucha anticolonial. Fue miembro del FPLP y en 1969, con 22 años, participó, ⬇
La libanesa Maha Abu Khalil es una figura importante de la lucha anticolonial. Fue miembro del FPLP y en 1969, con 22 años, participó, ⬇
[3] con Sami Aboud e Issam Dmeidi, en el intento de secuestro d un avión del El AI en Atenas. Arrestada, desafió al tribunal con el signo de la victoria, una imagen que recorrió el mundo y la convirtió en símbolo de la resistencia palestina. (Video ⤵)
Mitä pitäisi tehdä?
𝕏:ssä on viime aikoina keskusteltu mm. akselerationismista ja pienpuolueiden äänestämisestä systeemin muuttamiseksi.
Akselerationismin sinänsä kiehtova ajatus on siinä, että äänestämällä perinteisiä systeemipuolueita: Kokoomusta, Keskustaa tai SDP:tä saa käytännössä vain saattohoidon jatkoa kuihtuvan sosiaalidemokratian ”hengityskoneelle” → hidas, kivulias rappeutuminen, jossa zombitalous kitkuttelee eteenpäin, mutta ei koskaan nouse uuteen nousuun.
Sen sijaan äänestämällä Vasemmistoliittoa tai Vihreitä ”vedettäisiin tekohengityskoneen letkut irti” → talous ja hyvinvoinvaltion rahoituspohja romahtaisi nopeasti, jolla pakotetaan ulkopuolinen kriisinhallinta (”Troikka” eli IMF/EU-tyyppiset pakkouudistukset), minkä jälkeen voitaisiin aloittaa nopeammin puhtaalta pöydältä aidosti kasvua edistävällä linjalla.
Kuten täällä 𝕏:ssäkin ansiokkaasti osoitettiin, niin tämä romahdus ei käytännössä olisi nopea, vaan kestäisi vuosikausia. Tässä ajassa vasemmisto olisi jo ehtinyt betonoida vallan: exit-verot, marssi viimeistenkin instituutioiden (perustuslaki, tuomioistuimet, media, koulutus, poliisi) läpi, sananvapauden rajoitukset jne.
Seurauksena aivovuoto, pääomapako sekä peruuttamaton demografinen muutos, jolloin oikeisto-opposition rakentaminen vaikeutuu merkittävästi. Eikä IMF-troikkakaan ole luonut mitään paratiiseja, joten akselerationismi ei tule kysymykseen.
Toisena vaihtoehtona esitettiin "systeemin sisällä taistelemista" eli esim. pienpuolueiden äänestämistä. Tämäkään vaihtoehto ei ikävä kyllä toimi kovin hyvin, koska heti kun jokin varteenotettava vastavalta on nousemassa, ellei sitä ole jo kielletty, niin se kaapataan sisäisesti joko istuttamalla sinne sabotöörejä tai kompromentoituja status quon edustajia, jotka paljastuvat vasta saadessaan valtaa puhumattakaan kaatumista vallanhimoisten opportunistien sisäisiin riitoihin (Case Graniittipuolue).
Mutta on olemassa eräs vaihtoehto, joka ei ole suomalaisessa yhteiskunnassa saanut juurikaan huomiota: äänestämättä jättäminen.
Oikeastaan Alex on ainut, joka on liputtanut näkyvästi tämän mekanismin puolesta ja seuraavaksi yritän selittää miksi ja miten se toimii sekä miksi se on oikea ratkaisu ongelmiimme.
Ensimmäinen argumentti äänestämättä jättämistä vastaan on yleensä se, että poliitikot eivät juurikaan välitä äänestysprosentista – tai jos välittävät niin se on vain osa näytelmää. Että he penetroituvat kabineteissa ja pyörittävät tätä sirkusta ja kuppauskoneistoa sinekuurivirkojensa ja hyvä veli/ hyvä sisko -verkostojensa varjossa riippumatta siitä mitä mieltä rahvas on. Tämä on tällä hetkellä totta, koska järjestelmän luonto ei ole noussut yleiseen tietoisuuteen (engl. Common Knowledge).
Mitä on yleinen tieto/tietoisuus eli Common Knowledge? Se on tietoa, jonka kaikki tietävät, että kaikki tietävät. Juuri tämän vuoksi perinnemedia on kaapattu ja kahlittu portinvartijoilla, koska demokratian ohjailu ja suostumuksen masinointi tapahtuu siellä yleisen tietoisuuden manipuloinnilla.
Poliitikot tarvitsevat yleisön. Ei siksi että he muka oikeasti välittäisivät siitä mitä heistä tai heidän ajamistaan asioista ollaan mieltä, vaan siksi, että ilman sitä he eivät saa luotua oikeutusta ja perusteita vallalleen. Ilman mandaattia ja illuusiota ”kansan tahdosta” koko show alkaa tutista. Äänestämättä jättäminen riisuu heiltä legitimiteetin kokonaan ja heidän on jopa vastentahtoisesti muutettava ajamiaan asioita saadakseen epätoivoisesti taas yhteyden yleisöön, jotta saisivat kammettua itsensä takaisin valtaistuimelle.
Kuten aikaisemminkin täällä totesin. He ovat kuin lahjakas Herra Ripley. Psykopaatteja. Sosiopaatteja. Kameleontteja. Ei heillä ole mitään omia ajatuksia, vaan he ratsastavat keskimääräisen zeitgeistin aallonharjalla, joka on usein median sosiaalisen manipuloinnin ja ohjailun seurausta. Mutta kun tämä välipalikka otetaan pois ja käännetään itseään vastaan, niin silloin alkaa muutos.
𝕏:ssä on viime aikoina keskusteltu mm. akselerationismista ja pienpuolueiden äänestämisestä systeemin muuttamiseksi.
Akselerationismin sinänsä kiehtova ajatus on siinä, että äänestämällä perinteisiä systeemipuolueita: Kokoomusta, Keskustaa tai SDP:tä saa käytännössä vain saattohoidon jatkoa kuihtuvan sosiaalidemokratian ”hengityskoneelle” → hidas, kivulias rappeutuminen, jossa zombitalous kitkuttelee eteenpäin, mutta ei koskaan nouse uuteen nousuun.
Sen sijaan äänestämällä Vasemmistoliittoa tai Vihreitä ”vedettäisiin tekohengityskoneen letkut irti” → talous ja hyvinvoinvaltion rahoituspohja romahtaisi nopeasti, jolla pakotetaan ulkopuolinen kriisinhallinta (”Troikka” eli IMF/EU-tyyppiset pakkouudistukset), minkä jälkeen voitaisiin aloittaa nopeammin puhtaalta pöydältä aidosti kasvua edistävällä linjalla.
Kuten täällä 𝕏:ssäkin ansiokkaasti osoitettiin, niin tämä romahdus ei käytännössä olisi nopea, vaan kestäisi vuosikausia. Tässä ajassa vasemmisto olisi jo ehtinyt betonoida vallan: exit-verot, marssi viimeistenkin instituutioiden (perustuslaki, tuomioistuimet, media, koulutus, poliisi) läpi, sananvapauden rajoitukset jne.
Seurauksena aivovuoto, pääomapako sekä peruuttamaton demografinen muutos, jolloin oikeisto-opposition rakentaminen vaikeutuu merkittävästi. Eikä IMF-troikkakaan ole luonut mitään paratiiseja, joten akselerationismi ei tule kysymykseen.
Toisena vaihtoehtona esitettiin "systeemin sisällä taistelemista" eli esim. pienpuolueiden äänestämistä. Tämäkään vaihtoehto ei ikävä kyllä toimi kovin hyvin, koska heti kun jokin varteenotettava vastavalta on nousemassa, ellei sitä ole jo kielletty, niin se kaapataan sisäisesti joko istuttamalla sinne sabotöörejä tai kompromentoituja status quon edustajia, jotka paljastuvat vasta saadessaan valtaa puhumattakaan kaatumista vallanhimoisten opportunistien sisäisiin riitoihin (Case Graniittipuolue).
Mutta on olemassa eräs vaihtoehto, joka ei ole suomalaisessa yhteiskunnassa saanut juurikaan huomiota: äänestämättä jättäminen.
Oikeastaan Alex on ainut, joka on liputtanut näkyvästi tämän mekanismin puolesta ja seuraavaksi yritän selittää miksi ja miten se toimii sekä miksi se on oikea ratkaisu ongelmiimme.
Ensimmäinen argumentti äänestämättä jättämistä vastaan on yleensä se, että poliitikot eivät juurikaan välitä äänestysprosentista – tai jos välittävät niin se on vain osa näytelmää. Että he penetroituvat kabineteissa ja pyörittävät tätä sirkusta ja kuppauskoneistoa sinekuurivirkojensa ja hyvä veli/ hyvä sisko -verkostojensa varjossa riippumatta siitä mitä mieltä rahvas on. Tämä on tällä hetkellä totta, koska järjestelmän luonto ei ole noussut yleiseen tietoisuuteen (engl. Common Knowledge).
Mitä on yleinen tieto/tietoisuus eli Common Knowledge? Se on tietoa, jonka kaikki tietävät, että kaikki tietävät. Juuri tämän vuoksi perinnemedia on kaapattu ja kahlittu portinvartijoilla, koska demokratian ohjailu ja suostumuksen masinointi tapahtuu siellä yleisen tietoisuuden manipuloinnilla.
Poliitikot tarvitsevat yleisön. Ei siksi että he muka oikeasti välittäisivät siitä mitä heistä tai heidän ajamistaan asioista ollaan mieltä, vaan siksi, että ilman sitä he eivät saa luotua oikeutusta ja perusteita vallalleen. Ilman mandaattia ja illuusiota ”kansan tahdosta” koko show alkaa tutista. Äänestämättä jättäminen riisuu heiltä legitimiteetin kokonaan ja heidän on jopa vastentahtoisesti muutettava ajamiaan asioita saadakseen epätoivoisesti taas yhteyden yleisöön, jotta saisivat kammettua itsensä takaisin valtaistuimelle.
Kuten aikaisemminkin täällä totesin. He ovat kuin lahjakas Herra Ripley. Psykopaatteja. Sosiopaatteja. Kameleontteja. Ei heillä ole mitään omia ajatuksia, vaan he ratsastavat keskimääräisen zeitgeistin aallonharjalla, joka on usein median sosiaalisen manipuloinnin ja ohjailun seurausta. Mutta kun tämä välipalikka otetaan pois ja käännetään itseään vastaan, niin silloin alkaa muutos.
Otetaan esimerkiksi seniili Biden. Ennen tätä kuuluisaa 2024 "debattia" lähes kaikki eliitti, media ja osa kansastakin tiesi yksityisesti, että Bidenin kognitiivinen kyky oli merkittävästi heikentynyt (raportit, videot, sisäpiirin huhut). Mutta se että mies oli täysi kasvis ei ollut vielä valunut yleiseen tietoisuuteen – jokainen ajatteli omalla tahollaan, että “toiset eivät ehkä tiedä” tai “jos sanon tämän ääneen, minut leimataan äärioikeistoksi”.
Media ja puolue suojelivat narratiivia: “Biden on edelleen terävä”. Kuitenkin heti tämän debatin jälkeen pvm 27.6.2024 miljoonille katsojille kävi ilmi suorassa live-lähetyksessä Bidenin hapuilu, lauseiden keskeytymiset ja sekavuus. Se teki asiasta yleistä tietoa: “Kaikki tiesivät, että kaikki tiesivät, että Biden ei enää kykene presidentin tehtävään.”
Seurauksena oli puolueen sisäinen paniikki, sponsorit vetäytyivät, Biden joutui vetäytymään vaaleista. Ei riittänyt, että “joku tiesi” – tarvittiin julkinen hetki, jossa illuusio murskaantui kaikkien silmien edessä (kuten Keisarin uudet vaatteet -sadussa).
"Ei toimi Suomessa!"
Fair enough. Otetaan kotimaan esimerkki.
Mika Aaltolan nousu, uho ja tuho. Aaltola nousi hieman yllättäen puskista median kultapojaksi “Ukraina-asiantuntijana” ja sota-analyytikkona. TV-haastattelut, some ja presidenttikampanja tekivät hänestä näkyvän hahmon. Moni kuitenkin ajatteli yksityisesti omassa päässään, että "kylläpäs vaikuttaa taas hieman groomatulta vaihtoehdolta" ja hänen tyylinsä oli vahvaa uhoa (ylioptimistisia ennustuksia Venäjän täydellisestä romahduksesta, sodan nopeasta lopusta jne.), mutta media ja yleisö antoivat sille tilaa.
Kun videot itseriittoisista kommenteista ja kriittiset näkökulmat alkoivat leviämään kulovalkean lailla netissä, niin perinnemediakin joutui tekemään täyskäännöksen. Yhtäkkiä hänen ennustuksensa ja mediaviestinsä nähtiin liiallisena uhoamisena ja ylimielisyytenä. Siitä tuli yleistä tietoa: “Kaikki tiesivät, että kaikki tiesivät, että Aaltola oli mediassa rakennettu hahmo, jonka ennustukset eivät pitäneet.”
Tämän seurauksena Aaltola pudotettiin “jokapäiväisen kommentaattorin” paikalta, pressakampanja hiipui, ja hän päätyi häntä koipien välissä lopulta Kokoomuksen listalta MEP:ksi – aikamoinen downgreidaus.
Poliitikot ovat kuin teinityttöjä, jotka janoavat huomiota kaikin tavoin mutta eivät halua, että heitä tuijotetaan suoraan.
He vaativat alitajuisesti sivusilmällä katsekontaktin ja sen, että heidät huomataan, ja jos olet rennosti ihmisvilinässä ja annat katseen eksyä, niin he saavat haluamansa ja voivat näytellä ärsyyntynyttä, mutta jos et välitä heistä alkuunkaan ja kohtelet heitä kuin ilmaa, niin he eivät yksinkertaisesti edes tiedä miten päin olla ja heidän on pakko kävellä sinua päin tai jotenkin pakottaa reaktio ulos sinusta.
Juuri tähän perustuu äänestämättä jättäminen ja common knowledge.
"Helpoin tapa kukistaa gambiitti on kieltäytyä siitä".
Kun äänestysprosentti tippuu systemaattisesti ja tieto muuttuu yleiseksi – ”kaikki tietävät, että kaikki tietävät, että systeemi on mätä ja äänestämällä ei voi vaikuttaa” – he eivät voi enää esittää keisaria uusissa vaatteissa. He joutuvat reagoimaan, vaikka eivät haluaisi. Muuten oma etu- ja valtakoneisto on vaakalaudalla.
Tämä on hiljainen ja rauhanomainen vastavallankumous. Ei odoteta feeniksiä raunioista, vaan lakataan yksinkertaisesti osallistumasta sirkukseen. Samalla rakennetaan rinnakkaisrakenteita – yksityiskouluja, kotiopetusta, kansalaisjournalismia 𝕏:ssä ja YouTubessa – joissa kasvaa sukupolvi, joka ei enää palvo systeemiuskovaisena valtiokoneiston ylipapistoa eikä suostu olemaan osa tätä korruptoitunutta koneistoa.
Keisarilla ei ole vaatteita.
Media ja puolue suojelivat narratiivia: “Biden on edelleen terävä”. Kuitenkin heti tämän debatin jälkeen pvm 27.6.2024 miljoonille katsojille kävi ilmi suorassa live-lähetyksessä Bidenin hapuilu, lauseiden keskeytymiset ja sekavuus. Se teki asiasta yleistä tietoa: “Kaikki tiesivät, että kaikki tiesivät, että Biden ei enää kykene presidentin tehtävään.”
Seurauksena oli puolueen sisäinen paniikki, sponsorit vetäytyivät, Biden joutui vetäytymään vaaleista. Ei riittänyt, että “joku tiesi” – tarvittiin julkinen hetki, jossa illuusio murskaantui kaikkien silmien edessä (kuten Keisarin uudet vaatteet -sadussa).
"Ei toimi Suomessa!"
Fair enough. Otetaan kotimaan esimerkki.
Mika Aaltolan nousu, uho ja tuho. Aaltola nousi hieman yllättäen puskista median kultapojaksi “Ukraina-asiantuntijana” ja sota-analyytikkona. TV-haastattelut, some ja presidenttikampanja tekivät hänestä näkyvän hahmon. Moni kuitenkin ajatteli yksityisesti omassa päässään, että "kylläpäs vaikuttaa taas hieman groomatulta vaihtoehdolta" ja hänen tyylinsä oli vahvaa uhoa (ylioptimistisia ennustuksia Venäjän täydellisestä romahduksesta, sodan nopeasta lopusta jne.), mutta media ja yleisö antoivat sille tilaa.
Kun videot itseriittoisista kommenteista ja kriittiset näkökulmat alkoivat leviämään kulovalkean lailla netissä, niin perinnemediakin joutui tekemään täyskäännöksen. Yhtäkkiä hänen ennustuksensa ja mediaviestinsä nähtiin liiallisena uhoamisena ja ylimielisyytenä. Siitä tuli yleistä tietoa: “Kaikki tiesivät, että kaikki tiesivät, että Aaltola oli mediassa rakennettu hahmo, jonka ennustukset eivät pitäneet.”
Tämän seurauksena Aaltola pudotettiin “jokapäiväisen kommentaattorin” paikalta, pressakampanja hiipui, ja hän päätyi häntä koipien välissä lopulta Kokoomuksen listalta MEP:ksi – aikamoinen downgreidaus.
Poliitikot ovat kuin teinityttöjä, jotka janoavat huomiota kaikin tavoin mutta eivät halua, että heitä tuijotetaan suoraan.
He vaativat alitajuisesti sivusilmällä katsekontaktin ja sen, että heidät huomataan, ja jos olet rennosti ihmisvilinässä ja annat katseen eksyä, niin he saavat haluamansa ja voivat näytellä ärsyyntynyttä, mutta jos et välitä heistä alkuunkaan ja kohtelet heitä kuin ilmaa, niin he eivät yksinkertaisesti edes tiedä miten päin olla ja heidän on pakko kävellä sinua päin tai jotenkin pakottaa reaktio ulos sinusta.
Juuri tähän perustuu äänestämättä jättäminen ja common knowledge.
"Helpoin tapa kukistaa gambiitti on kieltäytyä siitä".
Kun äänestysprosentti tippuu systemaattisesti ja tieto muuttuu yleiseksi – ”kaikki tietävät, että kaikki tietävät, että systeemi on mätä ja äänestämällä ei voi vaikuttaa” – he eivät voi enää esittää keisaria uusissa vaatteissa. He joutuvat reagoimaan, vaikka eivät haluaisi. Muuten oma etu- ja valtakoneisto on vaakalaudalla.
Tämä on hiljainen ja rauhanomainen vastavallankumous. Ei odoteta feeniksiä raunioista, vaan lakataan yksinkertaisesti osallistumasta sirkukseen. Samalla rakennetaan rinnakkaisrakenteita – yksityiskouluja, kotiopetusta, kansalaisjournalismia 𝕏:ssä ja YouTubessa – joissa kasvaa sukupolvi, joka ei enää palvo systeemiuskovaisena valtiokoneiston ylipapistoa eikä suostu olemaan osa tätä korruptoitunutta koneistoa.
Keisarilla ei ole vaatteita.
The Power of Negweb.archive.org/web/2019022219…
Interesting WSJ story about the Emirates request for a swap line --
the UAE hasn't reported its end March reserves but it went into the conflict with tons of reserves and no shortage of liquid bills in US custodians
1/
the UAE hasn't reported its end March reserves but it went into the conflict with tons of reserves and no shortage of liquid bills in US custodians
1/
Given the central bank's ample apparent liquidity, the immense assets of Abu Dhabi's sovereign funds and the UAE/ Abu Dhabi's clear ability to borrow dollars, I am not sure there is a realistic prospect that the UAE will ever run short of dollars
2/
2/
But the fact that they have asked is interesting -- and they clearly think the threat of using yuan is a way to get the attention of the United States (my sense is that the Trump Administration is a bit too concerned about this ... )
3/
wsj.com/world/middle-e…
3/
wsj.com/world/middle-e…
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EQUALITY, EQUITY, & JUSTICE (INTERESTING EXPLANATION) 😊
Three individuals stand behind a fence watching a football match. One is tall. One is of average height. One is shorter.
Three individuals stand behind a fence watching a football match. One is tall. One is of average height. One is shorter.
1st Scenario: Everyone receives the same box to stand on. It sounds fair, right? But the shortest person still cannot see over the fence. That is equality.
2nd Scenario: So we try something better. We give more boxes to the person who needs them most. Now all three can see the match. That is equity. But then someone asks a deeper question: Why is there a fence blocking their view in the first place?
El 26 de febrero el Ministerio de Salud contrató un evento y en la misma tarima se subió Iván Cepeda a hacer campaña al otro día.
Aunque dijeron que eran contratos distintos, encontramos que el Ministerio de Salud pagó por 2 días esa tarima.
¿Política con recursos públicos?
Aunque dijeron que eran contratos distintos, encontramos que el Ministerio de Salud pagó por 2 días esa tarima.
¿Política con recursos públicos?
1.036 millones de pesos pagó el Ministerio de Salud por ese evento.
Al otro día Iván Cepeda usó la misma infraestructura para cerrar la campaña del Pacto Histórico en Bogotá.
Ítems como la tarima, las pantallas, luces y personal técnico fueron pagados por 2 días por @MinSaludCo
Al otro día Iván Cepeda usó la misma infraestructura para cerrar la campaña del Pacto Histórico en Bogotá.
Ítems como la tarima, las pantallas, luces y personal técnico fueron pagados por 2 días por @MinSaludCo
Recuerden que también denunciamos que la campaña del Pacto Histórico había pagado ese evento (En el que de subió Iván Cepeda) EN EFECTIVO
Hasta el momento el Procurador y el CNE no han sido capaces de pronunciarse.
La política con recursos públicos sigue avanzando.
Hasta el momento el Procurador y el CNE no han sido capaces de pronunciarse.
La política con recursos públicos sigue avanzando.
A $125 LLC. A $400/month office 20 minutes away. A new phone number.
That's the entire cost to add a second pin on Google Maps in the city next to you.
Your calls double. Your competitor doesn't even know what happened.
I've set this up for over 100 home service businesses. This is the full process, start to finish. Here is how to do it: 🧵🧵
That's the entire cost to add a second pin on Google Maps in the city next to you.
Your calls double. Your competitor doesn't even know what happened.
I've set this up for over 100 home service businesses. This is the full process, start to finish. Here is how to do it: 🧵🧵
Most people don't understand how Google Maps actually works.
Your listing only shows up about 5-10 miles from your address. That's it. You're based in Boca Raton.
Someone in West Palm Beach searches "plumber near me" and you don't exist to them. Even though your trucks are out there every week doing jobs.
You're invisible in every city you aren't physically located in.
A second profile with a West Palm address fixes that overnight. Two pins. Two map packs. Two cities feeding you calls.
Your listing only shows up about 5-10 miles from your address. That's it. You're based in Boca Raton.
Someone in West Palm Beach searches "plumber near me" and you don't exist to them. Even though your trucks are out there every week doing jobs.
You're invisible in every city you aren't physically located in.
A second profile with a West Palm address fixes that overnight. Two pins. Two map packs. Two cities feeding you calls.
First thing. You need a real business behind the second profile.
Go to your state's filing portal (Sunbiz in Florida) and register a new LLC.
Your company now: "Elite Plumbing Boca Raton LLC"
The new one: "Elite Plumbing West Palm Beach LLC"
This is the part nobody talks about. That city name in your business name is a cheat code.
When someone searches "plumbing West Palm Beach," your business name IS their search.
Google gives you relevance credit for that. It's called semi-exact match and it's absurdly effective.
$125 to file. 2-3 days to process. Then grab a free EIN from irs(.)gov
Go to your state's filing portal (Sunbiz in Florida) and register a new LLC.
Your company now: "Elite Plumbing Boca Raton LLC"
The new one: "Elite Plumbing West Palm Beach LLC"
This is the part nobody talks about. That city name in your business name is a cheat code.
When someone searches "plumbing West Palm Beach," your business name IS their search.
Google gives you relevance credit for that. It's called semi-exact match and it's absurdly effective.
$125 to file. 2-3 days to process. Then grab a free EIN from irs(.)gov
1/Mooi essay van leraar Willem van Klinken, 'Hoe krijgen we de jeugd weer veerkrachtig', en 2 columns over de smartphone als venster tussen ons en de werkelijkheid en over de daling van de intelligentie vanaf GenZ
2/"The IQ of Europeans is dropping due to technology"
De toepassing van AI wekt dat in de hand. Door het toenemend gebruik van technologie vervreemden we van de werkelijkheid en de medemens, kampen we met een zingevingsvacuüm en spirituele leegte en euronews.com/2017/12/29/the…
De toepassing van AI wekt dat in de hand. Door het toenemend gebruik van technologie vervreemden we van de werkelijkheid en de medemens, kampen we met een zingevingsvacuüm en spirituele leegte en euronews.com/2017/12/29/the…
3/verliezen we 'handigheid'. Wie niets meer zelf doet, verliest geestelijke en lichamelijke autonomie en wordt robot-achtiger.
Neem GPS. Wie altijd alleen GPS gebruikt, ontwikkelt geen ruimtelijke inzicht en zal zonder GPS eerder verdwalen.
Neem GPS. Wie altijd alleen GPS gebruikt, ontwikkelt geen ruimtelijke inzicht en zal zonder GPS eerder verdwalen.
The International Federation of Sports Medicine claims:
'... no established relationship exists between SRY status and performance.'
SRY = sex determining region Y gene.
So the claim is ... no established relationship exists between sex & performance.
FIMS knows this is untrue.
'... no established relationship exists between SRY status and performance.'
SRY = sex determining region Y gene.
So the claim is ... no established relationship exists between sex & performance.
FIMS knows this is untrue.
Let's take a look at the FIMS proposals:
1. 'Development of sport-specific eligibility frameworks reflecting the physiological demands of individual sports'.
No.
If a sport is sex-affected or has a womens category, it must exclude males from female sport.
Non-negotiable.
1. 'Development of sport-specific eligibility frameworks reflecting the physiological demands of individual sports'.
No.
If a sport is sex-affected or has a womens category, it must exclude males from female sport.
Non-negotiable.
2. 'Establishment of independent, large-scale research programmes focused on performance outcomes in relevant athlete populations'.
No.
A never ending job creation scheme. FIMS has a vested interest.
Relevant populations are female & male.
The research is in.
No.
A never ending job creation scheme. FIMS has a vested interest.
Relevant populations are female & male.
The research is in.
🔥🔥🔥Breaking! Obama linked Ushahidi of Kenya created New Knowledge who was involved in Project Birmingham aka the Hamilton68 Russian bot Hoax. Ushahidi will prove to be a major factor in current and past events. We are talking the 2020 election AND January 6th too! (Those will be in another part.) And it’s gonna get a whole lot worse than just the elections!
🔹PART FOUR! Elections, Obama, Ushahidi and Big Tech. Let’s get some Ushahidi facts straight before the later exposé parts. Trust me, you’ll want to get familiar.
For starters, Barack Obama used Ushahidi for his 2012 election. And it was also used to monitor the 2016 US election from Kenya.
The now prev CEO of Ushahidi, Nat Manning, was the first ever Chief Data Officer of USAID under Obama. And Ushahidi was actually partnered with USAid too. A 2009 USAID contract for Afghanistan got them off the ground. Also involved in this Afghanistan and Ushahidi project was FrontlineSMS, Google, and the Synergy Strike Force.
The earliest seed funding donor of Ushahidi besides USAID was Obama’s favorite, Omidyar. Other donors included Soros Open Society, Rockefeller, UKAID, and Ford Fndn.
Sara J Terp, who was told by Obama to prevent the next Trump was Ushahidi also.
The weird New Knowledge founders switcharoo:
Ushahidi created New Knowledge and Jonathan Morgan and Chris Albon both of Ushahidi and its crisis.net were the ORIGINAL Popily (New Knowledge) Founders. Then later yet, Vidya Spandana, was ADDED as a founder. Then much later yet, the founders were totally adjusted removing Chris Albon and Vidya Spandana. This is when Ryan Fox showed up.
Essentially New Knowledge was initially created by Ushahidi using Ushahidi people.
Interestingly, Chris Albon previously worked at FrontlineSMS. And after Ushahidi, he moved on to become a director at Wikimedia.
Also remember that New Knowledge aka Popily were paid as a contractor by Daniel Jones along with Bean LLC aka Fusion GPS etc.
Ushahidi also belonged to Obamas State Departments Open Government Hub (OGH). Where the director of the Rhize Color Revolution org, Nada Zohdy, was a director. She was also the global network lead of the Obama Foundation. Both Rhize and a founder of the Serbian Otpor color revolution met at the State Dept OGH during Trumps presidency.
Also a member of the OGH was FrontlineSMS from Ushahidi’s Afghanistan days.
Erin Mazursky, who ran the Rhize color revolution org, was a USAID Youth Advisor, was an Obama field organizer, and belonged to the Ushahidi message board. There, she admitted to working with George Soros Open Society and the Atlantic Council.
Only weeks after the 2016 election, Erin suggested running a color revolution on Trump.
Also recall that Renee Diresta and Jonathan Morgan (DARPA) of New Knowledge both worked for the Obama Whitehouse and met during a Obama White House high level tech meeting at Silicon Valley. Renee later went on to help the Trump resistance including Indivisible in its earliest days. While using an international tech force.
• The first of the high level tech meetings on Jan 8, 2016 involved:
Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI Director James Comey, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Lisa Monaco (counterterrorism adviser coordinating the effort). Additional participants included White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough.
• February 2016: Follow-on engagements. DiResta and Morgan personally first meet during/around these White House/tech sessions on extremist content and social-media manipulation (per DiResta’s 2017 NYT interview).
For the 2016 election, Ushahidi partnered with Georgetown University and the Election Protection Committee, who run 866-Our-Vote.
Post 2016 election, Ushahidi worked with Shaun King, professors at MIT and Harvard, Crisis Mappers, and a number of other organizations to gather reports of hate crimes across the USA.
Sources to follow, and see you for parts 5 and 6!
🔹PART FOUR! Elections, Obama, Ushahidi and Big Tech. Let’s get some Ushahidi facts straight before the later exposé parts. Trust me, you’ll want to get familiar.
For starters, Barack Obama used Ushahidi for his 2012 election. And it was also used to monitor the 2016 US election from Kenya.
The now prev CEO of Ushahidi, Nat Manning, was the first ever Chief Data Officer of USAID under Obama. And Ushahidi was actually partnered with USAid too. A 2009 USAID contract for Afghanistan got them off the ground. Also involved in this Afghanistan and Ushahidi project was FrontlineSMS, Google, and the Synergy Strike Force.
The earliest seed funding donor of Ushahidi besides USAID was Obama’s favorite, Omidyar. Other donors included Soros Open Society, Rockefeller, UKAID, and Ford Fndn.
Sara J Terp, who was told by Obama to prevent the next Trump was Ushahidi also.
The weird New Knowledge founders switcharoo:
Ushahidi created New Knowledge and Jonathan Morgan and Chris Albon both of Ushahidi and its crisis.net were the ORIGINAL Popily (New Knowledge) Founders. Then later yet, Vidya Spandana, was ADDED as a founder. Then much later yet, the founders were totally adjusted removing Chris Albon and Vidya Spandana. This is when Ryan Fox showed up.
Essentially New Knowledge was initially created by Ushahidi using Ushahidi people.
Interestingly, Chris Albon previously worked at FrontlineSMS. And after Ushahidi, he moved on to become a director at Wikimedia.
Also remember that New Knowledge aka Popily were paid as a contractor by Daniel Jones along with Bean LLC aka Fusion GPS etc.
Ushahidi also belonged to Obamas State Departments Open Government Hub (OGH). Where the director of the Rhize Color Revolution org, Nada Zohdy, was a director. She was also the global network lead of the Obama Foundation. Both Rhize and a founder of the Serbian Otpor color revolution met at the State Dept OGH during Trumps presidency.
Also a member of the OGH was FrontlineSMS from Ushahidi’s Afghanistan days.
Erin Mazursky, who ran the Rhize color revolution org, was a USAID Youth Advisor, was an Obama field organizer, and belonged to the Ushahidi message board. There, she admitted to working with George Soros Open Society and the Atlantic Council.
Only weeks after the 2016 election, Erin suggested running a color revolution on Trump.
Also recall that Renee Diresta and Jonathan Morgan (DARPA) of New Knowledge both worked for the Obama Whitehouse and met during a Obama White House high level tech meeting at Silicon Valley. Renee later went on to help the Trump resistance including Indivisible in its earliest days. While using an international tech force.
• The first of the high level tech meetings on Jan 8, 2016 involved:
Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI Director James Comey, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Lisa Monaco (counterterrorism adviser coordinating the effort). Additional participants included White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough.
• February 2016: Follow-on engagements. DiResta and Morgan personally first meet during/around these White House/tech sessions on extremist content and social-media manipulation (per DiResta’s 2017 NYT interview).
For the 2016 election, Ushahidi partnered with Georgetown University and the Election Protection Committee, who run 866-Our-Vote.
Post 2016 election, Ushahidi worked with Shaun King, professors at MIT and Harvard, Crisis Mappers, and a number of other organizations to gather reports of hate crimes across the USA.
Sources to follow, and see you for parts 5 and 6!
Ushahidi started Popily aka New Knowledge. Here’s two pieces of evidence.
“Ushahidi and its staff has incubated and spun out non-profits such as the iHub, and the Standby Volunteer Task Force, and for-profit entities such as BRCK and New Knowledge.”
archive.is/R3FFN
🔹Ushahidi 2015
“Spun out Popily, now newknowledge.io,
making AI tools to combat fake news.”
It’s dinner time so sourcing will be slow.
web.archive.org/web/2022043023…
“Ushahidi and its staff has incubated and spun out non-profits such as the iHub, and the Standby Volunteer Task Force, and for-profit entities such as BRCK and New Knowledge.”
archive.is/R3FFN
🔹Ushahidi 2015
“Spun out Popily, now newknowledge.io,
making AI tools to combat fake news.”
It’s dinner time so sourcing will be slow.
web.archive.org/web/2022043023…
🔹Here’s the Popily (New Knowledge) Website with its first founders.
Meet the Team:
Chris Albon
Jonathan Morgan
(Both from Ushahidi
Both from crisis.net)
archive.is/w3XEi
🔹And here’s the Ushahidi, Crisis.net cofounders
Chris Albon
Jonathan Morgan
archive.is/xGp0L
Meet the Team:
Chris Albon
Jonathan Morgan
(Both from Ushahidi
Both from crisis.net)
archive.is/w3XEi
🔹And here’s the Ushahidi, Crisis.net cofounders
Chris Albon
Jonathan Morgan
archive.is/xGp0L
Circula bastante un tipo de análisis donde se cuestiona que hayan mesas donde RLA y Sanchez obtuvieron votos bastante diferentes a lo esperado, generando sospechas de un fraude sistematizado.
Repasemos qué es lo que hacen y luego hablemos sobre las debilidades en sus métodos.
Repasemos qué es lo que hacen y luego hablemos sobre las debilidades en sus métodos.
¿Qué hicieron en elecciones-2026-app.vercel.app?
El trabajo consiste en encontrar las mesas donde los votos para RLA o Sanchez estan al menos tres desviaciones estandar de lo esperado según el promedio de votos en el local de votación.
Si en un local hay 30% para López Aliaga, entonces es extraño que una de las mesas tenga pocos votos para él.
Así, encuentran que hay 107 mesas que perjudican a López Aliaga (2,058 votos) y 154 mesas que benefician a Sanchez.
El trabajo consiste en encontrar las mesas donde los votos para RLA o Sanchez estan al menos tres desviaciones estandar de lo esperado según el promedio de votos en el local de votación.
Si en un local hay 30% para López Aliaga, entonces es extraño que una de las mesas tenga pocos votos para él.
Así, encuentran que hay 107 mesas que perjudican a López Aliaga (2,058 votos) y 154 mesas que benefician a Sanchez.
¿Cómo se seleccionan la mesas anómalas?
Prestemos más atención al filtro: "tres desviaciones estandar de lo esperado". Acá hay dos elementos importantes, las desviaciones estandar y lo esperado.
Lo esperado es simplemente lo más probable. El análisis al que nos referimos está diciendo es que lo más probable es que es una mesa vote como el resto de las mesas hermanas en un mismo local de votación. Por supuesto, el resultado más probable no siempre se dá, por eso también caracterizamos la posible variación de este resultado con desviaciones estándar.
La desviación estándar (σ) es una unidad de medida que resume cuánto varían normalmente los resultados entre mesas similares. Si en un local las mesas suelen dar entre 25% y 35% a un candidato, esa dispersión típica es la desviación estándar.
Porque σ mide qué tan lejos un resultado está del promedio, también nos dice qué tan anómalo es el resultado. Un resultado a 3σ de lo esperado significa que está tan lejos del promedio que, por puro azar, ocurriría menos del 0.1% de las veces.
Viendolo así, el filtro es bastante sencillo. Busquemos todas las mesas que están lo suficiente lejos de lo esperado.
Prestemos más atención al filtro: "tres desviaciones estandar de lo esperado". Acá hay dos elementos importantes, las desviaciones estandar y lo esperado.
Lo esperado es simplemente lo más probable. El análisis al que nos referimos está diciendo es que lo más probable es que es una mesa vote como el resto de las mesas hermanas en un mismo local de votación. Por supuesto, el resultado más probable no siempre se dá, por eso también caracterizamos la posible variación de este resultado con desviaciones estándar.
La desviación estándar (σ) es una unidad de medida que resume cuánto varían normalmente los resultados entre mesas similares. Si en un local las mesas suelen dar entre 25% y 35% a un candidato, esa dispersión típica es la desviación estándar.
Porque σ mide qué tan lejos un resultado está del promedio, también nos dice qué tan anómalo es el resultado. Un resultado a 3σ de lo esperado significa que está tan lejos del promedio que, por puro azar, ocurriría menos del 0.1% de las veces.
Viendolo así, el filtro es bastante sencillo. Busquemos todas las mesas que están lo suficiente lejos de lo esperado.
@nytimes @johnnydiaz__
Who is this person?
Who is this person?
Is @nytimes trying to tell us that the subject is a white man?
I routinely apply my own lived experience when legacy media @StarTribune @deenafaywinter fail to mention basic demographic information.
I routinely apply my own lived experience when legacy media @StarTribune @deenafaywinter fail to mention basic demographic information.
This is a great read on how Jared Kushner, Affinity Saudi and Epstein connect to the mess of the current war. Re: a $2 billion commitment to Affinity Partners and MBS did an override of his own screening panel to invest $2 billion with a fund his own advisors called “unsatisfactory in all aspects”.
@andrewlownie @StuartSyvret @jebrittan2 @JoannaColes @MichaelWolffNYC
@andrewlownie @StuartSyvret @jebrittan2 @JoannaColes @MichaelWolffNYC
Pay attention to the many names of various corporate entities it could be mixed up with if people simply hear the word “Affinity.”
In Canada we saw a lot of oil companies forming with names resembling Hollywood production companies including Fox Drilling, Summit Resources & Pixar Petroleum, MGM Energy and Paramount Resources Ltd. theglobeandmail.com/business/indus…
Ruining Braunstein
I'm here to Ruin your Braunstein. By which I mean that I am going to attempt to connect the newest old thing in D&D with my favorite contemporary fantasy series.
I'm here to Ruin your Braunstein. By which I mean that I am going to attempt to connect the newest old thing in D&D with my favorite contemporary fantasy series.
I started drafting this essay nearly a year ago, but the recent Kickstarter for Jeffro Johnson's Winning Secrets gave me the impetus I needed to complete it.
The newest old thing is the Braunstein. The true impact of David Wesely's Braunstein was re-discovered by Griffith Morgan in the documentary Secrets of Blackmoor.
