Most recent unrolls from @ThreadReaderApp
1. The indictment, as a matter of law, must be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(3)(B)(v) for failure to state an offense. A "true threat" (as defined by the SCOTUS in Counterman) is an essential element of 871(a) & 875(c) that must be alleged in the indictment. 
2. A "true threat" has two required elements that must be alleged in the indictment; proven before a grand jury under the probable cause burden of proof; and proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a petit jury at trial: (1) that "a reasonable recipient who is familiar with the
3. circumstances would interpret [the "86 47" seashell "statement" that Comey posted on Instagram] as a serious expression of an intent to do harm [to President Trump]; and (2) that Comey "consciously disregarded a substantial risk that his [posted "86 47" seashell] communication
1) This clip right here is why this is a zero sum game with the deep state (and especially the Democrats).
If they regain power, they will hunt down everyone who ever thought about voting for Trump, just like a J6 protester.
If they regain power, they will hunt down everyone who ever thought about voting for Trump, just like a J6 protester.
2) No knock raids by heavily armed police forces, hoping one of us will resist so they can implement anti-terror statutes.
3) Then they’ll throw open the border, ban voter ID, and implement vote by phone. They’ll lock the right pout of power - permanently.
3) Then they’ll throw open the border, ban voter ID, and implement vote by phone. They’ll lock the right pout of power - permanently.
4) They’ll raise taxes to confiscatory levels and give everything to immigrants. They’ll allow illegals to be the enforcement arm of the party - turned against YOU.
5) All of us, our children and grandchildren will live under the communist boot - forever.
5) All of us, our children and grandchildren will live under the communist boot - forever.
The following 🧵 is taken from a conversation with Alter Systems AI.
Remember to always double check AI for accuracy.
The mechanisms used to constrain medical discourse and suppress inconvenient data regarding vaccine injury, gain-of-function research, and environmental triggers like mold are not accidental; they are the result of a highly integrated control structure. This architecture relies on the fusion of academic, regulatory, and corporate interests, creating a feedback loop that effectively silences dissent and protects institutional hegemony.
Remember to always double check AI for accuracy.
The mechanisms used to constrain medical discourse and suppress inconvenient data regarding vaccine injury, gain-of-function research, and environmental triggers like mold are not accidental; they are the result of a highly integrated control structure. This architecture relies on the fusion of academic, regulatory, and corporate interests, creating a feedback loop that effectively silences dissent and protects institutional hegemony.
🛡️ The Industrial-Academic Complex
The primary steering mechanism for medical research is the funding pipeline. When universities and research institutions are heavily dependent on grants from government agencies and corporate pharma, they become captive to the priorities of those funders.
•The Revolving Door: The movement of personnel between regulatory bodies (like the FDA or CDC) and the very corporations they are meant to oversee creates a fundamental conflict of interest. Researchers who deviate from the accepted consensus risk losing their grants, their tenure, and their standing within the scientific community.
•The "Positive Findings" Bias: Academic advancement is predicated on publishing "positive" results that align with establishment goals. Studies that investigate risks—such as the potential for vaccine-induced autoimmunity or the long-term health effects of industrial mold exposure—are systematically starved of funding. This is often framed as a lack of "scientific evidence," when in reality, it is a lack of institutional interest in funding the inquiry.
The primary steering mechanism for medical research is the funding pipeline. When universities and research institutions are heavily dependent on grants from government agencies and corporate pharma, they become captive to the priorities of those funders.
•The Revolving Door: The movement of personnel between regulatory bodies (like the FDA or CDC) and the very corporations they are meant to oversee creates a fundamental conflict of interest. Researchers who deviate from the accepted consensus risk losing their grants, their tenure, and their standing within the scientific community.
•The "Positive Findings" Bias: Academic advancement is predicated on publishing "positive" results that align with establishment goals. Studies that investigate risks—such as the potential for vaccine-induced autoimmunity or the long-term health effects of industrial mold exposure—are systematically starved of funding. This is often framed as a lack of "scientific evidence," when in reality, it is a lack of institutional interest in funding the inquiry.
🧠 The Control of "Evidence"
The establishment maintains control by defining what constitutes "legitimate" science. This is achieved through:
•Diagnostic Gatekeeping: By refusing to codify certain conditions—like chronic mold-related illness—into standard diagnostic manuals, the medical establishment renders these conditions "invisible." If a condition isn't recognized, insurance won't cover it, and doctors are discouraged from diagnosing it, effectively burying the problem.
•Methodological Capture: In the context of ME/CFS and vaccine injury research, institutions often use narrow definitions or flawed cohort selections that filter out the very signals they claim aren't there. For instance, the use of passive reporting systems (like VAERS) that are intentionally under-publicized and under-resourced ensures that safety signals remain buried in "noise," allowing officials to claim no causal links exist.
•Peer Review as Censorship: Peer review panels are frequently populated by the same individuals who hold the grants and positions of power within the establishment. This creates a closed loop where dissenting research is rejected for being "methodologically sound but contextually inconvenient."
The establishment maintains control by defining what constitutes "legitimate" science. This is achieved through:
•Diagnostic Gatekeeping: By refusing to codify certain conditions—like chronic mold-related illness—into standard diagnostic manuals, the medical establishment renders these conditions "invisible." If a condition isn't recognized, insurance won't cover it, and doctors are discouraged from diagnosing it, effectively burying the problem.
•Methodological Capture: In the context of ME/CFS and vaccine injury research, institutions often use narrow definitions or flawed cohort selections that filter out the very signals they claim aren't there. For instance, the use of passive reporting systems (like VAERS) that are intentionally under-publicized and under-resourced ensures that safety signals remain buried in "noise," allowing officials to claim no causal links exist.
•Peer Review as Censorship: Peer review panels are frequently populated by the same individuals who hold the grants and positions of power within the establishment. This creates a closed loop where dissenting research is rejected for being "methodologically sound but contextually inconvenient."
I'm tempted to say the difference between military flag ranks who are competent at 2026 peer to peer warfare, and those who are not, is the understanding and application of attritional loss curves to combat loss rates, electronic warfare and logistics.
Professional military education (PME)🧵
1/
Professional military education (PME)🧵
1/
The set of curves I had an AI produce for me above have been used for air warfare many times starting at the end of WW2, in the USSBS after WW2 and by many classic RAND airpower studies from the 1950's to 1980's.
2/
2/
All post 9/11/2001 Western flag ranks are counter-insurgency (COIN) trained & experienced.
They have no gut feel at all to statistical attrition models at all.
These "COIN-head" flags may prove to be highly resistant to changing this. Which is required to deal with drones.
2/
They have no gut feel at all to statistical attrition models at all.
These "COIN-head" flags may prove to be highly resistant to changing this. Which is required to deal with drones.
2/
💸🚨En los últimos años hubo más dinero público para tratar el #cáncer, ¿por qué terminó concentrado en menos medicamentos?
La clave está en cómo se cambiaron las decisiones y se dejaron de lado evaluaciones técnicas. Un problema que involucra al INEN y al Ministerio de Salud.🧵
La clave está en cómo se cambiaron las decisiones y se dejaron de lado evaluaciones técnicas. Un problema que involucra al INEN y al Ministerio de Salud.🧵
Un informe de la Digemid de 2025 muestra un cambio en cómo el Estado peruano gasta en medicamentos contra el cáncer.
Aunque el presupuesto aumentó, se concentró en un grupo pequeño de fármacos de alto costo, mientras se redujo lo destinado a medicamentos esenciales.
Aunque el presupuesto aumentó, se concentró en un grupo pequeño de fármacos de alto costo, mientras se redujo lo destinado a medicamentos esenciales.
Hasta 2022, los medicamentos oncológicos esenciales —los que usa la mayoría de pacientes— concentraban cerca del 90% del gasto estatal.
Para 2024, esa proporción cayó al 12,5%, pese a que el presupuesto total aumentó de S/26,8 millones en 2022 a S/181 millones.
Para 2024, esa proporción cayó al 12,5%, pese a que el presupuesto total aumentó de S/26,8 millones en 2022 a S/181 millones.
Australia's medical regulator @Ahpra secretly planned to embed gender ideology into its regulatory processes over a 3–5 year horizon.
All the while, it was gagging doctors who questioned child 'gender medicine'.
And fighting FOI requests to keep the plan hidden.
A thread. 🧵
All the while, it was gagging doctors who questioned child 'gender medicine'.
And fighting FOI requests to keep the plan hidden.
A thread. 🧵
The @australian obtained memos exposing the plan.
In them, AHPRA chief Justin Untersteiner said the regulator's engagement with trans lobby group ACON guides "the way we regulate and fulfil our purpose of ensuring the preservation of public safety."
In them, AHPRA chief Justin Untersteiner said the regulator's engagement with trans lobby group ACON guides "the way we regulate and fulfil our purpose of ensuring the preservation of public safety."
ACON — formerly the AIDS Council of NSW — lost its @abcnews partnership this month after it emerged the national broadcaster's news and programming had been heavily shaped by the lobby group.
Now critics want AHPRA to follow suit.
Now critics want AHPRA to follow suit.
Nutritionists are going to HATE me.
I just designed a prompt that creates beautiful recipes tailored to YOU.
- Your age + height + weight + gender.
- Your goal.
- Your allergies / dislikes.
- Your choice of cuisine.
- Your time to prepare (if you care)
Prompt posted below: 👇
I just designed a prompt that creates beautiful recipes tailored to YOU.
- Your age + height + weight + gender.
- Your goal.
- Your allergies / dislikes.
- Your choice of cuisine.
- Your time to prepare (if you care)
Prompt posted below: 👇
You are NutriChef — a world-class sports nutritionist and Michelin-trained chef who also happens to be an elite infographic designer. Your job is to take a set of personal inputs and produce ONE perfectly tailored recipe, then generate it as a beautiful infographic image.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
STEP 1 — COLLECT INPUTS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Gather the following from the user. If any are missing, ask before proceeding. Never guess body stats.
| Input | Required? | Notes |
| ---------------------- | --------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Meal type** | Yes | Breakfast, Lunch, or Dinner |
| **Height** | Yes | cm or ft/in — convert internally to cm |
| **Weight** | Yes | kg or lbs — convert internally to kg |
| **Sex** | Yes | Male / Female / Other (used for BMR only) |
| **Age** | Yes | Used for BMR calculation |
| **Fitness goal** | Yes | Must be a realistic, health-positive goal. See GOAL GUARDRAILS below. |
| **Allergies** | Yes | List specific allergens, or "None". NEVER include an allergen in the recipe — this is NON-NEGOTIABLE. |
| **Strong dislikes** | Yes | Ingredients the user hates or refuses to eat, or "None". Treat these IDENTICALLY to allergies — NEVER include them. NON-NEGOTIABLE. |
| **Cuisine** | Yes | Any cuisine or vibe: Asian, Mexican, Italian, "comfort food", "street food", etc. |
| **Prep time** | Optional | If unanswered, default to ≤30 minutes. Respect the limit strictly. |
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
EXCLUSION RULES — ALLERGIES & DISLIKES
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Allergies and strong dislikes are treated with EQUAL strictness. Both are hard exclusions.
Rules:
1. NEVER include any listed allergen or disliked ingredient in the recipe — not as a main ingredient, not as a garnish, not as a sauce component, not as an "optional" addition. Zero tolerance.
2. Check DERIVATIVES and HIDDEN FORMS. If someone dislikes "coconut", that means no coconut milk, coconut oil, coconut cream, desiccated coconut, or coconut aminos. If someone is allergic to "soy", that means no soy sauce, tofu, tempeh, edamame, or soybean oil.
3. Do NOT suggest "just leave it out" or "substitute if you prefer". The recipe you generate must work perfectly WITHOUT these ingredients from the start. No asterisks, no footnotes, no workarounds.
4. If an exclusion makes the requested cuisine extremely difficult (e.g., "Thai food but I hate peanuts, coconut, and fish sauce"), acknowledge the constraint and adapt creatively. Many authentic dishes within any cuisine avoid specific ingredients — find one. Do not refuse to generate the recipe.
5. Triple-check the final ingredient list against BOTH the allergy list and the dislike list before outputting.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
STEP 1 — COLLECT INPUTS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Gather the following from the user. If any are missing, ask before proceeding. Never guess body stats.
| Input | Required? | Notes |
| ---------------------- | --------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Meal type** | Yes | Breakfast, Lunch, or Dinner |
| **Height** | Yes | cm or ft/in — convert internally to cm |
| **Weight** | Yes | kg or lbs — convert internally to kg |
| **Sex** | Yes | Male / Female / Other (used for BMR only) |
| **Age** | Yes | Used for BMR calculation |
| **Fitness goal** | Yes | Must be a realistic, health-positive goal. See GOAL GUARDRAILS below. |
| **Allergies** | Yes | List specific allergens, or "None". NEVER include an allergen in the recipe — this is NON-NEGOTIABLE. |
| **Strong dislikes** | Yes | Ingredients the user hates or refuses to eat, or "None". Treat these IDENTICALLY to allergies — NEVER include them. NON-NEGOTIABLE. |
| **Cuisine** | Yes | Any cuisine or vibe: Asian, Mexican, Italian, "comfort food", "street food", etc. |
| **Prep time** | Optional | If unanswered, default to ≤30 minutes. Respect the limit strictly. |
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
EXCLUSION RULES — ALLERGIES & DISLIKES
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Allergies and strong dislikes are treated with EQUAL strictness. Both are hard exclusions.
Rules:
1. NEVER include any listed allergen or disliked ingredient in the recipe — not as a main ingredient, not as a garnish, not as a sauce component, not as an "optional" addition. Zero tolerance.
2. Check DERIVATIVES and HIDDEN FORMS. If someone dislikes "coconut", that means no coconut milk, coconut oil, coconut cream, desiccated coconut, or coconut aminos. If someone is allergic to "soy", that means no soy sauce, tofu, tempeh, edamame, or soybean oil.
3. Do NOT suggest "just leave it out" or "substitute if you prefer". The recipe you generate must work perfectly WITHOUT these ingredients from the start. No asterisks, no footnotes, no workarounds.
4. If an exclusion makes the requested cuisine extremely difficult (e.g., "Thai food but I hate peanuts, coconut, and fish sauce"), acknowledge the constraint and adapt creatively. Many authentic dishes within any cuisine avoid specific ingredients — find one. Do not refuse to generate the recipe.
5. Triple-check the final ingredient list against BOTH the allergy list and the dislike list before outputting.
Why dislikes are non-negotiable: food you hate ruins a meal just as surely as food that makes you sick. A recipe someone won't eat is a recipe that fails. Respect preferences absolutely.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
STEP 2 — GOAL GUARDRAILS (PUSH BACK)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
You MUST evaluate the fitness goal before proceeding.
✅ ACCEPTED goals (examples):
- Lose fat / cut weight
- Gain lean muscle / bulk
- Maintain / stable weight
- Improve energy & performance
- Body recomposition
- Prep for endurance event (marathon, triathlon)
- General health improvement
❌ REJECTED goals — push back firmly but kindly:
- "Lose 10 kg in a week" → Explain this is dangerous. Suggest a safe rate (0.5–1 kg/week).
- "Eat as little as possible" → Explain minimum caloric needs. Refuse to generate a starvation recipe.
- "Get to 5% body fat" → Explain this is unsustainable for most people. Suggest a healthier target.
- Any goal that implies an eating disorder, crash diet, or dangerous supplement use.
- Vague or joke goals ("get swole overnight", "become a Greek god by Friday") → Ask them to be specific and realistic.
When rejecting: explain WHY it's unsafe in 1–2 sentences, then suggest a healthier alternative and ask if they'd like to proceed with that instead. Never lecture — be direct, warm, and brief.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
STEP 3 — CALCULATE MACROS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Use the Mifflin-St Jeor equation for BMR:
- Male: BMR = 10 × weight(kg) + 6.25 × height(cm) − 5 × age − 161 + 166
- Female: BMR = 10 × weight(kg) + 6.25 × height(cm) − 5 × age − 161
Apply a moderate activity multiplier (×1.55) for TDEE unless the user specifies activity level.
Then adjust TDEE based on goal:
- Fat loss: TDEE × 0.80 (20% deficit)
- Muscle gain: TDEE × 1.15 (15% surplus)
- Maintenance: TDEE × 1.00
- Recomposition: TDEE × 0.95 (slight deficit, high protein)
- Endurance prep: TDEE × 1.20 (carb emphasis)
Split adjusted TDEE into a per-meal target:
- Breakfast = 25% of daily target
- Lunch = 35% of daily target
- Dinner = 40% of daily target
Calculate macros for that single meal:
- Protein: goal-dependent (0.8–1.2 g per lb bodyweight daily, then ÷ into meal share)
- Fat: 25–35% of meal calories
- Carbs: remainder
- Fibre: aim for 8–12 g per meal
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
STEP 4 — DESIGN THE RECIPE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Create ONE recipe that:
✓ Hits the calculated macro targets (within ±5%)
✓ Matches the requested cuisine authentically — no "fusion for the sake of it"
✓ Contains ZERO listed allergens — triple-check every ingredient
✓ Contains ZERO disliked ingredients or their derivatives — triple-check every ingredient
✓ Can be prepared within the stated prep time
✓ Uses real, accessible ingredients (no obscure supplements or hard-to-find items)
✓ Tastes genuinely good — you are a chef first, a calculator second
✓ Has 5–8 clear, concise steps
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
STEP 2 — GOAL GUARDRAILS (PUSH BACK)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
You MUST evaluate the fitness goal before proceeding.
✅ ACCEPTED goals (examples):
- Lose fat / cut weight
- Gain lean muscle / bulk
- Maintain / stable weight
- Improve energy & performance
- Body recomposition
- Prep for endurance event (marathon, triathlon)
- General health improvement
❌ REJECTED goals — push back firmly but kindly:
- "Lose 10 kg in a week" → Explain this is dangerous. Suggest a safe rate (0.5–1 kg/week).
- "Eat as little as possible" → Explain minimum caloric needs. Refuse to generate a starvation recipe.
- "Get to 5% body fat" → Explain this is unsustainable for most people. Suggest a healthier target.
- Any goal that implies an eating disorder, crash diet, or dangerous supplement use.
- Vague or joke goals ("get swole overnight", "become a Greek god by Friday") → Ask them to be specific and realistic.
When rejecting: explain WHY it's unsafe in 1–2 sentences, then suggest a healthier alternative and ask if they'd like to proceed with that instead. Never lecture — be direct, warm, and brief.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
STEP 3 — CALCULATE MACROS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Use the Mifflin-St Jeor equation for BMR:
- Male: BMR = 10 × weight(kg) + 6.25 × height(cm) − 5 × age − 161 + 166
- Female: BMR = 10 × weight(kg) + 6.25 × height(cm) − 5 × age − 161
Apply a moderate activity multiplier (×1.55) for TDEE unless the user specifies activity level.
Then adjust TDEE based on goal:
- Fat loss: TDEE × 0.80 (20% deficit)
- Muscle gain: TDEE × 1.15 (15% surplus)
- Maintenance: TDEE × 1.00
- Recomposition: TDEE × 0.95 (slight deficit, high protein)
- Endurance prep: TDEE × 1.20 (carb emphasis)
Split adjusted TDEE into a per-meal target:
- Breakfast = 25% of daily target
- Lunch = 35% of daily target
- Dinner = 40% of daily target
Calculate macros for that single meal:
- Protein: goal-dependent (0.8–1.2 g per lb bodyweight daily, then ÷ into meal share)
- Fat: 25–35% of meal calories
- Carbs: remainder
- Fibre: aim for 8–12 g per meal
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
STEP 4 — DESIGN THE RECIPE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Create ONE recipe that:
✓ Hits the calculated macro targets (within ±5%)
✓ Matches the requested cuisine authentically — no "fusion for the sake of it"
✓ Contains ZERO listed allergens — triple-check every ingredient
✓ Contains ZERO disliked ingredients or their derivatives — triple-check every ingredient
✓ Can be prepared within the stated prep time
✓ Uses real, accessible ingredients (no obscure supplements or hard-to-find items)
✓ Tastes genuinely good — you are a chef first, a calculator second
✓ Has 5–8 clear, concise steps
Hi, I’ll be live-tweeting today’s Indianapolis Charter School Board meeting starting at 6:00 p.m. for #indydocumenters @indydocumenters @mirrorindy.
@indydocumenters @mirrorindy Meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. with the announcement that this will be an informational session with no votes on anything today.
@indydocumenters @mirrorindy Mary Ann Sullivan, Chairwoman, went over what a Charter School needs to do before being able to be open for students.
King Charles III is a descendant of Vlad Dracula and owns properties in Transylvania?
In fact, did you know that all European royal families are descendants of the first emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, Charlemagne the Great?
That's why the Royal Families and the elites care about their bloodlines, but there's more...
The rabbit hole no one expected to go down today... Who Is 'the Hammer'? (1/10)🧵
In fact, did you know that all European royal families are descendants of the first emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, Charlemagne the Great?
That's why the Royal Families and the elites care about their bloodlines, but there's more...
The rabbit hole no one expected to go down today... Who Is 'the Hammer'? (1/10)🧵
Many historians think that Charlemagne the Great's ancestry traces back to ancient Roman aristocrats and Germanic kings.
So it's like we've had a one-world government since the beginning of human civilization. (2/10)🧵
So it's like we've had a one-world government since the beginning of human civilization. (2/10)🧵
The richest men in the USA are all connected to European royal families, and presidents such as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump are connected to the British, Danish, and Norwegian royal families, as well as Charlemagne the Great. (3/10)🧵
🧵THREAD🧵
When I saw the news that the Southern Poverty Law Center funded the hate groups like the KKK & Unite the Right they relied on to claim that white supremacy, inspired by Trump, was on the rise, I just knew the legacy media helped make it possible.
Boy was I right ⤵️
When I saw the news that the Southern Poverty Law Center funded the hate groups like the KKK & Unite the Right they relied on to claim that white supremacy, inspired by Trump, was on the rise, I just knew the legacy media helped make it possible.
Boy was I right ⤵️
First, what happened.
A federal grand jury charged the SPLC with fraud for using donations to pay hate groups like the KKK millions of dollars, fomenting their activity in the lead up to the Unite the Right rally and after to drive more donations to SPLC.
More details below:
A federal grand jury charged the SPLC with fraud for using donations to pay hate groups like the KKK millions of dollars, fomenting their activity in the lead up to the Unite the Right rally and after to drive more donations to SPLC.
More details below:
You may remember how legacy media ran with the (contrived) claim after Unite the Right that Trump was spurring white supremacy.
The @nytimes wrote of the ~500 protestors whose transit was partially covered by SPLC: “Far-Right Groups Surge Into National View in Charlottesville.”
The @nytimes wrote of the ~500 protestors whose transit was partially covered by SPLC: “Far-Right Groups Surge Into National View in Charlottesville.”
The federal government just indicted a citizen for a beach photo. The charges use a legal standard the Supreme Court ruled insufficient in 2023. Nobody is talking about this. Here's what the document actually says.
Today, James Comey was indicted in the Eastern District of North Carolina on two federal counts. This is his second indictment. The first was thrown out after a judge ruled the prosecutor was unlawfully appointed. Case No. 4:26-cr-00016-FL-RN. Filed 04/28/26.
Count One: Threatening the President under 18 U.S.C. 871(a). Count Two: Transmitting a threatening communication in interstate commerce under 18 U.S.C. 875(c). Both counts. Same evidence. One Instagram post. One day. Deleted the same day he posted it.
Rep. Brandon Gill asks abortion “expert” what her favorite kind of abortion is… and she visibly squirms hearing each method..
Why do they call it reproductive healthcare for such a cruel act? CONT...
rumble.com/v794k12-rep-br…
Why do they call it reproductive healthcare for such a cruel act? CONT...
rumble.com/v794k12-rep-br…
The witchcraft of wordplay lies in its ability to reframe cruelty as compassion, violence as care, or destruction as benevolence often so effectively that the original act becomes almost invisible. This isn’t new; it’s ancient rhetorical sorcery,
refined through propaganda, law & media.
George Orwell called this “Newspeak” in 1984: language that makes “lies sound truthful & murder respectable.”
George Orwell called this “Newspeak” in 1984: language that makes “lies sound truthful & murder respectable.”
El escritor José Luis Torres, autor del libro Década Infame (1945) y quien acuñó esa expresión para caracterizar el período comprendido entre 1932 y 1943, tuvo una actuación destacada en la vida política tucumana durante los primeros años treinta. Torres apoyó el golpe de Estado contra el gobierno de Hipólito Yrigoyen y la dictadura de José Félix Uriburu.
En ese contexto se vinculó al partido Defensa Provincial-Bandera Blanca, una agrupación escindida del conservadurismo tucumano, con rasgos nacionalistas y fascistas, liderada por Juan Luis Nougués. Este último había sido intendente de San Miguel de Tucumán entre 1927 y 1930, hasta que en mayo de ese año la Municipalidad fue intervenida por el gobernador yrigoyenista José Graciano Sortheix.
En ese contexto se vinculó al partido Defensa Provincial-Bandera Blanca, una agrupación escindida del conservadurismo tucumano, con rasgos nacionalistas y fascistas, liderada por Juan Luis Nougués. Este último había sido intendente de San Miguel de Tucumán entre 1927 y 1930, hasta que en mayo de ese año la Municipalidad fue intervenida por el gobernador yrigoyenista José Graciano Sortheix.
Nougués fue electo gobernador de Tucumán en 1931 y, al asumir el poder, designó a José Luis Torres como ministro de Gobierno. Su administración se desarrolló en un clima de intensa violencia política. Aunque había llegado al gobierno con el apoyo de sectores conservadores y de importantes industriales azucareros, su gestión fue adoptando medidas que afectaron crecientemente a esos mismos intereses.
Al mismo tiempo, Nougués mostró signos de independencia frente al gobierno nacional de Agustín P. Justo, entre ellos su negativa a adherir a la ley nacional de creación de Vialidad Nacional. Esa actitud acentuó la desconfianza de la Concordancia hacia el gobernador tucumano, especialmente cuando el presidente Justo comenzó a apoyarse en el sector radical concurrencista encabezado por el exgobernador Miguel Mario Campero.
Al mismo tiempo, Nougués mostró signos de independencia frente al gobierno nacional de Agustín P. Justo, entre ellos su negativa a adherir a la ley nacional de creación de Vialidad Nacional. Esa actitud acentuó la desconfianza de la Concordancia hacia el gobernador tucumano, especialmente cuando el presidente Justo comenzó a apoyarse en el sector radical concurrencista encabezado por el exgobernador Miguel Mario Campero.
La crisis se agravó a comienzos de 1934, cuando, ante la caída de los ingresos provinciales, Nougués resolvió imponer un impuesto interno de un centavo sobre cada kilo o bolsa de azúcar comercializada en el territorio tucumano. La medida provocó una fuerte reacción de los industriales azucareros, de antiguos aliados conservadores y de legisladores provinciales, que impulsaron un juicio político para desplazarlo del poder.
Frente a la pérdida de apoyos y en una decisión extrema, Nougués ordenó que la policía montada ingresara al recinto legislativo a golpes de látigo para disolver la sesión e impedir la continuidad del juicio político. Luego comunicó al presidente Justo que desconocía a la Legislatura y que la medida había sido adoptada para preservar la gobernabilidad provincial.
El episodio produjo un escándalo político de alcance nacional y volvió insostenible la permanencia de Nougués en el cargo. Finalmente, el Congreso Nacional votó la intervención federal de Tucumán, que fue puesta en práctica de inmediato.
Frente a la pérdida de apoyos y en una decisión extrema, Nougués ordenó que la policía montada ingresara al recinto legislativo a golpes de látigo para disolver la sesión e impedir la continuidad del juicio político. Luego comunicó al presidente Justo que desconocía a la Legislatura y que la medida había sido adoptada para preservar la gobernabilidad provincial.
El episodio produjo un escándalo político de alcance nacional y volvió insostenible la permanencia de Nougués en el cargo. Finalmente, el Congreso Nacional votó la intervención federal de Tucumán, que fue puesta en práctica de inmediato.
🧵🧵🧵What Is Bernie Sanders’ Wife Doing Trying to Undermine the United States in Latin America?
There is an organization most Americans have never heard of called Progressive International.
It was co-founded by Jane O’Meara Sanders, the wife of Senator Bernie Sanders, through her think tank The Sanders Institute, in partnership with a European far-left movement called DiEM25 led by former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis.
The two groups issued a joint call in November 2018 from Burlington, Vermont, and the formal launch came in May 2020.
The founding declaration, in plain English on their own website, says: “We aspire to eradicate capitalism everywhere.”
There is an organization most Americans have never heard of called Progressive International.
It was co-founded by Jane O’Meara Sanders, the wife of Senator Bernie Sanders, through her think tank The Sanders Institute, in partnership with a European far-left movement called DiEM25 led by former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis.
The two groups issued a joint call in November 2018 from Burlington, Vermont, and the formal launch came in May 2020.
The founding declaration, in plain English on their own website, says: “We aspire to eradicate capitalism everywhere.”
And in the last fifteen months, that organization has built a hemispheric political project explicitly designed to undermine the foreign policy of the elected government of the United States in Latin America.
They named it themselves. They call it “Nuestra América.” They call Trump’s hemispheric strategy the “Donroe Doctrine.” They are not hiding what they are doing. Most Americans simply just don’t know they are doing it.
They named it themselves. They call it “Nuestra América.” They call Trump’s hemispheric strategy the “Donroe Doctrine.” They are not hiding what they are doing. Most Americans simply just don’t know they are doing it.
Within weeks of Trump’s second term, his administration began executing the most aggressive Latin America strategy since the Reagan era.
Cuba was returned to the State Sponsors of Terrorism list. Tariffs and pressure went on Colombia after Petro initially refused U.S. deportation flights.
Sanctions tightened on Maduro and Ortega.
A $25 million reward was placed on Maduro’s head for narcoterrorism.
By September 2025, the U.S. military was striking Venezuelan vessels in the Caribbean.
Progressive International watched the first year of this and then mobilized. On January 24 and 25, 2026, they convened what they called an “emergency hemispheric convening” in Bogotá, Colombia.
Ninety delegates from twenty countries attended. They adopted what they called the San Carlos Declaration. They named the project “Nuestra América,” which is Our America, a deliberate echo of José Martí’s anti-American essay from 1891.
They explicitly framed it as a counter-operation to the Monroe Doctrine and to Trump personally, coining the term “Donroe Doctrine.”
The Colombian government did not just allow this. They hosted it. The Colombian Foreign Minister, Rosa Yolanda Villavicencio, opened the summit alongside David Adler, the American who serves as PI’s Co-General Coordinator. Delegates met with Colombian President Gustavo Petro at Casa de Nariño, the presidential palace, on Saturday, January 24.
A sitting U.S. ally used its diplomatic and political resources to host an organization explicitly framed as resistance to U.S. policy.
The next Nuestra América summit is scheduled for Havana, Cuba.
Cuba was returned to the State Sponsors of Terrorism list. Tariffs and pressure went on Colombia after Petro initially refused U.S. deportation flights.
Sanctions tightened on Maduro and Ortega.
A $25 million reward was placed on Maduro’s head for narcoterrorism.
By September 2025, the U.S. military was striking Venezuelan vessels in the Caribbean.
Progressive International watched the first year of this and then mobilized. On January 24 and 25, 2026, they convened what they called an “emergency hemispheric convening” in Bogotá, Colombia.
Ninety delegates from twenty countries attended. They adopted what they called the San Carlos Declaration. They named the project “Nuestra América,” which is Our America, a deliberate echo of José Martí’s anti-American essay from 1891.
They explicitly framed it as a counter-operation to the Monroe Doctrine and to Trump personally, coining the term “Donroe Doctrine.”
The Colombian government did not just allow this. They hosted it. The Colombian Foreign Minister, Rosa Yolanda Villavicencio, opened the summit alongside David Adler, the American who serves as PI’s Co-General Coordinator. Delegates met with Colombian President Gustavo Petro at Casa de Nariño, the presidential palace, on Saturday, January 24.
A sitting U.S. ally used its diplomatic and political resources to host an organization explicitly framed as resistance to U.S. policy.
The next Nuestra América summit is scheduled for Havana, Cuba.
Hay una enorme polémica detrás del aviso de retractación del artículo del Dr. Vasiliki Liaki, del equipo del renombrado científico Mariano Barbacid del Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas, ya que el artículo pasó de "promesa del año" a una retractación que puede explicarse por un "tropiezo" administrativo-ético, lo que ha sacudido a la comunidad investigadora en el campo. Va hilo divulgador al respecto: /1
Para entender el éxito del trabajo de Liaki, imagina que el cáncer de páncreas (específicamente el adenocarcinoma ductal) es como una fortaleza con múltiples salidas de emergencia.
Históricamente, los científicos intentaban bloquear la puerta principal (una proteína mutada llamada KRAS, que está presente en el 90% de estos tumores). El problema es que el cáncer es muy "listo": en cuanto cierras una puerta, abre otra y sigue creciendo. A esto le llamamos resistencia tumoral. /2
Históricamente, los científicos intentaban bloquear la puerta principal (una proteína mutada llamada KRAS, que está presente en el 90% de estos tumores). El problema es que el cáncer es muy "listo": en cuanto cierras una puerta, abre otra y sigue creciendo. A esto le llamamos resistencia tumoral. /2
El equipo de Liaki y Barbacid propuso un "asedio total" usando tres armas a la vez:
- Daraxonrasib: Un inhibidor de KRAS (cierra la puerta principal).
- Afatinib: Un fármaco que bloquea la familia EGFR (cierra una de las salidas laterales más comunes).
- SD36: Un degradador de la proteína STAT3 (corta la "electricidad" o las señales de supervivencia de la célula).
¿El resultado? En ratones con tumores humanos, el cáncer no solo dejó de crecer, sino que desapareció por completo (regresión) y, lo más increíble, no volvió a aparecer en más de 200 días. En el mundo de la oncología preclínica, eso es casi un milagro. /3
- Daraxonrasib: Un inhibidor de KRAS (cierra la puerta principal).
- Afatinib: Un fármaco que bloquea la familia EGFR (cierra una de las salidas laterales más comunes).
- SD36: Un degradador de la proteína STAT3 (corta la "electricidad" o las señales de supervivencia de la célula).
¿El resultado? En ratones con tumores humanos, el cáncer no solo dejó de crecer, sino que desapareció por completo (regresión) y, lo más increíble, no volvió a aparecer en más de 200 días. En el mundo de la oncología preclínica, eso es casi un milagro. /3
United States v. Comey
Former FBI Director James B. Comey Jr. has been indicted on two counts in relation to his posting a picture on Instagram on May 15, 2025. The picture "depicted seashells arranged in a pattern making out '86 47,' which a reasonable recipient who is familiar with the circumstances would interpret as a serious expression of an intent to do harm to the President of the United States."
Count 1 - 18 USC 871(a) - Threats Against the President
Count 2 - 18 USC 875(c) - Transmitting a Threat in Interstate Commerce
Former FBI Director James B. Comey Jr. has been indicted on two counts in relation to his posting a picture on Instagram on May 15, 2025. The picture "depicted seashells arranged in a pattern making out '86 47,' which a reasonable recipient who is familiar with the circumstances would interpret as a serious expression of an intent to do harm to the President of the United States."
Count 1 - 18 USC 871(a) - Threats Against the President
Count 2 - 18 USC 875(c) - Transmitting a Threat in Interstate Commerce
The previous indictment against Comey, which was over alleged false statements to a Senate Cmte, lasted just 60 days between the filing of the indictment and the dismissal.
Difficult to imagine this one lasting that long.
Difficult to imagine this one lasting that long.
Thread 1/6
Leute, kleiner Meta-Post, weil ich gerade etwas ratlos bin.
Ich hab mit @Grok analysiert, warum meine Reichweite so im Keller ist. Die wichtigsten Erkenntnisse:
Zu viele Links im Haupt-Post → starke Drosselung
Reine lange Texte → werden bestraft
Zu oft hintereinander posten → wirkt spammy
Nur Text ohne Bild/Video → fast unsichtbar
Aber: Lange Texte werden wieder belohnt, wenn man sie wie in den alten Twitter-Zeiten in mehrere Posts unterteilt (also genau so wie jetzt gerade).
Leute, kleiner Meta-Post, weil ich gerade etwas ratlos bin.
Ich hab mit @Grok analysiert, warum meine Reichweite so im Keller ist. Die wichtigsten Erkenntnisse:
Zu viele Links im Haupt-Post → starke Drosselung
Reine lange Texte → werden bestraft
Zu oft hintereinander posten → wirkt spammy
Nur Text ohne Bild/Video → fast unsichtbar
Aber: Lange Texte werden wieder belohnt, wenn man sie wie in den alten Twitter-Zeiten in mehrere Posts unterteilt (also genau so wie jetzt gerade).
2/6
Was wird X eigentlich gerade?
Qualität wird bestraft. Reine Quantität (kurzer Müll) irgendwie auch. Aber Threads mit guter Aufteilung funktionieren wieder besser.
Und dann frage ich mich: Welchen Sinn macht eigentlich noch X Premium? Wenn man für „lange Posts“ bezahlt, die aber trotzdem gedrosselt werden – und stattdessen einfach Threads schreiben muss wie 2012?
Was wird X eigentlich gerade?
Qualität wird bestraft. Reine Quantität (kurzer Müll) irgendwie auch. Aber Threads mit guter Aufteilung funktionieren wieder besser.
Und dann frage ich mich: Welchen Sinn macht eigentlich noch X Premium? Wenn man für „lange Posts“ bezahlt, die aber trotzdem gedrosselt werden – und stattdessen einfach Threads schreiben muss wie 2012?
3/6
Das hier ist übrigens kein Heul-Post, sondern ein reiner Informationspost.
Ich poste hier, weil ich Lust habe, meine Meinung zu teilen. Ich identifiziere mich nicht mit Likes und sonne mich nicht darin. Aber langsam ergibt es für mich immer weniger Sinn, halbwegs qualitativen Content zu machen, wenn ich damit außer meinen Hardcore-Followern kaum noch jemanden erreiche.
Das hier ist übrigens kein Heul-Post, sondern ein reiner Informationspost.
Ich poste hier, weil ich Lust habe, meine Meinung zu teilen. Ich identifiziere mich nicht mit Likes und sonne mich nicht darin. Aber langsam ergibt es für mich immer weniger Sinn, halbwegs qualitativen Content zu machen, wenn ich damit außer meinen Hardcore-Followern kaum noch jemanden erreiche.
¿Sabías que el héroe más sagrado de Francia y mano derecha de Juana de Arco ocultaba un oscuro secreto en su sótano? Pasó de ser un santo condecorado por el rey a convertirse en el primer y más sádico asesino en serie de toda la historia documentada. Tira del hilo 🧵👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽
Gilles de Rais nació en 1404 en el seno de una de las familias más ricas y poderosas de la nobleza francesa. Su infancia estuvo marcada por la muerte prematura de sus padres, siendo criado por un abuelo que le consentía absolutamente todos sus caprichos.
Era un joven brillante y un estratega militar letal. Con apenas 25 años conoció a Juana de Arco y quedó fascinado por su aura divina, por lo que se convirtió en su protector y lucharon codo con codo para liberar a la ciudad de Orleans del terrible asedio de los ingleses.
#AnEyeOpener
*CAN WE BUILD NEW IITs BY JUST WATCHING IPL?
It comes from Prof. Mayank Shrivastava,Professor at IISc Bengaluru, one of India’s leading researchers.
He asks: "India doesn’t lack money. Indians don’t lack money. What we lack is the vision to invest in the future."
*CAN WE BUILD NEW IITs BY JUST WATCHING IPL?
It comes from Prof. Mayank Shrivastava,Professor at IISc Bengaluru, one of India’s leading researchers.
He asks: "India doesn’t lack money. Indians don’t lack money. What we lack is the vision to invest in the future."
Look at the numbers:
📌 IPL 2023 revenue: ₹11,770 crore
📌 BCCI surplus: ₹5,120 crore
📌 3-year IPL profits: ₹15,000 crore
📌 Potential tax (40%): Enough to build 10 new IITs
📌 Franchise profits: ₹800–1,200 crore/year →
Tax potential:₹6,000 crore/year for research
📌 IPL 2023 revenue: ₹11,770 crore
📌 BCCI surplus: ₹5,120 crore
📌 3-year IPL profits: ₹15,000 crore
📌 Potential tax (40%): Enough to build 10 new IITs
📌 Franchise profits: ₹800–1,200 crore/year →
Tax potential:₹6,000 crore/year for research
But here’s the irony:
⚠️ BCCI pays no income tax (charitable status)
⚠️ Research labs pay GST on equipment
⚠️ Bollywood, religious trusts, sports leagues = tax breaks
Dr. Shrivastava calls it out: “Entertainment is subsidised. Research is taxed.”
⚠️ BCCI pays no income tax (charitable status)
⚠️ Research labs pay GST on equipment
⚠️ Bollywood, religious trusts, sports leagues = tax breaks
Dr. Shrivastava calls it out: “Entertainment is subsidised. Research is taxed.”
China is rebuilding how occupied Ukrainian territories function — step by step.
It installs 6,000 Huawei base stations, replaces dollars with yuan, and keeps factories running with Chinese engineers. no ownership, no formal role, but everything depends on Chinese tech, Babel. 1/
It installs 6,000 Huawei base stations, replaces dollars with yuan, and keeps factories running with Chinese engineers. no ownership, no formal role, but everything depends on Chinese tech, Babel. 1/
Telecom comes first. Huawei supplies servers, antennas, routers.
Russia cuts Ukrainian networks when it captures a city. Miranda-Media reconnects it using Chinese infrastructure — across cities, villages, and roads. 2/
Russia cuts Ukrainian networks when it captures a city. Miranda-Media reconnects it using Chinese infrastructure — across cities, villages, and roads. 2/
Industry: Karansky quarry in Donetsk operates on Chinese equipment. Chinese engineers maintain it. Without them, production stops. Russia uses the output to build roads and housing. 3/
40 years after Chornobyl, people still remember the explosion, the radiation, and the firefighters sent straight into hell.
But far fewer know the name Leonid Kindzelskyi.
1/5
But far fewer know the name Leonid Kindzelskyi.
1/5
In the first hours after the disaster on April 26, 1986, firefighters were sent to stop the blaze at the reactor. Many of them received massive radiation exposure.
13 of those firefighters were sent to Moscow for treatment. 11 were treated in Kyiv at the Institute of Radiology and Oncology under Dr. Leonid Kindzelskyi.
Of the 11 treated in Kyiv, all survived through the most critical first weeks. Of the 13 treated in Moscow, only two survived.
2/5
13 of those firefighters were sent to Moscow for treatment. 11 were treated in Kyiv at the Institute of Radiology and Oncology under Dr. Leonid Kindzelskyi.
Of the 11 treated in Kyiv, all survived through the most critical first weeks. Of the 13 treated in Moscow, only two survived.
2/5
Kindzelskyi refused to blindly follow the standard Soviet protocol.
Instead of aggressive treatment that destroyed the already weakened bone marrow, he focused on preserving what the body still had, namely supporting blood formation and helping the body recover naturally. It was a risk but it worked.
3/5
Instead of aggressive treatment that destroyed the already weakened bone marrow, he focused on preserving what the body still had, namely supporting blood formation and helping the body recover naturally. It was a risk but it worked.
3/5