Most recent unrolls from @ThreadReaderApp
🌍Mundo ✍️@kemalozturk2020
Alianza Mediterránea: el futuro empieza ahora. 🌍 #Mediterráneo #Geopolítica #Paz
La Hora De Una Alianza Mediterránea Ha Llegado. @kritik_bakis aracılığıylakritikbakis.com/es/la-hora-de-…
Alianza Mediterránea: el futuro empieza ahora. 🌍 #Mediterráneo #Geopolítica #Paz
La Hora De Una Alianza Mediterránea Ha Llegado. @kritik_bakis aracılığıylakritikbakis.com/es/la-hora-de-…
La cuenca mediterránea vuelve a ser clave: energía y geopolítica. Es momento de que la región defina su propio destino. #Mediterráneo #Geopolítica
Unir capacidades en defensa, economía, tecnología y finanzas puede convertir al Mediterráneo en un nuevo centro de poder global. Menos conflicto, más cooperación: el camino hacia un futuro estable ya está sobre la mesa. #Cooperación #Economía #Tecnología #Paz #Geoestrategia
#NFLDRAFT2026
Josiah Trotter - LB - Mizzou
La suite en commentaire ⬇️
Josiah Trotter - LB - Mizzou
La suite en commentaire ⬇️
Qualités
- Bon Instincts
- Défense contre la course
- Se libère facilement des blocks
- Technique de placage propre
- Explosivité
- Âge
Défauts
- Coverage
- Sideline to Sideline
- Manque de fluidité
- Pas un playmaker
- Difficulté contre les RPO, Motion, Spread
- Bon Instincts
- Défense contre la course
- Se libère facilement des blocks
- Technique de placage propre
- Explosivité
- Âge
Défauts
- Coverage
- Sideline to Sideline
- Manque de fluidité
- Pas un playmaker
- Difficulté contre les RPO, Motion, Spread
Josiah Trotter, MIKE linebacker avec des instincts d’élite et une capacité rare à diagnostiquer le jeu pré- et post-snap. Ce qui me frappe immédiatement sur les tapes, c’est sa vitesse de lecture il identifie très rapidement les clés (guard flow, backfield action, mesh point)
17 avril 1951
Conseil de la République, questions orales.
Mis en cause pour ses relations pendant l’Occupation avec Maurice Voisin, rédacteur du journal collaborationniste « L’effort », le Ministre de la France d’outre-mer François Mitterrand s’explique sur son passé de vichysto-résistant. 🧵1/6
(Cité par Thomas Deltombe, #LAfriqueDAbord )
x.com/amis_mitterran…
Conseil de la République, questions orales.
Mis en cause pour ses relations pendant l’Occupation avec Maurice Voisin, rédacteur du journal collaborationniste « L’effort », le Ministre de la France d’outre-mer François Mitterrand s’explique sur son passé de vichysto-résistant. 🧵1/6
(Cité par Thomas Deltombe, #LAfriqueDAbord )
x.com/amis_mitterran…
François Mitterrand évoque son parcours, depuis son arrivée à Vichy en 1942 : « j'arrivais d'Allemagne d'où je venais de m'évader pour la 3e fois, après avoir passé 18 mois en captivité dont plusieurs en cellule…» jusqu’à la Libération, lorsqu’en qualité de membre du gouvernement provisoire, désigné par le général de Gaulle, il fut le 1er des Français à accueillir Raymond Dronne, 1er capitaine de la France libre. 2/6
Il explique quand et pourquoi il a démissionné de Vichy, raconte l’esclandre fait à la salle Wagram le 10 juillet 1943 et l’écho qui en fut donné par Maurice Schumann. « Ce garçon âgé de 26 ans alors — je suis gêné de le dire — c'était tout de même moi... Il peut paraitre inutile de rappeler tout cela, mais il ne faudrait pas exagérer. Je n’en avais jamais parlé… »3/6
Jak wygląda tzw. regulacja wynajmu krótkoterminowego i inwestycji hotelopodobnych w Warszawie? Zapraszam na wątek, bo gorzej chyba być nie mogło👇
Dzielnica Białołęka odmówiła wydania na tym terenie (usługi w MPZP) pozwolenia na budowę "hotelu", inwestor (Murapol) odwołał się...
Dzielnica Białołęka odmówiła wydania na tym terenie (usługi w MPZP) pozwolenia na budowę "hotelu", inwestor (Murapol) odwołał się...
...do wojewody mazowieckiego @M_Frankowski, który najpierw uchylił decyzję ratusza Białołęki i przekazał mu sprawę do ponownego rozpatrzenia, a później wydał pozwolenie na budowę "hotelu".
Z kuriozalnym uzasadnieniem, które wcześniej przedstawił Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny...
Z kuriozalnym uzasadnieniem, które wcześniej przedstawił Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny...
że w zasadzie organ wydający PNB nie powinien badać docelowego przeznaczenia inwestycji. Czyli jak ktoś wybuduje "hotel", a później wyodrębni lokale, to można zgłosić to do PINB... ale wcześniej trzeba wydać pozwolenie na budowę. Czyli w zasadzie po co nam MPZP?
1/ The Russian MOD's reported decision to block the supply of drones to frontline troops and reserve them solely for the Unmanned Systems Forces continues to cause consternation among Russian warbloggers. Former drone pilot Andrey Filatov predicts disastrous consequences. ⬇️
2/ Writing on Telegram, Filatov says:"Judging by rumours and the shortage of drones, there is a sense that Mr. (or whatever title the reader prefers) Krivoruchko, First Deputy Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation, wants to take drones away from frontline units,…
3/ …thereby effectively destroying the personnel trained at the cost of enormous losses on the front lines.
Facciamo finta che nella città in cui vivete per 2 giorni tolgono l'acqua per importanti lavori sulla rete. Poi quando ritorna vi viene detto di non usarla per fini alimentari e personali in attesa delle analisi e comunque di aspettare 7-8 giorni. Ma c'è un problema... 1) segue
Le case sono dotate di serbatoi autoclave necessarie a far arrivare in pressione l'acqua ai piani. Se l'acqua rimessa in circolo risulta ancora non potabile i serbatoi delle case risulteranno contaminati sia per la torbidità che per possibili patogeni.
Pertanto bisognerà ...2)
Pertanto bisognerà ...2)
3) far passare non solo i 7-8 giorni ma attendere che un idraulico, se disponibile, svuoti il serbatoio e lo sanifichi. Quindi passeranno altri 10 giorni se non di più e nel frattempo usare solo bottiglie d'acqua o taniche prelevando da fonti potabili. Quindi disagio...
@NobleRingleader @elizaclove I’m not sure which thread but yes, this is all very ‘normal’ for severe ME and LC. And it doesn’t cause abnormalities in standard lung and heart tests. What’s going wrong is in the microvessels that don’t get tested in medical tests, but the daily shows up in research grade tests
@NobleRingleader @elizaclove There’s also a high likelihood that it’s partly caused by microclots, which again, doctors don’t test for - they can test for it but they don’t know this as the methods are very new.
VQ scans and SPECT scans can detect these microclots and vascular problems in the lungs but…
VQ scans and SPECT scans can detect these microclots and vascular problems in the lungs but…
@NobleRingleader @elizaclove They’re not done as standard so we get sent home and discharged without treatment.
The best thing to trial is the blood enzymes like nattokiase or Lumbrokinase as we have to self treat this issue given how medicine fails to.
The best thing to trial is the blood enzymes like nattokiase or Lumbrokinase as we have to self treat this issue given how medicine fails to.
🧵 FIL: Quatre entitats “sense ànim de lucre” controlen +350M€ de diners públics a Cat. El que veuràs és un sistema tancat, opac i sense competència. I algú ho ha de dir. ⚠️👇
(i al centre de tot, els propietaris d’un dels hotels de més luxe de Barcelona: el Majèstic 5*GL)
(i al centre de tot, els propietaris d’un dels hotels de més luxe de Barcelona: el Majèstic 5*GL)
1/ Si no coneixes el “tercer sector”: són entitats privades que gestionen serveis públics (dependència, inserció, reinserció…). No són empreses clàssiques, però viuen gairebé exclusivament de diners públics. 🏛️💶
2/ Els noms clau: Suara, IRES, Surt i Intermèdia. Tres entitats socials i una fundació creada per elles mateixes. Entre totes, més de 350M€ en fons públics. I ara ve la part delicada. 👇
вирішив якось генерал із Генерального штабу особисто перевірити морально-психологічний стан добровольців 2022 року, про яких по телевізору розповідають, що вони титани і все завдяки їм, а командири весь час доповідають, що вони постійно усім задоволені і нарікань не мають.
скинув генерал свій мундир з медалями, натягнув старий засалений піксельний кітель, вʼїбав 100 грам, щоб не виділятись, насунув на лоба кепку та і пішов у самий забомжарений зариганий батальйон резерву в забутому Богом селі, набитий пораненими каліками, які не можуть списатись.
сів генерал біля самого старого, самого пʼяного, самого покаліченого діда, який четверту добу не спить і намагається на спиртівці закипʼятить кружку води, і питає:
- друже, а чого ти так вас тут пʼятий рік покалічених без дембеля і грошей тримають, як скотину?..
- друже, а чого ти так вас тут пʼятий рік покалічених без дембеля і грошей тримають, як скотину?..
“#MovingMoviez?”
“#OssCars?”
“#StairyMovie?”
“#TheFlatRooms??”
📹🚎🪜🏢?
“#TheGnomeCopes?”
🏢🪜🧗?
#TruthWillOut!
#SystemsWillHeal!
#TurnToJesusChrist!!!
✝️🕊🤍
⛬
[ #Earthsflat ? ]
[ #TheGnomeWarps ? ]
[ #TheFlatGeneration ? ]
🏢⚖️▶✝️🤍🪜??
trip??
healthy??
🐳Update zum Buckelwal Bullen #Hope /#Timmy – 17.04.2026, 00:15 Uhr🐳
Die aufwendige Rettungsoperation begonnen hat.
▶️ Hope / Timmy wurden heute feuchte Spezialtücher aufgelegt, um den Wal zu kühlen – so, wie es bei gestrandeten Walen üblich ist.
Die aufwendige Rettungsoperation begonnen hat.
▶️ Hope / Timmy wurden heute feuchte Spezialtücher aufgelegt, um den Wal zu kühlen – so, wie es bei gestrandeten Walen üblich ist.
Von Helfern vor Ort war außerdem zu hören, dass ein sogenannter
▶️ „Walflüsterer“
bei Hope war und dass der Wal dabei deutlich mitgemacht habe.
▶️ Hope brummt, bewegt sich, zeigt Buckel und bläst.
🐳🐳🐳
▶️ „Walflüsterer“
bei Hope war und dass der Wal dabei deutlich mitgemacht habe.
▶️ Hope brummt, bewegt sich, zeigt Buckel und bläst.
🐳🐳🐳
Zudem wurde berichtet, dass
▶️ Bluttests
‼️KEINE AUFFÄLLIGEN BESONDERHEITEN
wie stark erhöhte Entzündungswerte gezeigt hätten.
▶️ Bluttests
‼️KEINE AUFFÄLLIGEN BESONDERHEITEN
wie stark erhöhte Entzündungswerte gezeigt hätten.
SitRep - 16/04/26 - The port of Tuapse on fire
An overview of the daily events in Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Overnight, Ukrainian long-range drones struck the port city of Tuapse, setting oil tanks and other infrastructure ablaze.
REPOST=appreciated
1/X
An overview of the daily events in Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Overnight, Ukrainian long-range drones struck the port city of Tuapse, setting oil tanks and other infrastructure ablaze.
REPOST=appreciated
1/X
Missed the latest?
As usual we start with Russian losses
Trumps Bereicherung an Krieg und Tod –
▶️ anonyme Konten wetten auf Szenarien
Die Frage ist:
▶️ Werden hier konkret Menschenleben und Elend riskiert, um persönlich davon zu profitieren?
fr.de/politik/krieg-…
▶️ anonyme Konten wetten auf Szenarien
Die Frage ist:
▶️ Werden hier konkret Menschenleben und Elend riskiert, um persönlich davon zu profitieren?
fr.de/politik/krieg-…
Pikanterweise sind die Trump-Söhne an den Wettplattformen beteiligt, auf denen auf Trumps Entscheidungen gewettet werden kann.
▶️ Wer dann auch noch kurz vorher Bescheid weiß, was Trump wann und wie entscheiden wird, kann absahnen.
▶️ Wer dann auch noch kurz vorher Bescheid weiß, was Trump wann und wie entscheiden wird, kann absahnen.
Besonders brisant sind die Investitionen in kriegsrelevante Branchen. ▶️ Trumps Söhne haben in Drohnenfirmen und andere Rüstungstechnologien investiert, die von lukrativen Regierungsaufträgen profitieren.
Menjadi Netizen Cerdas: Memilih Kajian, Menjaga Persatuan
Di era digital, belajar agama jadi makin mudah lewat YouTube/medsos.
Tapi, kita harus ekstra hati-hati. Tidak semua yang berlabel "kajian" itu murni dakwah; ada juga yg disusupi agenda ideologi yg bertentangan dg negara.
Di era digital, belajar agama jadi makin mudah lewat YouTube/medsos.
Tapi, kita harus ekstra hati-hati. Tidak semua yang berlabel "kajian" itu murni dakwah; ada juga yg disusupi agenda ideologi yg bertentangan dg negara.
Pernah dengar istilah "Kajian Keren"? Visual yang estetik dan penyampaian yang santai memang menarik. Tapi ingat, jangan cuma lihat kemasannya. Kita wajib cek isinya: apakah narasinya menyejukkan atau justru memecah belah dan menolak ideologi negara?
Salah satu yang perlu diwaspadai adalah promosi ideologi khilafah yang ingin mengganti Pancasila. Dakwah seharusnya membimbing umat untuk menjadi pribadi yang lebih baik, bukan memprovokasi untuk merombak tatanan negara yang sudah disepakati bersama para pendiri bangsa.
@franceinfo un jeune joueur formé dans un club de ligue 1 gagne +6500€/mois (salaire minimal syndical)!!
Donc, 90k/an est à multiplié par 2 mini (sachant que logement, formation, bouffe, salaires des entraîneurs, cours et maintenance des infrastructures coûtent bien plus que 90k
1/n
Donc, 90k/an est à multiplié par 2 mini (sachant que logement, formation, bouffe, salaires des entraîneurs, cours et maintenance des infrastructures coûtent bien plus que 90k
1/n
@franceinfo Bref... les médias Fr encore soumis aux imposteurs du PSG, pour les faire passer pour de bons gestionnaires
2/3
2/3
@franceinfo Et c'est encore le service public qui fait la même merde que leurs CONfrères du 'privé' de RMC, Canal ou L'équipe : potins du sport en léchant le cul des 'Présidents' de club (99% de 'fils de' incultes et incompétents).
C'est clair, ces pistonnés veulent être 'privatisés'...
3/3
C'est clair, ces pistonnés veulent être 'privatisés'...
3/3
Czym tu się podniecacie? Za "czasów Moskwy" byliśmy 10-ą gospodarką świata. Mieliśmy WŁASNY majątek narodowy : kopalnie, stocznie, banki, cukrownie, browary, huty...itp Co mamy dziś? Trzy narody do wyżywienia a za rogiem czekają kolejne🤦🤦🤬
A kto – z młodych wykształconych, z dużych miast – wie, że kiedyś w Polsce produkowano generatory elektryczne dla największych elektrowni?
Że produkowano turbiny o mocy 500 MW, — a przymierzano się do turbin 1500 MW?
Że produkowano turbiny o mocy 500 MW, — a przymierzano się do turbin 1500 MW?
Że polowa chińskich, indyjskich, indonezyjskich, greckich i tureckich, libijskich i irackich elektrowni — wyposażona była / jest nie w amerykańskie, czy niemieckie — a w polskie turbiny?
Gus Yaqut membantah dan menegaskan tak pernah beri perintah dan terima uang USD 1 juta untuk Pansus Haji 2024. (a thread) #gusyaqutadalahkita
Gus Yaqut melalui kuasa hukumnya, Dodi S. Abdulkadir, membantah keterlibatan dalam dugaan pengondisian Pansus Haji 2024. Tidak ada instruksi atau uang yang diterima/diberikan terkait kasus tersebut. Keterangan pers resmi dirilis hari ini di Jakarta. (2/7) #gusyaqutadalahkita
Kuasa hukum Gus Yaqut, Dodi S. Abdulkadir, membantah klaim pihak manapun yang mengaku menerima perintah terkait Pansus Haji. Ia memastikan tidak ada aliran uang, baik yang diterima maupun diberikan oleh Gus Yaqut, secara langsung atau lewat perantara (3/7) #gusyaqutadalahkita
▶️ Die Partei sät schon lange Misstrauen gegen Wissenschaftler:
Rechte Influencer: ▶️ AfD-Vorfeld nutzt Wal für Propaganda gegen andere Parteien zum Stimmenfang und Installierung ihrer rechtsextremen Ideologie.
Die Emotionen sind ideal dafür.
👇👇👇
share.google/47HBY7yS1H1tnZ…
Rechte Influencer: ▶️ AfD-Vorfeld nutzt Wal für Propaganda gegen andere Parteien zum Stimmenfang und Installierung ihrer rechtsextremen Ideologie.
Die Emotionen sind ideal dafür.
👇👇👇
share.google/47HBY7yS1H1tnZ…
Ganz vorn dabei ist das rechtsradikale
‼️Compact-Magazin:
▶️ Sein „TV-Chef“ Paul Klemm bezeichnete das von manchen „Hope“ oder „Timmy“ genannte Tier in einem Youtube-Video als
▶️ „Symbol für eine Politik, die weder Hope noch ihr eigenes Volk zu retten in der Lage ist“.
‼️Compact-Magazin:
▶️ Sein „TV-Chef“ Paul Klemm bezeichnete das von manchen „Hope“ oder „Timmy“ genannte Tier in einem Youtube-Video als
▶️ „Symbol für eine Politik, die weder Hope noch ihr eigenes Volk zu retten in der Lage ist“.
Der am Montag veröffentlichte Film mit dem Titel
▶️ „Sie lassen den Wal verrecken!“ wurde bis Donnerstag mehr als 75.000 Mal abgespielt.
Das rechtsextreme Compact ließ in dem Film auch den mecklenburg-vorpommerischen AfD-Landtagsabgeordneten ▶️ Enrico Schult verkünden,
▶️ „Sie lassen den Wal verrecken!“ wurde bis Donnerstag mehr als 75.000 Mal abgespielt.
Das rechtsextreme Compact ließ in dem Film auch den mecklenburg-vorpommerischen AfD-Landtagsabgeordneten ▶️ Enrico Schult verkünden,
“#MovingMoviez?”
“#OssCars?”
“#StairyMovie?”
“#TheFlatRooms??”
📹🚎🪜🏢?
“#TheGnomeCopes?”
🏢🪜🧗?
#TruthWillOut!
#SystemsWillHeal!
#TurnToJesusChrist!!!
✝️🕊🤍
⛬
[ #Earthsflat ? ]
[ #TheGnomeWarps ? ]
[ #TheFlatGeneration ? ]
🏢⚖️▶✝️🤍🪜??youtube.com/shorts/uqH_FmA…
asmr o sumpin??
"#VisitOss?"
🧵2026.04.15 - Pam Hemphill Space
Title: DOJ moves to dismiss J6 convictions as if they never happened.
PamHemphill79 (04:10): Good evening, Marine.
Marine4America (04:12): Evening, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (04:14): It seems like nobody comes in until you pop in.
Marine4America (04:18): No, they're listening in the walls for now. So, hey, sorry about nodding off in that last one. We were on our way to winding down and I was already beat, and then next thing I know, I wake up, it's like an hour, hour and a half later and still going. And I have no idea what the hell's happening.
PamHemphill79 (04:44): I would've done it too.
Marine4America (04:47): I get
PamHemphill79 (04:48): It.
Marine4America (04:48): I'm giving myself a heart out by 1:00 AM tonight, but
PamHemphill79 (04:53): Oh no, let's try to keep it under that. We don't need to be up that late.
Marine4America (04:59): I mean, I'm up a lot of the time anyway, but I have been working a lot these past couple weeks too. I've been juggling a lot, man. Things kind of went off when I fell asleep because I am seeing some shit all over the place.
PamHemphill79 (05:18): I
Marine4America (05:18): Dunno.
PamHemphill79 (05:18): Yeah, it's crazy. Well, I got the clip. I don't know if you saw. Yeah, you did. You read about the tricks they used when we're trying to debate with them or talk with them?
Marine4America (05:30): Yeah.
PamHemphill79 (05:32): Is there a way you could play that when enough people come in?
Marine4America (05:40): I can try. I don't know how,
PamHemphill79 (05:41): It's not very long.
Marine4America (05:42): Yeah, it's not. I can try.
PamHemphill79 (05:45): Do you have a computer next to you?
Marine4America (05:47): I do. Lemme see.
PamHemphill79 (05:51): I mean those, he calls 'em tricks. I call 'em tactics, but they fit so good. I mean, I was like, oh my God, I know this, but I didn't know how to put it the way he was putting it because Exactly. I think a
Marine4America (06:05): Lot of you get tripped up.
PamHemphill79 (06:08): We see them doing that every time they come in here.
Marine4America (06:19): I'm trying to find it. Hang on. Yeah, there's this whole situation with Sandy that I was not even aware of until after I looked back on the space. So I just think maybe it's best if, I mean, I don't really want to stick my nose in people's real lives like that too deeply, so I'd be careful with
PamHemphill79 (06:50): Yeah, me too.
Marine4America (06:51): I think we should stick with the January 6th stuff. That's what we know best. Hey,
PamHemphill79 (06:58): Exactly.
Marine4America (07:00): Let me find this. Oh, you posted it, right?
PamHemphill79 (07:05): Yeah. Let's see. Should I put it in the blue bubble
Marine4America (07:10): Bubble? Yeah. You go ahead and do that, I think. Oh, I got it here. Oh, yeah. Shared a couple of them. The five cult debate tactics they use. Yeah,
PamHemphill79 (07:33): That's it.
Marine4America (07:35): This guy's got a goofy thumbnail. Six minutes long.
PamHemphill79 (07:39): I've got the list. The strawman, what abouts it? What about him? But what about, what is, what's that other one called
Marine4America (07:51): At homan?
PamHemphill79 (07:53): At homan? Slippery slopes. Policy burden of proof flip.
Marine4America (08:01): So these are pretty common things that it's rhetoric and everybody kind of employs these things and that's what makes some people so dangerous. The kind of thing that where when somebody says, oh, both sides do that. They're kind of right. These are things that you would find. And even in a debate club, you go over 'em like ad hominem, and a lot of times you'll hear somebody say, what I say is an ad hominem when I call them stupid. And there's a difference between an ad homonym and just insulting somebody. What I'll often do is I'll just insult somebody and then I would love to sit down and explain exactly why their argument is stupid. There's a difference between that and just trying to substitute and say, no, your argument is wrong because you're stupid. And that's the difference. There's all kinds of tricks. And Ryan seems to have studied the fucking fallacy. He's got the cheat sheet on command, so every time he's up here, and that's why I kind of trample over him. I think it's disgusting. I really do think these people are traitors and the way they just kind of have this decentralized system of sending it up the chain, the propaganda chain, and they are rewarded for it. So I mean, what can we do to fight that? I have no idea, but can pointed out,
PamHemphill79 (09:34): Just keep putting out the facts. It doesn't matter.
Marine4America (09:41): That's true.
PamHemphill79 (09:42): I mean, people know. I think they know. Yeah. Do you hear this? You can't change people. You're not going to change. It's not going to
Marine4America (09:54): Happen. No. That's when you try to lead by example. And I realize I don't lead by example when I'm in here. I am on the attack, but you
PamHemphill79 (10:06): All disinformation, you call it what it is. That's not factual.
Marine4America (10:12): Some stuff needs to be attacked like that. When people like Brian are saying, oh, it's a good thing that we cut all of cancer research because of some random thing from 2015. It's like, what the fuck does that even mean? And now we're arguing over some bullshit. It's gotten so far away from us. It's like, well, cancer research has gone so fuck.
PamHemphill79 (10:36): Yeah, that was ridiculous. And the bombing on the schools in Iran, that was ridiculous.
Marine4America (10:43): And they'll nitpick because what I just said, how cancer research being gone, they'll say, well, technically it's not gone because they'll point to some trace remnants and they'll say, technically the school wasn't bombed because the target wasn't the school. It was the shrapnel that killed the children. So they split hairs at these things and say, aha, we got you. You were wrong. But they missed the point where we're like, well, are we in a fucking word? What is happening? Nobody knows what's happening. And this constant sane washing of bullshit is so tired. People are tired of it.
PamHemphill79 (11:20): I know. I'm getting so burned out with this, been in it as long as I have and a lot of you and a of others, but I think it's okay. We got to take a break sometimes and just take care of ourselves. Try not to get caught up in resentments. And yeah,
Marine4America (11:41): That's why with Portland, I'm honestly thinking all these anti-ice people, Hey, I'm all for your first amendment. I'll support that all day, but don't get in the way of a good thing because they're shooting themselves in the foot right now. I think. I don't know. That's again, I don't want to put my nose where it doesn't belong, but the throwing of the dildos, I'll point that out. It's like that does nothing. And it just, people laugh at it and they don't take anything seriously and it just gives the worst kind of people more grounds to start stupid shit. And then that puts that propaganda magnifying glass on it. And that's the game right now. The game right now I think should be keep your head down because they're tripping over themselves.
PamHemphill79 (12:28): What brought the most publicity, and I think everybody was really behind it, was when the frogs started.
Marine4America (12:41): And I think that was a good move at the time because it did show that first bit of protesting. It's like, well, they are goofy. They're not trying to overrun the government here. No one is going to take them seriously. And that's kind of the strength of a peaceful protest, right? They are goofy. And of course they're going to take the bait and be like, oh, look at these people. Look at how unserious these people are because easy bait. But it's like, well, that is the right to be stupid and cringey and be loud against the government, even if it's a little misguided that a lot of it's not. Same with January 6th vindication on that shit. Oh, why do you bring that up all the time? Why do you bring that up all the time? Because fucking because look at that. Our government is now pushing to clear people of sedition, which is as close to treason as you could possibly fucking get. Yeah,
PamHemphill79 (13:51): Exactly.
Marine4America (13:53): No, there's no both sides here.
PamHemphill79 (13:57): Well, it needs the whole army out. Oath keepers and rest of those proud boys, of course, stand back, stand by.
Marine4America (14:07): They made shirts of that immediately after you said that.
PamHemphill79 (14:10): They did. That's right. Yeah.
Marine4America (14:18): I was looking more into this because I was ringing Enrique Tarrio's Bell a lot, and I'm like, you know what? I need to go deeper and read the indictments for myself because I have skimmed the shit before. But if I am going to be punching up at him in these spaces, I should read a little more and see what these cases are. And Jesus fucking Christ, these people belong to. They deserve to. They should be in jail. They should still be in jail. Fuck. Sorry, Pam, but
PamHemphill79 (14:58): Oh no, don't apologize to me. I agree with you.
Marine4America (15:01): I get a lot of people were misled but disgusting. What we allow now, the fact that we okayed the shit.
PamHemphill79 (15:15): We got a J six who trying to run for governor in South Carolina, and somebody called me and tell me about the interview he had with him, and they want me to come on their show because he says, we got to have somebody sharing the facts about January 6th because all we're getting is this propaganda and lies. Can you imagine? They're running for governors one in Portland too, and you look at their criminal arrest, what it was. Oh my God, it's so scary.
Marine4America (15:50): Yeah. The real gang now is to just legitimize themselves.
PamHemphill79 (15:58): I think that back, it's not governor of South Carolina, it's House of Reserv representatives. Yeah,
Marine4America (16:05): House reps.
Marine4America (16:13): My fucking MAGA coworker, her name is actually Karen, even Trump during Trump won, where it was kind of fun for her to be like, oh, he's just trolling. He's just trolling. And by the first week of working there, I was like, yeah, this is kind of bullshit. And she's like, I'll come out here, snowflake. I was like, what the fuck? You don't even know me. It's pretty wild. And that just set the tone for our entire working relationship and things were better during the Biden years because we could make fun of him together. That was fun. And then now Trump too, and January 6th, really. I mean, that was messed up, but afterwards I was like, all right, she's not budgeting on this and she doesn't want to talk about it anymore. So I just joined in and we were like, all right, well, at least we can punch up together, Biden together, because bullshit's bullshit. It is what it is. And then Trump too happened, and now she doesn't want to talk about anything ever. And fucking after the tariffs we're in shipping and business has been fucked. Everything's fucked. And she just looks at me like, wow, things are slow. Huh? Wow. I'm like, yeah, you think, what do you think is happening? She's like, I don't know. I'm like, yeah, you don't know. All right. Looking ridiculous.
PamHemphill79 (17:44): Put your head in the same,
Marine4America (17:46): Nothing's
PamHemphill79 (17:46): Happening. It's okay.
Marine4America (17:51): She fucking bought her house in 1970, whatever, got married whenever she checked out of life after that.
PamHemphill79 (18:01): We talking about again, who are you talking about?
Marine4America (18:03): My coworker Karen. And she's just like, I think she just represents a lot of MAGA coworkers across America, to be honest.
PamHemphill79 (18:20): Yeah. Yep. They're just watching the Fox News,
Marine4America (18:27): And that's the thing, I can't even bring it up. I wonder what she's thinking now because I know she loved Tucker Carlson just a few years ago, and she followed this whole track, but now all these people are ostracized from MAGA as well, so I have no idea. That's the thing. She doesn't want to talk about any of it, so it's too uncomfortable. She hedged way too much with all these figures, and they're all just fallen by the wayside.
PamHemphill79 (18:56): Yeah. Well, Trump's created it. I hope people do study what they're talking about, those tricks that they use trying to talk to you. Oh my God, they use them in here for sure. Trying to race what happened on January 6th by getting rid of these convict. Oh my God. They're just rewriting history, right? God, this would empower 'em to think they could do whatever they want now. It's scary.
Marine4America (19:45): I mean, though, they're getting in their own way. I think even with this God attorney general wine mom, what's her name? She's the one who moved to dismiss a lot of the convictions, right? Is that what happened?
PamHemphill79 (20:02): Oh yeah. Yes, yes.
Marine4America (20:03): Yeah. Yeah. Wine mom, attorney general wine mom. She just seems like always wine drunk to me. I don't know. That's what I always called her.
PamHemphill79 (20:15): I'm a little confused. So what's going to happen? It hasn't actually happened yet, or does it have to go?
Marine4America (20:21): They motion for it. Lemme look it up also. Lemme do a sound check. Can you hear this, Pam?
PamHemphill79 (20:26): Yeah, I hear you will.
Marine4America (20:28): No, no way. They do. I decided to do some research on the methods. The cult is to argue against facts, logic, and
PamHemphill79 (20:38): Once
Title: DOJ moves to dismiss J6 convictions as if they never happened.
PamHemphill79 (04:10): Good evening, Marine.
Marine4America (04:12): Evening, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (04:14): It seems like nobody comes in until you pop in.
Marine4America (04:18): No, they're listening in the walls for now. So, hey, sorry about nodding off in that last one. We were on our way to winding down and I was already beat, and then next thing I know, I wake up, it's like an hour, hour and a half later and still going. And I have no idea what the hell's happening.
PamHemphill79 (04:44): I would've done it too.
Marine4America (04:47): I get
PamHemphill79 (04:48): It.
Marine4America (04:48): I'm giving myself a heart out by 1:00 AM tonight, but
PamHemphill79 (04:53): Oh no, let's try to keep it under that. We don't need to be up that late.
Marine4America (04:59): I mean, I'm up a lot of the time anyway, but I have been working a lot these past couple weeks too. I've been juggling a lot, man. Things kind of went off when I fell asleep because I am seeing some shit all over the place.
PamHemphill79 (05:18): I
Marine4America (05:18): Dunno.
PamHemphill79 (05:18): Yeah, it's crazy. Well, I got the clip. I don't know if you saw. Yeah, you did. You read about the tricks they used when we're trying to debate with them or talk with them?
Marine4America (05:30): Yeah.
PamHemphill79 (05:32): Is there a way you could play that when enough people come in?
Marine4America (05:40): I can try. I don't know how,
PamHemphill79 (05:41): It's not very long.
Marine4America (05:42): Yeah, it's not. I can try.
PamHemphill79 (05:45): Do you have a computer next to you?
Marine4America (05:47): I do. Lemme see.
PamHemphill79 (05:51): I mean those, he calls 'em tricks. I call 'em tactics, but they fit so good. I mean, I was like, oh my God, I know this, but I didn't know how to put it the way he was putting it because Exactly. I think a
Marine4America (06:05): Lot of you get tripped up.
PamHemphill79 (06:08): We see them doing that every time they come in here.
Marine4America (06:19): I'm trying to find it. Hang on. Yeah, there's this whole situation with Sandy that I was not even aware of until after I looked back on the space. So I just think maybe it's best if, I mean, I don't really want to stick my nose in people's real lives like that too deeply, so I'd be careful with
PamHemphill79 (06:50): Yeah, me too.
Marine4America (06:51): I think we should stick with the January 6th stuff. That's what we know best. Hey,
PamHemphill79 (06:58): Exactly.
Marine4America (07:00): Let me find this. Oh, you posted it, right?
PamHemphill79 (07:05): Yeah. Let's see. Should I put it in the blue bubble
Marine4America (07:10): Bubble? Yeah. You go ahead and do that, I think. Oh, I got it here. Oh, yeah. Shared a couple of them. The five cult debate tactics they use. Yeah,
PamHemphill79 (07:33): That's it.
Marine4America (07:35): This guy's got a goofy thumbnail. Six minutes long.
PamHemphill79 (07:39): I've got the list. The strawman, what abouts it? What about him? But what about, what is, what's that other one called
Marine4America (07:51): At homan?
PamHemphill79 (07:53): At homan? Slippery slopes. Policy burden of proof flip.
Marine4America (08:01): So these are pretty common things that it's rhetoric and everybody kind of employs these things and that's what makes some people so dangerous. The kind of thing that where when somebody says, oh, both sides do that. They're kind of right. These are things that you would find. And even in a debate club, you go over 'em like ad hominem, and a lot of times you'll hear somebody say, what I say is an ad hominem when I call them stupid. And there's a difference between an ad homonym and just insulting somebody. What I'll often do is I'll just insult somebody and then I would love to sit down and explain exactly why their argument is stupid. There's a difference between that and just trying to substitute and say, no, your argument is wrong because you're stupid. And that's the difference. There's all kinds of tricks. And Ryan seems to have studied the fucking fallacy. He's got the cheat sheet on command, so every time he's up here, and that's why I kind of trample over him. I think it's disgusting. I really do think these people are traitors and the way they just kind of have this decentralized system of sending it up the chain, the propaganda chain, and they are rewarded for it. So I mean, what can we do to fight that? I have no idea, but can pointed out,
PamHemphill79 (09:34): Just keep putting out the facts. It doesn't matter.
Marine4America (09:41): That's true.
PamHemphill79 (09:42): I mean, people know. I think they know. Yeah. Do you hear this? You can't change people. You're not going to change. It's not going to
Marine4America (09:54): Happen. No. That's when you try to lead by example. And I realize I don't lead by example when I'm in here. I am on the attack, but you
PamHemphill79 (10:06): All disinformation, you call it what it is. That's not factual.
Marine4America (10:12): Some stuff needs to be attacked like that. When people like Brian are saying, oh, it's a good thing that we cut all of cancer research because of some random thing from 2015. It's like, what the fuck does that even mean? And now we're arguing over some bullshit. It's gotten so far away from us. It's like, well, cancer research has gone so fuck.
PamHemphill79 (10:36): Yeah, that was ridiculous. And the bombing on the schools in Iran, that was ridiculous.
Marine4America (10:43): And they'll nitpick because what I just said, how cancer research being gone, they'll say, well, technically it's not gone because they'll point to some trace remnants and they'll say, technically the school wasn't bombed because the target wasn't the school. It was the shrapnel that killed the children. So they split hairs at these things and say, aha, we got you. You were wrong. But they missed the point where we're like, well, are we in a fucking word? What is happening? Nobody knows what's happening. And this constant sane washing of bullshit is so tired. People are tired of it.
PamHemphill79 (11:20): I know. I'm getting so burned out with this, been in it as long as I have and a lot of you and a of others, but I think it's okay. We got to take a break sometimes and just take care of ourselves. Try not to get caught up in resentments. And yeah,
Marine4America (11:41): That's why with Portland, I'm honestly thinking all these anti-ice people, Hey, I'm all for your first amendment. I'll support that all day, but don't get in the way of a good thing because they're shooting themselves in the foot right now. I think. I don't know. That's again, I don't want to put my nose where it doesn't belong, but the throwing of the dildos, I'll point that out. It's like that does nothing. And it just, people laugh at it and they don't take anything seriously and it just gives the worst kind of people more grounds to start stupid shit. And then that puts that propaganda magnifying glass on it. And that's the game right now. The game right now I think should be keep your head down because they're tripping over themselves.
PamHemphill79 (12:28): What brought the most publicity, and I think everybody was really behind it, was when the frogs started.
Marine4America (12:41): And I think that was a good move at the time because it did show that first bit of protesting. It's like, well, they are goofy. They're not trying to overrun the government here. No one is going to take them seriously. And that's kind of the strength of a peaceful protest, right? They are goofy. And of course they're going to take the bait and be like, oh, look at these people. Look at how unserious these people are because easy bait. But it's like, well, that is the right to be stupid and cringey and be loud against the government, even if it's a little misguided that a lot of it's not. Same with January 6th vindication on that shit. Oh, why do you bring that up all the time? Why do you bring that up all the time? Because fucking because look at that. Our government is now pushing to clear people of sedition, which is as close to treason as you could possibly fucking get. Yeah,
PamHemphill79 (13:51): Exactly.
Marine4America (13:53): No, there's no both sides here.
PamHemphill79 (13:57): Well, it needs the whole army out. Oath keepers and rest of those proud boys, of course, stand back, stand by.
Marine4America (14:07): They made shirts of that immediately after you said that.
PamHemphill79 (14:10): They did. That's right. Yeah.
Marine4America (14:18): I was looking more into this because I was ringing Enrique Tarrio's Bell a lot, and I'm like, you know what? I need to go deeper and read the indictments for myself because I have skimmed the shit before. But if I am going to be punching up at him in these spaces, I should read a little more and see what these cases are. And Jesus fucking Christ, these people belong to. They deserve to. They should be in jail. They should still be in jail. Fuck. Sorry, Pam, but
PamHemphill79 (14:58): Oh no, don't apologize to me. I agree with you.
Marine4America (15:01): I get a lot of people were misled but disgusting. What we allow now, the fact that we okayed the shit.
PamHemphill79 (15:15): We got a J six who trying to run for governor in South Carolina, and somebody called me and tell me about the interview he had with him, and they want me to come on their show because he says, we got to have somebody sharing the facts about January 6th because all we're getting is this propaganda and lies. Can you imagine? They're running for governors one in Portland too, and you look at their criminal arrest, what it was. Oh my God, it's so scary.
Marine4America (15:50): Yeah. The real gang now is to just legitimize themselves.
PamHemphill79 (15:58): I think that back, it's not governor of South Carolina, it's House of Reserv representatives. Yeah,
Marine4America (16:05): House reps.
Marine4America (16:13): My fucking MAGA coworker, her name is actually Karen, even Trump during Trump won, where it was kind of fun for her to be like, oh, he's just trolling. He's just trolling. And by the first week of working there, I was like, yeah, this is kind of bullshit. And she's like, I'll come out here, snowflake. I was like, what the fuck? You don't even know me. It's pretty wild. And that just set the tone for our entire working relationship and things were better during the Biden years because we could make fun of him together. That was fun. And then now Trump too, and January 6th, really. I mean, that was messed up, but afterwards I was like, all right, she's not budgeting on this and she doesn't want to talk about it anymore. So I just joined in and we were like, all right, well, at least we can punch up together, Biden together, because bullshit's bullshit. It is what it is. And then Trump too happened, and now she doesn't want to talk about anything ever. And fucking after the tariffs we're in shipping and business has been fucked. Everything's fucked. And she just looks at me like, wow, things are slow. Huh? Wow. I'm like, yeah, you think, what do you think is happening? She's like, I don't know. I'm like, yeah, you don't know. All right. Looking ridiculous.
PamHemphill79 (17:44): Put your head in the same,
Marine4America (17:46): Nothing's
PamHemphill79 (17:46): Happening. It's okay.
Marine4America (17:51): She fucking bought her house in 1970, whatever, got married whenever she checked out of life after that.
PamHemphill79 (18:01): We talking about again, who are you talking about?
Marine4America (18:03): My coworker Karen. And she's just like, I think she just represents a lot of MAGA coworkers across America, to be honest.
PamHemphill79 (18:20): Yeah. Yep. They're just watching the Fox News,
Marine4America (18:27): And that's the thing, I can't even bring it up. I wonder what she's thinking now because I know she loved Tucker Carlson just a few years ago, and she followed this whole track, but now all these people are ostracized from MAGA as well, so I have no idea. That's the thing. She doesn't want to talk about any of it, so it's too uncomfortable. She hedged way too much with all these figures, and they're all just fallen by the wayside.
PamHemphill79 (18:56): Yeah. Well, Trump's created it. I hope people do study what they're talking about, those tricks that they use trying to talk to you. Oh my God, they use them in here for sure. Trying to race what happened on January 6th by getting rid of these convict. Oh my God. They're just rewriting history, right? God, this would empower 'em to think they could do whatever they want now. It's scary.
Marine4America (19:45): I mean, though, they're getting in their own way. I think even with this God attorney general wine mom, what's her name? She's the one who moved to dismiss a lot of the convictions, right? Is that what happened?
PamHemphill79 (20:02): Oh yeah. Yes, yes.
Marine4America (20:03): Yeah. Yeah. Wine mom, attorney general wine mom. She just seems like always wine drunk to me. I don't know. That's what I always called her.
PamHemphill79 (20:15): I'm a little confused. So what's going to happen? It hasn't actually happened yet, or does it have to go?
Marine4America (20:21): They motion for it. Lemme look it up also. Lemme do a sound check. Can you hear this, Pam?
PamHemphill79 (20:26): Yeah, I hear you will.
Marine4America (20:28): No, no way. They do. I decided to do some research on the methods. The cult is to argue against facts, logic, and
PamHemphill79 (20:38): Once
Recording (20:39): A little bit louder, lose all their power in every conversation you have in the future. Here are the five tricks the Trump cult uses to try and exhaust you and make sure a real argument. Argument never happens. One, the
PamHemphill79 (20:49): Strawman stop
Recording (20:53): Says, paid America and want to see it destroyed. You never said that. How about that? But now you're defending your patriotism instead of talking about war, the original point is completely forgotten. And then they're nodding like they won the conversation. They argue against something you never said. This is called the strawman vacy. They take your actual argument, replace it with something dumber and scarier, and argue against that fake version. Instead, in 1960, psychologist Peter Wasson at the University College of London found that the brain does not look for truth. It looks for the fastest way to protect what it already believes. So their brain is not asking if you are right, their brain is asking how to make you look wrong. You're questioning the Iran war, you're siding with the enemy, bring up Trump's criminal conviction. You have TDS ask about deportations, the foreign prisons, and they'll claim you want open borders. They never argued with what anyone actually says. They just try to make sure that your argument never gets heard. Two, what bism you bring up. Trump firing his attorney general. They say, what about Hillary's emails? You mentioned that Iran War started without Congress. They say, what about Biden? They never answer a single question because they know they can't answer it. This is called What about is? We are all very familiar with this one. Instead of responding to your point, they drag a completely different issue into the conversation to make you forget what you were talking about. Psychologist Daniel Kahneman at Princeton University found that the brain can only track a limited number of ideas at the same time. The moment someone introduces a second problem, your brain splits its attention. No.
Marine4America (22:10): Okay, so can you hear all that, Pam?
PamHemphill79 (22:15): Yeah.
Marine4America (22:15): Okay.
PamHemphill79 (22:16): We could just talk. That happens all the time.
Marine4America (22:18): Yeah. So what he just said right there about splitting their attention. So we see that a lot with the Epstein files. We're like, at the bare minimum, we should just investigate who's mentioned, who's involved the most, and they'll say, well, why didn't Biden investigate during his years? I'm like, truly, maybe I wasn't prepared to fucking answer that. That throws me off. They're like, aha, that they had trounce on that. Now we forgot the whole question. Why aren't the people in power right now investigating? That's the trick. I'll move on. I'll move on.
PamHemphill79 (22:56): And you have to be knowledge. Oh,
Marine4America (22:58): Go on.
PamHemphill79 (22:58): Knowledgeable. You have to be knowledgeable too. Why? And some people aren't. I'm not knowledgeable. I don't know everything. Of course, I know the answer to that one because they couldn't. But you know what I'm saying? We don't always know the information and they're hoping that we don't.
Marine4America (23:20): That's what I mean. Normal people aren't prepared to fucking debate suit and tie Rhein with his little profile picture. You know what I mean? Most people aren't actually prepared to answer that. A lot of the people who go to even something as tepid as a no King's protest, they're just there to express like, Hey, I disagree with how things are going. And that's really it. And when some idiot with a microphone who claims to be a journalist goes, excuse me. Excuse me. What policy do you actually disagree with? And they're like, oh, I don't know. And they're like, ah. They can't even answer these crazy leftists. They don't even know what they're protesting. We have no king. And then they just, that's the strawman. They use these unprepared people as living straw men and they've manufactured an entire industry out of it.
PamHemphill79 (24:05): Yeah, what you're talking about is on this video. So
Marine4America (24:09): Yeah, I'll move on.
PamHemphill79 (24:10): Charlie Cook? Yeah.
Marine4America (24:12): Oh yeah. Here we go. So he says, here we go.
Recording (24:15): The moment someone introduces a second problem, your brain splits its attention. Now, if you add a third and a fourth problem, your brain can't keep up and loses the original thread they use. What about him to exploit the brain's weakness on purpose? They do this because they saw other people do it and it worked. It's not like they have some grand plan or anything. Every time they say, what about they're not making a point, they're running away from yours. What about him is not a defense? It's a weak person's confession that they have no argument. Three ad homan attack. You say Trump is breaking the law. They say you have Trump derangement syndrome and you hate America. Trump is still breaking the law. But now the conversation is about whether you are crazy instead of what Trump actually did. This is called an ad homan attack. To put it plainly, they're just insulting you instead of answering any questions, the goal is to destroy your credibility before your argument even gets evaluated. Psychologist Robert Cialdini at Arizona University found that people do not evaluate arguments in a vacuum. We decide whether to listen based on who is talking. Ad hominin makes the audience question whether you are even worth listening to before they engage with what you said. When they cannot argue facts, they come after you instead. And the moment you start defending yourself, the argument is over and they win. For the slippery slope fallacy, you say, the government should not be able to deport American citizens without due process. They say you want to let criminals pour into the country. You said nothing about criminals, but now everyone is arguing about something you never brought up. This is called the slippery slope fallacy. They take one reasonable idea and claim it will automatically lead to the most extreme outcome imaginable. No evidence, no logical steps. They're just creating fear.
Marine4America (25:41): They see that a lot with, like I say, there's lots of general reasons somebody might be protesting. Even somebody might be protesting against ice, depending on how local you're getting, there might genuinely be a case where somebody's rights were violated in some way and that can't be shown until after they actually get their day in court, which takes time. So they're just advocating for that person. George Ttes. There's a couple people I know it's not like rampant, but there's lots of genuine reasons why somebody might be objecting to how things are being handled, and they will jump on you like, well, why do you want to protect illegals? And that's not what I fucking said.
PamHemphill79 (26:27): Exactly. And that's not why we're protesting ice either. It's the behavior of ice. What we're they acting like Estoppels instead of the ice that we knew in the past.
Marine4America (26:39): Yeah, that's what I mean. There's just lots of general reasons and people are going to have to account for that because it's starting to add up. And people with even more common sense are seeing that too. And people with one fucking brain cell like Tommy can't get it. So they're like, why
Recording (26:58): Do you want to protect illegals? Why do you want to protect illegals?
Marine4America (27:03): So you don't know what you're talking about. Okay, I don't think you've, all right. Nevermind. Let's see what else to discuss. This
Recording (27:12): Psychologist, Paul Ekman at the University of California San Francisco found that fear overrides rational thinking faster than any other emotion. Once your brain perceives a threat, it stops evaluating evidence and starts looking for an exit. The slippery slope is designed to trigger the fear response before your brain can ask whether the threat is even real scare people enough, and they stop thinking. And people who stop thinking are easy to control, just ask Fox News. Newsmax five, the burden of proof flip. Charlie Kirk built his entire career on this trick. He would show up to college campuses, make wild claims with no evidence and demand that students disprove him on the spot. When students couldn't disprove him, Kirk declared victory and forced the student to give up the mic. He called it owning the libs. It was not a real debate. It was an ambush on unprepared kids. This is called the burden of proof. Flip. Person making the claim is always responsible for proving the claim, but Kirk and every conservative like him make wild claims with no evidence and then demand that you disprove those claims. Crazy, right? And here's why. You can never win. You show them a court ruling. They claim the judge is corrupt. You show them a study, the science is corrupt. You show them a news report, the outlet take news. Every piece of evidence, brain just gets added. The conspiracy,
Troll (28:18): Get her out of here.
PamHemphill79 (28:21): I got rid of him.
Marine4America (28:23): Oh, well, that's what it's down to now. It's just that
PamHemphill79 (28:30): What he was just sharing there. Isn't that so true? Oh my God. It happens
Marine4America (28:35): All
PamHemphill79 (28:35): The time when I'm down there.
Marine4America (28:38): What's your desire?
PamHemphill79 (28:40): Protests in Portland. People will walk away after they've talked to 'em and say, oh my God, my head's spinning. And mine would too, and I knew what was happening, but I didn't know how to point out the tactics. I know the tactics of the criminal mind, but they're very similar. But that's exactly, I can't believe it. I just identified with that one. A hundred percent.
Marine4America (29:04): Yeah. There's another minute left.
Recording (29:09): The outlet is fake news. Every piece of evidence you bring just gets added to the conspiracy. There's no evidence they'll accept, because accepting evidence was never part of the deal. Psychologist Daniel Kahneman found that once someone believes something, their brain treats every piece of supporting evidence as proof and every piece of contradicting evidence as part of the coverup or conspiracy. Kirk was never really debating anyone. He was running a scam in a real debate. The person making the claim has to prove their claim to be true. Kirk never proved anything. He just demanded you disprove him and called it a win when you couldn't. That is not a debate that is a weak scam and only worked on kids who are under 20 years old. Most of these people have no idea what they're actually saying. They saw it on TikTok or they heard it on Fox News. They repeated it to you and called it an argument. Actually trying to win a debate. They're trying to feel superior to someone they are secretly intimidated by. That is all owning the libs ever was deeply insecure. People using borrowed tricks to feel powerful for five minutes. Now that you know these tricks, you'll never have to fall for them again. They're what weak people use to try and trick smart people into arguing. When you're not smart enough to win a real argument, you kind of have to trick people.
Marine4America (30:10): Yeah, it's the best way to put it.
PamHemphill79 (30:15): Okay, go to the next one.
Marine4America (30:18): Which one was the next one? I'll
PamHemphill79 (30:20): Pull people up in a minute as soon as we're done with this video.
Marine4America (30:23): Which other one did you want?
PamHemphill79 (30:25): That wasn't the last, was it?
Marine4America (30:27): Oh yeah. No, that was the end of the video. It was only six minutes long.
PamHemphill79 (30:31): Oh, burden of proof flip. Okay.
Marine4America (30:33): Yeah, yeah. I had ho Homan burden of proof straw man.
Recording (30:44): Even worth slope fallacy. They take one
Marine4America (30:47): Slippery slope.
Recording (30:50): That's
PamHemphill79 (30:50): Why I want people to
Marine4America (30:51): Learn. I'll post this on the pill.
PamHemphill79 (30:55): Okay. I think it's important to learn this so you don't waste your time. I mean, if you want to have a conversation, they come in here and yell at me and call me names. That's not a conversation. Let's talk about Iran and what the hell's going on and what do you like about it or don't like about it. We don't have to agree, but go into personalities trying to got your moments. It is just a waste of our time.
Marine4America (31:26): Speaking of we have Guyer.
PamHemphill79 (31:30): Yeah. See if he'll be nice. Don't pull into your tactics. We are aware of 'em. We got your number.
Marine4America (31:42): Nick sorter types. It's okay. You're free to speak. It's just us. Oh, did it not go through
PamHemphill79 (32:02): Guy? I don't dunno if you're hearing us, but you're free to talk, but we'll wait until you put this hand up.
Marine4America (32:08): It might be a space thing. It still says there's a request and I don't see the request anymore. I tried to bring 'em up. Maybe try to do it if I invite them. Invite to speak spaces is weird. I think everybody needs a little bit of grace and patience with that.
PamHemphill79 (20:49): Strawman stop
Recording (20:53): Says, paid America and want to see it destroyed. You never said that. How about that? But now you're defending your patriotism instead of talking about war, the original point is completely forgotten. And then they're nodding like they won the conversation. They argue against something you never said. This is called the strawman vacy. They take your actual argument, replace it with something dumber and scarier, and argue against that fake version. Instead, in 1960, psychologist Peter Wasson at the University College of London found that the brain does not look for truth. It looks for the fastest way to protect what it already believes. So their brain is not asking if you are right, their brain is asking how to make you look wrong. You're questioning the Iran war, you're siding with the enemy, bring up Trump's criminal conviction. You have TDS ask about deportations, the foreign prisons, and they'll claim you want open borders. They never argued with what anyone actually says. They just try to make sure that your argument never gets heard. Two, what bism you bring up. Trump firing his attorney general. They say, what about Hillary's emails? You mentioned that Iran War started without Congress. They say, what about Biden? They never answer a single question because they know they can't answer it. This is called What about is? We are all very familiar with this one. Instead of responding to your point, they drag a completely different issue into the conversation to make you forget what you were talking about. Psychologist Daniel Kahneman at Princeton University found that the brain can only track a limited number of ideas at the same time. The moment someone introduces a second problem, your brain splits its attention. No.
Marine4America (22:10): Okay, so can you hear all that, Pam?
PamHemphill79 (22:15): Yeah.
Marine4America (22:15): Okay.
PamHemphill79 (22:16): We could just talk. That happens all the time.
Marine4America (22:18): Yeah. So what he just said right there about splitting their attention. So we see that a lot with the Epstein files. We're like, at the bare minimum, we should just investigate who's mentioned, who's involved the most, and they'll say, well, why didn't Biden investigate during his years? I'm like, truly, maybe I wasn't prepared to fucking answer that. That throws me off. They're like, aha, that they had trounce on that. Now we forgot the whole question. Why aren't the people in power right now investigating? That's the trick. I'll move on. I'll move on.
PamHemphill79 (22:56): And you have to be knowledge. Oh,
Marine4America (22:58): Go on.
PamHemphill79 (22:58): Knowledgeable. You have to be knowledgeable too. Why? And some people aren't. I'm not knowledgeable. I don't know everything. Of course, I know the answer to that one because they couldn't. But you know what I'm saying? We don't always know the information and they're hoping that we don't.
Marine4America (23:20): That's what I mean. Normal people aren't prepared to fucking debate suit and tie Rhein with his little profile picture. You know what I mean? Most people aren't actually prepared to answer that. A lot of the people who go to even something as tepid as a no King's protest, they're just there to express like, Hey, I disagree with how things are going. And that's really it. And when some idiot with a microphone who claims to be a journalist goes, excuse me. Excuse me. What policy do you actually disagree with? And they're like, oh, I don't know. And they're like, ah. They can't even answer these crazy leftists. They don't even know what they're protesting. We have no king. And then they just, that's the strawman. They use these unprepared people as living straw men and they've manufactured an entire industry out of it.
PamHemphill79 (24:05): Yeah, what you're talking about is on this video. So
Marine4America (24:09): Yeah, I'll move on.
PamHemphill79 (24:10): Charlie Cook? Yeah.
Marine4America (24:12): Oh yeah. Here we go. So he says, here we go.
Recording (24:15): The moment someone introduces a second problem, your brain splits its attention. Now, if you add a third and a fourth problem, your brain can't keep up and loses the original thread they use. What about him to exploit the brain's weakness on purpose? They do this because they saw other people do it and it worked. It's not like they have some grand plan or anything. Every time they say, what about they're not making a point, they're running away from yours. What about him is not a defense? It's a weak person's confession that they have no argument. Three ad homan attack. You say Trump is breaking the law. They say you have Trump derangement syndrome and you hate America. Trump is still breaking the law. But now the conversation is about whether you are crazy instead of what Trump actually did. This is called an ad homan attack. To put it plainly, they're just insulting you instead of answering any questions, the goal is to destroy your credibility before your argument even gets evaluated. Psychologist Robert Cialdini at Arizona University found that people do not evaluate arguments in a vacuum. We decide whether to listen based on who is talking. Ad hominin makes the audience question whether you are even worth listening to before they engage with what you said. When they cannot argue facts, they come after you instead. And the moment you start defending yourself, the argument is over and they win. For the slippery slope fallacy, you say, the government should not be able to deport American citizens without due process. They say you want to let criminals pour into the country. You said nothing about criminals, but now everyone is arguing about something you never brought up. This is called the slippery slope fallacy. They take one reasonable idea and claim it will automatically lead to the most extreme outcome imaginable. No evidence, no logical steps. They're just creating fear.
Marine4America (25:41): They see that a lot with, like I say, there's lots of general reasons somebody might be protesting. Even somebody might be protesting against ice, depending on how local you're getting, there might genuinely be a case where somebody's rights were violated in some way and that can't be shown until after they actually get their day in court, which takes time. So they're just advocating for that person. George Ttes. There's a couple people I know it's not like rampant, but there's lots of genuine reasons why somebody might be objecting to how things are being handled, and they will jump on you like, well, why do you want to protect illegals? And that's not what I fucking said.
PamHemphill79 (26:27): Exactly. And that's not why we're protesting ice either. It's the behavior of ice. What we're they acting like Estoppels instead of the ice that we knew in the past.
Marine4America (26:39): Yeah, that's what I mean. There's just lots of general reasons and people are going to have to account for that because it's starting to add up. And people with even more common sense are seeing that too. And people with one fucking brain cell like Tommy can't get it. So they're like, why
Recording (26:58): Do you want to protect illegals? Why do you want to protect illegals?
Marine4America (27:03): So you don't know what you're talking about. Okay, I don't think you've, all right. Nevermind. Let's see what else to discuss. This
Recording (27:12): Psychologist, Paul Ekman at the University of California San Francisco found that fear overrides rational thinking faster than any other emotion. Once your brain perceives a threat, it stops evaluating evidence and starts looking for an exit. The slippery slope is designed to trigger the fear response before your brain can ask whether the threat is even real scare people enough, and they stop thinking. And people who stop thinking are easy to control, just ask Fox News. Newsmax five, the burden of proof flip. Charlie Kirk built his entire career on this trick. He would show up to college campuses, make wild claims with no evidence and demand that students disprove him on the spot. When students couldn't disprove him, Kirk declared victory and forced the student to give up the mic. He called it owning the libs. It was not a real debate. It was an ambush on unprepared kids. This is called the burden of proof. Flip. Person making the claim is always responsible for proving the claim, but Kirk and every conservative like him make wild claims with no evidence and then demand that you disprove those claims. Crazy, right? And here's why. You can never win. You show them a court ruling. They claim the judge is corrupt. You show them a study, the science is corrupt. You show them a news report, the outlet take news. Every piece of evidence, brain just gets added. The conspiracy,
Troll (28:18): Get her out of here.
PamHemphill79 (28:21): I got rid of him.
Marine4America (28:23): Oh, well, that's what it's down to now. It's just that
PamHemphill79 (28:30): What he was just sharing there. Isn't that so true? Oh my God. It happens
Marine4America (28:35): All
PamHemphill79 (28:35): The time when I'm down there.
Marine4America (28:38): What's your desire?
PamHemphill79 (28:40): Protests in Portland. People will walk away after they've talked to 'em and say, oh my God, my head's spinning. And mine would too, and I knew what was happening, but I didn't know how to point out the tactics. I know the tactics of the criminal mind, but they're very similar. But that's exactly, I can't believe it. I just identified with that one. A hundred percent.
Marine4America (29:04): Yeah. There's another minute left.
Recording (29:09): The outlet is fake news. Every piece of evidence you bring just gets added to the conspiracy. There's no evidence they'll accept, because accepting evidence was never part of the deal. Psychologist Daniel Kahneman found that once someone believes something, their brain treats every piece of supporting evidence as proof and every piece of contradicting evidence as part of the coverup or conspiracy. Kirk was never really debating anyone. He was running a scam in a real debate. The person making the claim has to prove their claim to be true. Kirk never proved anything. He just demanded you disprove him and called it a win when you couldn't. That is not a debate that is a weak scam and only worked on kids who are under 20 years old. Most of these people have no idea what they're actually saying. They saw it on TikTok or they heard it on Fox News. They repeated it to you and called it an argument. Actually trying to win a debate. They're trying to feel superior to someone they are secretly intimidated by. That is all owning the libs ever was deeply insecure. People using borrowed tricks to feel powerful for five minutes. Now that you know these tricks, you'll never have to fall for them again. They're what weak people use to try and trick smart people into arguing. When you're not smart enough to win a real argument, you kind of have to trick people.
Marine4America (30:10): Yeah, it's the best way to put it.
PamHemphill79 (30:15): Okay, go to the next one.
Marine4America (30:18): Which one was the next one? I'll
PamHemphill79 (30:20): Pull people up in a minute as soon as we're done with this video.
Marine4America (30:23): Which other one did you want?
PamHemphill79 (30:25): That wasn't the last, was it?
Marine4America (30:27): Oh yeah. No, that was the end of the video. It was only six minutes long.
PamHemphill79 (30:31): Oh, burden of proof flip. Okay.
Marine4America (30:33): Yeah, yeah. I had ho Homan burden of proof straw man.
Recording (30:44): Even worth slope fallacy. They take one
Marine4America (30:47): Slippery slope.
Recording (30:50): That's
PamHemphill79 (30:50): Why I want people to
Marine4America (30:51): Learn. I'll post this on the pill.
PamHemphill79 (30:55): Okay. I think it's important to learn this so you don't waste your time. I mean, if you want to have a conversation, they come in here and yell at me and call me names. That's not a conversation. Let's talk about Iran and what the hell's going on and what do you like about it or don't like about it. We don't have to agree, but go into personalities trying to got your moments. It is just a waste of our time.
Marine4America (31:26): Speaking of we have Guyer.
PamHemphill79 (31:30): Yeah. See if he'll be nice. Don't pull into your tactics. We are aware of 'em. We got your number.
Marine4America (31:42): Nick sorter types. It's okay. You're free to speak. It's just us. Oh, did it not go through
PamHemphill79 (32:02): Guy? I don't dunno if you're hearing us, but you're free to talk, but we'll wait until you put this hand up.
Marine4America (32:08): It might be a space thing. It still says there's a request and I don't see the request anymore. I tried to bring 'em up. Maybe try to do it if I invite them. Invite to speak spaces is weird. I think everybody needs a little bit of grace and patience with that.
GuyerDigital (32:27): Sorry, I was on a phone call. What happened now?
Marine4America (32:29): No problem. You had a request to speak, so
GuyerDigital (32:35): I just wanted to say, hi, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (32:38): Hello.
GuyerDigital (32:41): How come I got booted from your last space?
PamHemphill79 (32:45): I
Marine4America (32:45): Don't know, man. Maybe that was me. I think I might've been a little trolley. Did you do any January 6th looking into,
GuyerDigital (32:54): I still don't really seem to care about what happened six years ago.
Marine4America (32:58): There's a whole news about the DOJ moving to get rid of people's charges for sedition.
GuyerDigital (33:06): Alright, so what do you consider storming an immigration customs enforcement facility and totally turning that thing upside down. You don't think storming a federal building isn't considered any of that?
Marine4America (33:19): It sure could be.
PamHemphill79 (33:19): Okay. What tactic was that one? What trick was that? One?
Marine4America (33:23): It was kind of the age of the subject. Not really. He wasn't alluding directly. He was just saying the what about it? And I would say, yeah, you're right. Yeah, I What's the beep?
GuyerDigital (33:37): So what are your thoughts on that then? Do you think those people should be charged accordingly?
Marine4America (33:42): They should be charged. Yeah, I said that. Oh, I hear an echo.
GuyerDigital (33:46): Okay. So Pam,
Marine4America (33:47): You can go back into every single space I've been in and said, yeah, especially those people banging on the gate. Those people who cried, open the door. That dude who kicked out the camera? Anybody shoving cops? Yeah, charge 'em.
GuyerDigital (34:01): Okay. I agree.
Marine4America (34:03): So getting rid of charges for sedition would be a bad thing, right?
GuyerDigital (34:09): How many people did they get rid of charges for?
Marine4America (34:12): I don't even know if it happened yet, but the judge, Janine Pierro moved for it.
GuyerDigital (34:17): So if it hasn't happened yet, why are we talking about it?
Marine4America (34:20): All right. Well, the pardons for January 6th. How about that? People who were actually pardoned for their assault on police officers.
GuyerDigital (34:28): Okay, well, I haven't read much about it, so I still haven't looked into it. I've got other things to worry about. That's
Marine4America (34:33): Always the answer with people. That's why I don't think, I'm sorry. That's why I wonder if you're a journalist. I don't think you are.
GuyerDigital (34:41): Well, that's fine. A lot of people don't think I am. But you can look at my credentials and you can also look at my past history working as a journalist.
PamHemphill79 (34:49): Well, that's a way to wipe out the history of January 6th. It never happened. And gaslight their convictions.
GuyerDigital (34:58): How does it affect me as an Oregonian right now?
Marine4America (35:01): I think you should be mad as an American that the federal government would pardon people who assaulted police officers and federal buildings. Just like you're supposedly mad at pardoning that would presumably say there's a systemic reason it's okay to commit this violence.
GuyerDigital (35:17): Oh, we already know that there's a systemic reason between everything. I mean, I'm against the establishment. I don't think the establishment is working fairly to the people.
Marine4America (35:26): Okay, cool.
PamHemphill79 (35:28): Yeah, it'd be like wiping out. Just you're against what's happening down at the ice Portland right now. It'd be the same thing.
GuyerDigital (35:36): I wasn't down at January 6th to document, so I can't really put my 2 cents in.
Marine4America (35:41): Alright.
GuyerDigital (35:43): As a journalist, I don't want to use other people what other people said or what other people do. I want to see it for myself. That's why I go down to ice,
Marine4America (35:50): Like sworn testimony, eyewitness accounts, consider again and try to wave affect me as an Oregonian. I think it was a federal issue. I think this is the rot that's happening within the country that people like you allow
GuyerDigital (36:06): People like me.
Marine4America (36:07): Yeah.
GuyerDigital (36:08): What do you mean people like me?
Marine4America (36:09): People who are in such a rush to be the next Nick Shirley who don't realize that the
GuyerDigital (36:13): Nick Shirley. You know what's funny is I didn't even know who Nick Shirley was.
Marine4America (36:17): You don't realize that he just had, I met him about
GuyerDigital (36:19): A month and
Marine4America (36:19): A half, four
GuyerDigital (36:20): Months ago.
Marine4America (36:21): He has a web of support of a rich family, like a Hollywood mom.
GuyerDigital (36:24): Okay?
Marine4America (36:26): Do I have a
GuyerDigital (36:26): Hollywood mom with the rich family and a web of support?
Marine4America (36:28): Probably not. Which is why it's not going to happen for you. Well,
GuyerDigital (36:31): I'm not trying to be Nick Shirley. Why am I trying to be Nick Shirley, thanks for watching my stuff, by the way, and reading the comments.
Marine4America (36:36): You should go be a carpenter.
GuyerDigital (36:39): A carpenter.
Marine4America (36:40): Yeah.
GuyerDigital (36:41): Just like you, Chandler,
Marine4America (36:44): Who
GuyerDigital (36:45): You sound a lot like Chandler.
Marine4America (36:46): Chandler, but I've seen him.
GuyerDigital (36:49): He's a carpenter. I've got a broken back. I can't be a carpenter.
Marine4America (36:55): Okay.
GuyerDigital (36:59): I would rather use my skills that I know how to do and actually do something for my state rather than build a fence or a house.
Marine4America (37:07): Yeah, I understand that
GuyerDigital (37:12): Carpenters are oversaturated in this state anyways. Plus they don't get, they're trying to. The
Marine4America (37:18): Idea was a practical skill,
GuyerDigital (37:19): Small businesses
Marine4America (37:20): To contribute to your community.
GuyerDigital (37:22): SB 1, 5 0 7. You guys know about that? Or wait?
Marine4America (37:26): No, man, don't. You're
GuyerDigital (37:27): Oregonian. That's right.
Marine4America (37:29): So
GuyerDigital (37:29): Why don't you care about SB seven? Sorry.
Marine4America (37:31): Am I Chandler or not?
GuyerDigital (37:33): Are you?
Marine4America (37:35): No.
GuyerDigital (37:35): Okay. You sound a lot like him. So do you care about SB 1 5 0 7
Marine4America (37:39): With my East Coast accent? I know. I try to mask my Philly accent, but I still say water. I don't know. I don't think Chandler says water. I got water rights all day.
PamHemphill79 (37:53): You don't sound like him to me, but
Marine4America (37:56): I haven't heard him speak. I think I did one time, but he was like, he all pissed off at somebody and then I looked him up and no, I looked up Antifa and then he's like the leader of Antifa, the self proclaimed leader of for some chips.
PamHemphill79 (38:12): No, he's not. That's mega saying that about him. It's not true at all. That's me.
Marine4America (38:18): The leader. No, in the sense that what you're doing, where it's like people call him that and he just kind of owned it as a joke and people interviewed him like that. I didn't really look into it. I think the Portland thing, I think you guys are getting a little too stupid.
Marine4America (38:41): Kidding.
Marine4America (38:42): You know what guy, you're right. I don't have a problem with you. If you're just kind of chasing neighborhood pets, by all means do that. I don't want to get in your way and tell you not to do that shit. I'm
GuyerDigital (38:51): Not chasing
Marine4America (38:52): Neighborhood
GuyerDigital (38:52): Pets, but that's all right. There's other people in my town that do that.
Marine4America (38:56): Alright, well, I don't see you as a tentacle. Like Ryan, I see you. Something else. A little more misled, but
GuyerDigital (39:06): Misled. Okay.
Marine4America (39:07): I don't know you.
GuyerDigital (39:08): Okay. Well, luckily I've got some pretty good advisors that lead me in the right direction.
Marine4America (39:15): Good. I think you have a creative heart and I appreciate that.
GuyerDigital (39:20): Oh, that's the first nice thing you said about me all night.
Marine4America (39:23): I can be very nice.
GuyerDigital (39:28): So were you a J Fixer?
Marine4America (39:30): No. I watched from my warehouse what I did watch on the mainstream media first, but I was kind of ready for something hot all day. My other friend who I served with, he lives in Ohio and he was working the night shift and we had a tradition of he was leaving work and I was going to work. So we would just talk on the phone the whole time.
GuyerDigital (39:54): And this
Marine4America (39:55): Whole,
GuyerDigital (39:55): What did you do in January 6th, Pam?
Marine4America (40:00): So he was like, call me up. Something's about to pop off. I was like, something's definitely going to pop off. And then something popped off.
GuyerDigital (40:12): I'm curious to know Pam's involvement in January 6th.
PamHemphill79 (40:17): Oh my God, in three years, all the interviews I've had, you have no clue really.
Marine4America (40:22): We'll tell your story.
GuyerDigital (40:23): Just obsessed over you. You think a lot of people are.
PamHemphill79 (40:32): What'd you say, Marine?
Marine4America (40:34): If you want to go over your story again for the billion time, I'm down to listen to it.
PamHemphill79 (40:40): Got to realize I've been doing this for three years. Oh my God. I still get interviewed every week. I'm just burned out with telling the story. I really am. That's why I just put up an interview better than me. Keep going over and over, but Pacific questions I don't mind answering. You have a specific question? I can't hear you very well.
GuyerDigital (41:05): Yeah, specific question. My specific question is when you're at the fence and you're telling 'em, go in there, go in there, go in there, go get 'em, and you're standing in front of the fence with the police officer and you were told to stand over here. Why were you saying go in there. Go in there. Go in there. What were you trying to do?
PamHemphill79 (41:25): That was out right away. All the media. Put that little clip out. But first don't be saying what I said when that's not correct. That's all I asked.
Marine4America (41:36): That January 6th.
GuyerDigital (41:38): Let's replay the clip here.
PamHemphill79 (41:40): Yeah, I have to go back a little bit.
Marine4America (41:45): Is this the thing you were found guilty for?
PamHemphill79 (41:47): No, not at all. What had happened? Trying to think of his name, William. It'll come to me. Anyway, he was talking to a capitol police officer and I turned to him. I said, what are you guys talking about? He says, we're negotiating. They're going to move the barriers and let us up to the steps. And I thought that would be great. Maybe that's where Trump's going to be. I kept thinking Trump was going to be there to talk. He had asked everybody to go there and you know how you're at a football game or a concert. People are allowed to come in, but they're pushing too fast. That's what I thought was happening. I thought they were letting us in. An officer pulled me over, so I thought he was helping me to get in first. Why would he pull me over? So I go walking around and say, come on in.It's your house. It's your house. I'm laughing now, but it's not funny. But I walked over to this female officer and I said, they're not coming in. What's going on? We're not letting them in. I said, oh my God. My heart went to my feet. And I said, shit. So they put me back to the same spot and they did it again. And I knew that time I was in trouble. I'm right up front at the gate, can't go anywhere. And the officer, the same one pulls me over again. I run to an officer and because I had 40 stitches, I told him I'm in trouble. It was like a buffalo coming at you behind you. It's very frightening. You don't know what to do. They could trump you. He says, I'll call in upfront and you go up there and they'll put you behind them until we can get you out of here. But when I got up there, they pushed me towards an officer. I fell backwards on purpose so I don't hit the officer. And they stepped on my head, pulled up my shoulder, cut my knee, broke my glasses. I was not breathing. I was close to just dying. And an officer pulled me up and saved me and got me behind him. So that's what happened that day. But you could play the clip. I don't care. I mean, that's been out there for three years. I'm not giving, I don't want to paint a picture like I'm a victim. I made a choice to stay. That's why I pleaded guilty. I was guilty. It's really that
GuyerDigital (44:14): Simple. Well, when we're not painting a picture that you're a victim, you pleaded guilty, which means you're the opposite of the victim.
PamHemphill79 (44:20): Yeah. I had a choice I could have left.
GuyerDigital (44:22): Right, but you were also telling people, go in there, it's your house. And they were standing behind a guardrail.
PamHemphill79 (44:28): That's what I told you. I thought they were letting us in. That's what a
Marine4America (44:31): Lot of people were screaming.
GuyerDigital (44:32): Right. So why are you telling people to go in there? And then also, I
PamHemphill79 (44:36): Just
GuyerDigital (44:36): Explained it,
Marine4America (44:38): But this is what the whole crowd was saying. A lot of people were saying, this is our house. Go in there. Yeah, I sold your Well
PamHemphill79 (44:45): Wait, Marine. Wait, Marine guy. I just explained it and you didn't hear a word I said, or you wouldn't be asking this. I just explained it.
GuyerDigital (44:55): I heard every word you said, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (44:57): I said, I thought they were letting us in because he said they're negotiating. They're letting people come in. But
GuyerDigital (45:03): Why do you still believe it was an insurrection?
PamHemphill79 (45:06): Well, we already know by research that it was planned by the proud boys and Oath keepers Trump. You named the other
GuyerDigital (45:13): People. Did you know it was going to be an insurrection when you went down
PamHemphill79 (45:15): There? No, I didn't know nothing. Of course not.
Marine4America (45:18): Why would you think she did?
Marine4America (32:29): No problem. You had a request to speak, so
GuyerDigital (32:35): I just wanted to say, hi, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (32:38): Hello.
GuyerDigital (32:41): How come I got booted from your last space?
PamHemphill79 (32:45): I
Marine4America (32:45): Don't know, man. Maybe that was me. I think I might've been a little trolley. Did you do any January 6th looking into,
GuyerDigital (32:54): I still don't really seem to care about what happened six years ago.
Marine4America (32:58): There's a whole news about the DOJ moving to get rid of people's charges for sedition.
GuyerDigital (33:06): Alright, so what do you consider storming an immigration customs enforcement facility and totally turning that thing upside down. You don't think storming a federal building isn't considered any of that?
Marine4America (33:19): It sure could be.
PamHemphill79 (33:19): Okay. What tactic was that one? What trick was that? One?
Marine4America (33:23): It was kind of the age of the subject. Not really. He wasn't alluding directly. He was just saying the what about it? And I would say, yeah, you're right. Yeah, I What's the beep?
GuyerDigital (33:37): So what are your thoughts on that then? Do you think those people should be charged accordingly?
Marine4America (33:42): They should be charged. Yeah, I said that. Oh, I hear an echo.
GuyerDigital (33:46): Okay. So Pam,
Marine4America (33:47): You can go back into every single space I've been in and said, yeah, especially those people banging on the gate. Those people who cried, open the door. That dude who kicked out the camera? Anybody shoving cops? Yeah, charge 'em.
GuyerDigital (34:01): Okay. I agree.
Marine4America (34:03): So getting rid of charges for sedition would be a bad thing, right?
GuyerDigital (34:09): How many people did they get rid of charges for?
Marine4America (34:12): I don't even know if it happened yet, but the judge, Janine Pierro moved for it.
GuyerDigital (34:17): So if it hasn't happened yet, why are we talking about it?
Marine4America (34:20): All right. Well, the pardons for January 6th. How about that? People who were actually pardoned for their assault on police officers.
GuyerDigital (34:28): Okay, well, I haven't read much about it, so I still haven't looked into it. I've got other things to worry about. That's
Marine4America (34:33): Always the answer with people. That's why I don't think, I'm sorry. That's why I wonder if you're a journalist. I don't think you are.
GuyerDigital (34:41): Well, that's fine. A lot of people don't think I am. But you can look at my credentials and you can also look at my past history working as a journalist.
PamHemphill79 (34:49): Well, that's a way to wipe out the history of January 6th. It never happened. And gaslight their convictions.
GuyerDigital (34:58): How does it affect me as an Oregonian right now?
Marine4America (35:01): I think you should be mad as an American that the federal government would pardon people who assaulted police officers and federal buildings. Just like you're supposedly mad at pardoning that would presumably say there's a systemic reason it's okay to commit this violence.
GuyerDigital (35:17): Oh, we already know that there's a systemic reason between everything. I mean, I'm against the establishment. I don't think the establishment is working fairly to the people.
Marine4America (35:26): Okay, cool.
PamHemphill79 (35:28): Yeah, it'd be like wiping out. Just you're against what's happening down at the ice Portland right now. It'd be the same thing.
GuyerDigital (35:36): I wasn't down at January 6th to document, so I can't really put my 2 cents in.
Marine4America (35:41): Alright.
GuyerDigital (35:43): As a journalist, I don't want to use other people what other people said or what other people do. I want to see it for myself. That's why I go down to ice,
Marine4America (35:50): Like sworn testimony, eyewitness accounts, consider again and try to wave affect me as an Oregonian. I think it was a federal issue. I think this is the rot that's happening within the country that people like you allow
GuyerDigital (36:06): People like me.
Marine4America (36:07): Yeah.
GuyerDigital (36:08): What do you mean people like me?
Marine4America (36:09): People who are in such a rush to be the next Nick Shirley who don't realize that the
GuyerDigital (36:13): Nick Shirley. You know what's funny is I didn't even know who Nick Shirley was.
Marine4America (36:17): You don't realize that he just had, I met him about
GuyerDigital (36:19): A month and
Marine4America (36:19): A half, four
GuyerDigital (36:20): Months ago.
Marine4America (36:21): He has a web of support of a rich family, like a Hollywood mom.
GuyerDigital (36:24): Okay?
Marine4America (36:26): Do I have a
GuyerDigital (36:26): Hollywood mom with the rich family and a web of support?
Marine4America (36:28): Probably not. Which is why it's not going to happen for you. Well,
GuyerDigital (36:31): I'm not trying to be Nick Shirley. Why am I trying to be Nick Shirley, thanks for watching my stuff, by the way, and reading the comments.
Marine4America (36:36): You should go be a carpenter.
GuyerDigital (36:39): A carpenter.
Marine4America (36:40): Yeah.
GuyerDigital (36:41): Just like you, Chandler,
Marine4America (36:44): Who
GuyerDigital (36:45): You sound a lot like Chandler.
Marine4America (36:46): Chandler, but I've seen him.
GuyerDigital (36:49): He's a carpenter. I've got a broken back. I can't be a carpenter.
Marine4America (36:55): Okay.
GuyerDigital (36:59): I would rather use my skills that I know how to do and actually do something for my state rather than build a fence or a house.
Marine4America (37:07): Yeah, I understand that
GuyerDigital (37:12): Carpenters are oversaturated in this state anyways. Plus they don't get, they're trying to. The
Marine4America (37:18): Idea was a practical skill,
GuyerDigital (37:19): Small businesses
Marine4America (37:20): To contribute to your community.
GuyerDigital (37:22): SB 1, 5 0 7. You guys know about that? Or wait?
Marine4America (37:26): No, man, don't. You're
GuyerDigital (37:27): Oregonian. That's right.
Marine4America (37:29): So
GuyerDigital (37:29): Why don't you care about SB seven? Sorry.
Marine4America (37:31): Am I Chandler or not?
GuyerDigital (37:33): Are you?
Marine4America (37:35): No.
GuyerDigital (37:35): Okay. You sound a lot like him. So do you care about SB 1 5 0 7
Marine4America (37:39): With my East Coast accent? I know. I try to mask my Philly accent, but I still say water. I don't know. I don't think Chandler says water. I got water rights all day.
PamHemphill79 (37:53): You don't sound like him to me, but
Marine4America (37:56): I haven't heard him speak. I think I did one time, but he was like, he all pissed off at somebody and then I looked him up and no, I looked up Antifa and then he's like the leader of Antifa, the self proclaimed leader of for some chips.
PamHemphill79 (38:12): No, he's not. That's mega saying that about him. It's not true at all. That's me.
Marine4America (38:18): The leader. No, in the sense that what you're doing, where it's like people call him that and he just kind of owned it as a joke and people interviewed him like that. I didn't really look into it. I think the Portland thing, I think you guys are getting a little too stupid.
Marine4America (38:41): Kidding.
Marine4America (38:42): You know what guy, you're right. I don't have a problem with you. If you're just kind of chasing neighborhood pets, by all means do that. I don't want to get in your way and tell you not to do that shit. I'm
GuyerDigital (38:51): Not chasing
Marine4America (38:52): Neighborhood
GuyerDigital (38:52): Pets, but that's all right. There's other people in my town that do that.
Marine4America (38:56): Alright, well, I don't see you as a tentacle. Like Ryan, I see you. Something else. A little more misled, but
GuyerDigital (39:06): Misled. Okay.
Marine4America (39:07): I don't know you.
GuyerDigital (39:08): Okay. Well, luckily I've got some pretty good advisors that lead me in the right direction.
Marine4America (39:15): Good. I think you have a creative heart and I appreciate that.
GuyerDigital (39:20): Oh, that's the first nice thing you said about me all night.
Marine4America (39:23): I can be very nice.
GuyerDigital (39:28): So were you a J Fixer?
Marine4America (39:30): No. I watched from my warehouse what I did watch on the mainstream media first, but I was kind of ready for something hot all day. My other friend who I served with, he lives in Ohio and he was working the night shift and we had a tradition of he was leaving work and I was going to work. So we would just talk on the phone the whole time.
GuyerDigital (39:54): And this
Marine4America (39:55): Whole,
GuyerDigital (39:55): What did you do in January 6th, Pam?
Marine4America (40:00): So he was like, call me up. Something's about to pop off. I was like, something's definitely going to pop off. And then something popped off.
GuyerDigital (40:12): I'm curious to know Pam's involvement in January 6th.
PamHemphill79 (40:17): Oh my God, in three years, all the interviews I've had, you have no clue really.
Marine4America (40:22): We'll tell your story.
GuyerDigital (40:23): Just obsessed over you. You think a lot of people are.
PamHemphill79 (40:32): What'd you say, Marine?
Marine4America (40:34): If you want to go over your story again for the billion time, I'm down to listen to it.
PamHemphill79 (40:40): Got to realize I've been doing this for three years. Oh my God. I still get interviewed every week. I'm just burned out with telling the story. I really am. That's why I just put up an interview better than me. Keep going over and over, but Pacific questions I don't mind answering. You have a specific question? I can't hear you very well.
GuyerDigital (41:05): Yeah, specific question. My specific question is when you're at the fence and you're telling 'em, go in there, go in there, go in there, go get 'em, and you're standing in front of the fence with the police officer and you were told to stand over here. Why were you saying go in there. Go in there. Go in there. What were you trying to do?
PamHemphill79 (41:25): That was out right away. All the media. Put that little clip out. But first don't be saying what I said when that's not correct. That's all I asked.
Marine4America (41:36): That January 6th.
GuyerDigital (41:38): Let's replay the clip here.
PamHemphill79 (41:40): Yeah, I have to go back a little bit.
Marine4America (41:45): Is this the thing you were found guilty for?
PamHemphill79 (41:47): No, not at all. What had happened? Trying to think of his name, William. It'll come to me. Anyway, he was talking to a capitol police officer and I turned to him. I said, what are you guys talking about? He says, we're negotiating. They're going to move the barriers and let us up to the steps. And I thought that would be great. Maybe that's where Trump's going to be. I kept thinking Trump was going to be there to talk. He had asked everybody to go there and you know how you're at a football game or a concert. People are allowed to come in, but they're pushing too fast. That's what I thought was happening. I thought they were letting us in. An officer pulled me over, so I thought he was helping me to get in first. Why would he pull me over? So I go walking around and say, come on in.It's your house. It's your house. I'm laughing now, but it's not funny. But I walked over to this female officer and I said, they're not coming in. What's going on? We're not letting them in. I said, oh my God. My heart went to my feet. And I said, shit. So they put me back to the same spot and they did it again. And I knew that time I was in trouble. I'm right up front at the gate, can't go anywhere. And the officer, the same one pulls me over again. I run to an officer and because I had 40 stitches, I told him I'm in trouble. It was like a buffalo coming at you behind you. It's very frightening. You don't know what to do. They could trump you. He says, I'll call in upfront and you go up there and they'll put you behind them until we can get you out of here. But when I got up there, they pushed me towards an officer. I fell backwards on purpose so I don't hit the officer. And they stepped on my head, pulled up my shoulder, cut my knee, broke my glasses. I was not breathing. I was close to just dying. And an officer pulled me up and saved me and got me behind him. So that's what happened that day. But you could play the clip. I don't care. I mean, that's been out there for three years. I'm not giving, I don't want to paint a picture like I'm a victim. I made a choice to stay. That's why I pleaded guilty. I was guilty. It's really that
GuyerDigital (44:14): Simple. Well, when we're not painting a picture that you're a victim, you pleaded guilty, which means you're the opposite of the victim.
PamHemphill79 (44:20): Yeah. I had a choice I could have left.
GuyerDigital (44:22): Right, but you were also telling people, go in there, it's your house. And they were standing behind a guardrail.
PamHemphill79 (44:28): That's what I told you. I thought they were letting us in. That's what a
Marine4America (44:31): Lot of people were screaming.
GuyerDigital (44:32): Right. So why are you telling people to go in there? And then also, I
PamHemphill79 (44:36): Just
GuyerDigital (44:36): Explained it,
Marine4America (44:38): But this is what the whole crowd was saying. A lot of people were saying, this is our house. Go in there. Yeah, I sold your Well
PamHemphill79 (44:45): Wait, Marine. Wait, Marine guy. I just explained it and you didn't hear a word I said, or you wouldn't be asking this. I just explained it.
GuyerDigital (44:55): I heard every word you said, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (44:57): I said, I thought they were letting us in because he said they're negotiating. They're letting people come in. But
GuyerDigital (45:03): Why do you still believe it was an insurrection?
PamHemphill79 (45:06): Well, we already know by research that it was planned by the proud boys and Oath keepers Trump. You named the other
GuyerDigital (45:13): People. Did you know it was going to be an insurrection when you went down
PamHemphill79 (45:15): There? No, I didn't know nothing. Of course not.
Marine4America (45:18): Why would you think she did?