Most recent unrolls from @ThreadReaderApp
@Datenarche @BoschimoDr @muldental3r @OstPlage @MFBraukmann audible.de/pd/Wie-der-Teu…©2019 ROOTS RECORDING (P)2019 ROOTS RECORDING
Massenbewegungen, Aufstände und Revolutionen, Krisen, destabilisierte Länder - wie komplex und verwirrend die aktuellen Ereignisse auch erscheinen mögen, es geschieht nichts zufällig. Die Völker der Welt
Massenbewegungen, Aufstände und Revolutionen, Krisen, destabilisierte Länder - wie komplex und verwirrend die aktuellen Ereignisse auch erscheinen mögen, es geschieht nichts zufällig. Die Völker der Welt
@Datenarche @BoschimoDr @muldental3r @OstPlage @MFBraukmann geben ihm viele Namen. Auch in der modernen Zeit führt er - nennen wir ihn einfach Teufel - seinen Kampf gegen die Menschheit. Er unterwandert Politik, Wirtschaft, Medien und die Religionen, sabotiert internationale und soziale Beziehungen, verdirbt Kunst, Kultur und Bildung.
@Datenarche @BoschimoDr @muldental3r @OstPlage @MFBraukmann Er verführt die Jugend zu einer beeinflussbaren Masse - entwurzelt und haltlos. In diesem Buch sollen die verschiedenen Gesichter des Teufels der letzten hundert Jahre dargestellt und ihm seine vielfältigen Masken heruntergerissen werden. Einer zehrenden
Gedanken zur Tageslosung für Donnerstag, den 09.07.2026
Losungswort
Es ist ein Gott im Himmel, der Geheimnisse offenbart.
Daniel 2,28
Lehrtext
Seinen Heiligen wollte Gott kundtun, was der herrliche Reichtum dieses Geheimnisses unter den Völkern ist,
Losungswort
Es ist ein Gott im Himmel, der Geheimnisse offenbart.
Daniel 2,28
Lehrtext
Seinen Heiligen wollte Gott kundtun, was der herrliche Reichtum dieses Geheimnisses unter den Völkern ist,
nämlich Christus in euch, die Hoffnung der Herrlichkeit.
Kolosser 1,27
Die Losungen der Herrnhuter Brüdergemeine
Das offenbarte Geheimnis Gottes
In der Vorgeschichte zum heutigen Losungswort wurde der Hebräer Daniel als junger Mann in ein fremdes Land
Kolosser 1,27
Die Losungen der Herrnhuter Brüdergemeine
Das offenbarte Geheimnis Gottes
In der Vorgeschichte zum heutigen Losungswort wurde der Hebräer Daniel als junger Mann in ein fremdes Land
verschleppt, wo er dem dortigen Machthaber dienen musste. Als der Herrscher einen beunruhigenden Traum hatte, verlangte er von seinen Beratern Unmögliches: Ohne ihnen den Traum zu erzählen, sollten sie diesen deuten. Da sie das nicht konnten, drohte ihnen der Tod.
4. Mose 27,1-28,2
Zelofhads Töchter fordern ihr Recht • Mose soll sich auf seinen Tod vorbereiten • Opferbestimmungen für die verschiedenen Festzeitentwr360.org/programs/view/…
„Durch die Bibel“ ist ein weltweites Bibelprogramm in über 100 Sprachen und Dialekten. Unsere Mission ist einfach und sie ist dieselbe, die Dr. McGee für sich selbst annahm: Das ganze Wort Gottes der ganzen Welt zu verkündigen.
I paid around 6,000 dollars a year to study under one of the best traders alive.
Most people expect a room full of secret setups.
That is not what changed my trading.
It was something far more boring, and far more important ↓
Most people expect a room full of secret setups.
That is not what changed my trading.
It was something far more boring, and far more important ↓
The global economy transacts in milliseconds and chases scammers in minutes. Yet in Indonesia, victims face a red-carpet highway for fraud. Here is a story of how our financial ecosystem sacrifices consumer protection to worship rigid bureaucracy 👇
thejusticequeen.wordpress.com/2026/07/09/why…
thejusticequeen.wordpress.com/2026/07/09/why…
A few weeks ago, I officially became a statistic. My hard-earned money vanished due to a fraudster.Being financially literate, I executed the playbook: secured a Police Report (STPL) and raced to a @HaloBCA branch to freeze the suspect's account. Instead, I hit a wall
@HaloBCA The compliance team of @HaloBCA flatly refused to act on my police report. They said: “We cannot execute an administrative hold without an official freezing order issued directly by the Regional Police Chief (Kapolres).” A month later, the letter is still buried in red tape.
Zhu Rongji is remembered as the iron-willed reformer who "grasped the large and let go the small"-gutting China's state sector and setting up two decades of boom. But what did that reform do to how ordinary Chinese see their government? Our new paper @PolBehavior has an answer.
@PolBehavior The scale was staggering: from 1998–2007, over 80% of SOEs were shut or privatized. ~5.7 trillion RMB in state assets went private. More than 40 million workers — once the "aristocracy of Chinese labor" — were laid off.
@PolBehavior The classic political economy story (Przeworski, Rodrik): reforms hurt at first, but once growth arrives, support recovers. China is the perfect test case — privatization actually delivered the boom. So did trust bounce back?
🧵 Vladimir Putin stole Crimea and called it "eternal destiny."
Twelve years later, the entire peninsula is in a total blackout, and residents are hunting for emergency roaming.
The annexation had flags. The occupation has a service notice. Forever has merely lost signal. 1/🧵
Twelve years later, the entire peninsula is in a total blackout, and residents are hunting for emergency roaming.
The annexation had flags. The occupation has a service notice. Forever has merely lost signal. 1/🧵
2/ Ukrainian strikes knocked out power across 18 districts, forcing operators into emergency roaming.
As the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) assessed, Ukraine's campaign is actively "collapsing logistics in occupied Crimea." Not embarrassing; collapsing.
As the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) assessed, Ukraine's campaign is actively "collapsing logistics in occupied Crimea." Not embarrassing; collapsing.
3/ Drone commander Madyar reported striking 24 shadow-fleet ships in the Sea of Azov.
A tanker with a name, like Venera-3 or Sanar-1, is harder to turn into destiny. It either finishes the trip, or it burns. The shadow fleet is leaving the area.
A tanker with a name, like Venera-3 or Sanar-1, is harder to turn into destiny. It either finishes the trip, or it burns. The shadow fleet is leaving the area.
For several years now, embalmers in multiple countries have reported unusual white fibrous structures being found inside the deceased.
The reports began appearing after the COVID injection rollout. Yet despite the public concern, there has been little visible effort from major health authorities to explain what these structures are, how common they may be, or what they could mean for the living.
Now, two peer-reviewed papers have pushed the issue into a more serious category. One documented survey reports from embalmers across multiple countries. The other analyzed the material itself and reported evidence consistent with amyloid-like, misfolded protein structures using Raman spectroscopy and other testing methods.
The unsettling part is not only that these structures may exist. It is that the question has been sitting in plain view for years while the institutions with the power, funding, and equipment to investigate it have largely stayed silent.
For tonight's special report, we are joined by journalist Wayne Crouch, U.S. embalmer Richard Hirschman, Major Tom Haviland, and organic chemist Greg Harrison. Together, they bring a rare mix of frontline embalming observations, multi-year survey work, investigative persistence, and analytical chemistry to one of the strangest unresolved questions of the post-COVID era. 🧵
The reports began appearing after the COVID injection rollout. Yet despite the public concern, there has been little visible effort from major health authorities to explain what these structures are, how common they may be, or what they could mean for the living.
Now, two peer-reviewed papers have pushed the issue into a more serious category. One documented survey reports from embalmers across multiple countries. The other analyzed the material itself and reported evidence consistent with amyloid-like, misfolded protein structures using Raman spectroscopy and other testing methods.
The unsettling part is not only that these structures may exist. It is that the question has been sitting in plain view for years while the institutions with the power, funding, and equipment to investigate it have largely stayed silent.
For tonight's special report, we are joined by journalist Wayne Crouch, U.S. embalmer Richard Hirschman, Major Tom Haviland, and organic chemist Greg Harrison. Together, they bring a rare mix of frontline embalming observations, multi-year survey work, investigative persistence, and analytical chemistry to one of the strangest unresolved questions of the post-COVID era. 🧵
The first major issue was the magnitude of the problem being ignored.
The embalmer survey paper did not treat the white fibrous clot phenomenon as a one-off claim from a single funeral home or a small group of activists. It gathered multi-year responses from embalmers in five countries, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand.
Across four years of surveys, 808 embalmers reportedly took part. Of those, 608 said they had seen the white fibrous structures. That’s more than 75% of respondents.
Even more striking was the reported frequency. These were not described as rare findings showing up once in a while under unusual circumstances. The average reported occurrence was around 23% of corpses.
That number is the kind of figure that should immediately trigger serious follow-up. Even if the exact cause remains disputed, even if some findings require further confirmation, even if additional controls are needed, the claim being raised is too large to ignore. When experienced embalmers say they began seeing something unfamiliar in bodies after 2021, the responsible response is not silence. It is investigation.
The timing also mattered. Some embalmers reported seeing unusual clotting in 2020, during the COVID era but before the vaccine rollout. However, the larger reported increase appeared in 2021, after the rollout began.
That distinction is important because it keeps the question broader than a single theory. The issue being raised is not only whether the injections played a role, but whether spike protein exposure from infection, injection, or both may be connected to abnormal clotting and protein misfolding.
At this stage, the survey did not prove causation. But it did document a pattern that many embalmers said they had not seen during decades of prior work.
And that is exactly why the matter should not be left to online debate alone.
The embalmer survey paper did not treat the white fibrous clot phenomenon as a one-off claim from a single funeral home or a small group of activists. It gathered multi-year responses from embalmers in five countries, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand.
Across four years of surveys, 808 embalmers reportedly took part. Of those, 608 said they had seen the white fibrous structures. That’s more than 75% of respondents.
Even more striking was the reported frequency. These were not described as rare findings showing up once in a while under unusual circumstances. The average reported occurrence was around 23% of corpses.
That number is the kind of figure that should immediately trigger serious follow-up. Even if the exact cause remains disputed, even if some findings require further confirmation, even if additional controls are needed, the claim being raised is too large to ignore. When experienced embalmers say they began seeing something unfamiliar in bodies after 2021, the responsible response is not silence. It is investigation.
The timing also mattered. Some embalmers reported seeing unusual clotting in 2020, during the COVID era but before the vaccine rollout. However, the larger reported increase appeared in 2021, after the rollout began.
That distinction is important because it keeps the question broader than a single theory. The issue being raised is not only whether the injections played a role, but whether spike protein exposure from infection, injection, or both may be connected to abnormal clotting and protein misfolding.
At this stage, the survey did not prove causation. But it did document a pattern that many embalmers said they had not seen during decades of prior work.
And that is exactly why the matter should not be left to online debate alone.
Unless you have explicitly told your financial advisor to pull your money out of tech, you are fully invested in the AI bubble right now.
Nobody asked for your permission. Nobody had to.
Your 401(k) is on autopilot, and autopilot means the biggest names on Wall Street get to use your retirement to fund their AI bets. Larry Fink’s BlackRock alone manages $12 trillion of money just like yours.
If it pays off, they take the fees. If it pops, you hold the bag.
But there’s a way to opt out of the AI bubble, and Genesis Gold shows you how.
They put together a free guide with the whole picture. How exposed your retirement really is. What happens after the crash. And how to get your hard-earned money out before the bomb goes off.
Get it now at DailyPulseGold.com. That’s DailyPulseGold.com.
Nobody asked for your permission. Nobody had to.
Your 401(k) is on autopilot, and autopilot means the biggest names on Wall Street get to use your retirement to fund their AI bets. Larry Fink’s BlackRock alone manages $12 trillion of money just like yours.
If it pays off, they take the fees. If it pops, you hold the bag.
But there’s a way to opt out of the AI bubble, and Genesis Gold shows you how.
They put together a free guide with the whole picture. How exposed your retirement really is. What happens after the crash. And how to get your hard-earned money out before the bomb goes off.
Get it now at DailyPulseGold.com. That’s DailyPulseGold.com.
You've tried to change by sheer willpower.
Read the Bible more. Sin less. Try harder.
And it keeps failing because willpower was never designed to carry the weight of transformation.
Jesus pointed to something deeper in John 15.
And interestingly, what modern brain science observes about how habits form lines up with the pattern He described.
Not "science proves the Bible" but a striking overlap worth exploring. 🧵
Read the Bible more. Sin less. Try harder.
And it keeps failing because willpower was never designed to carry the weight of transformation.
Jesus pointed to something deeper in John 15.
And interestingly, what modern brain science observes about how habits form lines up with the pattern He described.
Not "science proves the Bible" but a striking overlap worth exploring. 🧵
Why does willpower keep failing?
Because it's a limited resource, you can white-knuckle a change for a while, but under stress, exhaustion, or temptation, willpower runs dry, and you snap back to the old pattern.
Anyone who has broken the same resolution a hundred times knows this by experience.
Jesus seemed to assume it too.
He never said, "try harder to produce fruit."
He said: "Apart from me you can do nothing." (John 15:5)
The starting point of real change isn't more effort.
It's recognizing that effort alone was never going to be enough.
Because it's a limited resource, you can white-knuckle a change for a while, but under stress, exhaustion, or temptation, willpower runs dry, and you snap back to the old pattern.
Anyone who has broken the same resolution a hundred times knows this by experience.
Jesus seemed to assume it too.
He never said, "try harder to produce fruit."
He said: "Apart from me you can do nothing." (John 15:5)
The starting point of real change isn't more effort.
It's recognizing that effort alone was never going to be enough.
Here's what brain science broadly observes about habits.
Repeated thoughts and actions tend to strengthen neural pathways — patterns the brain runs more automatically over time.
Neuroscientists sometimes summarize this as "neurons that fire together, wire together."
The brain also retains a capacity to form new pathways throughout life — often called neuroplasticity.
Important caveat: this research describes general tendencies, not a precise formula, and much of it is still being studied.
But the broad picture is suggestive: what you repeatedly dwell on shapes what becomes automatic in you.
Repeated thoughts and actions tend to strengthen neural pathways — patterns the brain runs more automatically over time.
Neuroscientists sometimes summarize this as "neurons that fire together, wire together."
The brain also retains a capacity to form new pathways throughout life — often called neuroplasticity.
Important caveat: this research describes general tendencies, not a precise formula, and much of it is still being studied.
But the broad picture is suggestive: what you repeatedly dwell on shapes what becomes automatic in you.
🧵 𝗥𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗻 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀: 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗟𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗿𝗺𝘆 𝗦𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗡𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀
In 2015 the Army War College published 𝘓𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘖𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 — a candid look at how overwhelming requirements force officers into routine dishonesty and ethical fading.
Decades earlier, Adm. Hyman G. Rickover built the nuclear Navy on one uncompromising principle: face hard realities.
This thread breaks down his key lessons on truth, responsibility, and bureaucracy — 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆.
#ArmyLeadership #Rickover #WarriorEthos
In 2015 the Army War College published 𝘓𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘖𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 — a candid look at how overwhelming requirements force officers into routine dishonesty and ethical fading.
Decades earlier, Adm. Hyman G. Rickover built the nuclear Navy on one uncompromising principle: face hard realities.
This thread breaks down his key lessons on truth, responsibility, and bureaucracy — 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆.
#ArmyLeadership #Rickover #WarriorEthos
2/7
“𝗙𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀.”
One of Rickover’s core management rules for the nuclear program.
In today’s Army we live by metrics, checklists, and “check the block.” Too often we report what higher wants to hear rather than what is.
𝗥𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀. The nuclear Navy succeeded because problems were surfaced early — not hidden until they became disasters.
We need that same discipline now.
“𝗙𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀.”
One of Rickover’s core management rules for the nuclear program.
In today’s Army we live by metrics, checklists, and “check the block.” Too often we report what higher wants to hear rather than what is.
𝗥𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀. The nuclear Navy succeeded because problems were surfaced early — not hidden until they became disasters.
We need that same discipline now.
3/7
𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘁 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗬𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 (𝗞𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗢𝘄𝗻 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱)
“Although it is not easy to admit what a person once thought correct now appears to be wrong, one must discipline himself to face the facts objectively and make the necessary changes — regardless of the consequences to himself.
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦… 𝘏𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦, 𝘪𝘯 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵, 𝘵𝘰 ‘𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥’ 𝘪𝘧 𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘺.”
-𝘈𝘥𝘮. 𝘙𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳
Leaders must model this. How many failing programs, requirements, or policies do we keep alive because someone’s ego or slide deck depends on it? ...umm IVAS??
𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘁 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗬𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 (𝗞𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗢𝘄𝗻 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱)
“Although it is not easy to admit what a person once thought correct now appears to be wrong, one must discipline himself to face the facts objectively and make the necessary changes — regardless of the consequences to himself.
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦… 𝘏𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦, 𝘪𝘯 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵, 𝘵𝘰 ‘𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥’ 𝘪𝘧 𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘺.”
-𝘈𝘥𝘮. 𝘙𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳
Leaders must model this. How many failing programs, requirements, or policies do we keep alive because someone’s ego or slide deck depends on it? ...umm IVAS??
@nasimishabnam is thoroughly confused.
This is like Islamic Iran which decimated Zoroastrianism & the Persian Empire, suddenly claiming the mantle of the Persian civilisation and ancient Zoroastrian settlements.
youtube.com/shorts/5TYiF9L…
This is like Islamic Iran which decimated Zoroastrianism & the Persian Empire, suddenly claiming the mantle of the Persian civilisation and ancient Zoroastrian settlements.
youtube.com/shorts/5TYiF9L…
The Muslims who wanted a seperate homeland Pakistan, carved out of Ma Bharat (Mother India)
* Took pride in their separateness from the majority Hindus of Bharat
* Changed their history and taught their children that they had nothing to do with the despicable Hindus.
* Took pride in their separateness from the majority Hindus of Bharat
* Changed their history and taught their children that they had nothing to do with the despicable Hindus.
* Denied against all reason and evidence that the vast majority of them were descended from Converted Hindu ancestors.
* So it is pathetic and laughable that THEY ARE NOW, SUDDENLY TRYING TO CLAIM descent from the forebears [Indus Valley/Mohenjo Daro/Rakigarhi) of the continuing
* So it is pathetic and laughable that THEY ARE NOW, SUDDENLY TRYING TO CLAIM descent from the forebears [Indus Valley/Mohenjo Daro/Rakigarhi) of the continuing
@JuanManuelDasso @RealTimeRating @edufeiok 1)
A principios del siglo XIX, Argentina tenía una población afrodescendiente considerable, especialmente en Buenos Aires y otras provincias. Según algunos censos de esa época, los afroargentinos y afrodescendientes llegaban a representar el 30% de la población de Buenos Aires en
A principios del siglo XIX, Argentina tenía una población afrodescendiente considerable, especialmente en Buenos Aires y otras provincias. Según algunos censos de esa época, los afroargentinos y afrodescendientes llegaban a representar el 30% de la población de Buenos Aires en
@JuanManuelDasso @RealTimeRating @edufeiok 2)
ciertos momentos, e incluso más en provincias como Córdoba o Santiago del Estero
Esto se debía en gran parte a la esclavitud, ya que muchos habían sido traídos como esclavizados durante la época colonial para trabajar en el servicio doméstico, la agricultura y oficios urbanos
ciertos momentos, e incluso más en provincias como Córdoba o Santiago del Estero
Esto se debía en gran parte a la esclavitud, ya que muchos habían sido traídos como esclavizados durante la época colonial para trabajar en el servicio doméstico, la agricultura y oficios urbanos
@JuanManuelDasso @RealTimeRating @edufeiok 3)
Esa población disminuyó drásticamente a lo largo del siglo XIX por varias razones:
Guerras: muchos afroargentinos fueron reclutados como soldados (incluso durante las guerras de independencia y la Guerra del Paraguay), y sufrieron bajas desproporcionadas.
Esa población disminuyó drásticamente a lo largo del siglo XIX por varias razones:
Guerras: muchos afroargentinos fueron reclutados como soldados (incluso durante las guerras de independencia y la Guerra del Paraguay), y sufrieron bajas desproporcionadas.
They Opposed It, and History Forgot (1/4)
Opening
There's a familiar narrative: Jews in Arab lands waited for Zionism, welcomed it joyfully, and fled to Israel at the first opportunity. That narrative is convenient. It's also, for the most part, not true.
Jewish leaders in Iraq, in Egypt, and elsewhere — rabbis, lawyers, philanthropists — opposed Zionism actively, publicly, and at times with remarkable courage. They didn't do this out of betrayal of the Jewish people. They did it out of a deep conviction that their home already existed — and that it was in Baghdad, in Cairo, not in Palestine.
First Figure: Menachem Saleh Daniel
[Image: Menachem Saleh Daniel]
On September 8, 1922, Menachem Saleh Daniel — Iraq's first Jewish senator, the wealthiest man among Iraqi Jews, the man who hosted King Faisal I in his own home when the king's palace was destroyed by flooding — sat down and wrote a letter to the secretary of the Zionist Organization in London.
He didn't write in anger. He wrote with great respect, almost apologetically: he began by expressing his admiration for their noble ideal. Then came the "but." In Iraq, he explained, Zionism was not an entirely ideal matter — it represented a problem, with aspects requiring careful consideration, circumstances that no European Jewish community faced. In all Arab lands, he warned, the Zionist movement was seen as a serious threat to Arab national life.
This wasn't a theoretical position. Daniel knew exactly what he was talking about: Jews had lived in Iraq for some 3,500 years. They would not emigrate, he argued, unless forced to — and if forced, it would be the fault of government policy, not genuine desire.
His son, Ezra Daniel, inherited his seat in the Senate — and was the only one among Iraq's Jewish community leaders who spoke out openly, in his Senate speeches, against the government's discriminatory policies. His speeches weren't published in the press. They were echoed by word of mouth, precisely because they came from someone who wasn't a Zionist.
According to the Iraqi historian Nabil al-Rubaie, the graves of Menachem and Ezra Daniel in the city of Kifl were removed.
Opening
There's a familiar narrative: Jews in Arab lands waited for Zionism, welcomed it joyfully, and fled to Israel at the first opportunity. That narrative is convenient. It's also, for the most part, not true.
Jewish leaders in Iraq, in Egypt, and elsewhere — rabbis, lawyers, philanthropists — opposed Zionism actively, publicly, and at times with remarkable courage. They didn't do this out of betrayal of the Jewish people. They did it out of a deep conviction that their home already existed — and that it was in Baghdad, in Cairo, not in Palestine.
First Figure: Menachem Saleh Daniel
[Image: Menachem Saleh Daniel]
On September 8, 1922, Menachem Saleh Daniel — Iraq's first Jewish senator, the wealthiest man among Iraqi Jews, the man who hosted King Faisal I in his own home when the king's palace was destroyed by flooding — sat down and wrote a letter to the secretary of the Zionist Organization in London.
He didn't write in anger. He wrote with great respect, almost apologetically: he began by expressing his admiration for their noble ideal. Then came the "but." In Iraq, he explained, Zionism was not an entirely ideal matter — it represented a problem, with aspects requiring careful consideration, circumstances that no European Jewish community faced. In all Arab lands, he warned, the Zionist movement was seen as a serious threat to Arab national life.
This wasn't a theoretical position. Daniel knew exactly what he was talking about: Jews had lived in Iraq for some 3,500 years. They would not emigrate, he argued, unless forced to — and if forced, it would be the fault of government policy, not genuine desire.
His son, Ezra Daniel, inherited his seat in the Senate — and was the only one among Iraq's Jewish community leaders who spoke out openly, in his Senate speeches, against the government's discriminatory policies. His speeches weren't published in the press. They were echoed by word of mouth, precisely because they came from someone who wasn't a Zionist.
According to the Iraqi historian Nabil al-Rubaie, the graves of Menachem and Ezra Daniel in the city of Kifl were removed.
Second Figure: Yosef al-Kabir (2/4)
Yosef al-Kabir was no ordinary lawyer. He was deputy chairman of the Iraqi Bar Association — an unprecedented achievement for a member of the Jewish minority at the time — and a member of the team of jurists who drafted independent Iraq's constitution in the 1920s. His brother, Ibrahim al-Kabir, served as deputy director-general of the Iraqi Ministry of Finance.
On November 5, 1938, al-Kabir published a letter in the Iraq Times, Baghdad's leading English-language newspaper. He didn't write as an enemy of Zionism out of hatred — he wrote as a lawyer examining the problem closely. The Balfour Declaration, he argued, had attempted to solve a European problem — and would remain one, in both its origin and the scope of its impact. He warned that the Declaration was a dangerous formula for political acrobatics, built on a partnership that could not actually be realized.
This wasn't the writing of an isolated man. A fully independent, secular Iraqi-Arab source, published decades later by a researcher with no Jewish affiliation, quoted this very letter precisely — evidence that this position was etched into Iraqi historical memory itself, not only in Jewish sources.
Two years later, in 1941, when the Farhud pogrom struck Baghdad, al-Kabir did not stand aside. He served on the official commission of inquiry, and insisted that the violence had not been a spontaneous mob outburst — it had been an organized plan, led by pro-Nazi figures within the government, headed by Minister of Information Yunis al-Sabawi.
Al-Kabir believed the Jews' future lay in equal citizenship in Iraq — "sons of the faith of Moses," not a separate people. Only in his later years, as discriminatory legislation tightened its grip, did he come to understand that this vision had failed. He emigrated to London, where he continued working for the rights of Iraqi Jews who had been forced to leave everything behind.
Yosef al-Kabir was no ordinary lawyer. He was deputy chairman of the Iraqi Bar Association — an unprecedented achievement for a member of the Jewish minority at the time — and a member of the team of jurists who drafted independent Iraq's constitution in the 1920s. His brother, Ibrahim al-Kabir, served as deputy director-general of the Iraqi Ministry of Finance.
On November 5, 1938, al-Kabir published a letter in the Iraq Times, Baghdad's leading English-language newspaper. He didn't write as an enemy of Zionism out of hatred — he wrote as a lawyer examining the problem closely. The Balfour Declaration, he argued, had attempted to solve a European problem — and would remain one, in both its origin and the scope of its impact. He warned that the Declaration was a dangerous formula for political acrobatics, built on a partnership that could not actually be realized.
This wasn't the writing of an isolated man. A fully independent, secular Iraqi-Arab source, published decades later by a researcher with no Jewish affiliation, quoted this very letter precisely — evidence that this position was etched into Iraqi historical memory itself, not only in Jewish sources.
Two years later, in 1941, when the Farhud pogrom struck Baghdad, al-Kabir did not stand aside. He served on the official commission of inquiry, and insisted that the violence had not been a spontaneous mob outburst — it had been an organized plan, led by pro-Nazi figures within the government, headed by Minister of Information Yunis al-Sabawi.
Al-Kabir believed the Jews' future lay in equal citizenship in Iraq — "sons of the faith of Moses," not a separate people. Only in his later years, as discriminatory legislation tightened its grip, did he come to understand that this vision had failed. He emigrated to London, where he continued working for the rights of Iraqi Jews who had been forced to leave everything behind.
Third Figure: Chaim Nahum Effendi — A Leader Between Two Pressures (3/4)
[Image: Chaim Nahum Effendi]
Not all opposition looked the same. Chaim Nahum Effendi represents an entirely different kind of standing firm — cautious, sophisticated, not always heroic, but real.
Born in Turkey, a descendant of Spanish exiles, Nahum served as Chacham Bashi (chief rabbi) of the entire Ottoman Empire, and then, from 1925, as chief rabbi of Egyptian Jewry. He was an extraordinarily prolific scholar: he wrote a book on Babylonian Jewry, a book on Karaite Judaism, and even translated into French every Ottoman decree sent to Egypt over nearly 400 years. He was a familiar presence at the courts of two Egyptian kings and served in the Egyptian Senate.
When the War of Independence broke out in 1948, Nahum found himself caught between two impossible pressures. The Egyptian government demanded he publicly denounce Zionism — and he complied, but with notable caution: the "condemnation" he issued was described at the time as weak. At the same time, when that same government demanded he add a prayer for Egypt's victory in the war to synagogue services, he refused.
This was a delicate, deliberate balance: giving the government the minimum it demanded, without mobilizing religion itself for a war that wasn't his own.
Nahum was not a man of revolution. He was a man trying to keep an entire community alive one more day, one more year — hundreds of Jews arrested and interrogated for "Zionist activity," businesses seized, bank accounts frozen. At age 78, he lost his eyesight. He died in 1960, after 35 years in office.
Not everyone who resisted did so loudly. Some did it through calculated silence that couldn't easily be read — one refusal, one compliance, a hundred small choices that determined where the line was drawn.
[Image: Chaim Nahum Effendi]
Not all opposition looked the same. Chaim Nahum Effendi represents an entirely different kind of standing firm — cautious, sophisticated, not always heroic, but real.
Born in Turkey, a descendant of Spanish exiles, Nahum served as Chacham Bashi (chief rabbi) of the entire Ottoman Empire, and then, from 1925, as chief rabbi of Egyptian Jewry. He was an extraordinarily prolific scholar: he wrote a book on Babylonian Jewry, a book on Karaite Judaism, and even translated into French every Ottoman decree sent to Egypt over nearly 400 years. He was a familiar presence at the courts of two Egyptian kings and served in the Egyptian Senate.
When the War of Independence broke out in 1948, Nahum found himself caught between two impossible pressures. The Egyptian government demanded he publicly denounce Zionism — and he complied, but with notable caution: the "condemnation" he issued was described at the time as weak. At the same time, when that same government demanded he add a prayer for Egypt's victory in the war to synagogue services, he refused.
This was a delicate, deliberate balance: giving the government the minimum it demanded, without mobilizing religion itself for a war that wasn't his own.
Nahum was not a man of revolution. He was a man trying to keep an entire community alive one more day, one more year — hundreds of Jews arrested and interrogated for "Zionist activity," businesses seized, bank accounts frozen. At age 78, he lost his eyesight. He died in 1960, after 35 years in office.
Not everyone who resisted did so loudly. Some did it through calculated silence that couldn't easily be read — one refusal, one compliance, a hundred small choices that determined where the line was drawn.
7 Preguntas Sexys Para Llevarla a la Cama
(La mayoría de los hombres tienen demasiado miedo para hacer estas)
HILO 🧵
(La mayoría de los hombres tienen demasiado miedo para hacer estas)
HILO 🧵
1. “Sé honesto… ¿qué tan excitado estás en este momento?”
La obliga a reconocer su propia excitación. En el momento en que lo admite, su cuerpo la sigue. Muy poderoso al principio de la seducción.
La obliga a reconocer su propia excitación. En el momento en que lo admite, su cuerpo la sigue. Muy poderoso al principio de la seducción.
2. “¿Cuál es el pensamiento más sucio que has tenido sobre mí?”
Este bypassa la charla trivial y va directo a sus fantasías. Espera que se ponga tímida… y luego extremadamente honesta.
Este bypassa la charla trivial y va directo a sus fantasías. Espera que se ponga tímida… y luego extremadamente honesta.
🚨 Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan sharply refuses to stay her ruling dismantling DHS's expanded SAVE system, leaving the agency caught between two directly conflicting federal court orders after a Florida judge ordered the same features restored.
The dispute centers on DHS's expanded SAVE system, which let states use Social Security numbers and bulk searches to verify citizenship and immigration status for voter rolls and certain other lawful purposes. Judge Sooknanan ruled those changes violated federal law.
But Florida had already settled a separate lawsuit with DHS requiring those same SAVE features. After DHS disabled them to comply with Judge Sooknanan's ruling, a federal judge in Florida ordered the agency to restore them, creating a direct conflict between two federal courts.
Communiqué du collectif La parole accueillie, suite aux révélations par I'AFP des accusations de violences sexuelles commises par l'archevêque de Rabat, sur plusieurs femmes. 1/6
Notre collectif croit les victimes et les soutient. Nous déplorons la minimisation des accusations dans le communiqué du cardinal. Le choix des mots est important : les victimes parlent d'agressions sexuelles aggravées et de harcèlement sexuel aggravé. 2/6
Nous prenons au mot les déclarations du pape Léon pour la transparence et la vérité : "La communauté ecclésiale est appelée à répondre par l'écoute, la vérité, la justice, la réparation et un engagement toujours plus résolu en matière
de prévention et de culture du soin". 3/6
de prévention et de culture du soin". 3/6
Una anécdota de Phil Reagan.
Joaquín Ortega
Corría el año 1991 o 1992 (noviembre o diciembre) En el lobby del Hotel Caracas Hilton un autobús de peloteros descargaba jugadores en un maremagnum dominguero.
Joaquín Ortega
Corría el año 1991 o 1992 (noviembre o diciembre) En el lobby del Hotel Caracas Hilton un autobús de peloteros descargaba jugadores en un maremagnum dominguero.
Gente que intentaba alojarse versus familias buscando su Brunch; otros íbamos a la FIA de ese año, otros estacionaban para ir al Teresa Carreño.
De pronto, a lo lejos una joven madre intentaba empujar el coche con su bebé y un maletín gigante Samsonite con ruedas (el carry on no se había inventado todavía) Phil Reagan sentado en una de las butacas (a mano derecha) veía a la mujer en su predicamento.
実は「花の香りを嗅ぐと、脳が大きくなる」と分かってきました。記憶力を上げるには「脳トレ」や「運動」が必要だと思われがちです。でも京都大学が2024年、常識をひっくり返す発見をしました。「1ヶ月間バラの香りを嗅ぎ続けたら、記憶・情報処理に関わる脳の部位が大きくなった」その仕組みとは…
「花の香りで脳が大きくなる」という話をします。
2024年3月、京都大学と筑波大学が科学誌『Brain Research Bulletin』に発表した研究です。
まず、ずっと信じられてきた話から。
2024年3月、京都大学と筑波大学が科学誌『Brain Research Bulletin』に発表した研究です。
まず、ずっと信じられてきた話から。
記憶力を上げるには、脳に刺激を与えるしかない。だから「脳トレ」「読書」「運動」が注目されてきた。脳の外から鍛えるしかないと。
でも研究チームは、全く別のアプローチで脳を変えることに成功しました。
「香りを嗅ぐだけ」です。
実験はシンプルでした。
でも研究チームは、全く別のアプローチで脳を変えることに成功しました。
「香りを嗅ぐだけ」です。
実験はシンプルでした。
⚠️What does BlackRock own in Scotland?
Because the answer is more than most people realise.
Start with ports.
BlackRock holds a 30% stake in Peel Ports, which operates Scotland's west coast infrastructure through Clydeport, King George V Dock in Glasgow, Greenock Ocean Terminal, Hunterston, and Ardrossan. Scottish ports, American shareholders.
Because the answer is more than most people realise.
Start with ports.
BlackRock holds a 30% stake in Peel Ports, which operates Scotland's west coast infrastructure through Clydeport, King George V Dock in Glasgow, Greenock Ocean Terminal, Hunterston, and Ardrossan. Scottish ports, American shareholders.
Then wind energy.
BlackRock has direct exposure to Tormywheel wind farm in West Lothian and Glens of Foudland in Aberdeenshire.
It also holds a stake in Iberdrola, which owns Scottish Power, giving it indirect exposure to Whitelee, the UK's largest onshore wind farm.
BlackRock has direct exposure to Tormywheel wind farm in West Lothian and Glens of Foudland in Aberdeenshire.
It also holds a stake in Iberdrola, which owns Scottish Power, giving it indirect exposure to Whitelee, the UK's largest onshore wind farm.
Then the operational base.
Edinburgh has been BlackRock's first international office since 1995.
In 2025 it expanded to 140,000 sq ft at Dundas House, with a capacity for 1,400 staff.
It is now one of BlackRock's largest offices globally.
Edinburgh has been BlackRock's first international office since 1995.
In 2025 it expanded to 140,000 sq ft at Dundas House, with a capacity for 1,400 staff.
It is now one of BlackRock's largest offices globally.
🔥🔥It’s Game Over Omidyar! The destruction of capitalism is a part of a Pierre Omidyar package deal that includes censorship legislation targeting the speech of the people that could stop it!
They are also linked to the new surge of anti capitalist candidates! And equity and digital identity was part of the package deal too.
They claim that they want to “build more equitable economies”. Yeah socialism and communism..
♦️It’s no coincidence that both the inception of Omidyar’s censorship legislation forming org called “RESET” and “Reimagine Capitalism” programs started at the SAME EXACT TIME.
The first mention I saw of fighting Capitalism was not in 2020 like others think, but inside the Digital Deceit 2 which included Omidyar’s Ben Scott which set off their global censorship legislation work together with Carnegie Uk.
“We are experiencing the greatest concentration of wealth in capitalism in a
century, and it is built on the value of aggregated personal data. We need bold proposals for change.”
So, I did a little bit more looking around and found a DELETED Oct 17, 2018 Mike Kubzansky article on their new strategies. He was the managing partner of the Omidyar Network.
“First, we will focus on a core set of the pressing, difficult, and deeper issues that have emerged in society across four broad areas: reimagining capitalism; promoting the beneficial use of technology; building bridges in a pluralistic world; and fostering individual capabilities and empowerment.”
Bridge Building 🤔
He also brought up GIIN which is the New Capitalism Project. And mentioned wanting to change the economies of the entire world. Hello Lex Luther.
“We will support efforts to build more equitable economies that rebalance the social contract among business, the state, and the individual.”
♦️Then Mike brought up making the rules of the Tech Bro world.
“Next, we will seek to promote the use of technology for beneficial purposes.
We will address RULES and norms and build resilience and capacity to address and manage the risks, unintended consequences, or unforeseen negative outcomes that new technologies may create.”
‼️Welcome to the beginning of Global Censorship laws and Anti Capitalism!
♦️And of course, equity came up in their new strategies too.
“Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, we will to continue to foster individuals’ capabilities. Strong, inclusive, and equitable societies exist only when individuals have the ability and opportunity to realize their full potential and are able to advocate for and drive their own empowerment.”
♦️ And we can’t forget the digital Id push.
“We were the first investor in MOSIP, a modular and
open-source identity platform that has worked with seven countries (and counting) to
implement a digital, foundational ID in a cost-effective way.”
♦️Here’s some of their partners for their anti capitalist efforts:
*Let me remind you that the Obama partnered More Perfect Union is pushing the communist left.
- More perfect union
- Tides
- Demos
- Center for Popular Democracy
- Center for American Progress
- Working families org
- GIIN – New Capitalism Project
- Brookings
- Main steeet alliance
- Reuters
- Roosevelt
- Groundwork action (Arabella sixteen thirty fund)
- Horizon project
- Community Change Action
- Poynter
- Swiss Philanthropy FNDN
- Windward fund
- Share action - global
- Novato - GLOBAL
- Economic Change Unit - EU
- State - Global
- Plus tons more
♦️Also working with Omidyar on Reimagine Capitalism is Hewlett Foundation and it’s Larry Kramer. This was for destroying neoliberalism (capitalism) at universities.
When Kramer left, he said he was talking the work to the London School of Economics.👀
First Grants from Hewlett Fndn & Omidyar to fund centers around the world:
- Harvard University
- Howard Univ
- Johns Hopkins Univ
- MIT
- Santa Fe Institute
- Ford
- Open Society
Sources and much more info to follow.
They are also linked to the new surge of anti capitalist candidates! And equity and digital identity was part of the package deal too.
They claim that they want to “build more equitable economies”. Yeah socialism and communism..
♦️It’s no coincidence that both the inception of Omidyar’s censorship legislation forming org called “RESET” and “Reimagine Capitalism” programs started at the SAME EXACT TIME.
The first mention I saw of fighting Capitalism was not in 2020 like others think, but inside the Digital Deceit 2 which included Omidyar’s Ben Scott which set off their global censorship legislation work together with Carnegie Uk.
“We are experiencing the greatest concentration of wealth in capitalism in a
century, and it is built on the value of aggregated personal data. We need bold proposals for change.”
So, I did a little bit more looking around and found a DELETED Oct 17, 2018 Mike Kubzansky article on their new strategies. He was the managing partner of the Omidyar Network.
“First, we will focus on a core set of the pressing, difficult, and deeper issues that have emerged in society across four broad areas: reimagining capitalism; promoting the beneficial use of technology; building bridges in a pluralistic world; and fostering individual capabilities and empowerment.”
Bridge Building 🤔
He also brought up GIIN which is the New Capitalism Project. And mentioned wanting to change the economies of the entire world. Hello Lex Luther.
“We will support efforts to build more equitable economies that rebalance the social contract among business, the state, and the individual.”
♦️Then Mike brought up making the rules of the Tech Bro world.
“Next, we will seek to promote the use of technology for beneficial purposes.
We will address RULES and norms and build resilience and capacity to address and manage the risks, unintended consequences, or unforeseen negative outcomes that new technologies may create.”
‼️Welcome to the beginning of Global Censorship laws and Anti Capitalism!
♦️And of course, equity came up in their new strategies too.
“Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, we will to continue to foster individuals’ capabilities. Strong, inclusive, and equitable societies exist only when individuals have the ability and opportunity to realize their full potential and are able to advocate for and drive their own empowerment.”
♦️ And we can’t forget the digital Id push.
“We were the first investor in MOSIP, a modular and
open-source identity platform that has worked with seven countries (and counting) to
implement a digital, foundational ID in a cost-effective way.”
♦️Here’s some of their partners for their anti capitalist efforts:
*Let me remind you that the Obama partnered More Perfect Union is pushing the communist left.
- More perfect union
- Tides
- Demos
- Center for Popular Democracy
- Center for American Progress
- Working families org
- GIIN – New Capitalism Project
- Brookings
- Main steeet alliance
- Reuters
- Roosevelt
- Groundwork action (Arabella sixteen thirty fund)
- Horizon project
- Community Change Action
- Poynter
- Swiss Philanthropy FNDN
- Windward fund
- Share action - global
- Novato - GLOBAL
- Economic Change Unit - EU
- State - Global
- Plus tons more
♦️Also working with Omidyar on Reimagine Capitalism is Hewlett Foundation and it’s Larry Kramer. This was for destroying neoliberalism (capitalism) at universities.
When Kramer left, he said he was talking the work to the London School of Economics.👀
First Grants from Hewlett Fndn & Omidyar to fund centers around the world:
- Harvard University
- Howard Univ
- Johns Hopkins Univ
- MIT
- Santa Fe Institute
- Ford
- Open Society
Sources and much more info to follow.
Forword:
The DELETED web page was the holy grail and I found this today. So ruminating on things isn’t such a bad idea.
Also, @CCDHWatch showed me another web page a couple of days ago. I said the reason you are sharing this is not why it’s important. So thanks to him, I had a new area of interest to investigate. The relationship between Omidyars anti capitalism and censorship.
Who better to stop communism and all of Omidyar’s other plans, but republicans. The obvious targets of his censorship.
The DELETED web page was the holy grail and I found this today. So ruminating on things isn’t such a bad idea.
Also, @CCDHWatch showed me another web page a couple of days ago. I said the reason you are sharing this is not why it’s important. So thanks to him, I had a new area of interest to investigate. The relationship between Omidyars anti capitalism and censorship.
Who better to stop communism and all of Omidyar’s other plans, but republicans. The obvious targets of his censorship.
🔥This webpage was deleted for a good reason. It outlines Lex Luther’s, er I mean Omidyar’s plans. This covers just about everything so I’ll provide a handful of juicy quotes.
This includes censorship, digital identity, equity, and anti capitalism.
♦️A New Approach for a New Frontier
October 17, 2018
By: Mike Kubzansky Managing Partner
“We will focus on a core set of the pressing, difficult, and deeper issues that have emerged in society across four broad areas: reimagining capitalism; promoting the beneficial use of technology; building bridges in a pluralistic world; and fostering individual capabilities and empowerment.”
“First, we’ll seek to reimagine capitalism.
Capitalism and markets remain the best option we know to deliver broad benefits to individuals and to society, but without the right guardrails in place, they produce serious inequities and profound negative consequences well beyond the economic realm alone. We will support efforts to build more equitable economies that rebalance the social contract among business, the state, and the individual.”
“Second, we will seek to promote the use of technology for beneficial purposes.
We will support positive efforts for technology to improve societal outcomes, to enable people to assert their identities online, claim their land rights, and improve their educational outcomes. We also will work to ensure that the fundamental drivers of responsible technological innovation are human well-being and respect for individual liberty.
We will address rules and norms and build resilience and capacity to address and manage the risks, unintended consequences, or unforeseen negative outcomes that new technologies may create.”
“Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, we will to continue to foster individuals’ capabilities.
Strong, inclusive, and equitable societies exist only when individuals have the ability and opportunity to realize their full potential and are able to advocate for and drive their own empowerment.”
“Similarly, we will maintain the Digital Identity initiative’s work to support innovative companies, inform policies, engage with governments, and promote technologies that establish privacy safeguards around the trails left by one’s interaction in the digital world.”
Read more at the link.👇🏻
archive.is/ZD7Di
This includes censorship, digital identity, equity, and anti capitalism.
♦️A New Approach for a New Frontier
October 17, 2018
By: Mike Kubzansky Managing Partner
“We will focus on a core set of the pressing, difficult, and deeper issues that have emerged in society across four broad areas: reimagining capitalism; promoting the beneficial use of technology; building bridges in a pluralistic world; and fostering individual capabilities and empowerment.”
“First, we’ll seek to reimagine capitalism.
Capitalism and markets remain the best option we know to deliver broad benefits to individuals and to society, but without the right guardrails in place, they produce serious inequities and profound negative consequences well beyond the economic realm alone. We will support efforts to build more equitable economies that rebalance the social contract among business, the state, and the individual.”
“Second, we will seek to promote the use of technology for beneficial purposes.
We will support positive efforts for technology to improve societal outcomes, to enable people to assert their identities online, claim their land rights, and improve their educational outcomes. We also will work to ensure that the fundamental drivers of responsible technological innovation are human well-being and respect for individual liberty.
We will address rules and norms and build resilience and capacity to address and manage the risks, unintended consequences, or unforeseen negative outcomes that new technologies may create.”
“Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, we will to continue to foster individuals’ capabilities.
Strong, inclusive, and equitable societies exist only when individuals have the ability and opportunity to realize their full potential and are able to advocate for and drive their own empowerment.”
“Similarly, we will maintain the Digital Identity initiative’s work to support innovative companies, inform policies, engage with governments, and promote technologies that establish privacy safeguards around the trails left by one’s interaction in the digital world.”
Read more at the link.👇🏻
archive.is/ZD7Di
During @SenMcConnell's ongoing health crisis, his wife, former Transportation Secretary @ElaineChao, was meeting with CCP officials in China.
Her reasoning for not returning sooner? “The Senator’s health did not warrant an immediate return to the U.S.”
🧵
Her reasoning for not returning sooner? “The Senator’s health did not warrant an immediate return to the U.S.”
🧵
Who did Chao meet with during her June trip? Chinese state news & university records indicate three public meetings:
• 6/12: Shanghai Jiao Tong University – an institution that boasts a hall named after her late mother & houses a military-tied naval architecture program.
• 6/16: Wu Ken, President of Chinese People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs (CPIFA) - a designated “United Front” group by Congress.
• 6/17: Chinese Vice President Han Zheng – recently served on the Politburo Standing Committee
While on @SeanStations I discussed this with @jasoninthehouse. 👇
• 6/12: Shanghai Jiao Tong University – an institution that boasts a hall named after her late mother & houses a military-tied naval architecture program.
• 6/16: Wu Ken, President of Chinese People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs (CPIFA) - a designated “United Front” group by Congress.
• 6/17: Chinese Vice President Han Zheng – recently served on the Politburo Standing Committee
While on @SeanStations I discussed this with @jasoninthehouse. 👇
This news isn’t shocking to us at the @Govt_Acct_Inst. I documented the McConnell-Chao family’s ties to Beijing in my 2018 book 'Secret Empires.'
Foremost Group, owned by Chao’s family, has received CCP funding since McConnell, Chao, and her father met with the China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) in 1993.
Foremost Group, owned by Chao’s family, has received CCP funding since McConnell, Chao, and her father met with the China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) in 1993.
