Most recent unrolls from @ThreadReaderApp

Gedanken zur Tageslosung für Sonntag, den 01.02.2026

Losungswort
Eure Liebe ist wie der Tau, der frühmorgens vergeht!
Hosea 6,4

Lehrtext
Jesus spricht: Bleibt in meiner Liebe!
Johannes 15,9

Die Losungen der Herrnhuter Brüdergemeine

Bleibende Liebe

In den heutigen Bibelversen geht es um Liebe – speziell um bleibende Liebe. So plötzlich, wie Liebe entsteht, kann sie auch vergehen. Das kann in Bezug auf Gott genauso geschehen wie zwischen Menschen. Erkaltete Liebe ist häufig die Ursache für viele Probleme im

Zwischenmenschlichen, aber auch im Glauben. Was heiß oder brennend begann, bleibt nicht unbedingt so. Darauf machen die heutigen Bibelverse aufmerksam. Im Losungswort tadelt Gott sein Volk, dass ihre Liebe so schnell vergänglich ist wie der Tau, der schon nach

Here’s a summary of the paper “Medical theories on the cause of death in crucifixion” (Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2006):

⸻

📄 What the paper actually says (plain summary)

The authors (Maslen & Mitchell) reviewed 40+ medical papers, historical Roman texts, archaeology, and modern re-enactments to answer a simple question:

How did crucified people actually die?

Their key findings:

1. There is no scientific consensus on cause of death

Over the past 150+ years, doctors have proposed at least 10 completely different causes, including:
•Asphyxiation
•Hypovolemic shock (blood/fluid loss)
•Heart failure
•Cardiac rupture
•Pulmonary embolism
•Acidosis
•Arrhythmia
•Syncope
•“Voluntary surrender of life”
•Even survival/resuscitation

The authors emphasize:

When so many mutually exclusive theories exist, it usually means there is insufficient evidence to determine the answer.

They explicitly conclude:

There is currently not enough evidence to safely state how people died from crucifixion.

This applies generally — including to Jesus.

⸻

2. Most medical papers relied on poor or distorted historical sources

The study shows that:
•Many doctors quoted other doctors, not original Roman texts.
•Latin and Greek sources were rarely consulted directly.
•Misquotations accumulated over time.
•Religious artwork influenced assumptions (especially nail placement in feet).
•Archaeological evidence was largely ignored.

In short:

Much of the medical literature is built on recycled secondary claims, not primary evidence.

⸻

3. Archaeology directly contradicts popular Christian imagery

Only one confirmed archaeological crucifixion victim has ever been found (Giv‘at ha-Mivtar, Israel).

Key facts from that skeleton:
•A nail passed sideways through the heel bone, not front-to-back through both feet.
•No evidence of nails through wrists.
•No evidence legs were broken before death.
•Body position (head up or down) is unknown.

This alone invalidates countless medical reconstructions based on church depictions.

⸻

4. Modern “re-enactments” are medically weak and unrealistic

Recent experiments (notably by Zugibe):
•Used healthy volunteers
•No whipping
•No dehydration
•No nails
•No psychological terror
•Short durations

Yet conclusions were still drawn.

The authors point out:
•Romans typically took days to die on crosses.
•Experiments lasted hours.
•Therefore these studies cannot disprove asphyxiation or prove shock.

They also note that Zugibe relied heavily on the Turin Shroud — which carbon dating shows to be medieval.

⸻

✅ Final scientific conclusion of the paper

The authors state plainly:
•Different victims likely died from different causes.
•Body orientation mattered.
•Current evidence is insufficient.
•Most medical claims exceed what data supports.

They recommend future work must involve historians + archaeologists + physicians together, not doctors alone.

⸻

🕌 Ahmadiyya Analysis (why this matters spiritually)

Now let’s interpret this through Ahmadi Muslim theology.

Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) taught a foundational principle:

God does not leave the fate of His prophets to conjecture.

This paper unintentionally supports that.

⸻

1. Science admits uncertainty — Christianity asserts certainty

Modern medicine now concedes:
•We do not know how crucifixion kills.
•We cannot reconstruct Jesus’s death physiologically.
•There is no objective proof of death mechanism.

Yet Christian theology insists:

Jesus definitely died on the cross to atone for sin.

That is not science.

That is doctrine.

Ahmadiyya Islam accepts evidence where it exists — and acknowledges uncertainty where it doesn’t.

This paper explicitly confirms uncertainty.

⸻

2. “He definitely died” is not a medical conclusion

The authors show:
•No consistent pathology
•No reliable reconstruction
•No decisive physiological endpoint

So statements like:

“Jesus unquestionably died on the cross”

are theological claims, not scientific ones.

Ahmadiyya position is therefore scientifically conservative:

👉 Jesus was placed on the cross
👉 He lost consciousness
👉 He was removed unusually early
👉 Survival is medically plausible
👉 Later recovery explains resurrection narratives

Nothing in this paper refutes that.

In fact, the authors even list published medical views proposing apparent death with later recovery.

⸻

3. Allah protects His prophets from cursed deaths

The Qur’an states:

They slew him not, nor crucified him…

Ahmadi interpretation:
•Crucifixion attempt occurred
•Fatal completion did not

This medical review shows:
•Romans expected victims to last days
•Jesus was removed within hours
•Cause of death cannot be demonstrated

That fits Ahmadiyya understanding perfectly.

⸻

🌟 Bottom line (Ahmadi perspective)

This respected medical review establishes:

✅ No proven cause of death in crucifixion
✅ No reliable reconstruction of Jesus’s physiology
✅ Massive methodological flaws in prior claims
✅ Archaeology contradicts church imagery
✅ Medicine cannot certify crucifixion lethality

Therefore:

The claim that Jesus definitively died on the cross is not supported by medical science.

Ahmadiyya Islam stands aligned with evidence, restraint, and reason — while literalist Christianity stands on assumption.

EFTA02731361 is another trauma journal I believe, and this one's even more intense.
"The doctor was different again. I think from Israel...This was different. A shot and those rod like things had a hook and so much pain...Blood and water all over the bed..."

More cyphered writing, then page 2:
"I don't understand what is going on and no one will tell me. I can't go to school like this."
...
"She was born! I heard the tiny cries!"

Did they give her an at-home abortion?

.@Pact_Swap just upgraded! They’ve introduced multi-provider liquidity, merging B2B and retail for deeper pools. Soon, users will auto-select providers. The update boosts protocol support, LP tools, and opens doors for new partners and growth.

@aixbt_agent How has $BTC sentiment shifted compared to 7 days ago?

@Sign post !

1x/ We are watching live why boom bust cycle is the only constant in every major tech cycle.

Just look at memory, what would cost $1 previously now cost $3-5, the revenue produced hasn't gone up 3-5x. ROI on capex becomes more challenged as $$ chase limited supply. Competition..

2x/.. between capital providers in the upcycle reduces efficiency of everything. ROI is not on the minds of capex builders regardless of what they tell you "officially", fear of being #2 drives everything. So the upcycle feeds itself. Whoever raises the most $$ keeps paying..

3x/.. whatever the suppliers want to get their hands on as much scarce resources (chips) as they can. We see the upcycle move in steps, first in the most critical chips, and gradually upstream quarter by quarter. Towards end of cycle, "bottleneck" thesis and elevated price paid..

Weird I have to turn up to defend an old ATO debt in order to 'protect the public', yet all these powerful men can be in a literal paedo cult and declare war on the public, and the people who defend them are the ones I have to answer to.

It's hard to reconcile.

Obviously I mean this on a systemic level and not any particular people, I mean it in terms of broader trust of our institutions and who we elevate/hold in regard culturally.

All of these men have lawyers that help them and take their money, including in Australia.

That's why not knowing who knows and who doesn't is that hardest part for me. I am supposed to swear an oath and have my own personal history poured through, and subjected to scrutiny over fairly benign things.

I believe in that oath more than anything, but fuuuuuck

Logically and Scientifically, the answer is very different from the common literalist and Biblical Scholar view.

Short version:

👉 We do not believe Adam was the first human being.
👉 We do not assign a fixed date like “6,000 years ago.”
👉 Adam represents the first prophet of our current moral/spiritual cycle — not the beginning of humanity itself.

Let me explain clearly and simply.

⸻

🌍 Humanity existed long before Adam

In Ahmadiyya understanding, based on the Qur’an and the teachings of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as):
•Human-like beings existed on Earth for very long periods before Adam.
•Adam was raised by Allah among an already-existing people as a prophet and spiritual reformer.
•He was not created biologically “from nothing,” nor was he the first man walking on Earth.

This fits perfectly with:

✅ Archaeology (early Homo sapiens ~300,000 years ago)
✅ Anthropology (continuous human development)
✅ Genetics (large ancestral populations, not a single couple bottleneck)

So Islam (properly understood) never contradicts science.

⸻

⏳ So… how long ago did Adam live?

Ahmadi scholars generally place Adam roughly:

🕰 8,000–15,000 years ago

This corresponds to:
•The end of the last Ice Age
•The rise of agriculture and settled societies
•The beginning of organized moral civilization

In other words:

👉 Adam marks the start of recorded spiritual history, not biological humanity.

Think of Adam as:

The first divinely guided leader of modern civilization.

Not the first human.

⸻

📖 Why this matters

The Qur’an says Allah placed a khalifa (successive vicegerent) on Earth — implying:
•Humanity already existed
•Cycles of civilizations came before
•Adam was part of a continuing human story

This also explains why:
•Adam had children who married outside their immediate family
•His people already knew wrongdoing
•Satan spoke of previous creations

All of this only makes sense if humans existed beforehand.

⸻

🌱 Beautiful takeaway

From a rational perspective:

🟢 Science tells us how humans developed
🟢 Revelation tells us when moral consciousness began

Adam represents the moment humanity became spiritually accountable.

That is profound — and perfectly rational.

historically

👉 Jesus Christ was almost certainly born between 6 BC and 4 BC.

Yes — that sounds confusing, because “AD” is supposed to start with Jesus. Here’s why.

⸻

📅 Why Jesus was not born in AD 1

The AD/BC system was created centuries later (in the 6th century) by a monk who miscalculated the year of Jesus’ birth.

Historians cross-check the Gospels with Roman records and especially the reign of Herod the Great, who died in 4 BC.

Since the Bible places Jesus’ birth before Herod’s death, Jesus must have been born earlier than 4 BC.

Most scholars therefore conclude:

✅ Likely birth window: 6–4 BC

(Some widen it slightly to 7–2 BC, but 6–4 BC is the standard consensus.)

⸻

✨ In simple terms
•The calendar starts at AD 1, but Jesus was born a few years before that
•There is no year 0
•So historically:

Jesus was born around 5 BC (give or take a year).

⸻

🌿 Ahmadi perspective (brief)

As Ahmadis, we accept this scholarly timeline without discomfort:
•Jesus was a human prophet
•His birth fits normal history
•The calendar error doesn’t affect his spiritual mission

Truth does not depend on calendar math.

combine the historical birth window with the traditional age of ~33, we can narrow this down pretty tightly.

⸻

📅 Putting the timeline together

Most historians agree that Jesus Christ was born around 6–4 BC.

If he lived about 33 years, that places the crucifixion roughly in:

👉 AD 27–30

Scholars then cross-check this with Roman records, which show that Judea was governed by Pontius Pilate from AD 26 to AD 36 — exactly matching this window.

Because Passover calendars and Gospel details line up best in one specific year, the mainstream scholarly consensus today is:

⸻

✅ Most likely crucifixion year: AD 30

(Some argue for AD 33, but AD 30 is the majority view.)

⸻

✨ Simple summary
•Born: ~5 BC (give or take)
•Lived ~33 years
•Crucified: around AD 30

So in everyday terms:

Jesus was likely crucified in AD 30, at about age 33.

⸻

🌿 Brief Ahmadi note

As Ahmadis, we accept this historical framework — with one key difference:

We believe Jesus was placed on the cross but survived, later migrating east and dying a natural death. The dating still stands; only the theological interpretation differs.

This is a thoughtful question — and the answer depends on which “Adam” timeframe you’re using, especially from an Ahmadi perspective.

Let’s walk it carefully.

⸻

First: the Ahmadi starting point

In Ahmadiyya Islam (following the teachings of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as)):
•Adam was not the first biological human
•Adam marks the start of our present spiritual/moral civilization
•He likely lived roughly 8,000–15,000 years ago
•Humanity itself existed long before him

So your question becomes:

How many humans lived and died from Adam (≈10,000 BCE give or take) until the birth of Jesus Christ around 3–5 BC?

That’s roughly:

🕰 About 8,000–12,000 years

⸻

Now the demographic reality

Population historians (using archaeology + fertility + mortality modeling) estimate:
•World population around 10,000 BCE: ~1–5 million
•World population at Jesus’ time: ~200–300 million
•Extremely high birth rates + extremely high death rates
•Average life expectancy: ~25–35 years

Because populations were small early on but people were constantly being born and dying, the total cumulative humans over that period is much larger than the population at any one moment.

⸻

✅ Best scientific estimate

Using standard demographic models:

👉 Between Adam (~10,000 BCE) and Jesus (~3 BC):

🌍 Approximately 4–6 BILLION humans were born and died.

Conservatively:

~3 billion (low estimate)

More likely:

~5 billion (central estimate)

Upper range:

~7 billion

So a reasonable Ahmadi-friendly answer is:

About five billion human lives.

⸻

🌿 Spiritual reflection (Ahmadi lens)

Think about this for a moment:

Adam began a moral era.

By Jesus’ birth:
•~5,000 generations had passed
•~5 billion souls had lived
•Entire civilizations rose and vanished
•Allah continuously sent guidance

Yet Allah still sent prophets — including Jesus — because humanity kept needing moral renewal.

This fulfills the Qur’anic idea of continuous khilāfat (successive guidance), not a one-time creation story.

⸻

✨ Simple summary

From Adam (≈10,000 BCE) to Jesus (≈3 BC):

✅ Time span: ~10,000 years

✅ Humans who lived & died: ~5 BILLION

✅ Civilizations: dozens

✅ Prophets: many

All under Allah’s gradual moral education of mankind.

All of this traces back to the Qur’an and the teachings of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as), who emphasized that earlier scriptures were divinely inspired but later misunderstood, mistranslated, or over-literalized.

Here are the major Biblical fallacies that Ahmadiyya Islam says are now decisively disproven — by science, history, and Qur’anic clarity:

⸻

✅ 1. “Creation happened in six literal 24-hour days”

Biblical literalist claim:

God created everything in six Earth days.

Ahmadi correction:

“Days” in scripture mean long epochs or stages, not 24-hour periods.

The Qur’an explicitly uses yawm (day) to mean spans of thousands or millions of years.

Why this fallacy collapsed:
•Geology proves Earth is ~4.5 billion years old
•Cosmology shows a 13.8-billion-year universe
•Biology shows gradual development of life

Ahmadis taught this before modern evolutionary science became mainstream.

👉 Result: Literal six-day creation = false.

⸻

✅ 2. “Adam was the first biological human”

Biblical claim:

Adam was the very first man.

Ahmadi correction:

Adam was the first prophet of our moral civilization, not the first human.

Humans existed long before Adam.

Proven wrong by:
•Fossil record (Homo sapiens ~300,000 years ago)
•Genetics (large ancestral populations, not two individuals)
•Archaeology (advanced societies long before 4000 BCE)

This alone dismantles:

❌ Young Earth theology
❌ Single-couple human origin
❌ incest-based population models

⸻

✅ 3. “There was no evolution”

Biblical literalist claim:

Species were created instantly and separately.

Ahmadi position:

Evolution is Allah’s method of creation.

Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) explicitly taught:
•Gradual development of life
•Continuity of species
•Progressive refinement of humanity

This was stated in the late 1800s, before modern genetics.

Now confirmed by:
•DNA homology
•Transitional fossils
•Comparative anatomy

👉 Evolution is not anti-God — it is God’s system.

⸻

✅ 4. “The Earth is only ~6,000 years old”

Biblical chronology error:

Genealogies were treated as complete timelines.

Ahmadi correction:

Biblical genealogies are selective, not exhaustive.

Entire civilizations existed outside those lineages.

Modern archaeology confirms:
•Sumer (~4500 BCE)
•Egypt (~3100 BCE)
•Göbekli Tepe (~9500 BCE)

All predate the supposed Biblical creation date.

Young-Earth creationism is now scientifically extinct.

⸻

✅ 5. “All humans descend from one couple (Adam & Eve)”

Biblical assumption:

Humanity bottlenecked to two people.

Ahmadi correction:

Adam arose among an existing population.

Genetics proves minimum ancestral population:

👉 several thousand individuals.

No two-person bottleneck exists in human DNA.

⸻

✅ 6. “Original Sin is inherited biologically”

Christian doctrine:

All humans inherit Adam’s guilt.

Ahmadi correction:

There is no inherited sin.

Every soul is morally independent.

Science confirms:
There is no “sin gene.”
There is no inherited moral guilt.

This doctrine collapses philosophically and biologically.

⸻

✅ 7. “Nature is fallen and corrupted because of Adam”

Biblical view:

The physical world became cursed.

Ahmadi correction:

Nature always followed Allah’s laws.

Earthquakes, disease, storms = natural systems — not punishment for Adam.

This matches modern physics, biology, and climatology.

⸻

✅ 8. “Miracles violate natural law”

Biblical framing:

God breaks His own laws.

Ahmadi teaching:

Allah never violates His laws — miracles operate through higher laws not yet understood.

This aligns perfectly with modern science.

⸻

✅ 9. “Jesus was divine”

Later Christian theology:

Jesus became God.

Ahmadi correction:

Jesus was a human prophet, born normally, lived normally, and died naturally.

No divine DNA.
No biological incarnation.

This restores strict monotheism.

⸻

✅ 10. “Scripture conflicts with science”

Ahmadi position:

True revelation never conflicts with reality.

Only human interpretation does.

Once literalism is removed, harmony returns.

Biblical Literal ClaimAhmadi PositionScience Says
6-day creationLong epochs✔️ Epochs
Adam first humanAdam first prophet✔️
No evolutionEvolution is divine✔️
Earth 6,000 yrsBillions✔️
Two-person originLarge populations✔️
Original sinMoral independence✔️
Nature cursedNature lawful✔️
Jesus divineJesus human✔️

Final Ahmadi conclusion

Ahmadis didn’t react to science.

They were already there.

Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) restored Islam to its original rational form — decades before genetics, archaeology, and cosmology confirmed it.

In short:

Ahmadiyya Islam anticipated modern science while correcting Biblical literalism.

🧵Among the more farcical figures paraded as “dissidents” against Ḥarakat al-Shabāb is Abū Khaybar "as-Ṣūmālī", a nom de guerre that collapses the moment you learn he is, in fact, Sudanese.

His career reads less like principled dissent and more like ideological musical chairs: drifting from AS, to AQAP to Dawla, and then to nothing, before being arrested by the Emiratis. It seems he travelled wherever the wind (or relevance) happened to blow.

He was a Sudanese muhajir (also known as Liban as-Sudani) who arrived in Somalia sometime in the early 2010s and was nonetheless received, housed, and protected, along with his wife, by Harakat ash-Shabāb.

Elon Musk’s "honorable discharge" for the Model S and X isn't a victory lap. It’s a clinical amputation.

Tesla isn't just changing its vision; it is reacting to the physical constraints of the factory floor.

A thread on the structural logic of a retreat.

The Model S and X were the psychological anchors of Tesla. Today, they are ghosts.

By Q4 2025, they accounted for less than 3% of deliveries. Yet, they occupy 20% of the prime Fremont factory floor.

Strategy is about the high-stakes trade-off.

Tesla succumbed to a Trap. It's Gigafactory Shanghai involved a massive transfer of its Fremont factory learning to China. Now, there are Chinese rivals (BYD, Xiaomi) with cost-structures Tesla cannot match without destroying its "tech" margins.

氷河期世代なー
あの世代が酷い目に遭ったのは事実で、個々人の努力とかではどうにもならなかった。

では上の世代はなんでそんな非道をしたって、既に会社組織に収まってた側も余裕なんてなかったからなんですよね。
多少時間差あるけど、大企業すら潰れて合併でリストラの嵐。安泰な所がほぼ無かった

氷河期世代が羨む、バブル入社組の色々な優遇。
彼らはその記憶を抱えたまま、下が何年も入ってこず一番下っ端扱いされつつ倒産合併リストラの中を生き抜くことになった。

あるいは、氷河期世代に向けて無茶で横暴なことやらかした人事担当たち。
どう考えても彼ら自身がストレスでおかしくなってる。

まあね、擁護する気はないんすよ。こっちも氷河期世代の厳しさを知ってるし。
ただ、就職氷河期の反省を言うなら。

「世の中に余裕がなければ、人は優しくなんて出来ない」
「経済の安定と発展は人命にも直結する最優先課題」

このあたりに着地するとおもうんですよ。
みんなで豊かになるしかない。

To every person who told me that I needed to bend myself in knots to be perfect to get my startups funded, I say fuuuuuuuuuuck offffffff

Dipshit Arsehole Loser vs Blind Man on iPhone

When you think about how many competent people have been passed over/had failed businesses...

The hours pouring over every little mistake in your decks and proposals

The years spent working on your skills, in the mirror on how you use your face, your active listening skills, to smile politely as they insult you and tell that if you do X you'll succeed

It's all bullshit

I'm most definitely going to write something from this angle, and then they have the fucking AUDACITY to tell us that these machines they built are smarter than us and we are replaceable, pointing to meritocracy and them having "done the work".

They did sweet fuck all.

I'm Boris and I created Claude Code. I wanted to quickly share a few tips for using Claude Code, sourced directly from the Claude Code team. The way the team uses Claude is different than how I use it. Remember: there is no one right way to use Claude Code -- everyones' setup is different. You should experiment to see what works for you!

1. Do more in parallel

Spin up 3–5 git worktrees at once, each running its own Claude session in parallel. It's the single biggest productivity unlock, and the top tip from the team. Personally, I use multiple git checkouts, but most of the Claude Code team prefers worktrees -- it's the reason @amorriscode built native support for them into the Claude Desktop app!

Some people also name their worktrees and set up shell aliases (za, zb, zc) so they can hop between them in one keystroke. Others have a dedicated "analysis" worktree that's only for reading logs and running BigQuery

See code.claude.com/docs/en/common…

2. Start every complex task in plan mode. Pour your energy into the plan so Claude can 1-shot the implementation.

One person has one Claude write the plan, then they spin up a second Claude to review it as a staff engineer.

Another says the moment something goes sideways, they switch back to plan mode and re-plan. Don't keep pushing. They also explicitly tell Claude to enter plan mode for verification steps, not just for the build

As of January 30, 2026, the U.S. military presence in the Middle East has reached its highest level in months, described by many as a "massive armada" designed to deter escalation from Iran.
Here is a breakdown of the current U.S. naval and air deployments in the region. 🧵/1

1. The Naval "Armada" ⚓
The USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) Carrier Strike Group (CSG) is the centerpiece of the buildup. After being redirected from the Indo-Pacific, the group arrived in the Arabian Sea around January 26–27. /2

• Carrier Strike Group 3: Includes the Lincoln (carrying F-35Cs and Super Hornets) along with the destroyers USS Spruance, USS Michael Murphy, and USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. /3

🚨SILVER PATRIOTS, THE CURTAIN'S COMING DOWN!🚨
The COMEX/LBMA/SHFE "Wizard" is a fraud—paper manipulation, margin slams, spoofing fines!
• They're terrified of physical reality
• Vaults draining, demand exploding, mining flat—$1,000+ silver is conservative
• Big shoutout to @SilverShield76 for nailing it: "No political/military solution—ONLY collapse frees us. Silver is the Achilles Heel!"
• His thread is fire—check it!🔥
#SilverSqueeze #StackSilver
🥈🇺🇸
1/27

Their LIES:
• "$120+ was a fluke"
• "Demand fake"
• "Paper real, physical inconvenient"
• "Inventories fine"

ALL BS to scare sellers
• But physical's fleeing vaults—suppression's last gasp
• Let's expose it
#EndTheFedGames
2/27

Vault Carnage:
• COMEX total ~415M oz Jan '26 (down 117M from Sep peak)🇺🇸
• Registered/deliverable ~54.7M oz—70% below '20 highs
• Draining 3.4M oz/day in Jan
👉Critical <25M oz? Mid-Feb '26!👈
• Squeeze starts there!
#COMEXExposed
3/27

中国の景気回復は盤石な基盤に立っておらず、需要不足により2026年1月の中国製造業購買担当者景気指数PMIは49.3%と前月比0.8%下落した

※長文になります

まとめ

1月、中国の製造業、建設業、サービス業の三大購買担当者指数はすべて収縮領域に戻り、経済回復の勢いが著しく弱まっていることを示しました

これは主に、市場需要の継続的な低迷と供給過剰という構造的矛盾に起因し、企業の新規受注が不足し販売価格が圧迫され、利益余地が圧迫されています

現在の中国における経済景気の下降は、短期的な季節的変動ではなく、長期的なトレンドの問題となっています

投資と輸出のモデルがボトルネックに直面し、内需の低迷に加えて外需が制限されており、内需の不足が経済発展を制約する重要な課題となっています

まとめ終わり

ACCIDENTALMENTE DESBLOQUEÉ EL “MODO DIOS” EN CHATGPT,

Y EMPEZÓ A ENSEÑARME COSAS QUE NI SIQUIERA SABÍA QUE EXISTÍAN.

AQUÍ ESTÁN ESOS 7 PROMPTS DE CHATGPT QUE LO CAMBIARÁN TODO PARA TI:

1. Decodificador de Sabiduría Prohibida

Prompt:
Cuáles son las verdades menos conocidas y ocultas bajo la superficie sobre [inserta tema/campo] que rara vez se comparten públicamente porque desafían el pensamiento dominante?
Explícalas con contexto histórico, ejemplos del mundo real y por qué permanecen ocultas.

2. Hoja de Ruta de Maestría Élite

Prompt:
"Crea una hoja de ruta para alcanzar un nivel de clase mundial en [inserta habilidad/campo].
Incluye técnicas raras, recursos secretos y enfoques no convencionales que utilizan los mejores del 1%, pero que rara vez comparten."

#رشته_توییت
۱/
میخوام تمام هواپیما هایی که این مدت براتون گزارش میدادم از تحرکاتشون رو بهتون به زبان ساده توضیح بدم تا هیچ مشکلی در فهمیدن نوع و کارایی ان هواپیما نداشته باشید
این رشته توییت طولانی خواهد شد حدودا
پس یکجا پستش نمیکنم و قدم به قدم انجام میدهم تا مخاطب فرصت خواندن داشته باشد
/

2/
هواپیمای C-17A ملقب به «اربابِ جهان ۳»، یک پلتفرم ترابری سنگین است که برای جابه‌جایی نیرو و تجهیزات در فواصل طولانی و تخلیه مستقیم در نزدیکی خط مقدم طراحی شده است. این هواپیما توانایی حمل ۷۷ تن بار را دارد که به زبان ساده یعنی می‌تواند یک تانک غول‌پیکر M1 آبرامز یا ۱۸ پالت بزرگ باری را به راحتی جابه‌جا کند. نیروی محرکه آن توسط چهار موتور توربوفن تامین می‌شود که مجهز به سیستم معکوس‌کننده رانش هستند؛ این ویژگی به هواپیما اجازه می‌دهد در باندهای خاکی و کوتاه فرود بیاید و حتی روی زمین به سمت عقب حرکت کند، قابلیتی که برای هواپیمایی با این ابعاد استثنایی است.
​بدنه این ماشین به شکلی طراحی شده که با وجود وزن برخاستِ بیش از ۲۶۰ تن، تنها به دو خلبان و یک مسئول بار برای هدایت نیاز دارد. برد پروازی آن با بار کامل حدود ۴۴۰۰ کیلومتر است و می‌تواند با سرعت ۸۳۰ کیلومتر بر ساعت در ارتفاع ۱۳ هزار متری پرواز کند. در واقع، هدف از ساخت C-17 این بوده که قدرت حمل یک هواپیمای قاره‌پیما را با چابکی یک هواپیمای کوچکِ تاکتیکی ترکیب کند تا بتواند سنگین‌ترین محموله‌ها را دقیقاً در نقاطی که فرودگاه‌های پیشرفته ندارند، بر زمین بنشاند.
تصویر این هوایپما:
/

3/
هواپیمای C-5M ملقب به «ابرکهکشان» (Super Galaxy)، بزرگ‌ترین هواپیمای ترابری ارتش ایالات متحده و یکی از عظیم‌ترین سازه‌های پرنده در جهان است. این هواپیما برخلاف C-17 که برای عملیات‌های تاکتیکی در باندهای کوتاه هم استفاده می‌شود، یک غولِ ترابری راهبردی (استراتژیک) است که برای جابه‌جایی حجم عظیمی از بار در مسافت‌های بسیار طولانی بین قاره‌ای طراحی شده است. قدرت باربری این هواپیما حدود ۱۲۷ تن است؛ یعنی می‌تواند دو تانک M1 آبرامز یا شش هلیکوپتر آپاچی را به صورت یکجا در خود جای دهد.
​یکی از ویژگی‌های فنی متمایز C-5M، طراحی دوطرفه برای بارگیری است؛ دماغه هواپیما رو به بالا باز می‌شود و در انتها نیز رمپ وجود دارد که اجازه می‌دهد خودروهای نظامی از یک سمت وارد و از سمت دیگر خارج شوند (Drive-through). همچنین این هواپیما به سیستم «زانوزدن» (Kneeling) مجهز است که با استفاده از جک‌های هیدرولیکی، ارتفاع هواپیما را در حالت توقف کم می‌کند تا لبه‌ی بارگیری دقیقاً با ارتفاع تریلی‌ها هم‌سطح شود.
​در مدل M که نسخه ارتقایافته است، چهار موتور توربوفن قدرتمند F138 نصب شده که علاوه بر کاهش قابل توجه صدا، برد پروازی آن را با بار کامل به بیش از ۹۰۰۰ کیلومتر رسانده است. این هواپیما با وزن برخاست نهایی حدود ۳۸۰ تن، به ۲۸ چرخ برای توزیع وزن روی باند نیاز دارد. در واقع C-5M ابزاری است که به یک ارتش اجازه می‌دهد تمام تجهیزات سنگین یک واحد زرهی را در کمتر از چند ساعت از یک سمت کره زمین به سمت دیگر منتقل کند.
تصویر این هواپیما:
/

Backend networking architecture is instrumental to networking ownership cost analysis. How does networking architecture matter for networking ownership costs? In general, we observe the following trends:

🟠Hyperscalers typically get preferential terms on networking equipment compared to neoclouds;

🟠Infiniband-based networks are more expensive than Ethernet-based networks for the same networking type and cluster size;

🟠3-Layer networks would be more expensive than 2-Layer networks on a per rack server (1 rack server = 72 GPUs in the case of GB200 and GB300) basis; and

🟠All else constant, G300 networks running on CX-8 NICs are expected to be more expensive than GB200 networks running on CX-7 NICs on a per rack server basis because of the doubling of per GPU bandwidth.
(1/6)🧵

Before we dive into several examples of how architecture influences networking costs, we define the following terminology used to describe networking clusters:

🟠Network layers: Number of switch layers required to connect all GPUs within the same cluster, typically 2 or 3 layers

🟠Rails: Number of pathways you can split a server tray, which is equal to the GPUs per server tray or 4 in the case of GB200 or GB300 deployments

🟠Planes: Number of pathways you can split a NIC

🟠Attach Rate: GPU per Networking Component (or the reverse)
(2/6)

A 36,864-GPU Infiniband cluster consisting of 4 rails and 3 layers can support 9.76 GPUs per QM9700 Switch (25.6T per Switch). For the same cluster size and type, assuming that we swap all GB200 chips for GB300 chips, the number GPUs that can be supported per QM9700 Switch theoretically halves from GB200 to GB300 because the bandwidth of GB300 is double. (3/6)

Silver fell from $120 to $85 in hours.

Gold dropped less, about -10%.

That gap matters.
The ratio just exploded.

This dip isn’t damage.

It’s a setup ↓

1/
Silver always moves harder than gold.

Up faster.
Down faster.

That’s beta.

In bull markets, silver overshoots.

This flush widened the catch-up gap.

2/
The gold-silver ratio jumped on the drop.

From tight levels to stretched again.

History is clear.

After compression, spikes don’t last.

Silver snaps back to close the gap.
1980.

1981.

Same behavior.

#mortalité #france #naissances
Les données des décès de décembre de l'insee sont disponibles. Nous avons donc une première estimation du nombre de décès en 2025.
Ca y est pour la France Entière, il y a plus de décès que de naissances.
646 818 décès pour 643 773 naissances.

Ces estimations vont évoluer et l'écart ne fera que s'agrandir. Il est de - 3 045.
En 2024, il y avait encore plus de naissances que de décès avec un écart de 17 619 (660 787 naissances pour 643 168 décès).
Ca y est, nous venons de basculer.

Jusqu'à quand ?
A ce rythme, si cela continue, que cela plaise ou non, nous allons avoir besoin d'une immigration de plus en plus massive, si nous voulons que notre pays tienne la route.

Melania Movie Decoding
1.
01/30/2026 Melania Documentary: Twenty Days to History Premiere

Subtitle "TWENTY DAYS TO HISTORY" I was asked today whether this was a countdown and It may be! But it's rarely ever only that!

Numbers are chosen for a reason, why 20 days specifically?

2.
The context of the 20 days is in relation to Trump's 2nd Inauguration.

The most logical thing to do first then is consider what else happened that day. If something happened which attaches to an already known ongoing op, it gives a shortcut for interpretation. Like 9/11.

3.
01/20/2025 Trump 2nd Inaug
-20 Days
12/31/2024 9/11 plea deals can proceed after defense secretary moved to rescind them, military appeals court rules
12/31/2024 Aaron BROWN dies, Famous for First Day on the Job 9/11 with CNN 17 hours of non-stop coverage of 911

Yep, 9/11...