Most recent unrolls from @ThreadReaderApp
Czym tu się podniecacie? Za "czasów Moskwy" byliśmy 10-ą gospodarką świata. Mieliśmy WŁASNY majątek narodowy : kopalnie, stocznie, banki, cukrownie, browary, huty...itp Co mamy dziś? Trzy narody do wyżywienia a za rogiem czekają kolejne🤦🤦🤬
A kto – z młodych wykształconych, z dużych miast – wie, że kiedyś w Polsce produkowano generatory elektryczne dla największych elektrowni?
Że produkowano turbiny o mocy 500 MW, — a przymierzano się do turbin 1500 MW?
Że produkowano turbiny o mocy 500 MW, — a przymierzano się do turbin 1500 MW?
Że polowa chińskich, indyjskich, indonezyjskich, greckich i tureckich, libijskich i irackich elektrowni — wyposażona była / jest nie w amerykańskie, czy niemieckie — a w polskie turbiny?
▶️ Die Partei sät schon lange Misstrauen gegen Wissenschaftler:
Rechte Influencer: ▶️ AfD-Vorfeld nutzt Wal für Propaganda gegen andere Parteien zum Stimmenfang und Installierung ihrer rechtsextremen Ideologie.
Die Emotionen sind ideal dafür.
👇👇👇
share.google/47HBY7yS1H1tnZ…
Rechte Influencer: ▶️ AfD-Vorfeld nutzt Wal für Propaganda gegen andere Parteien zum Stimmenfang und Installierung ihrer rechtsextremen Ideologie.
Die Emotionen sind ideal dafür.
👇👇👇
share.google/47HBY7yS1H1tnZ…
Ganz vorn dabei ist das rechtsradikale
‼️Compact-Magazin:
▶️ Sein „TV-Chef“ Paul Klemm bezeichnete das von manchen „Hope“ oder „Timmy“ genannte Tier in einem Youtube-Video als
▶️ „Symbol für eine Politik, die weder Hope noch ihr eigenes Volk zu retten in der Lage ist“.
‼️Compact-Magazin:
▶️ Sein „TV-Chef“ Paul Klemm bezeichnete das von manchen „Hope“ oder „Timmy“ genannte Tier in einem Youtube-Video als
▶️ „Symbol für eine Politik, die weder Hope noch ihr eigenes Volk zu retten in der Lage ist“.
Der am Montag veröffentlichte Film mit dem Titel
▶️ „Sie lassen den Wal verrecken!“ wurde bis Donnerstag mehr als 75.000 Mal abgespielt.
Das rechtsextreme Compact ließ in dem Film auch den mecklenburg-vorpommerischen AfD-Landtagsabgeordneten ▶️ Enrico Schult verkünden,
▶️ „Sie lassen den Wal verrecken!“ wurde bis Donnerstag mehr als 75.000 Mal abgespielt.
Das rechtsextreme Compact ließ in dem Film auch den mecklenburg-vorpommerischen AfD-Landtagsabgeordneten ▶️ Enrico Schult verkünden,
“#MovingMoviez?”
“#OssCars?”
“#StairyMovie?”
“#TheFlatRooms??”
📹🚎🪜🏢?
“#TheGnomeCopes?”
🏢🪜🧗?
#TruthWillOut!
#SystemsWillHeal!
#TurnToJesusChrist!!!
✝️🕊🤍
⛬
[ #Earthsflat ? ]
[ #TheGnomeWarps ? ]
[ #TheFlatGeneration ? ]
🏢⚖️▶✝️🤍🪜??youtube.com/shorts/uqH_FmA…
asmr o sumpin??
"#VisitOss?"
🧵2026.04.15 - Pam Hemphill Space
Title: DOJ moves to dismiss J6 convictions as if they never happened.
PamHemphill79 (04:10): Good evening, Marine.
Marine4America (04:12): Evening, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (04:14): It seems like nobody comes in until you pop in.
Marine4America (04:18): No, they're listening in the walls for now. So, hey, sorry about nodding off in that last one. We were on our way to winding down and I was already beat, and then next thing I know, I wake up, it's like an hour, hour and a half later and still going. And I have no idea what the hell's happening.
PamHemphill79 (04:44): I would've done it too.
Marine4America (04:47): I get
PamHemphill79 (04:48): It.
Marine4America (04:48): I'm giving myself a heart out by 1:00 AM tonight, but
PamHemphill79 (04:53): Oh no, let's try to keep it under that. We don't need to be up that late.
Marine4America (04:59): I mean, I'm up a lot of the time anyway, but I have been working a lot these past couple weeks too. I've been juggling a lot, man. Things kind of went off when I fell asleep because I am seeing some shit all over the place.
PamHemphill79 (05:18): I
Marine4America (05:18): Dunno.
PamHemphill79 (05:18): Yeah, it's crazy. Well, I got the clip. I don't know if you saw. Yeah, you did. You read about the tricks they used when we're trying to debate with them or talk with them?
Marine4America (05:30): Yeah.
PamHemphill79 (05:32): Is there a way you could play that when enough people come in?
Marine4America (05:40): I can try. I don't know how,
PamHemphill79 (05:41): It's not very long.
Marine4America (05:42): Yeah, it's not. I can try.
PamHemphill79 (05:45): Do you have a computer next to you?
Marine4America (05:47): I do. Lemme see.
PamHemphill79 (05:51): I mean those, he calls 'em tricks. I call 'em tactics, but they fit so good. I mean, I was like, oh my God, I know this, but I didn't know how to put it the way he was putting it because Exactly. I think a
Marine4America (06:05): Lot of you get tripped up.
PamHemphill79 (06:08): We see them doing that every time they come in here.
Marine4America (06:19): I'm trying to find it. Hang on. Yeah, there's this whole situation with Sandy that I was not even aware of until after I looked back on the space. So I just think maybe it's best if, I mean, I don't really want to stick my nose in people's real lives like that too deeply, so I'd be careful with
PamHemphill79 (06:50): Yeah, me too.
Marine4America (06:51): I think we should stick with the January 6th stuff. That's what we know best. Hey,
PamHemphill79 (06:58): Exactly.
Marine4America (07:00): Let me find this. Oh, you posted it, right?
PamHemphill79 (07:05): Yeah. Let's see. Should I put it in the blue bubble
Marine4America (07:10): Bubble? Yeah. You go ahead and do that, I think. Oh, I got it here. Oh, yeah. Shared a couple of them. The five cult debate tactics they use. Yeah,
PamHemphill79 (07:33): That's it.
Marine4America (07:35): This guy's got a goofy thumbnail. Six minutes long.
PamHemphill79 (07:39): I've got the list. The strawman, what abouts it? What about him? But what about, what is, what's that other one called
Marine4America (07:51): At homan?
PamHemphill79 (07:53): At homan? Slippery slopes. Policy burden of proof flip.
Marine4America (08:01): So these are pretty common things that it's rhetoric and everybody kind of employs these things and that's what makes some people so dangerous. The kind of thing that where when somebody says, oh, both sides do that. They're kind of right. These are things that you would find. And even in a debate club, you go over 'em like ad hominem, and a lot of times you'll hear somebody say, what I say is an ad hominem when I call them stupid. And there's a difference between an ad homonym and just insulting somebody. What I'll often do is I'll just insult somebody and then I would love to sit down and explain exactly why their argument is stupid. There's a difference between that and just trying to substitute and say, no, your argument is wrong because you're stupid. And that's the difference. There's all kinds of tricks. And Ryan seems to have studied the fucking fallacy. He's got the cheat sheet on command, so every time he's up here, and that's why I kind of trample over him. I think it's disgusting. I really do think these people are traitors and the way they just kind of have this decentralized system of sending it up the chain, the propaganda chain, and they are rewarded for it. So I mean, what can we do to fight that? I have no idea, but can pointed out,
PamHemphill79 (09:34): Just keep putting out the facts. It doesn't matter.
Marine4America (09:41): That's true.
PamHemphill79 (09:42): I mean, people know. I think they know. Yeah. Do you hear this? You can't change people. You're not going to change. It's not going to
Marine4America (09:54): Happen. No. That's when you try to lead by example. And I realize I don't lead by example when I'm in here. I am on the attack, but you
PamHemphill79 (10:06): All disinformation, you call it what it is. That's not factual.
Marine4America (10:12): Some stuff needs to be attacked like that. When people like Brian are saying, oh, it's a good thing that we cut all of cancer research because of some random thing from 2015. It's like, what the fuck does that even mean? And now we're arguing over some bullshit. It's gotten so far away from us. It's like, well, cancer research has gone so fuck.
PamHemphill79 (10:36): Yeah, that was ridiculous. And the bombing on the schools in Iran, that was ridiculous.
Marine4America (10:43): And they'll nitpick because what I just said, how cancer research being gone, they'll say, well, technically it's not gone because they'll point to some trace remnants and they'll say, technically the school wasn't bombed because the target wasn't the school. It was the shrapnel that killed the children. So they split hairs at these things and say, aha, we got you. You were wrong. But they missed the point where we're like, well, are we in a fucking word? What is happening? Nobody knows what's happening. And this constant sane washing of bullshit is so tired. People are tired of it.
PamHemphill79 (11:20): I know. I'm getting so burned out with this, been in it as long as I have and a lot of you and a of others, but I think it's okay. We got to take a break sometimes and just take care of ourselves. Try not to get caught up in resentments. And yeah,
Marine4America (11:41): That's why with Portland, I'm honestly thinking all these anti-ice people, Hey, I'm all for your first amendment. I'll support that all day, but don't get in the way of a good thing because they're shooting themselves in the foot right now. I think. I don't know. That's again, I don't want to put my nose where it doesn't belong, but the throwing of the dildos, I'll point that out. It's like that does nothing. And it just, people laugh at it and they don't take anything seriously and it just gives the worst kind of people more grounds to start stupid shit. And then that puts that propaganda magnifying glass on it. And that's the game right now. The game right now I think should be keep your head down because they're tripping over themselves.
PamHemphill79 (12:28): What brought the most publicity, and I think everybody was really behind it, was when the frogs started.
Marine4America (12:41): And I think that was a good move at the time because it did show that first bit of protesting. It's like, well, they are goofy. They're not trying to overrun the government here. No one is going to take them seriously. And that's kind of the strength of a peaceful protest, right? They are goofy. And of course they're going to take the bait and be like, oh, look at these people. Look at how unserious these people are because easy bait. But it's like, well, that is the right to be stupid and cringey and be loud against the government, even if it's a little misguided that a lot of it's not. Same with January 6th vindication on that shit. Oh, why do you bring that up all the time? Why do you bring that up all the time? Because fucking because look at that. Our government is now pushing to clear people of sedition, which is as close to treason as you could possibly fucking get. Yeah,
PamHemphill79 (13:51): Exactly.
Marine4America (13:53): No, there's no both sides here.
PamHemphill79 (13:57): Well, it needs the whole army out. Oath keepers and rest of those proud boys, of course, stand back, stand by.
Marine4America (14:07): They made shirts of that immediately after you said that.
PamHemphill79 (14:10): They did. That's right. Yeah.
Marine4America (14:18): I was looking more into this because I was ringing Enrique Tarrio's Bell a lot, and I'm like, you know what? I need to go deeper and read the indictments for myself because I have skimmed the shit before. But if I am going to be punching up at him in these spaces, I should read a little more and see what these cases are. And Jesus fucking Christ, these people belong to. They deserve to. They should be in jail. They should still be in jail. Fuck. Sorry, Pam, but
PamHemphill79 (14:58): Oh no, don't apologize to me. I agree with you.
Marine4America (15:01): I get a lot of people were misled but disgusting. What we allow now, the fact that we okayed the shit.
PamHemphill79 (15:15): We got a J six who trying to run for governor in South Carolina, and somebody called me and tell me about the interview he had with him, and they want me to come on their show because he says, we got to have somebody sharing the facts about January 6th because all we're getting is this propaganda and lies. Can you imagine? They're running for governors one in Portland too, and you look at their criminal arrest, what it was. Oh my God, it's so scary.
Marine4America (15:50): Yeah. The real gang now is to just legitimize themselves.
PamHemphill79 (15:58): I think that back, it's not governor of South Carolina, it's House of Reserv representatives. Yeah,
Marine4America (16:05): House reps.
Marine4America (16:13): My fucking MAGA coworker, her name is actually Karen, even Trump during Trump won, where it was kind of fun for her to be like, oh, he's just trolling. He's just trolling. And by the first week of working there, I was like, yeah, this is kind of bullshit. And she's like, I'll come out here, snowflake. I was like, what the fuck? You don't even know me. It's pretty wild. And that just set the tone for our entire working relationship and things were better during the Biden years because we could make fun of him together. That was fun. And then now Trump too, and January 6th, really. I mean, that was messed up, but afterwards I was like, all right, she's not budgeting on this and she doesn't want to talk about it anymore. So I just joined in and we were like, all right, well, at least we can punch up together, Biden together, because bullshit's bullshit. It is what it is. And then Trump too happened, and now she doesn't want to talk about anything ever. And fucking after the tariffs we're in shipping and business has been fucked. Everything's fucked. And she just looks at me like, wow, things are slow. Huh? Wow. I'm like, yeah, you think, what do you think is happening? She's like, I don't know. I'm like, yeah, you don't know. All right. Looking ridiculous.
PamHemphill79 (17:44): Put your head in the same,
Marine4America (17:46): Nothing's
PamHemphill79 (17:46): Happening. It's okay.
Marine4America (17:51): She fucking bought her house in 1970, whatever, got married whenever she checked out of life after that.
PamHemphill79 (18:01): We talking about again, who are you talking about?
Marine4America (18:03): My coworker Karen. And she's just like, I think she just represents a lot of MAGA coworkers across America, to be honest.
PamHemphill79 (18:20): Yeah. Yep. They're just watching the Fox News,
Marine4America (18:27): And that's the thing, I can't even bring it up. I wonder what she's thinking now because I know she loved Tucker Carlson just a few years ago, and she followed this whole track, but now all these people are ostracized from MAGA as well, so I have no idea. That's the thing. She doesn't want to talk about any of it, so it's too uncomfortable. She hedged way too much with all these figures, and they're all just fallen by the wayside.
PamHemphill79 (18:56): Yeah. Well, Trump's created it. I hope people do study what they're talking about, those tricks that they use trying to talk to you. Oh my God, they use them in here for sure. Trying to race what happened on January 6th by getting rid of these convict. Oh my God. They're just rewriting history, right? God, this would empower 'em to think they could do whatever they want now. It's scary.
Marine4America (19:45): I mean, though, they're getting in their own way. I think even with this God attorney general wine mom, what's her name? She's the one who moved to dismiss a lot of the convictions, right? Is that what happened?
PamHemphill79 (20:02): Oh yeah. Yes, yes.
Marine4America (20:03): Yeah. Yeah. Wine mom, attorney general wine mom. She just seems like always wine drunk to me. I don't know. That's what I always called her.
PamHemphill79 (20:15): I'm a little confused. So what's going to happen? It hasn't actually happened yet, or does it have to go?
Marine4America (20:21): They motion for it. Lemme look it up also. Lemme do a sound check. Can you hear this, Pam?
PamHemphill79 (20:26): Yeah, I hear you will.
Marine4America (20:28): No, no way. They do. I decided to do some research on the methods. The cult is to argue against facts, logic, and
PamHemphill79 (20:38): Once
Title: DOJ moves to dismiss J6 convictions as if they never happened.
PamHemphill79 (04:10): Good evening, Marine.
Marine4America (04:12): Evening, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (04:14): It seems like nobody comes in until you pop in.
Marine4America (04:18): No, they're listening in the walls for now. So, hey, sorry about nodding off in that last one. We were on our way to winding down and I was already beat, and then next thing I know, I wake up, it's like an hour, hour and a half later and still going. And I have no idea what the hell's happening.
PamHemphill79 (04:44): I would've done it too.
Marine4America (04:47): I get
PamHemphill79 (04:48): It.
Marine4America (04:48): I'm giving myself a heart out by 1:00 AM tonight, but
PamHemphill79 (04:53): Oh no, let's try to keep it under that. We don't need to be up that late.
Marine4America (04:59): I mean, I'm up a lot of the time anyway, but I have been working a lot these past couple weeks too. I've been juggling a lot, man. Things kind of went off when I fell asleep because I am seeing some shit all over the place.
PamHemphill79 (05:18): I
Marine4America (05:18): Dunno.
PamHemphill79 (05:18): Yeah, it's crazy. Well, I got the clip. I don't know if you saw. Yeah, you did. You read about the tricks they used when we're trying to debate with them or talk with them?
Marine4America (05:30): Yeah.
PamHemphill79 (05:32): Is there a way you could play that when enough people come in?
Marine4America (05:40): I can try. I don't know how,
PamHemphill79 (05:41): It's not very long.
Marine4America (05:42): Yeah, it's not. I can try.
PamHemphill79 (05:45): Do you have a computer next to you?
Marine4America (05:47): I do. Lemme see.
PamHemphill79 (05:51): I mean those, he calls 'em tricks. I call 'em tactics, but they fit so good. I mean, I was like, oh my God, I know this, but I didn't know how to put it the way he was putting it because Exactly. I think a
Marine4America (06:05): Lot of you get tripped up.
PamHemphill79 (06:08): We see them doing that every time they come in here.
Marine4America (06:19): I'm trying to find it. Hang on. Yeah, there's this whole situation with Sandy that I was not even aware of until after I looked back on the space. So I just think maybe it's best if, I mean, I don't really want to stick my nose in people's real lives like that too deeply, so I'd be careful with
PamHemphill79 (06:50): Yeah, me too.
Marine4America (06:51): I think we should stick with the January 6th stuff. That's what we know best. Hey,
PamHemphill79 (06:58): Exactly.
Marine4America (07:00): Let me find this. Oh, you posted it, right?
PamHemphill79 (07:05): Yeah. Let's see. Should I put it in the blue bubble
Marine4America (07:10): Bubble? Yeah. You go ahead and do that, I think. Oh, I got it here. Oh, yeah. Shared a couple of them. The five cult debate tactics they use. Yeah,
PamHemphill79 (07:33): That's it.
Marine4America (07:35): This guy's got a goofy thumbnail. Six minutes long.
PamHemphill79 (07:39): I've got the list. The strawman, what abouts it? What about him? But what about, what is, what's that other one called
Marine4America (07:51): At homan?
PamHemphill79 (07:53): At homan? Slippery slopes. Policy burden of proof flip.
Marine4America (08:01): So these are pretty common things that it's rhetoric and everybody kind of employs these things and that's what makes some people so dangerous. The kind of thing that where when somebody says, oh, both sides do that. They're kind of right. These are things that you would find. And even in a debate club, you go over 'em like ad hominem, and a lot of times you'll hear somebody say, what I say is an ad hominem when I call them stupid. And there's a difference between an ad homonym and just insulting somebody. What I'll often do is I'll just insult somebody and then I would love to sit down and explain exactly why their argument is stupid. There's a difference between that and just trying to substitute and say, no, your argument is wrong because you're stupid. And that's the difference. There's all kinds of tricks. And Ryan seems to have studied the fucking fallacy. He's got the cheat sheet on command, so every time he's up here, and that's why I kind of trample over him. I think it's disgusting. I really do think these people are traitors and the way they just kind of have this decentralized system of sending it up the chain, the propaganda chain, and they are rewarded for it. So I mean, what can we do to fight that? I have no idea, but can pointed out,
PamHemphill79 (09:34): Just keep putting out the facts. It doesn't matter.
Marine4America (09:41): That's true.
PamHemphill79 (09:42): I mean, people know. I think they know. Yeah. Do you hear this? You can't change people. You're not going to change. It's not going to
Marine4America (09:54): Happen. No. That's when you try to lead by example. And I realize I don't lead by example when I'm in here. I am on the attack, but you
PamHemphill79 (10:06): All disinformation, you call it what it is. That's not factual.
Marine4America (10:12): Some stuff needs to be attacked like that. When people like Brian are saying, oh, it's a good thing that we cut all of cancer research because of some random thing from 2015. It's like, what the fuck does that even mean? And now we're arguing over some bullshit. It's gotten so far away from us. It's like, well, cancer research has gone so fuck.
PamHemphill79 (10:36): Yeah, that was ridiculous. And the bombing on the schools in Iran, that was ridiculous.
Marine4America (10:43): And they'll nitpick because what I just said, how cancer research being gone, they'll say, well, technically it's not gone because they'll point to some trace remnants and they'll say, technically the school wasn't bombed because the target wasn't the school. It was the shrapnel that killed the children. So they split hairs at these things and say, aha, we got you. You were wrong. But they missed the point where we're like, well, are we in a fucking word? What is happening? Nobody knows what's happening. And this constant sane washing of bullshit is so tired. People are tired of it.
PamHemphill79 (11:20): I know. I'm getting so burned out with this, been in it as long as I have and a lot of you and a of others, but I think it's okay. We got to take a break sometimes and just take care of ourselves. Try not to get caught up in resentments. And yeah,
Marine4America (11:41): That's why with Portland, I'm honestly thinking all these anti-ice people, Hey, I'm all for your first amendment. I'll support that all day, but don't get in the way of a good thing because they're shooting themselves in the foot right now. I think. I don't know. That's again, I don't want to put my nose where it doesn't belong, but the throwing of the dildos, I'll point that out. It's like that does nothing. And it just, people laugh at it and they don't take anything seriously and it just gives the worst kind of people more grounds to start stupid shit. And then that puts that propaganda magnifying glass on it. And that's the game right now. The game right now I think should be keep your head down because they're tripping over themselves.
PamHemphill79 (12:28): What brought the most publicity, and I think everybody was really behind it, was when the frogs started.
Marine4America (12:41): And I think that was a good move at the time because it did show that first bit of protesting. It's like, well, they are goofy. They're not trying to overrun the government here. No one is going to take them seriously. And that's kind of the strength of a peaceful protest, right? They are goofy. And of course they're going to take the bait and be like, oh, look at these people. Look at how unserious these people are because easy bait. But it's like, well, that is the right to be stupid and cringey and be loud against the government, even if it's a little misguided that a lot of it's not. Same with January 6th vindication on that shit. Oh, why do you bring that up all the time? Why do you bring that up all the time? Because fucking because look at that. Our government is now pushing to clear people of sedition, which is as close to treason as you could possibly fucking get. Yeah,
PamHemphill79 (13:51): Exactly.
Marine4America (13:53): No, there's no both sides here.
PamHemphill79 (13:57): Well, it needs the whole army out. Oath keepers and rest of those proud boys, of course, stand back, stand by.
Marine4America (14:07): They made shirts of that immediately after you said that.
PamHemphill79 (14:10): They did. That's right. Yeah.
Marine4America (14:18): I was looking more into this because I was ringing Enrique Tarrio's Bell a lot, and I'm like, you know what? I need to go deeper and read the indictments for myself because I have skimmed the shit before. But if I am going to be punching up at him in these spaces, I should read a little more and see what these cases are. And Jesus fucking Christ, these people belong to. They deserve to. They should be in jail. They should still be in jail. Fuck. Sorry, Pam, but
PamHemphill79 (14:58): Oh no, don't apologize to me. I agree with you.
Marine4America (15:01): I get a lot of people were misled but disgusting. What we allow now, the fact that we okayed the shit.
PamHemphill79 (15:15): We got a J six who trying to run for governor in South Carolina, and somebody called me and tell me about the interview he had with him, and they want me to come on their show because he says, we got to have somebody sharing the facts about January 6th because all we're getting is this propaganda and lies. Can you imagine? They're running for governors one in Portland too, and you look at their criminal arrest, what it was. Oh my God, it's so scary.
Marine4America (15:50): Yeah. The real gang now is to just legitimize themselves.
PamHemphill79 (15:58): I think that back, it's not governor of South Carolina, it's House of Reserv representatives. Yeah,
Marine4America (16:05): House reps.
Marine4America (16:13): My fucking MAGA coworker, her name is actually Karen, even Trump during Trump won, where it was kind of fun for her to be like, oh, he's just trolling. He's just trolling. And by the first week of working there, I was like, yeah, this is kind of bullshit. And she's like, I'll come out here, snowflake. I was like, what the fuck? You don't even know me. It's pretty wild. And that just set the tone for our entire working relationship and things were better during the Biden years because we could make fun of him together. That was fun. And then now Trump too, and January 6th, really. I mean, that was messed up, but afterwards I was like, all right, she's not budgeting on this and she doesn't want to talk about it anymore. So I just joined in and we were like, all right, well, at least we can punch up together, Biden together, because bullshit's bullshit. It is what it is. And then Trump too happened, and now she doesn't want to talk about anything ever. And fucking after the tariffs we're in shipping and business has been fucked. Everything's fucked. And she just looks at me like, wow, things are slow. Huh? Wow. I'm like, yeah, you think, what do you think is happening? She's like, I don't know. I'm like, yeah, you don't know. All right. Looking ridiculous.
PamHemphill79 (17:44): Put your head in the same,
Marine4America (17:46): Nothing's
PamHemphill79 (17:46): Happening. It's okay.
Marine4America (17:51): She fucking bought her house in 1970, whatever, got married whenever she checked out of life after that.
PamHemphill79 (18:01): We talking about again, who are you talking about?
Marine4America (18:03): My coworker Karen. And she's just like, I think she just represents a lot of MAGA coworkers across America, to be honest.
PamHemphill79 (18:20): Yeah. Yep. They're just watching the Fox News,
Marine4America (18:27): And that's the thing, I can't even bring it up. I wonder what she's thinking now because I know she loved Tucker Carlson just a few years ago, and she followed this whole track, but now all these people are ostracized from MAGA as well, so I have no idea. That's the thing. She doesn't want to talk about any of it, so it's too uncomfortable. She hedged way too much with all these figures, and they're all just fallen by the wayside.
PamHemphill79 (18:56): Yeah. Well, Trump's created it. I hope people do study what they're talking about, those tricks that they use trying to talk to you. Oh my God, they use them in here for sure. Trying to race what happened on January 6th by getting rid of these convict. Oh my God. They're just rewriting history, right? God, this would empower 'em to think they could do whatever they want now. It's scary.
Marine4America (19:45): I mean, though, they're getting in their own way. I think even with this God attorney general wine mom, what's her name? She's the one who moved to dismiss a lot of the convictions, right? Is that what happened?
PamHemphill79 (20:02): Oh yeah. Yes, yes.
Marine4America (20:03): Yeah. Yeah. Wine mom, attorney general wine mom. She just seems like always wine drunk to me. I don't know. That's what I always called her.
PamHemphill79 (20:15): I'm a little confused. So what's going to happen? It hasn't actually happened yet, or does it have to go?
Marine4America (20:21): They motion for it. Lemme look it up also. Lemme do a sound check. Can you hear this, Pam?
PamHemphill79 (20:26): Yeah, I hear you will.
Marine4America (20:28): No, no way. They do. I decided to do some research on the methods. The cult is to argue against facts, logic, and
PamHemphill79 (20:38): Once
Recording (20:39): A little bit louder, lose all their power in every conversation you have in the future. Here are the five tricks the Trump cult uses to try and exhaust you and make sure a real argument. Argument never happens. One, the
PamHemphill79 (20:49): Strawman stop
Recording (20:53): Says, paid America and want to see it destroyed. You never said that. How about that? But now you're defending your patriotism instead of talking about war, the original point is completely forgotten. And then they're nodding like they won the conversation. They argue against something you never said. This is called the strawman vacy. They take your actual argument, replace it with something dumber and scarier, and argue against that fake version. Instead, in 1960, psychologist Peter Wasson at the University College of London found that the brain does not look for truth. It looks for the fastest way to protect what it already believes. So their brain is not asking if you are right, their brain is asking how to make you look wrong. You're questioning the Iran war, you're siding with the enemy, bring up Trump's criminal conviction. You have TDS ask about deportations, the foreign prisons, and they'll claim you want open borders. They never argued with what anyone actually says. They just try to make sure that your argument never gets heard. Two, what bism you bring up. Trump firing his attorney general. They say, what about Hillary's emails? You mentioned that Iran War started without Congress. They say, what about Biden? They never answer a single question because they know they can't answer it. This is called What about is? We are all very familiar with this one. Instead of responding to your point, they drag a completely different issue into the conversation to make you forget what you were talking about. Psychologist Daniel Kahneman at Princeton University found that the brain can only track a limited number of ideas at the same time. The moment someone introduces a second problem, your brain splits its attention. No.
Marine4America (22:10): Okay, so can you hear all that, Pam?
PamHemphill79 (22:15): Yeah.
Marine4America (22:15): Okay.
PamHemphill79 (22:16): We could just talk. That happens all the time.
Marine4America (22:18): Yeah. So what he just said right there about splitting their attention. So we see that a lot with the Epstein files. We're like, at the bare minimum, we should just investigate who's mentioned, who's involved the most, and they'll say, well, why didn't Biden investigate during his years? I'm like, truly, maybe I wasn't prepared to fucking answer that. That throws me off. They're like, aha, that they had trounce on that. Now we forgot the whole question. Why aren't the people in power right now investigating? That's the trick. I'll move on. I'll move on.
PamHemphill79 (22:56): And you have to be knowledge. Oh,
Marine4America (22:58): Go on.
PamHemphill79 (22:58): Knowledgeable. You have to be knowledgeable too. Why? And some people aren't. I'm not knowledgeable. I don't know everything. Of course, I know the answer to that one because they couldn't. But you know what I'm saying? We don't always know the information and they're hoping that we don't.
Marine4America (23:20): That's what I mean. Normal people aren't prepared to fucking debate suit and tie Rhein with his little profile picture. You know what I mean? Most people aren't actually prepared to answer that. A lot of the people who go to even something as tepid as a no King's protest, they're just there to express like, Hey, I disagree with how things are going. And that's really it. And when some idiot with a microphone who claims to be a journalist goes, excuse me. Excuse me. What policy do you actually disagree with? And they're like, oh, I don't know. And they're like, ah. They can't even answer these crazy leftists. They don't even know what they're protesting. We have no king. And then they just, that's the strawman. They use these unprepared people as living straw men and they've manufactured an entire industry out of it.
PamHemphill79 (24:05): Yeah, what you're talking about is on this video. So
Marine4America (24:09): Yeah, I'll move on.
PamHemphill79 (24:10): Charlie Cook? Yeah.
Marine4America (24:12): Oh yeah. Here we go. So he says, here we go.
Recording (24:15): The moment someone introduces a second problem, your brain splits its attention. Now, if you add a third and a fourth problem, your brain can't keep up and loses the original thread they use. What about him to exploit the brain's weakness on purpose? They do this because they saw other people do it and it worked. It's not like they have some grand plan or anything. Every time they say, what about they're not making a point, they're running away from yours. What about him is not a defense? It's a weak person's confession that they have no argument. Three ad homan attack. You say Trump is breaking the law. They say you have Trump derangement syndrome and you hate America. Trump is still breaking the law. But now the conversation is about whether you are crazy instead of what Trump actually did. This is called an ad homan attack. To put it plainly, they're just insulting you instead of answering any questions, the goal is to destroy your credibility before your argument even gets evaluated. Psychologist Robert Cialdini at Arizona University found that people do not evaluate arguments in a vacuum. We decide whether to listen based on who is talking. Ad hominin makes the audience question whether you are even worth listening to before they engage with what you said. When they cannot argue facts, they come after you instead. And the moment you start defending yourself, the argument is over and they win. For the slippery slope fallacy, you say, the government should not be able to deport American citizens without due process. They say you want to let criminals pour into the country. You said nothing about criminals, but now everyone is arguing about something you never brought up. This is called the slippery slope fallacy. They take one reasonable idea and claim it will automatically lead to the most extreme outcome imaginable. No evidence, no logical steps. They're just creating fear.
Marine4America (25:41): They see that a lot with, like I say, there's lots of general reasons somebody might be protesting. Even somebody might be protesting against ice, depending on how local you're getting, there might genuinely be a case where somebody's rights were violated in some way and that can't be shown until after they actually get their day in court, which takes time. So they're just advocating for that person. George Ttes. There's a couple people I know it's not like rampant, but there's lots of genuine reasons why somebody might be objecting to how things are being handled, and they will jump on you like, well, why do you want to protect illegals? And that's not what I fucking said.
PamHemphill79 (26:27): Exactly. And that's not why we're protesting ice either. It's the behavior of ice. What we're they acting like Estoppels instead of the ice that we knew in the past.
Marine4America (26:39): Yeah, that's what I mean. There's just lots of general reasons and people are going to have to account for that because it's starting to add up. And people with even more common sense are seeing that too. And people with one fucking brain cell like Tommy can't get it. So they're like, why
Recording (26:58): Do you want to protect illegals? Why do you want to protect illegals?
Marine4America (27:03): So you don't know what you're talking about. Okay, I don't think you've, all right. Nevermind. Let's see what else to discuss. This
Recording (27:12): Psychologist, Paul Ekman at the University of California San Francisco found that fear overrides rational thinking faster than any other emotion. Once your brain perceives a threat, it stops evaluating evidence and starts looking for an exit. The slippery slope is designed to trigger the fear response before your brain can ask whether the threat is even real scare people enough, and they stop thinking. And people who stop thinking are easy to control, just ask Fox News. Newsmax five, the burden of proof flip. Charlie Kirk built his entire career on this trick. He would show up to college campuses, make wild claims with no evidence and demand that students disprove him on the spot. When students couldn't disprove him, Kirk declared victory and forced the student to give up the mic. He called it owning the libs. It was not a real debate. It was an ambush on unprepared kids. This is called the burden of proof. Flip. Person making the claim is always responsible for proving the claim, but Kirk and every conservative like him make wild claims with no evidence and then demand that you disprove those claims. Crazy, right? And here's why. You can never win. You show them a court ruling. They claim the judge is corrupt. You show them a study, the science is corrupt. You show them a news report, the outlet take news. Every piece of evidence, brain just gets added. The conspiracy,
Troll (28:18): Get her out of here.
PamHemphill79 (28:21): I got rid of him.
Marine4America (28:23): Oh, well, that's what it's down to now. It's just that
PamHemphill79 (28:30): What he was just sharing there. Isn't that so true? Oh my God. It happens
Marine4America (28:35): All
PamHemphill79 (28:35): The time when I'm down there.
Marine4America (28:38): What's your desire?
PamHemphill79 (28:40): Protests in Portland. People will walk away after they've talked to 'em and say, oh my God, my head's spinning. And mine would too, and I knew what was happening, but I didn't know how to point out the tactics. I know the tactics of the criminal mind, but they're very similar. But that's exactly, I can't believe it. I just identified with that one. A hundred percent.
Marine4America (29:04): Yeah. There's another minute left.
Recording (29:09): The outlet is fake news. Every piece of evidence you bring just gets added to the conspiracy. There's no evidence they'll accept, because accepting evidence was never part of the deal. Psychologist Daniel Kahneman found that once someone believes something, their brain treats every piece of supporting evidence as proof and every piece of contradicting evidence as part of the coverup or conspiracy. Kirk was never really debating anyone. He was running a scam in a real debate. The person making the claim has to prove their claim to be true. Kirk never proved anything. He just demanded you disprove him and called it a win when you couldn't. That is not a debate that is a weak scam and only worked on kids who are under 20 years old. Most of these people have no idea what they're actually saying. They saw it on TikTok or they heard it on Fox News. They repeated it to you and called it an argument. Actually trying to win a debate. They're trying to feel superior to someone they are secretly intimidated by. That is all owning the libs ever was deeply insecure. People using borrowed tricks to feel powerful for five minutes. Now that you know these tricks, you'll never have to fall for them again. They're what weak people use to try and trick smart people into arguing. When you're not smart enough to win a real argument, you kind of have to trick people.
Marine4America (30:10): Yeah, it's the best way to put it.
PamHemphill79 (30:15): Okay, go to the next one.
Marine4America (30:18): Which one was the next one? I'll
PamHemphill79 (30:20): Pull people up in a minute as soon as we're done with this video.
Marine4America (30:23): Which other one did you want?
PamHemphill79 (30:25): That wasn't the last, was it?
Marine4America (30:27): Oh yeah. No, that was the end of the video. It was only six minutes long.
PamHemphill79 (30:31): Oh, burden of proof flip. Okay.
Marine4America (30:33): Yeah, yeah. I had ho Homan burden of proof straw man.
Recording (30:44): Even worth slope fallacy. They take one
Marine4America (30:47): Slippery slope.
Recording (30:50): That's
PamHemphill79 (30:50): Why I want people to
Marine4America (30:51): Learn. I'll post this on the pill.
PamHemphill79 (30:55): Okay. I think it's important to learn this so you don't waste your time. I mean, if you want to have a conversation, they come in here and yell at me and call me names. That's not a conversation. Let's talk about Iran and what the hell's going on and what do you like about it or don't like about it. We don't have to agree, but go into personalities trying to got your moments. It is just a waste of our time.
Marine4America (31:26): Speaking of we have Guyer.
PamHemphill79 (31:30): Yeah. See if he'll be nice. Don't pull into your tactics. We are aware of 'em. We got your number.
Marine4America (31:42): Nick sorter types. It's okay. You're free to speak. It's just us. Oh, did it not go through
PamHemphill79 (32:02): Guy? I don't dunno if you're hearing us, but you're free to talk, but we'll wait until you put this hand up.
Marine4America (32:08): It might be a space thing. It still says there's a request and I don't see the request anymore. I tried to bring 'em up. Maybe try to do it if I invite them. Invite to speak spaces is weird. I think everybody needs a little bit of grace and patience with that.
PamHemphill79 (20:49): Strawman stop
Recording (20:53): Says, paid America and want to see it destroyed. You never said that. How about that? But now you're defending your patriotism instead of talking about war, the original point is completely forgotten. And then they're nodding like they won the conversation. They argue against something you never said. This is called the strawman vacy. They take your actual argument, replace it with something dumber and scarier, and argue against that fake version. Instead, in 1960, psychologist Peter Wasson at the University College of London found that the brain does not look for truth. It looks for the fastest way to protect what it already believes. So their brain is not asking if you are right, their brain is asking how to make you look wrong. You're questioning the Iran war, you're siding with the enemy, bring up Trump's criminal conviction. You have TDS ask about deportations, the foreign prisons, and they'll claim you want open borders. They never argued with what anyone actually says. They just try to make sure that your argument never gets heard. Two, what bism you bring up. Trump firing his attorney general. They say, what about Hillary's emails? You mentioned that Iran War started without Congress. They say, what about Biden? They never answer a single question because they know they can't answer it. This is called What about is? We are all very familiar with this one. Instead of responding to your point, they drag a completely different issue into the conversation to make you forget what you were talking about. Psychologist Daniel Kahneman at Princeton University found that the brain can only track a limited number of ideas at the same time. The moment someone introduces a second problem, your brain splits its attention. No.
Marine4America (22:10): Okay, so can you hear all that, Pam?
PamHemphill79 (22:15): Yeah.
Marine4America (22:15): Okay.
PamHemphill79 (22:16): We could just talk. That happens all the time.
Marine4America (22:18): Yeah. So what he just said right there about splitting their attention. So we see that a lot with the Epstein files. We're like, at the bare minimum, we should just investigate who's mentioned, who's involved the most, and they'll say, well, why didn't Biden investigate during his years? I'm like, truly, maybe I wasn't prepared to fucking answer that. That throws me off. They're like, aha, that they had trounce on that. Now we forgot the whole question. Why aren't the people in power right now investigating? That's the trick. I'll move on. I'll move on.
PamHemphill79 (22:56): And you have to be knowledge. Oh,
Marine4America (22:58): Go on.
PamHemphill79 (22:58): Knowledgeable. You have to be knowledgeable too. Why? And some people aren't. I'm not knowledgeable. I don't know everything. Of course, I know the answer to that one because they couldn't. But you know what I'm saying? We don't always know the information and they're hoping that we don't.
Marine4America (23:20): That's what I mean. Normal people aren't prepared to fucking debate suit and tie Rhein with his little profile picture. You know what I mean? Most people aren't actually prepared to answer that. A lot of the people who go to even something as tepid as a no King's protest, they're just there to express like, Hey, I disagree with how things are going. And that's really it. And when some idiot with a microphone who claims to be a journalist goes, excuse me. Excuse me. What policy do you actually disagree with? And they're like, oh, I don't know. And they're like, ah. They can't even answer these crazy leftists. They don't even know what they're protesting. We have no king. And then they just, that's the strawman. They use these unprepared people as living straw men and they've manufactured an entire industry out of it.
PamHemphill79 (24:05): Yeah, what you're talking about is on this video. So
Marine4America (24:09): Yeah, I'll move on.
PamHemphill79 (24:10): Charlie Cook? Yeah.
Marine4America (24:12): Oh yeah. Here we go. So he says, here we go.
Recording (24:15): The moment someone introduces a second problem, your brain splits its attention. Now, if you add a third and a fourth problem, your brain can't keep up and loses the original thread they use. What about him to exploit the brain's weakness on purpose? They do this because they saw other people do it and it worked. It's not like they have some grand plan or anything. Every time they say, what about they're not making a point, they're running away from yours. What about him is not a defense? It's a weak person's confession that they have no argument. Three ad homan attack. You say Trump is breaking the law. They say you have Trump derangement syndrome and you hate America. Trump is still breaking the law. But now the conversation is about whether you are crazy instead of what Trump actually did. This is called an ad homan attack. To put it plainly, they're just insulting you instead of answering any questions, the goal is to destroy your credibility before your argument even gets evaluated. Psychologist Robert Cialdini at Arizona University found that people do not evaluate arguments in a vacuum. We decide whether to listen based on who is talking. Ad hominin makes the audience question whether you are even worth listening to before they engage with what you said. When they cannot argue facts, they come after you instead. And the moment you start defending yourself, the argument is over and they win. For the slippery slope fallacy, you say, the government should not be able to deport American citizens without due process. They say you want to let criminals pour into the country. You said nothing about criminals, but now everyone is arguing about something you never brought up. This is called the slippery slope fallacy. They take one reasonable idea and claim it will automatically lead to the most extreme outcome imaginable. No evidence, no logical steps. They're just creating fear.
Marine4America (25:41): They see that a lot with, like I say, there's lots of general reasons somebody might be protesting. Even somebody might be protesting against ice, depending on how local you're getting, there might genuinely be a case where somebody's rights were violated in some way and that can't be shown until after they actually get their day in court, which takes time. So they're just advocating for that person. George Ttes. There's a couple people I know it's not like rampant, but there's lots of genuine reasons why somebody might be objecting to how things are being handled, and they will jump on you like, well, why do you want to protect illegals? And that's not what I fucking said.
PamHemphill79 (26:27): Exactly. And that's not why we're protesting ice either. It's the behavior of ice. What we're they acting like Estoppels instead of the ice that we knew in the past.
Marine4America (26:39): Yeah, that's what I mean. There's just lots of general reasons and people are going to have to account for that because it's starting to add up. And people with even more common sense are seeing that too. And people with one fucking brain cell like Tommy can't get it. So they're like, why
Recording (26:58): Do you want to protect illegals? Why do you want to protect illegals?
Marine4America (27:03): So you don't know what you're talking about. Okay, I don't think you've, all right. Nevermind. Let's see what else to discuss. This
Recording (27:12): Psychologist, Paul Ekman at the University of California San Francisco found that fear overrides rational thinking faster than any other emotion. Once your brain perceives a threat, it stops evaluating evidence and starts looking for an exit. The slippery slope is designed to trigger the fear response before your brain can ask whether the threat is even real scare people enough, and they stop thinking. And people who stop thinking are easy to control, just ask Fox News. Newsmax five, the burden of proof flip. Charlie Kirk built his entire career on this trick. He would show up to college campuses, make wild claims with no evidence and demand that students disprove him on the spot. When students couldn't disprove him, Kirk declared victory and forced the student to give up the mic. He called it owning the libs. It was not a real debate. It was an ambush on unprepared kids. This is called the burden of proof. Flip. Person making the claim is always responsible for proving the claim, but Kirk and every conservative like him make wild claims with no evidence and then demand that you disprove those claims. Crazy, right? And here's why. You can never win. You show them a court ruling. They claim the judge is corrupt. You show them a study, the science is corrupt. You show them a news report, the outlet take news. Every piece of evidence, brain just gets added. The conspiracy,
Troll (28:18): Get her out of here.
PamHemphill79 (28:21): I got rid of him.
Marine4America (28:23): Oh, well, that's what it's down to now. It's just that
PamHemphill79 (28:30): What he was just sharing there. Isn't that so true? Oh my God. It happens
Marine4America (28:35): All
PamHemphill79 (28:35): The time when I'm down there.
Marine4America (28:38): What's your desire?
PamHemphill79 (28:40): Protests in Portland. People will walk away after they've talked to 'em and say, oh my God, my head's spinning. And mine would too, and I knew what was happening, but I didn't know how to point out the tactics. I know the tactics of the criminal mind, but they're very similar. But that's exactly, I can't believe it. I just identified with that one. A hundred percent.
Marine4America (29:04): Yeah. There's another minute left.
Recording (29:09): The outlet is fake news. Every piece of evidence you bring just gets added to the conspiracy. There's no evidence they'll accept, because accepting evidence was never part of the deal. Psychologist Daniel Kahneman found that once someone believes something, their brain treats every piece of supporting evidence as proof and every piece of contradicting evidence as part of the coverup or conspiracy. Kirk was never really debating anyone. He was running a scam in a real debate. The person making the claim has to prove their claim to be true. Kirk never proved anything. He just demanded you disprove him and called it a win when you couldn't. That is not a debate that is a weak scam and only worked on kids who are under 20 years old. Most of these people have no idea what they're actually saying. They saw it on TikTok or they heard it on Fox News. They repeated it to you and called it an argument. Actually trying to win a debate. They're trying to feel superior to someone they are secretly intimidated by. That is all owning the libs ever was deeply insecure. People using borrowed tricks to feel powerful for five minutes. Now that you know these tricks, you'll never have to fall for them again. They're what weak people use to try and trick smart people into arguing. When you're not smart enough to win a real argument, you kind of have to trick people.
Marine4America (30:10): Yeah, it's the best way to put it.
PamHemphill79 (30:15): Okay, go to the next one.
Marine4America (30:18): Which one was the next one? I'll
PamHemphill79 (30:20): Pull people up in a minute as soon as we're done with this video.
Marine4America (30:23): Which other one did you want?
PamHemphill79 (30:25): That wasn't the last, was it?
Marine4America (30:27): Oh yeah. No, that was the end of the video. It was only six minutes long.
PamHemphill79 (30:31): Oh, burden of proof flip. Okay.
Marine4America (30:33): Yeah, yeah. I had ho Homan burden of proof straw man.
Recording (30:44): Even worth slope fallacy. They take one
Marine4America (30:47): Slippery slope.
Recording (30:50): That's
PamHemphill79 (30:50): Why I want people to
Marine4America (30:51): Learn. I'll post this on the pill.
PamHemphill79 (30:55): Okay. I think it's important to learn this so you don't waste your time. I mean, if you want to have a conversation, they come in here and yell at me and call me names. That's not a conversation. Let's talk about Iran and what the hell's going on and what do you like about it or don't like about it. We don't have to agree, but go into personalities trying to got your moments. It is just a waste of our time.
Marine4America (31:26): Speaking of we have Guyer.
PamHemphill79 (31:30): Yeah. See if he'll be nice. Don't pull into your tactics. We are aware of 'em. We got your number.
Marine4America (31:42): Nick sorter types. It's okay. You're free to speak. It's just us. Oh, did it not go through
PamHemphill79 (32:02): Guy? I don't dunno if you're hearing us, but you're free to talk, but we'll wait until you put this hand up.
Marine4America (32:08): It might be a space thing. It still says there's a request and I don't see the request anymore. I tried to bring 'em up. Maybe try to do it if I invite them. Invite to speak spaces is weird. I think everybody needs a little bit of grace and patience with that.
GuyerDigital (32:27): Sorry, I was on a phone call. What happened now?
Marine4America (32:29): No problem. You had a request to speak, so
GuyerDigital (32:35): I just wanted to say, hi, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (32:38): Hello.
GuyerDigital (32:41): How come I got booted from your last space?
PamHemphill79 (32:45): I
Marine4America (32:45): Don't know, man. Maybe that was me. I think I might've been a little trolley. Did you do any January 6th looking into,
GuyerDigital (32:54): I still don't really seem to care about what happened six years ago.
Marine4America (32:58): There's a whole news about the DOJ moving to get rid of people's charges for sedition.
GuyerDigital (33:06): Alright, so what do you consider storming an immigration customs enforcement facility and totally turning that thing upside down. You don't think storming a federal building isn't considered any of that?
Marine4America (33:19): It sure could be.
PamHemphill79 (33:19): Okay. What tactic was that one? What trick was that? One?
Marine4America (33:23): It was kind of the age of the subject. Not really. He wasn't alluding directly. He was just saying the what about it? And I would say, yeah, you're right. Yeah, I What's the beep?
GuyerDigital (33:37): So what are your thoughts on that then? Do you think those people should be charged accordingly?
Marine4America (33:42): They should be charged. Yeah, I said that. Oh, I hear an echo.
GuyerDigital (33:46): Okay. So Pam,
Marine4America (33:47): You can go back into every single space I've been in and said, yeah, especially those people banging on the gate. Those people who cried, open the door. That dude who kicked out the camera? Anybody shoving cops? Yeah, charge 'em.
GuyerDigital (34:01): Okay. I agree.
Marine4America (34:03): So getting rid of charges for sedition would be a bad thing, right?
GuyerDigital (34:09): How many people did they get rid of charges for?
Marine4America (34:12): I don't even know if it happened yet, but the judge, Janine Pierro moved for it.
GuyerDigital (34:17): So if it hasn't happened yet, why are we talking about it?
Marine4America (34:20): All right. Well, the pardons for January 6th. How about that? People who were actually pardoned for their assault on police officers.
GuyerDigital (34:28): Okay, well, I haven't read much about it, so I still haven't looked into it. I've got other things to worry about. That's
Marine4America (34:33): Always the answer with people. That's why I don't think, I'm sorry. That's why I wonder if you're a journalist. I don't think you are.
GuyerDigital (34:41): Well, that's fine. A lot of people don't think I am. But you can look at my credentials and you can also look at my past history working as a journalist.
PamHemphill79 (34:49): Well, that's a way to wipe out the history of January 6th. It never happened. And gaslight their convictions.
GuyerDigital (34:58): How does it affect me as an Oregonian right now?
Marine4America (35:01): I think you should be mad as an American that the federal government would pardon people who assaulted police officers and federal buildings. Just like you're supposedly mad at pardoning that would presumably say there's a systemic reason it's okay to commit this violence.
GuyerDigital (35:17): Oh, we already know that there's a systemic reason between everything. I mean, I'm against the establishment. I don't think the establishment is working fairly to the people.
Marine4America (35:26): Okay, cool.
PamHemphill79 (35:28): Yeah, it'd be like wiping out. Just you're against what's happening down at the ice Portland right now. It'd be the same thing.
GuyerDigital (35:36): I wasn't down at January 6th to document, so I can't really put my 2 cents in.
Marine4America (35:41): Alright.
GuyerDigital (35:43): As a journalist, I don't want to use other people what other people said or what other people do. I want to see it for myself. That's why I go down to ice,
Marine4America (35:50): Like sworn testimony, eyewitness accounts, consider again and try to wave affect me as an Oregonian. I think it was a federal issue. I think this is the rot that's happening within the country that people like you allow
GuyerDigital (36:06): People like me.
Marine4America (36:07): Yeah.
GuyerDigital (36:08): What do you mean people like me?
Marine4America (36:09): People who are in such a rush to be the next Nick Shirley who don't realize that the
GuyerDigital (36:13): Nick Shirley. You know what's funny is I didn't even know who Nick Shirley was.
Marine4America (36:17): You don't realize that he just had, I met him about
GuyerDigital (36:19): A month and
Marine4America (36:19): A half, four
GuyerDigital (36:20): Months ago.
Marine4America (36:21): He has a web of support of a rich family, like a Hollywood mom.
GuyerDigital (36:24): Okay?
Marine4America (36:26): Do I have a
GuyerDigital (36:26): Hollywood mom with the rich family and a web of support?
Marine4America (36:28): Probably not. Which is why it's not going to happen for you. Well,
GuyerDigital (36:31): I'm not trying to be Nick Shirley. Why am I trying to be Nick Shirley, thanks for watching my stuff, by the way, and reading the comments.
Marine4America (36:36): You should go be a carpenter.
GuyerDigital (36:39): A carpenter.
Marine4America (36:40): Yeah.
GuyerDigital (36:41): Just like you, Chandler,
Marine4America (36:44): Who
GuyerDigital (36:45): You sound a lot like Chandler.
Marine4America (36:46): Chandler, but I've seen him.
GuyerDigital (36:49): He's a carpenter. I've got a broken back. I can't be a carpenter.
Marine4America (36:55): Okay.
GuyerDigital (36:59): I would rather use my skills that I know how to do and actually do something for my state rather than build a fence or a house.
Marine4America (37:07): Yeah, I understand that
GuyerDigital (37:12): Carpenters are oversaturated in this state anyways. Plus they don't get, they're trying to. The
Marine4America (37:18): Idea was a practical skill,
GuyerDigital (37:19): Small businesses
Marine4America (37:20): To contribute to your community.
GuyerDigital (37:22): SB 1, 5 0 7. You guys know about that? Or wait?
Marine4America (37:26): No, man, don't. You're
GuyerDigital (37:27): Oregonian. That's right.
Marine4America (37:29): So
GuyerDigital (37:29): Why don't you care about SB seven? Sorry.
Marine4America (37:31): Am I Chandler or not?
GuyerDigital (37:33): Are you?
Marine4America (37:35): No.
GuyerDigital (37:35): Okay. You sound a lot like him. So do you care about SB 1 5 0 7
Marine4America (37:39): With my East Coast accent? I know. I try to mask my Philly accent, but I still say water. I don't know. I don't think Chandler says water. I got water rights all day.
PamHemphill79 (37:53): You don't sound like him to me, but
Marine4America (37:56): I haven't heard him speak. I think I did one time, but he was like, he all pissed off at somebody and then I looked him up and no, I looked up Antifa and then he's like the leader of Antifa, the self proclaimed leader of for some chips.
PamHemphill79 (38:12): No, he's not. That's mega saying that about him. It's not true at all. That's me.
Marine4America (38:18): The leader. No, in the sense that what you're doing, where it's like people call him that and he just kind of owned it as a joke and people interviewed him like that. I didn't really look into it. I think the Portland thing, I think you guys are getting a little too stupid.
Marine4America (38:41): Kidding.
Marine4America (38:42): You know what guy, you're right. I don't have a problem with you. If you're just kind of chasing neighborhood pets, by all means do that. I don't want to get in your way and tell you not to do that shit. I'm
GuyerDigital (38:51): Not chasing
Marine4America (38:52): Neighborhood
GuyerDigital (38:52): Pets, but that's all right. There's other people in my town that do that.
Marine4America (38:56): Alright, well, I don't see you as a tentacle. Like Ryan, I see you. Something else. A little more misled, but
GuyerDigital (39:06): Misled. Okay.
Marine4America (39:07): I don't know you.
GuyerDigital (39:08): Okay. Well, luckily I've got some pretty good advisors that lead me in the right direction.
Marine4America (39:15): Good. I think you have a creative heart and I appreciate that.
GuyerDigital (39:20): Oh, that's the first nice thing you said about me all night.
Marine4America (39:23): I can be very nice.
GuyerDigital (39:28): So were you a J Fixer?
Marine4America (39:30): No. I watched from my warehouse what I did watch on the mainstream media first, but I was kind of ready for something hot all day. My other friend who I served with, he lives in Ohio and he was working the night shift and we had a tradition of he was leaving work and I was going to work. So we would just talk on the phone the whole time.
GuyerDigital (39:54): And this
Marine4America (39:55): Whole,
GuyerDigital (39:55): What did you do in January 6th, Pam?
Marine4America (40:00): So he was like, call me up. Something's about to pop off. I was like, something's definitely going to pop off. And then something popped off.
GuyerDigital (40:12): I'm curious to know Pam's involvement in January 6th.
PamHemphill79 (40:17): Oh my God, in three years, all the interviews I've had, you have no clue really.
Marine4America (40:22): We'll tell your story.
GuyerDigital (40:23): Just obsessed over you. You think a lot of people are.
PamHemphill79 (40:32): What'd you say, Marine?
Marine4America (40:34): If you want to go over your story again for the billion time, I'm down to listen to it.
PamHemphill79 (40:40): Got to realize I've been doing this for three years. Oh my God. I still get interviewed every week. I'm just burned out with telling the story. I really am. That's why I just put up an interview better than me. Keep going over and over, but Pacific questions I don't mind answering. You have a specific question? I can't hear you very well.
GuyerDigital (41:05): Yeah, specific question. My specific question is when you're at the fence and you're telling 'em, go in there, go in there, go in there, go get 'em, and you're standing in front of the fence with the police officer and you were told to stand over here. Why were you saying go in there. Go in there. Go in there. What were you trying to do?
PamHemphill79 (41:25): That was out right away. All the media. Put that little clip out. But first don't be saying what I said when that's not correct. That's all I asked.
Marine4America (41:36): That January 6th.
GuyerDigital (41:38): Let's replay the clip here.
PamHemphill79 (41:40): Yeah, I have to go back a little bit.
Marine4America (41:45): Is this the thing you were found guilty for?
PamHemphill79 (41:47): No, not at all. What had happened? Trying to think of his name, William. It'll come to me. Anyway, he was talking to a capitol police officer and I turned to him. I said, what are you guys talking about? He says, we're negotiating. They're going to move the barriers and let us up to the steps. And I thought that would be great. Maybe that's where Trump's going to be. I kept thinking Trump was going to be there to talk. He had asked everybody to go there and you know how you're at a football game or a concert. People are allowed to come in, but they're pushing too fast. That's what I thought was happening. I thought they were letting us in. An officer pulled me over, so I thought he was helping me to get in first. Why would he pull me over? So I go walking around and say, come on in.It's your house. It's your house. I'm laughing now, but it's not funny. But I walked over to this female officer and I said, they're not coming in. What's going on? We're not letting them in. I said, oh my God. My heart went to my feet. And I said, shit. So they put me back to the same spot and they did it again. And I knew that time I was in trouble. I'm right up front at the gate, can't go anywhere. And the officer, the same one pulls me over again. I run to an officer and because I had 40 stitches, I told him I'm in trouble. It was like a buffalo coming at you behind you. It's very frightening. You don't know what to do. They could trump you. He says, I'll call in upfront and you go up there and they'll put you behind them until we can get you out of here. But when I got up there, they pushed me towards an officer. I fell backwards on purpose so I don't hit the officer. And they stepped on my head, pulled up my shoulder, cut my knee, broke my glasses. I was not breathing. I was close to just dying. And an officer pulled me up and saved me and got me behind him. So that's what happened that day. But you could play the clip. I don't care. I mean, that's been out there for three years. I'm not giving, I don't want to paint a picture like I'm a victim. I made a choice to stay. That's why I pleaded guilty. I was guilty. It's really that
GuyerDigital (44:14): Simple. Well, when we're not painting a picture that you're a victim, you pleaded guilty, which means you're the opposite of the victim.
PamHemphill79 (44:20): Yeah. I had a choice I could have left.
GuyerDigital (44:22): Right, but you were also telling people, go in there, it's your house. And they were standing behind a guardrail.
PamHemphill79 (44:28): That's what I told you. I thought they were letting us in. That's what a
Marine4America (44:31): Lot of people were screaming.
GuyerDigital (44:32): Right. So why are you telling people to go in there? And then also, I
PamHemphill79 (44:36): Just
GuyerDigital (44:36): Explained it,
Marine4America (44:38): But this is what the whole crowd was saying. A lot of people were saying, this is our house. Go in there. Yeah, I sold your Well
PamHemphill79 (44:45): Wait, Marine. Wait, Marine guy. I just explained it and you didn't hear a word I said, or you wouldn't be asking this. I just explained it.
GuyerDigital (44:55): I heard every word you said, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (44:57): I said, I thought they were letting us in because he said they're negotiating. They're letting people come in. But
GuyerDigital (45:03): Why do you still believe it was an insurrection?
PamHemphill79 (45:06): Well, we already know by research that it was planned by the proud boys and Oath keepers Trump. You named the other
GuyerDigital (45:13): People. Did you know it was going to be an insurrection when you went down
PamHemphill79 (45:15): There? No, I didn't know nothing. Of course not.
Marine4America (45:18): Why would you think she did?
Marine4America (32:29): No problem. You had a request to speak, so
GuyerDigital (32:35): I just wanted to say, hi, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (32:38): Hello.
GuyerDigital (32:41): How come I got booted from your last space?
PamHemphill79 (32:45): I
Marine4America (32:45): Don't know, man. Maybe that was me. I think I might've been a little trolley. Did you do any January 6th looking into,
GuyerDigital (32:54): I still don't really seem to care about what happened six years ago.
Marine4America (32:58): There's a whole news about the DOJ moving to get rid of people's charges for sedition.
GuyerDigital (33:06): Alright, so what do you consider storming an immigration customs enforcement facility and totally turning that thing upside down. You don't think storming a federal building isn't considered any of that?
Marine4America (33:19): It sure could be.
PamHemphill79 (33:19): Okay. What tactic was that one? What trick was that? One?
Marine4America (33:23): It was kind of the age of the subject. Not really. He wasn't alluding directly. He was just saying the what about it? And I would say, yeah, you're right. Yeah, I What's the beep?
GuyerDigital (33:37): So what are your thoughts on that then? Do you think those people should be charged accordingly?
Marine4America (33:42): They should be charged. Yeah, I said that. Oh, I hear an echo.
GuyerDigital (33:46): Okay. So Pam,
Marine4America (33:47): You can go back into every single space I've been in and said, yeah, especially those people banging on the gate. Those people who cried, open the door. That dude who kicked out the camera? Anybody shoving cops? Yeah, charge 'em.
GuyerDigital (34:01): Okay. I agree.
Marine4America (34:03): So getting rid of charges for sedition would be a bad thing, right?
GuyerDigital (34:09): How many people did they get rid of charges for?
Marine4America (34:12): I don't even know if it happened yet, but the judge, Janine Pierro moved for it.
GuyerDigital (34:17): So if it hasn't happened yet, why are we talking about it?
Marine4America (34:20): All right. Well, the pardons for January 6th. How about that? People who were actually pardoned for their assault on police officers.
GuyerDigital (34:28): Okay, well, I haven't read much about it, so I still haven't looked into it. I've got other things to worry about. That's
Marine4America (34:33): Always the answer with people. That's why I don't think, I'm sorry. That's why I wonder if you're a journalist. I don't think you are.
GuyerDigital (34:41): Well, that's fine. A lot of people don't think I am. But you can look at my credentials and you can also look at my past history working as a journalist.
PamHemphill79 (34:49): Well, that's a way to wipe out the history of January 6th. It never happened. And gaslight their convictions.
GuyerDigital (34:58): How does it affect me as an Oregonian right now?
Marine4America (35:01): I think you should be mad as an American that the federal government would pardon people who assaulted police officers and federal buildings. Just like you're supposedly mad at pardoning that would presumably say there's a systemic reason it's okay to commit this violence.
GuyerDigital (35:17): Oh, we already know that there's a systemic reason between everything. I mean, I'm against the establishment. I don't think the establishment is working fairly to the people.
Marine4America (35:26): Okay, cool.
PamHemphill79 (35:28): Yeah, it'd be like wiping out. Just you're against what's happening down at the ice Portland right now. It'd be the same thing.
GuyerDigital (35:36): I wasn't down at January 6th to document, so I can't really put my 2 cents in.
Marine4America (35:41): Alright.
GuyerDigital (35:43): As a journalist, I don't want to use other people what other people said or what other people do. I want to see it for myself. That's why I go down to ice,
Marine4America (35:50): Like sworn testimony, eyewitness accounts, consider again and try to wave affect me as an Oregonian. I think it was a federal issue. I think this is the rot that's happening within the country that people like you allow
GuyerDigital (36:06): People like me.
Marine4America (36:07): Yeah.
GuyerDigital (36:08): What do you mean people like me?
Marine4America (36:09): People who are in such a rush to be the next Nick Shirley who don't realize that the
GuyerDigital (36:13): Nick Shirley. You know what's funny is I didn't even know who Nick Shirley was.
Marine4America (36:17): You don't realize that he just had, I met him about
GuyerDigital (36:19): A month and
Marine4America (36:19): A half, four
GuyerDigital (36:20): Months ago.
Marine4America (36:21): He has a web of support of a rich family, like a Hollywood mom.
GuyerDigital (36:24): Okay?
Marine4America (36:26): Do I have a
GuyerDigital (36:26): Hollywood mom with the rich family and a web of support?
Marine4America (36:28): Probably not. Which is why it's not going to happen for you. Well,
GuyerDigital (36:31): I'm not trying to be Nick Shirley. Why am I trying to be Nick Shirley, thanks for watching my stuff, by the way, and reading the comments.
Marine4America (36:36): You should go be a carpenter.
GuyerDigital (36:39): A carpenter.
Marine4America (36:40): Yeah.
GuyerDigital (36:41): Just like you, Chandler,
Marine4America (36:44): Who
GuyerDigital (36:45): You sound a lot like Chandler.
Marine4America (36:46): Chandler, but I've seen him.
GuyerDigital (36:49): He's a carpenter. I've got a broken back. I can't be a carpenter.
Marine4America (36:55): Okay.
GuyerDigital (36:59): I would rather use my skills that I know how to do and actually do something for my state rather than build a fence or a house.
Marine4America (37:07): Yeah, I understand that
GuyerDigital (37:12): Carpenters are oversaturated in this state anyways. Plus they don't get, they're trying to. The
Marine4America (37:18): Idea was a practical skill,
GuyerDigital (37:19): Small businesses
Marine4America (37:20): To contribute to your community.
GuyerDigital (37:22): SB 1, 5 0 7. You guys know about that? Or wait?
Marine4America (37:26): No, man, don't. You're
GuyerDigital (37:27): Oregonian. That's right.
Marine4America (37:29): So
GuyerDigital (37:29): Why don't you care about SB seven? Sorry.
Marine4America (37:31): Am I Chandler or not?
GuyerDigital (37:33): Are you?
Marine4America (37:35): No.
GuyerDigital (37:35): Okay. You sound a lot like him. So do you care about SB 1 5 0 7
Marine4America (37:39): With my East Coast accent? I know. I try to mask my Philly accent, but I still say water. I don't know. I don't think Chandler says water. I got water rights all day.
PamHemphill79 (37:53): You don't sound like him to me, but
Marine4America (37:56): I haven't heard him speak. I think I did one time, but he was like, he all pissed off at somebody and then I looked him up and no, I looked up Antifa and then he's like the leader of Antifa, the self proclaimed leader of for some chips.
PamHemphill79 (38:12): No, he's not. That's mega saying that about him. It's not true at all. That's me.
Marine4America (38:18): The leader. No, in the sense that what you're doing, where it's like people call him that and he just kind of owned it as a joke and people interviewed him like that. I didn't really look into it. I think the Portland thing, I think you guys are getting a little too stupid.
Marine4America (38:41): Kidding.
Marine4America (38:42): You know what guy, you're right. I don't have a problem with you. If you're just kind of chasing neighborhood pets, by all means do that. I don't want to get in your way and tell you not to do that shit. I'm
GuyerDigital (38:51): Not chasing
Marine4America (38:52): Neighborhood
GuyerDigital (38:52): Pets, but that's all right. There's other people in my town that do that.
Marine4America (38:56): Alright, well, I don't see you as a tentacle. Like Ryan, I see you. Something else. A little more misled, but
GuyerDigital (39:06): Misled. Okay.
Marine4America (39:07): I don't know you.
GuyerDigital (39:08): Okay. Well, luckily I've got some pretty good advisors that lead me in the right direction.
Marine4America (39:15): Good. I think you have a creative heart and I appreciate that.
GuyerDigital (39:20): Oh, that's the first nice thing you said about me all night.
Marine4America (39:23): I can be very nice.
GuyerDigital (39:28): So were you a J Fixer?
Marine4America (39:30): No. I watched from my warehouse what I did watch on the mainstream media first, but I was kind of ready for something hot all day. My other friend who I served with, he lives in Ohio and he was working the night shift and we had a tradition of he was leaving work and I was going to work. So we would just talk on the phone the whole time.
GuyerDigital (39:54): And this
Marine4America (39:55): Whole,
GuyerDigital (39:55): What did you do in January 6th, Pam?
Marine4America (40:00): So he was like, call me up. Something's about to pop off. I was like, something's definitely going to pop off. And then something popped off.
GuyerDigital (40:12): I'm curious to know Pam's involvement in January 6th.
PamHemphill79 (40:17): Oh my God, in three years, all the interviews I've had, you have no clue really.
Marine4America (40:22): We'll tell your story.
GuyerDigital (40:23): Just obsessed over you. You think a lot of people are.
PamHemphill79 (40:32): What'd you say, Marine?
Marine4America (40:34): If you want to go over your story again for the billion time, I'm down to listen to it.
PamHemphill79 (40:40): Got to realize I've been doing this for three years. Oh my God. I still get interviewed every week. I'm just burned out with telling the story. I really am. That's why I just put up an interview better than me. Keep going over and over, but Pacific questions I don't mind answering. You have a specific question? I can't hear you very well.
GuyerDigital (41:05): Yeah, specific question. My specific question is when you're at the fence and you're telling 'em, go in there, go in there, go in there, go get 'em, and you're standing in front of the fence with the police officer and you were told to stand over here. Why were you saying go in there. Go in there. Go in there. What were you trying to do?
PamHemphill79 (41:25): That was out right away. All the media. Put that little clip out. But first don't be saying what I said when that's not correct. That's all I asked.
Marine4America (41:36): That January 6th.
GuyerDigital (41:38): Let's replay the clip here.
PamHemphill79 (41:40): Yeah, I have to go back a little bit.
Marine4America (41:45): Is this the thing you were found guilty for?
PamHemphill79 (41:47): No, not at all. What had happened? Trying to think of his name, William. It'll come to me. Anyway, he was talking to a capitol police officer and I turned to him. I said, what are you guys talking about? He says, we're negotiating. They're going to move the barriers and let us up to the steps. And I thought that would be great. Maybe that's where Trump's going to be. I kept thinking Trump was going to be there to talk. He had asked everybody to go there and you know how you're at a football game or a concert. People are allowed to come in, but they're pushing too fast. That's what I thought was happening. I thought they were letting us in. An officer pulled me over, so I thought he was helping me to get in first. Why would he pull me over? So I go walking around and say, come on in.It's your house. It's your house. I'm laughing now, but it's not funny. But I walked over to this female officer and I said, they're not coming in. What's going on? We're not letting them in. I said, oh my God. My heart went to my feet. And I said, shit. So they put me back to the same spot and they did it again. And I knew that time I was in trouble. I'm right up front at the gate, can't go anywhere. And the officer, the same one pulls me over again. I run to an officer and because I had 40 stitches, I told him I'm in trouble. It was like a buffalo coming at you behind you. It's very frightening. You don't know what to do. They could trump you. He says, I'll call in upfront and you go up there and they'll put you behind them until we can get you out of here. But when I got up there, they pushed me towards an officer. I fell backwards on purpose so I don't hit the officer. And they stepped on my head, pulled up my shoulder, cut my knee, broke my glasses. I was not breathing. I was close to just dying. And an officer pulled me up and saved me and got me behind him. So that's what happened that day. But you could play the clip. I don't care. I mean, that's been out there for three years. I'm not giving, I don't want to paint a picture like I'm a victim. I made a choice to stay. That's why I pleaded guilty. I was guilty. It's really that
GuyerDigital (44:14): Simple. Well, when we're not painting a picture that you're a victim, you pleaded guilty, which means you're the opposite of the victim.
PamHemphill79 (44:20): Yeah. I had a choice I could have left.
GuyerDigital (44:22): Right, but you were also telling people, go in there, it's your house. And they were standing behind a guardrail.
PamHemphill79 (44:28): That's what I told you. I thought they were letting us in. That's what a
Marine4America (44:31): Lot of people were screaming.
GuyerDigital (44:32): Right. So why are you telling people to go in there? And then also, I
PamHemphill79 (44:36): Just
GuyerDigital (44:36): Explained it,
Marine4America (44:38): But this is what the whole crowd was saying. A lot of people were saying, this is our house. Go in there. Yeah, I sold your Well
PamHemphill79 (44:45): Wait, Marine. Wait, Marine guy. I just explained it and you didn't hear a word I said, or you wouldn't be asking this. I just explained it.
GuyerDigital (44:55): I heard every word you said, Pam.
PamHemphill79 (44:57): I said, I thought they were letting us in because he said they're negotiating. They're letting people come in. But
GuyerDigital (45:03): Why do you still believe it was an insurrection?
PamHemphill79 (45:06): Well, we already know by research that it was planned by the proud boys and Oath keepers Trump. You named the other
GuyerDigital (45:13): People. Did you know it was going to be an insurrection when you went down
PamHemphill79 (45:15): There? No, I didn't know nothing. Of course not.
Marine4America (45:18): Why would you think she did?
What happens when a property co-owner dies in India? Does the survivor get full ownership or is he left in a legal tangle? Yes, a tangle - if you haven't done the paperwork. Here's what you need to know: 🧵 
1/ Co-ownership ≠ automatic protection
If ownership is "tenancy in common" + will favours others, the surviving co-owner may lose their claim. Joint ownership does NOT auto-protect you.
If ownership is "tenancy in common" + will favours others, the surviving co-owner may lose their claim. Joint ownership does NOT auto-protect you.
2/ The deceased's share doesn't automatically go to you
It splits among legal heirs → they collectively become new co-owners alongside you. Suddenly you have strangers as co-owners.
It splits among legal heirs → they collectively become new co-owners alongside you. Suddenly you have strangers as co-owners.
कुंभक प्राणायाम … हिमालयी योगियों की प्राचीन विद्या जो उम्र को उलट सकती है वेद पुराणों का गुप्त रहस्य
कुंभक कोई जिम की कसरत नहीं है।
क्या आपने कभी सोचा है कि हिमालय के योगी सौ साल की उम्र में भी युवाओं जैसी असीम ऊर्जा चेहरे की चमक और शरीर का लचीलापन कैसे बनाए रखते हैं। क्या सचमुच संभव है कि साठ साल की उम्र में भी पच्चीस साल के जवान जैसा जीवंत और स्वस्थ दिखा जा सके।
कुंभक कोई जिम की कसरत नहीं है।
क्या आपने कभी सोचा है कि हिमालय के योगी सौ साल की उम्र में भी युवाओं जैसी असीम ऊर्जा चेहरे की चमक और शरीर का लचीलापन कैसे बनाए रखते हैं। क्या सचमुच संभव है कि साठ साल की उम्र में भी पच्चीस साल के जवान जैसा जीवंत और स्वस्थ दिखा जा सके।
आज हम उसी प्राचीन महाविद्या कुंभक प्राणायाम की गहराइयों में उतर रहे हैं जो समय के पहिए को उलटने की शक्ति रखती है।
उम्र बढ़ना सिर्फ कोशिकाओं का क्षरण नहीं बल्कि मन और प्राण की गति का परिणाम है। जब हमारी सांस तेज और उथली होती है तो शरीर लगातार तनाव की स्थिति में रहता है। प्रकृति का सरल नियम देखिए कुत्ता एक मिनट में बीस तीस सांस लेता है और उसकी उम्र दस पंद्रह साल होती है जबकि कछुआ तीन चार सांस लेता है और दो सौ तीन सौ साल तक स्वस्थ रहता है। हमारे ऋषियों ने हजारों साल पहले यही समझ लिया था कि ईश्वर ने हमें सांसों की एक निश्चित संख्या दी है।
उम्र बढ़ना सिर्फ कोशिकाओं का क्षरण नहीं बल्कि मन और प्राण की गति का परिणाम है। जब हमारी सांस तेज और उथली होती है तो शरीर लगातार तनाव की स्थिति में रहता है। प्रकृति का सरल नियम देखिए कुत्ता एक मिनट में बीस तीस सांस लेता है और उसकी उम्र दस पंद्रह साल होती है जबकि कछुआ तीन चार सांस लेता है और दो सौ तीन सौ साल तक स्वस्थ रहता है। हमारे ऋषियों ने हजारों साल पहले यही समझ लिया था कि ईश्वर ने हमें सांसों की एक निश्चित संख्या दी है।
श्वेताश्वतार उपनिषद हठयोग प्रदीपिका और योग वासिष्ठ में स्पष्ट लिखा है कि श्वास चलती है तो मन चंचल होता है और जब कुंभक से श्वास स्थिर हो जाती है तो मन भी शांत हो जाता है। जब मन और प्राण दोनों ठहर जाते हैं तो शरीर के अंदर ऊर्जा का अनावश्यक खर्च रुक जाता है और कोशिकाओं का टूटना यानी बुढ़ापा वहीं थम जाता है। यह कोई कथा नहीं बल्कि ब्रह्मांडीय सत्य है जिसे आज का विज्ञान ऑक्सीडेटिव स्ट्रेस कम होने और सेलुलर रिपेयर के रूप में देख रहा है।
I have a bunch of secret AI benchmarks I only reveal when they fall, and today one did. I give the AI 1000 words written by me and never published, and ask them who the author is. They generally give flattering wrong answers (see ChatGPT, below:)
Opus 4.7 is the first model to get it correct at all, and it's reliable- 5/5 in the API with max thinking. (It's sometimes accurate but unreliable in chat; seems to sometimes sabotage itself with the 'adaptive' thinking, and get it right only if prodded to think more.)
Now, this is not a text that screams 'Kelsey Piper'.It is a heist scene, the opening chapter of a spy novel. None of my published work is a fantasy heist! Nonetheless, a sufficiently good text-predictor would be able to identify the author of a text, so I knew the day would come.
🚨 Most people are wasting AI.
Here’s how smart creators are making MONEY with it (step-by-step):
🧵👇
Here’s how smart creators are making MONEY with it (step-by-step):
🧵👇
1. Stop using AI for “fun”
Use it for income.
Most people:
→ Ask random questions
→ Generate useless content
Smart people:
→ Build assets
→ Automate work
→ Sell solutions
Use it for income.
Most people:
→ Ask random questions
→ Generate useless content
Smart people:
→ Build assets
→ Automate work
→ Sell solutions
2. Pick ONE money path (don’t mix)
Choose:
A. Content creation
B. Freelancing
C. Digital products
D. Automation services
Focus = money
Choose:
A. Content creation
B. Freelancing
C. Digital products
D. Automation services
Focus = money
France, Saint Jean Du Gard
Witness "Madame. X" had been camping with her husband on the terraced garden above her friend's house, when all the noise coming from the festivities at the town made her wake up around two and half AM, only to experience something truly bizarre...
Witness "Madame. X" had been camping with her husband on the terraced garden above her friend's house, when all the noise coming from the festivities at the town made her wake up around two and half AM, only to experience something truly bizarre...
The location she was staying had a view that extended itself over the hills bordering the valley, and she could see the bright glow above the town emanating from afar, but on their side of the valley it was pitch black. The houses had their lights off, big clouds on the horizon.
As she enjoyed the cool night breeze, her attention was directed to a white ball the size of an "Isotta Fiat" stationed at one of the parking spots reserved for the occupants of the villas, which puzzled her, how could a car shine so brightly when all around her was so dark?
I have officially never owned so much put premium as I do today. Index/ponzi/consumer cyclical as well as protective puts against most of my long shares.
All of this is barbelled with calls and spreads on boats, energy, and metals in case we go full Zimbabwe.
Basically a giant regime change straddle long vol and atoms and short bits.
Yes, I know I’m in danger but the stars have aligned and it’s time to take a stand. Wish me luck.
All of this is barbelled with calls and spreads on boats, energy, and metals in case we go full Zimbabwe.
Basically a giant regime change straddle long vol and atoms and short bits.
Yes, I know I’m in danger but the stars have aligned and it’s time to take a stand. Wish me luck.
Where to start…
How about earnings. Have we finally set a hurdle too high for even the financial engineering geniuses at the MAG7 to beat and raise over? Estimates are… euphoric.
How about earnings. Have we finally set a hurdle too high for even the financial engineering geniuses at the MAG7 to beat and raise over? Estimates are… euphoric.
Price action: Sure looks like the final UTAD to me…
É por isso que as companhias aéreas odeiam o Claude 4.6
Passagem por $550. Eu paguei $180.
Sem milhas. Sem parcerias. Sem VPN.
Aqui vão 8 prompts que usei pra viajar como um profissional :
Passagem por $550. Eu paguei $180.
Sem milhas. Sem parcerias. Sem VPN.
Aqui vão 8 prompts que usei pra viajar como um profissional :
1. Buscador de Voos Ocultos
"Liste todos os voos de [origem] para [destino] nas próximas [X semanas], incluindo companhias de baixo custo, regionais e conexões menos conhecidas. Classifique pelo preço total real, não apenas pela tarifa base."
"Liste todos os voos de [origem] para [destino] nas próximas [X semanas], incluindo companhias de baixo custo, regionais e conexões menos conhecidas. Classifique pelo preço total real, não apenas pela tarifa base."
2. Otimizador de Rotas com Escalas Inteligentes
"Projete rotas alternativas com 1 ou 2 escalas de [origem] para [destino] por menos de [X] $. Priorize escalas com menos de [X horas] e aeroportos sem altas taxas de trânsito.
"Projete rotas alternativas com 1 ou 2 escalas de [origem] para [destino] por menos de [X] $. Priorize escalas com menos de [X horas] e aeroportos sem altas taxas de trânsito.
🧵 Thread
51 sacred places. One Divine Mother.
Each Shakti Peethas holds Maa Sati’s eternal energy. 🙏
As per the Devi Bhagavata Purana, each Peetha heals a specific pain.
Not coincidence. Divine design.
Save this—your Peetha might be waiting.
51 sacred places. One Divine Mother.
Each Shakti Peethas holds Maa Sati’s eternal energy. 🙏
As per the Devi Bhagavata Purana, each Peetha heals a specific pain.
Not coincidence. Divine design.
Save this—your Peetha might be waiting.
The Carthaginians traced roots to Phoenician Semitic cities like Tyre and Arqa. Sources from Josephus to Ibn Manzur and Abu al-Fida describe Canaanites as descendants of Shem, with Phoenicians as their line. Thus Carthage is viewed as a Semitic Phoenician civilization. THREAD 🧵
Phoenicians 🇱🇧 built fortified temples with courtyards and bi-portal facades. They are said to have helped build Solomon’s Temple. Reliefs of Sennacherib show decorated city windows. They built strong walls, ports (cothons), bridges, and cities like Tyre, Arwad, and Carthage.
Carthage, a Phoenician state, was a Western Mediterranean power with a large fleet and trade empire. It used naval rams, produced thinkers like Cleitomachus, and Phoenicians built 183 ports across the Mediterranean, North Africa, and Spain.
Ben Roberts-Smith bail hearing - I am sitting in court room reporting to you LIVE
There are over fifty journalists packed in the court room
Ben Roberts-Smith just appeared on live stream to the court - he is sitting clean shaven in a green jumper with a stoic expression
His first words ''Thank you, your honour''
His parents are sitting in the front row of the court
There are over fifty journalists packed in the court room
Ben Roberts-Smith just appeared on live stream to the court - he is sitting clean shaven in a green jumper with a stoic expression
His first words ''Thank you, your honour''
His parents are sitting in the front row of the court
Ben Roberts-Smith's lawyers: ''This prosection will take many, many years.''
''This is unchartered territory for the Commonwealth.''
''The proceedings will be beset with a multitude of delays ... delays if the OSI decide to charge other soldiers with the same incidents ... which would result in applications to join proceedings.''
''It is very likely in due course a superior court may need to consider whether the extraordinary pre-trial publicity in relation to this case - publicity which has persisted for years and continues to persist - means that a fair trial is not possible.''
''Fundamentally the fairness of these proceedings will be compromised if the applicant has to defend himself from remand custody - if the applicant is in custody there is no way that any area of the prison will be able to be cleared for an area where the applicant will be able to access evidence.''
''He won't be able to speak openly with his lawyers, to prepare for his court appearances and his defence''
''This is unchartered territory for the Commonwealth.''
''The proceedings will be beset with a multitude of delays ... delays if the OSI decide to charge other soldiers with the same incidents ... which would result in applications to join proceedings.''
''It is very likely in due course a superior court may need to consider whether the extraordinary pre-trial publicity in relation to this case - publicity which has persisted for years and continues to persist - means that a fair trial is not possible.''
''Fundamentally the fairness of these proceedings will be compromised if the applicant has to defend himself from remand custody - if the applicant is in custody there is no way that any area of the prison will be able to be cleared for an area where the applicant will be able to access evidence.''
''He won't be able to speak openly with his lawyers, to prepare for his court appearances and his defence''
Ben Roberts-Smith's lawyers: ''THE FACTS MAKE REPEATED REFERENCE TO THE DEFAMATION PROCEEDINGS.''
THESE WERE NOT CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS.
THEY WERE DECIDED ON A BODY OF EVIDENCE THAT WILL BE NOTHING LIKE THE BODY OF EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE.''
THESE WERE NOT CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS.
THEY WERE DECIDED ON A BODY OF EVIDENCE THAT WILL BE NOTHING LIKE THE BODY OF EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE.''
It was an honor to represent Secretary Hegseth yesterday at a productive session of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group. Our European allies must take primary responsibility for their continent’s security by expanding their industrial capacity and leading on support to Ukraine. 1/
Have also enjoyed recent productive engagements with NATO Chief of Staff @leeuwengew, Mike Needham @CounselorDOS, and Matt Whitaker @USAMBNATO as we at the DoW work to put the Alliance on a stronger and more durable footing.
Some key points from my remarks at the UDCG below.🧵2/
Some key points from my remarks at the UDCG below.🧵2/
“We must be clear-eyed about the gravity of the current moment: Europe must accelerate its assumption of primary responsibility for the conventional defense of the continent. This is not a matter of choice, but of strategic necessity.” 3/
TW!!!! / PELECEHAN SEKSUAL DAN PEMBULLYAN SESAMA LAKI-LAKI DI GRUP CHAT WA. [Threads]
Pelaku adalah alumni SMA Trenmatika:
Fathurrahman (MBTI Telkom 25)
Evando riski (Akun Telkom 25)
Falih Haffiyah Dewanto (Akun Telkom 25)
M.Anza Pranawa (Binus sofware engineering 25)
Pelaku adalah alumni SMA Trenmatika:
Fathurrahman (MBTI Telkom 25)
Evando riski (Akun Telkom 25)
Falih Haffiyah Dewanto (Akun Telkom 25)
M.Anza Pranawa (Binus sofware engineering 25)
Kronologi: Pada Oktober 2025, korban tidak sengaja mengintip dengan sekilas ke handphone milik anak pimpinan sekolah saat kegiatan field trip. Pada saat itu yang korban liat adalah adanya grup dengan nama "(nama korban) + OnlyFans"
Korban juga melihat sekilas anggota dari grup chat tersebut. Diketahui bahwa hal ini terjadi saat mereka duduk di kelas 12 akhir.
🧵🔥👀 YOU CANT UNSEE IT. MIKE BENZ HAS A “HOLY SH*T” MOMENT.
WHO IS AVRIL GAINES???
This is the strongest circumstantial evidence that there was foreknowledge at bare minimum IMO of the pandemic. If you watch ANYTHING all the way through this week watch this.
What if I told you she was Obama’s former deputy Director of the CIA … under Brennan. Gets crazier.. She was on a panel for a CORONAVIRUS SIMULATOR was playing out at the SAME TIME the Wuhan Games was going on in Oct 2019. It was funded by BILL GATES.
Present there were all the Pharma execs… former deputy Director of the CIA Avril Haines. One of the topics was RUNNING A SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP SIMULATOR to stop the spread of MISINFORMATION online .
Who else was in attendance? GEORGE GAO who is the director of the Chinese CDC. Now why would HE be there if this was for a simulation based on a virus that started in Brazil?? Why was there not a SINGLE REPRESENTATIVE FROM SOUTH AMERICA PRESENT?
Now what if I told you that after BIDEN “WON” following Covid leading to the ushering in of mail ins and MASS SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP about the virus ….that she helped wargame A YEAR BEFORE… that BIDEN made her head of the DNI … she was Tulsi Gabbard’s predecessor.
@MikeBenzCyber absolutely blew my mind. Wait til you see where she was LAST MONTH and who she was WITH. 🧵👇🏻 Every one of these videos will red pill you like you have NEVER BEEN.
WHO IS AVRIL GAINES???
This is the strongest circumstantial evidence that there was foreknowledge at bare minimum IMO of the pandemic. If you watch ANYTHING all the way through this week watch this.
What if I told you she was Obama’s former deputy Director of the CIA … under Brennan. Gets crazier.. She was on a panel for a CORONAVIRUS SIMULATOR was playing out at the SAME TIME the Wuhan Games was going on in Oct 2019. It was funded by BILL GATES.
Present there were all the Pharma execs… former deputy Director of the CIA Avril Haines. One of the topics was RUNNING A SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP SIMULATOR to stop the spread of MISINFORMATION online .
Who else was in attendance? GEORGE GAO who is the director of the Chinese CDC. Now why would HE be there if this was for a simulation based on a virus that started in Brazil?? Why was there not a SINGLE REPRESENTATIVE FROM SOUTH AMERICA PRESENT?
Now what if I told you that after BIDEN “WON” following Covid leading to the ushering in of mail ins and MASS SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP about the virus ….that she helped wargame A YEAR BEFORE… that BIDEN made her head of the DNI … she was Tulsi Gabbard’s predecessor.
@MikeBenzCyber absolutely blew my mind. Wait til you see where she was LAST MONTH and who she was WITH. 🧵👇🏻 Every one of these videos will red pill you like you have NEVER BEEN.
🧵🔥 UNREAL.. Mike Benz notes that the Head of the Chinese CDC GAO & Former CIA Deputy Director Avril Haines JUST HAPPENED to be seated DIRECTLY next to each other at a PANDEMIC SIMULATION on how to combat misinformation such as
“This was man made” .
Thing was 2 MONTHS prior to outbreak of the virus and the simulation was based around SOUTH AMERICA virus but not a single representative was there from S. America. 🧵👇🏻
“This was man made” .
Thing was 2 MONTHS prior to outbreak of the virus and the simulation was based around SOUTH AMERICA virus but not a single representative was there from S. America. 🧵👇🏻
🧵🔥 How does someone go from a physics student who repaired car engines in their spare time end up dropping out of a doctoral program to buy a bar that was seized by the government that was turned into a bookstore to get a JD from Georgetown and end up being THE OBAMA DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF THE CIA UNDER BRENNAN IN 15 years???
@MikeBenzCyber breaks down that she m then go to work as a mercenary (CENSORS IN EXHILE) for NATO/PENTAGON funded “RESEARCH” groups that were war gaming MEDIA CENSORSHIP. Then right back but now as the HEAD OF DNI UNDER BIDEN.
Are we getting it? 🧵👇🏻 Where was she last week?
@MikeBenzCyber breaks down that she m then go to work as a mercenary (CENSORS IN EXHILE) for NATO/PENTAGON funded “RESEARCH” groups that were war gaming MEDIA CENSORSHIP. Then right back but now as the HEAD OF DNI UNDER BIDEN.
Are we getting it? 🧵👇🏻 Where was she last week?
When Pope Leo chooses to embrace his Muslim brothers while doing little about the Catholics and Christians being mass murdered by Islamic violence, and refuses to support Israel facing the same existential threat,
1)
Meme via Terrence K Williams
1)
Meme via Terrence K Williams
he loses not only credibility on the world political stage but more importantly from his Catholic flock. Many are leaving the Catholic Church or refusing to financially support it.
2)
2)
He seems to ignore that when the Messiah comes, he will be leading from Eretz Yisrael. He would be far better off to stay in his religious lane and stay out of politics.
3)
3)
1/12 Only one BIG problem with this. Trump has already vowed he will pardon "anyone who has ever been within 10 feet of him". SOMETHING needs to be done with the Presidential pardon rule, as Trump has SERIOUSLY violated pardon protocol. The U.S. President has the constitutional
2/12 power to grant pardons at any time after the crime is committed, without restriction by Congress OR the judiciary. Applicants usually must meet certain criteria, such as completing their sentence, including prison, parole, or probation. For federal pardons, there is
3/12 generally a FIVE YEAR waiting period after sentence completion before applying through the Department of Justice. The pardon process involves submitting an application to the appropriate authority, either the President via the Department of Justice for federal cases or a