Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #CEL81
Most recents (9)
Attention @CelsiusUcc there is an unregulated offshore platform, soliciting unlicensed services to #Celsius creditors.
Are you not concerned?
Are you not concerned?
Cause & effect;
28th of Oct 2022 makes unfounded and obscure references to regulatory licensing.
46 days later, he boasts that 700+ #Celsius creditors believed his promises for those licenses and compliance and put their claims on BTTF.
They believed him and signed up.
28th of Oct 2022 makes unfounded and obscure references to regulatory licensing.
46 days later, he boasts that 700+ #Celsius creditors believed his promises for those licenses and compliance and put their claims on BTTF.
They believed him and signed up.
BTTF publicly acknowledges the need for licenses to serve non-HNW investors. However, as they haven't obtained these licenses yet, it implies that there are currently no investor protections in place.
For it needs regulatory requirements before it can operate in that capacity.
For it needs regulatory requirements before it can operate in that capacity.
You did nothing, there is NOT one Stretto document that list anything you have done. You have been caught lying and gaslighting the #Celsius community for 11 months, and of that there is ample evidence.
He is now telling you he is so important that he needs to sit at the table.
He is now telling you he is so important that he needs to sit at the table.
With his insolvent, unregulated, unlicensed offshore BTTF. He wants to sit at the table that decides the future of your equity.
We are here because of Judge Glenn and the Ch 11 process, not because of Dixon.
We are here because of Judge Glenn and the Ch 11 process, not because of Dixon.
OK. Latest on the #Celsius Chapter 11…
Auction continues tomorrow - Notice about the 5/3 @ 10am continuation time cases.stretto.com/public/x191/11…
Joint agreement between Celsius/@CelsiusUcc to have W&C/UCC pursue & litigate the constructive fraudulent transfer/conveyance and similar claims held by LLC against CNL. All to push towards setting what creditors & shareholders own cases.stretto.com/public/x191/11…
I've not removed funds from #Celsius, since early 2021.
I completely, reject this insidious and threatening legal over-reach. The committee's and its council's job, is to protect creditors, not set the dogs on them!
This gives precedent to attack other #Celsius creditors.
I completely, reject this insidious and threatening legal over-reach. The committee's and its council's job, is to protect creditors, not set the dogs on them!
This gives precedent to attack other #Celsius creditors.
You don't protect creditors by attacking other creditors. (ponzi)
If it happens once, it will happen again. (if one asset is revalued, others will follow)
Kelvin showed there is no need for clawbacks, therefore this is a calculated legal maneuver. (precedent)
If it happens once, it will happen again. (if one asset is revalued, others will follow)
Kelvin showed there is no need for clawbacks, therefore this is a calculated legal maneuver. (precedent)
1: This one time I was in a 7/11 when it got robbed, and they didn't catch the owner/gunman, but they arrested me, because I was a customer of the store.
You hear that creditors, the kid has scored big, or so he thinks...
He provides a couple of screenies for proof.
Flipburger is saying is, that thanks to his hearsay, K&E went chasing after some money and scored big.
Now, we can only go off this screenshot, it's all he provided for context, this is all what he wants us to see, and that will do.
Now, we can only go off this screenshot, it's all he provided for context, this is all what he wants us to see, and that will do.
While it's CEO is busy gaslighting #Celsius creditors, a reminder of what BTTF is:
WTF is a BNK TO THE FUTURE, a bAnk with no A in its name?
Here's the crash course:
WTF is a BNK TO THE FUTURE, a bAnk with no A in its name?
Here's the crash course:
Apparently he's going around suggesting that BTTF is choicer than Wulfy. He was saying something about available liquidity, and he's been busy making fun of the #HASH token.
So it sounds like he's saying that BTTF and its mighty BFT token, are a better choice.
So it sounds like he's saying that BTTF and its mighty BFT token, are a better choice.
meanwhile
So if I follow this in a line, you liked Santiago's reply to Keith's conclusions, as follows;
Santiago: "The data aligns with what he's reflecting and his fiduciary to creditors."
Keith: "So when you vote to subsidize CEL with the majority of the customers BTC, ETH, and stables just remember it ain't to help the majority of customers. Just the fractional minority"
Keith
Keith: "So when you vote to subsidize CEL with the majority of the customers BTC, ETH, and stables just remember it ain't to help the majority of customers. Just the fractional minority"
Keith
He's advocating that innocent retail users who bought #CEL be punished, while he has total rights to everything they also contributed to.
Every #Celsius creditor, contributed to the overall wealth of every other #Celsius creditor.
He's organizing to steal from some of them.
Every #Celsius creditor, contributed to the overall wealth of every other #Celsius creditor.
He's organizing to steal from some of them.
Remember this, the next time he is given the mic by the @CelsisuUCC during town halls. Remember also, this person has legal representation, but the UCC keeps giving him the mic.
4 times so far, that's already 90% more than ANY other creditor.
What's up with that @CelsiusUCC?
4 times so far, that's already 90% more than ANY other creditor.
What's up with that @CelsiusUCC?
Where he takes the mic and proceeds to bullshit the horseshit out of the #CelsiusUCC, then promptly turns around on Twitter and continues his psychotic attacks on the creditors who believe in a ReOrg AND EQUAL TREATMENT OF ALL ASSETS.
The billing log from @elementus_io, the blockchain firm hired by the @CelsiusUcc, raises more questions than answers. (Docket 2116)
cases.stretto.com/public/x191/11…
Here are just a few:
cases.stretto.com/public/x191/11…
Here are just a few:
Total January spend for blockchain analysis: $278k
Talk about tunnel vision! #Cel81
Mentions of:
* CEL token: 17 times
* Mashinsky: 5 times
* NovaWulf: 3 times
* Any other potential bidders: 0 times
* FTX: 0 times
* Alameda: 0 times
Sample pages:
Mentions of:
* CEL token: 17 times
* Mashinsky: 5 times
* NovaWulf: 3 times
* Any other potential bidders: 0 times
* FTX: 0 times
* Alameda: 0 times
Sample pages:
