Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #CIM
Most recents (3)
Not mutually exclusive, but most people said they'd prefer seeing rather than joining a discussion to analyze THAT erythritol paper, and I have some airport hours ahead...
Here go🧵.
In case you've been living under a rock, this is the paper:
nature.com/articles/s4159…
Here go🧵.
In case you've been living under a rock, this is the paper:
nature.com/articles/s4159…
Relevant disclosures for interpreting my interpretation?
I'll speak more as a clinician clinician who sees many ⬆️CVDrisk patients following a low-carb diet than as a healthy adult who follows a low-carb diet and occasionally consumes erythritol.
I'll speak more as a clinician clinician who sees many ⬆️CVDrisk patients following a low-carb diet than as a healthy adult who follows a low-carb diet and occasionally consumes erythritol.
Things I liked about the paper = ✅️.
Things I didn't like (and matter) = ⚠️
Things I didn't like (and are nitpicking) = 🧐.
🩸[] = blood concentration.
CVD = CardioVascular Disease.
MACE = Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events.
Why we "liked" erythritol in the first place?
Things I didn't like (and matter) = ⚠️
Things I didn't like (and are nitpicking) = 🧐.
🩸[] = blood concentration.
CVD = CardioVascular Disease.
MACE = Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events.
Why we "liked" erythritol in the first place?
1/18) 🚨NEW PAPER in @AJCN provides evidence supporting #CIM of #obesity
👉 Glycemic Load >>> Calorie Counting for weight loss
👉 Biomarkers of Low carb diet predict weight
👉Insulin hyper-secreters especially benefit fromlow-carb
Video 👉👉
🧵...
👉 Glycemic Load >>> Calorie Counting for weight loss
👉 Biomarkers of Low carb diet predict weight
👉Insulin hyper-secreters especially benefit fromlow-carb
Video 👉👉
🧵...
2/18) First, and foremost, a big congrats to @AdrianSotoMota and @davidludwigmd for an excellent work!
& of course, for those who have the time, I highly recommend reading the full paper, here: doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcn…
But for those who prefer video or TW thread... HERE WE GO...
& of course, for those who have the time, I highly recommend reading the full paper, here: doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcn…
But for those who prefer video or TW thread... HERE WE GO...
3/18) What the researchers did in this paper is perform a secondary analysis of pre-existing data from a 12-month RCT: the DIETFITS trial in which 609 adults aged 18-50 without diabetes were randomized to either a 12 m Low-carb diet (LCD) or low-fa diet (LFD).
⚠️NEW PAPER⚠️
@AJCNutrition with: Mark Pereria, Cara Ebbeling, @LuciaAronica & @davidludwigmd
doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcn…
With many of my favorite things:
1) Open Science.
2)Critical analysis of high quality research.
3) Causal inference.
4) #CiCo vs #CIM
5) 1600 lines of R code.
@AJCNutrition with: Mark Pereria, Cara Ebbeling, @LuciaAronica & @davidludwigmd
doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcn…
With many of my favorite things:
1) Open Science.
2)Critical analysis of high quality research.
3) Causal inference.
4) #CiCo vs #CIM
5) 1600 lines of R code.
This is a post-hoc analysis of the DIETFITS, a high-quality RCT from @StanfordMed lead by @GardnerPhD (who kindly reviewed an earlier version of our manuscript) which compared carbohydrate vs fat restriction to achieve weight-loss during one year.
jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
This trial found non-significant weight-loss differences between both diets.
Additionally, no interaction was observed with genotype nor hyperinsulinemia.
Additionally, no interaction was observed with genotype nor hyperinsulinemia.
