Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #CoachEvaluation
Most recents (2)
Best #CoachEvaluation comps to Jimmy Lake
^ Y2 score -30% to -60% (Lake now is -45%)
^ P5
^ since 2000
^ no deep rebuilds
Y2 / Final (sorted by inheritance quality)
-57% / -50% : Rodriguez, Michigan (3)
-42% / -42% : Taggart, FSU (3)
-32% / -15% : Shannon, Miami (4)
1/4
^ Y2 score -30% to -60% (Lake now is -45%)
^ P5
^ since 2000
^ no deep rebuilds
Y2 / Final (sorted by inheritance quality)
-57% / -50% : Rodriguez, Michigan (3)
-42% / -42% : Taggart, FSU (3)
-32% / -15% : Shannon, Miami (4)
1/4
-38% / -37% : Strong, Texas (3)
-31% / -23% : Tuberville, Texas Tech (3)
-49% / -49% : Gilbertson, UW (2)
-31% / -41% : Prince, Kansas State (3)
-37% / -41% : Rhule, Baylor (3, promoted)
-32% / -39% : Neuheisel, UCLA (4)
-42% / -50% : Kragthorpe, Louisville (3)
2/4
-31% / -23% : Tuberville, Texas Tech (3)
-49% / -49% : Gilbertson, UW (2)
-31% / -41% : Prince, Kansas State (3)
-37% / -41% : Rhule, Baylor (3, promoted)
-32% / -39% : Neuheisel, UCLA (4)
-42% / -50% : Kragthorpe, Louisville (3)
2/4
-36% / -23% : Kingsbury, Texas Tech (6, promoted)
-48% / -9% : Sitake, BYU (5, sitting)
-45% / -57% : Mackovic, Arizona (3)
-39% / -42% : Hawkins, Colorado (5)
-31% / -13% : Dykes, Cal (4)
-47% / -46% : Brewster, Minnesota (4)
-30% / 25% : Sherman, Texas A&M (4)
3/4
-48% / -9% : Sitake, BYU (5, sitting)
-45% / -57% : Mackovic, Arizona (3)
-39% / -42% : Hawkins, Colorado (5)
-31% / -13% : Dykes, Cal (4)
-47% / -46% : Brewster, Minnesota (4)
-30% / 25% : Sherman, Texas A&M (4)
3/4
Big picture & neutral Jimmy Lake evaluation thread.
I have a formula (#CoachEvaluation) that grades FBS head coaches.
I've yet to deep test for predictive value. Anecdotally it works, but I have a lot of work to do before I'd feel really good using it in front of an AD.
1/25
I have a formula (#CoachEvaluation) that grades FBS head coaches.
I've yet to deep test for predictive value. Anecdotally it works, but I have a lot of work to do before I'd feel really good using it in front of an AD.
1/25
A little about the #CoachEvaluation formula...
Conceptually, it compares the performance of a team in a HC's tenure w/ the that of the team in the years prior to the HC's hire. Using advanced metrics, with the goal being to be fair to both coaches taking over strong
2/25
Conceptually, it compares the performance of a team in a HC's tenure w/ the that of the team in the years prior to the HC's hire. Using advanced metrics, with the goal being to be fair to both coaches taking over strong
2/25
programs (to avoid the "nowhere to go but down" dynamic) and coaches taking over bad programs. It knows that reasonable expectations are drastically different, both across teams in any given moment, and within the same program over different eras.
Are there potential
3/25
Are there potential
3/25
