Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #Embryology
Most recents (1)
It is difficult to understand why @Nature publishes papers like this nature.com/articles/s4158… whose title promises much but which in the end is, simply, a data set with little insight & a number of misleading statements.
Perhaps the most valuable figures, which are not discussed in sufficient detail, are 2d and 4b where there we can see some spatial expression. Rather than genes that are the same, it would have been good to see differences.
Overall the technical work is good, probably useful, but the study is a superficial and misleading annotation of the data set to cell types: CDX1 and OTX2 as markers for Definitive Endoderm? HOX as a marker for the node?.
