Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #GIPAgate

Most recents (1)

Point 51 of the judgement is incorrect and once we get the R scripts we can see whether Christine Selvey committed perjury.

In R, for a data frame to be populated it has to have been read from a static file or database. The data frame is held in RAM but the source is not.
This is "Dr Selvey".

Do you find her credible?

If she stated that the source data is no longer available "because it was held in RAM" this was a lie.

Perhaps she was reading from a script... Just like this

We know that the source data still exists because it was populated from the Australian immunisation register.

The only way it could no longer exist is if they deleted the AIR, which would be a criminal act.

This could get very interesting.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!