Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #Hearsay
Most recents (2)
1/5 "There was not competent, substantial evidence legally sufficient to support the RPO. Hearsay is not competent evidence. Klemple v. Gagliano, 197 So. 3d 1283, 1286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) Unsworn factual allegations, such as Det. Silberberg’s “affidavit” containing only (cont)
2/5 Third-party allegations, are not competent evidence. See, e.g., Leon Shaffer Golnick Advertising, Inc. v. Cedar, 423
So. 2d 1015, 1016-7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) non-record evidence is not competent, substantial evidence. See Coe, 39 So. 3d at 545-6. #hearsay
So. 2d 1015, 1016-7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) non-record evidence is not competent, substantial evidence. See Coe, 39 So. 3d at 545-6. #hearsay
3/5The trial court’s findings also cited the affidavit of Deputy Silberberg, which the trial court erroneously admitted into evidence on the basis of § 790.401(3)(d), Fla. Stat. Appellant objected (R. 316.):
#FollowTheFacts: Trump tried to coerce a foreign leader to make up dirt on his opponent and interfere in our election, was caught by a #whistleblower’s “urgent concern” complaint to Congress, but moved key evidence to a secret server in the #CoverUpOfTheCoverUp.
The #whistleblower used an Office of Director of National Intelligence form dni.gov/files/ICIG/Doc… to convey the Ukraine matter of “urgent concern” to Congress
PAGE 1 anticipates the complaint could go to Congress
PAGE 2 anticipates #hearsay
(“I heard about it from others.”)
PAGE 1 anticipates the complaint could go to Congress
PAGE 2 anticipates #hearsay
(“I heard about it from others.”)
So when you see protests from Donald Trump’s enablers of this #CoverUpOfTheCoverUp, do not follow them down the rabbit hole - #FollowTheFacts and remind them that whistleblower complaints go to Congress and that Congress expects they may begin as #hearsay.
cc @LindseyGrahamSC
cc @LindseyGrahamSC
