Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #InSearchOfJyotish
Most recents (1)
#InSearchOfJyotish #ISJBook10 10.4.1.2.5 #Randhresha #8L
Regarding RandhreÅa, there is some confusion regarding what Maharį¹£i ParÄÅara stated. On the one hand, he says that the Lords of VyÄya, DvitÄ«ya and Randhra become KÄraka or AkÄraka based on the ownership of another BhÄva.
Regarding RandhreÅa, there is some confusion regarding what Maharį¹£i ParÄÅara stated. On the one hand, he says that the Lords of VyÄya, DvitÄ«ya and Randhra become KÄraka or AkÄraka based on the ownership of another BhÄva.
However, in the following statement, he states that RandhreÅa is not favourable, as he owns the VyÄya (loss) from DharmabhÄva (righteousness).
If Randhra is considered unfavourable, why must its nature be divined from the other Lord?
If Randhra is considered unfavourable, why must its nature be divined from the other Lord?
We may conclude here that RandhreÅa is not completely neutral (Taį¹astha) like DhaneÅa and VyÄyeÅa and carries some degree of unfavorability (AkÄrakatva). This is toned down considerably when it owns a Koį¹a, like in the case of Åani for Mithuna, or Budha for Makara...
