@BJP4Karnataka

@BJP4Karnataka

@BJP4Karnataka

@TwitterIndia

@TwitterIndia

@TwitterIndia

@TwitterIndia

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

@TwitterIndia

The Karnataka High Court will soon continue hearing a plea by Twitter challenging account-level blocking claiming that it is a disproportionate measure & violates Constitutional rights of users.

Live updates below 👇🏽

#KarnatakaHighCourt
@TwitterIndia

@TwitterIndia

During the previous hearing, Twitter had argued that blocking orders issued by the Central government must contain reasons that are communicated to users of the social media platform.

#KarnatakaHighCourt
@TwitterIndia

@TwitterIndia

The Central government is expected to put forth its arguments today.

#KarnatakaHighCourt
@TwitterIndia

Read 4 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

@TwitterIndia

The Karnataka High Court will soon hear a plea by Twitter challenging account-level blocking claiming that it is a disproportionate measure & violates Constitutional rights of users.

Live updates below 👇🏽

#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia

@TwitterIndia

The case will be heard by Justice Krishna S Dixit.

#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia

@TwitterIndia

During the previous hearing, Senior Advocate Arvind Datar appeared for Twitter and informed the court that it was asked by the Centre to block multiple accounts during the farmer's protests in 2021.

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia

Read 46 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

@TwitterIndia

Today, the Karnataka High Court will hear Twitter's petition challenging blocking orders issued by the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology on the ground that account-level blocking violates users' rights.

#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia

@TwitterIndia

The Central government, in response to Twitter's petition, had said that the directions to block certain twitter accounts were issued in national and public interest.

Read more on the government's stand here: barandbench.com/news/national-…

#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia

@TwitterIndia

The case will be heard by single-judge Krishna S Dixit. Follow this thread for updates 👇🏼

#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia

Read 45 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

Karnataka High Court is hearing the PIL related to the filling up of potholes in Bangalore and surrounding areas.

BBMP Lawyer Srinidhi: All Efforts are being made to make passage for rain water movement

#BBMP #BangaloreRains #Karnataka

HC: What is the update Rajakaluve and related encroachment drive? Is it being stopped? Also Dont give us old statistics. How many encroachments have you identified?

#BBMP #BangaloreRains #Karnataka #karnatakahighcourt

Srinidhi: Encroachment identification and clearing them has been a daily job.

HC: You need to update us about the number of encroachments. How else would we keep an eye on them

#BBMP #BangaloreRains #Karnataka #Karnatakahighcourt

Read 6 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

BREAKING: Karnataka High Court is hearing Anjuman Islam Trust against a Karnataka High Court order against Ganesh Chaturthi celebrations in Hubbali Idgah Maidan #GaneshChaturthi2022

The Anjuman Islam Trust refers to Supreme Court order of passed in the evening which had halted Ganesh Chaturthi festivities at another Idgah Maidan of Bengaluru. Trust says same relief be given here #GaneshChaturthi2022

AAG says that the Corporation has the right to use the property as it pleases. Bench asks if this is true.
AAG says there is no dispute to the Title of the Maidan. “#Ganeshotsav2022 is not strictly religious, after all everyone is welcome,” he says

Read 12 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

The #KarnatakaHighCourt has in a judgment recently observed that “It is primarily the task of the Government to govern and in the guise of judicial review, COURTS SHOULD NOT SEEK TO RUN THE GOVERNMENT.”

A division Bech of Karnataka High Court consisting of Justices Krishna Dixit and Krishna Bhat observed this in a appeal against order of a single judge refusing to entertain a challenge to land acquisition for Upper Krishna Project.

The court, has further observed that when a measure is taken by the government for implementing mega infrastructural project pursuant to policy and expert opinion, courts should REFRAIN FROM ACTING LIKE SUPER-ACCOUNTANT and INTERFERENCE SHOULD BE EXTREMELY RARE

Read 7 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

The Supreme Court is hearing a plea by ADGP Seemanth Kumar Singh challenging an order passed by Justice HP Sandesh of Karnataka High Court on July 7 while hearing a bail petition last week.

#SupremeCourt #KarnatakaHighCourt

CJI NV Ramana: the judge has passed a speaking order

SG Tushar Mehta: Even after a mention was entertained by this court. Even then the court proceeded.

CJI: the matter is listen when?

SG: Tomorrow. This could have been avoided

CJI: let the High court proceed and pass orders. What is the case please tell.

SG: somebody applied for regular bail. He could have been granted or refused bail. The judge went on to observe that dept is not working properly and sought details of de summary report since 2016

Read 12 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

In #KarnatakaHighCourt the bench headed by CJ Ritu Raj Awasthi is hearing a PIL seeking protection of street dogs. CJ says “When I go for a walk at Cubbon park in #Bengaluru , there are so many street dogs that it gets difficult to walk. People take care of them so well.”

The counsel says “Whenever there is an incident of attack by Street dogs, the authorities come to the area. Take them and completely destroy them. This cannot be done.”

BREAKING: #KarnatakaHighCourt issues notice to the government and ask them to find out if the government has taken steps to implement Animal Birth Control (Birth) Rules, 2001.

Read 4 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

BREAKING: #KarnatakaHighCourt in a judgment today has said that "A brutal act of sexual assault on
the wife, against her consent, albeit by the husband, cannot but
be termed to be a rape."
#MaritalRape

The bench penned that "Such sexual assault by a husband on
his wife will have grave consequences on the mental sheet of the
wife, it has both psychological and physiological impact on her."

"Such acts of husbands scar the soul of the wives. It is, therefore, imperative for the law makers to now “hear the voices of
silence”," the bench added.

Read 4 tweets

Ansh Agarwal 👨🏽‍🚀

@bigansh

Alright! Time for a controversial thread. Recently #KarnatakaHighCourt released its verdict about the #HijabBan & the status was the ban should persist. What does it really stand for?

I have an anecdote. I don't know which class, but I distinctly remember an illustrative depiction of a conversation between a Sikh & a common man.

Sikh wasn't wearing a helmet & the common man asked why? Wouldn't you be charged? Sikh said as he was wearing a turban, he could not be charged.

Read 10 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

Hijab Ban Judgment: LIVE UPDATES from Karnataka High court.

Track this thread.

#HijabControversy #Hijab #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHighCourt

@CPBlr

Section 144 (Prohibitory Orders) CRPC imposed in Bangalore City and many parts of Karnataka from today till March 21 by
@CPBlr
in view of the #KarnatakaHijabRow judgment from Karnataka High Court

NO agitation, protests, etc

Bench has assembled.

#hijab #KarnatakaHighCourt #HijabControversy

Read 9 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

🚨 Karnataka High Court will shortly commence hearing in the Hijab Row case(s)
Yesterday, Advocate General placed FIR registered for investigating Campus Front of India’s alleged involvement in pushing #hijab at PU Colleges ot Karnataka in a “sealed cover” before bench
#HijabRow

Yesterday, senior adv AM Dar made submissions for petitioner students who had allegedly been denied entry to a PU College New Horizon school. AG however told court that it is a private school. Dar told Court that Hijab is a matter of life & death in Islam.
lawbeat.in/top-stories/we…

Further, Sr Adv Kamat for original petitioners told court that the Court must decide basis “Pro-choice” decisions like Sabarimala. He said that right to wear Hijab cannot be restricted as it is a Fundamental Right & an Essential Religious Practice which need not be tested.

Read 52 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

The Hijab Hearing is set to commence in Karnataka High Court shortly.
The petitioner(s) have challenged the alleged ban on wearing #Hijab in government PU colleges at Udupi district.
#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow

Yesterday: “If uniform has been prescribed by college, it has to be followed till disposal of this matter", Karnataka High Court clarified on interim arrangement
Read here 👇
#KarnatakaHijabControversy
lawbeat.in/top-stories/if…

Furthermore, Senior Advocate Naganand had told Court that the "drum beating for Hijab" was being carried out with pressure from the Campus front of India. CFI is alleged to have affiliations to an org with radical ideologue "Popular Front of India"
lawbeat.in/top-stories/ca…

Read 90 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

Hijab Row: A full bench of Karnataka High Court will resume hearing at 2.30 pm in case against ban on hijab in certain colleges.

Track this thread for live updates from Day 9 of the hearing.

#HijabRowInKarnataka #KarnatakaHijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC

The State government concluded its arguments yesterday after which other respondents started their submissions.

#HijabRowInKarnataka #KarnatakaHijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC

Hijab Row: Day 9 of the hearing

#HijabRowInKarnataka #KarnatakaHijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC

Read LIVE UPDATES from Court here: bityl.co/B3T1

Read 141 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

A Special Bench of #KarnatakaHighCourt will at 2.30 PM resume hearing plea(s) by girl students challenging alleged ban on wearing #Hijab in government PU colleges in Udupi district. S.S.Naganand,Sr.Adv, is expected to continue making his submissions #HijabRow

Yesterday, AG Prabhuling Navadgi argued that Islam can survive without #Hijab and cited the example of France where it is banned in public places #HijabBan

lawbeat.in/top-stories/is…

Bench assembles #KarnatakaHijabRow

Read 99 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

Hijab Row: Karnataka High Court to resume hearing case at 2.30 pm today.

#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHighCourt #KarnatakaHC #HijabRowInKarnataka

Track this thread for live account from the hearing

Yesterday, the State government told the Karnataka High Court that the petitioners were claiming that wearing of hijab was an essential religious practice, with a view to bind every Muslim woman to a particular dress code.

#KarnatakaHijabRow

A plea has also been filed before Karnataka High Court alleging that the controversy is a creation of 'toolkit' to Islamise India, and has sought NIA probe

Read more here: bityl.co/B2LC

Read 117 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

A Special Bench of #KarnatakaHighCourt will at 2.30 PM resume hearing plea(s) by girl students challenging alleged ban on wearing #Hijab in government PU colleges in Udupi district. AG Prabhuling Navadgi is expected to continue making his submissions #HijabRow

On the last date of hearing, Advocate General Prabhuling Navadgi argued that Dr.Ambedkar specifically asked not to let religion enter education institutions #HijabControversy #HijabRow

lawbeat.in/top-stories/te…

When a counsel mentioned of 'State excess' to implement the interim order being discussed in TV channels, the court asked him to argue before the TV channel #Hijab #HijabControversy

lawbeat.in/top-stories/th…

Read 90 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

Hijab Row: Karnataka High Court full bench to continue hearing batch of petitions against hijab ban in educational institutions

#HijabBan #HijabCircular #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC

LIVE UPDATES -Day 7

Hijab Row: During the last hearing the State govt had told the High Court that Hijab must pass Constitutional Morality test in Sabarimala, Triple Talaq rulings of Supreme Court

#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #karnatakahighcourt

Read story: bityl.co/B1Lq

Hijab Row: LIVE UPDATES from Karnataka High Court - Day 7

#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #karnatakahighcourt #HijabCircular

Read LIVE ACCOUNT of hearing here: bityl.co/B1Lt

Read 105 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

A Special Bench of #KarnatakaHighCourt will shorty resume hearing plea(s) by girl students challenging alleged ban on wearing #Hijab in government PU colleges in Udupi district. AG Prabhuling Navadgi is expected to continue making his submissions #HijabRow

On the last date of hearing Navadgi argued that #Hijab will have to stand the test of individual dignity and constitutional morality to constitute an Essential Religious Practice (ERP) #HijabRow
lawbeat.in/top-stories/hi…

The Karnataka High Court today declined a plea to stall live streaming of proceedings in the ongoing hijab row controversy. It remarked that the people need to know the stand of the government and college #HijabRow
lawbeat.in/top-stories/le…

Read 74 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

@RashmiDVS

BREAKING: @RashmiDVS approaches Karnataka HC in ongoing #HijabRow case. Inter alia avers “alarmed at purported attempt to introduce symbols widely regarded as tending to promote discrimination & exclusion of women in state-run edu. institutions under garb of Freedom of Religion”

@RashmiDVS

.@RashmiDVS tells Karnataka HC that she herself was once a student of PU College & recalls that she & peers adhered to a strict uniform code which they welcomed as it “fostered sense of sameness & community”, “fulcrum upon which entire student body united” #HijabRowInKarnataka

@RashmiDVS

Despite views expressed by noted scholars & activists such as “Hijab is meant to keep muslim women oppressed” (Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed), “Veil not mandatory in Islam” (Indian muslims for secular democracy) etc, religious chauvinism being pushed: @RashmiDVS to #KarnatakaHC

Read 4 tweets

JayEnAar

@GorwayGlobal

#HijabRow.
Thread.
Lets go back to basics. What is the core question?
Might be easier to define what it is NOT.
1. It is not whether Hijab is mandated by Islam. You could have a decades-long debate on that Q and still not get universal agreement. It Does NOT matter.

@IlhanMN

2. It is not whether a Hijab (or for that matter a #Ghunghat, a turban, a #mangalsutra or whatever) is a regressive practice. Women are repressed in all communities. And you could hardly argue that @IlhanMN or Halimah Yacob suffer repression
#Hijab and repression are NOT linked.

3. The Q is not "Why do some women insist on wearing a #Hijab?". You could, with equal stupidity, ask "Why do some women not wear a Hijab or a Ghunghat?"

Read 8 tweets

Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #KarnatakaHighCourt

Most recents (24)

Related hashtags

Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #KarnatakaHighCourt

Most recents (24)

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?