Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #Karnatakahighcourt
Most recents (24)
The Karnataka High Court will soon hear a PIL calling for a stay on the two road shows by Prime Minister Narendra Modi set to be conducted in Bengaluru this weekend.
#KarnatakaHighCourt #KarnatakaElections2023 @BJP4Karnataka @narendramodi
#KarnatakaHighCourt #KarnatakaElections2023 @BJP4Karnataka @narendramodi
The case will be heard by a bench of Justices Krishna S Dixit and Vijaykumar A Patil.
#KarnatakaHighCourt #KarnatakaElections2023 @BJP4Karnataka
#KarnatakaHighCourt #KarnatakaElections2023 @BJP4Karnataka
The PIL seeks the interim relief in a plea claiming that Karnataka's people are suffering from traffic jams for the past week created by several political parties under the guise of road shows.
#KarnatakaHighCourt #KarnatakaElections2023
#KarnatakaHighCourt #KarnatakaElections2023
The Karnataka High Court is hearing Twitter's petition challenging blocking orders issued by the Union Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology on the ground that account-level blocking violates users' rights.
Live updates below 👇🏽
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
Live updates below 👇🏽
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
Justice Krishna S Dixit will continue hearing the Central Government’s arguments.
A detailed report on the previous hearing can be found here:
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
A detailed report on the previous hearing can be found here:
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
The Karnataka High Court will today continue hearing a plea by Twitter challenging account-level blocking claiming that it is a disproportionate measure & violates Constitutional rights of users.
Live updates below 👇🏽
#KarnatakaHighCourt
@TwitterIndia
Live updates below 👇🏽
#KarnatakaHighCourt
@TwitterIndia
Counsel for central government appears and seeks adjournment, requests case be listed on 27 January or 3 February.
Justice Dixit expresses display at repeated adjournments: Such an important matter.. i will give one week.
#KarnatakaHighCourt
Justice Dixit expresses display at repeated adjournments: Such an important matter.. i will give one week.
#KarnatakaHighCourt
The Karnataka High Court will soon continue hearing a plea by Twitter challenging account-level blocking claiming that it is a disproportionate measure & violates Constitutional rights of users.
Live updates below 👇🏽
#KarnatakaHighCourtÂ
@TwitterIndia
Live updates below 👇🏽
#KarnatakaHighCourtÂ
@TwitterIndia
During the previous hearing, Twitter had argued that blocking orders issued by the Central government must contain reasons that are communicated to users of the social media platform.
#KarnatakaHighCourtÂ
@TwitterIndia
#KarnatakaHighCourtÂ
@TwitterIndia
The Central government is expected to put forth its arguments today.
#KarnatakaHighCourtÂ
@TwitterIndia
#KarnatakaHighCourtÂ
@TwitterIndia
The Karnataka High Court will soon hear a plea by Twitter challenging account-level blocking claiming that it is a disproportionate measure & violates Constitutional rights of users.
Live updates below 👇🏽
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
Live updates below 👇🏽
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
During the previous hearing, Senior Advocate Arvind Datar appeared for Twitter and informed the court that it was asked by the Centre to block multiple accounts during the farmer's protests in 2021.
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
Today, the Karnataka High Court will hear Twitter's petition challenging blocking orders issued by the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology on the ground that account-level blocking violates users' rights.
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
The Central government, in response to Twitter's petition, had said that the directions to block certain twitter accounts were issued in national and public interest.
Read more on the government's stand here: barandbench.com/news/national-…
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
Read more on the government's stand here: barandbench.com/news/national-…
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
The case will be heard by single-judge Krishna S Dixit. Follow this thread for updates 👇🏼
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
#KarnatakaHighCourt @TwitterIndia
Karnataka High Court is hearing the PIL related to the filling up of potholes in Bangalore and surrounding areas.
BBMP Lawyer Srinidhi: All Efforts are being made to make passage for rain water movement
#BBMP #BangaloreRains #Karnataka
BBMP Lawyer Srinidhi: All Efforts are being made to make passage for rain water movement
#BBMP #BangaloreRains #Karnataka
HC: What is the update Rajakaluve and related encroachment drive? Is it being stopped? Also Dont give us old statistics. How many encroachments have you identified?
#BBMP #BangaloreRains #Karnataka #karnatakahighcourt
#BBMP #BangaloreRains #Karnataka #karnatakahighcourt
Srinidhi: Encroachment identification and clearing them has been a daily job.
HC: You need to update us about the number of encroachments. How else would we keep an eye on them
#BBMP #BangaloreRains #Karnataka #Karnatakahighcourt
HC: You need to update us about the number of encroachments. How else would we keep an eye on them
#BBMP #BangaloreRains #Karnataka #Karnatakahighcourt
BREAKING: Karnataka High Court is hearing Anjuman Islam Trust against a Karnataka High Court order against Ganesh Chaturthi celebrations in Hubbali Idgah Maidan #GaneshChaturthi2022
The Anjuman Islam Trust refers to Supreme Court order of passed in the evening which had halted Ganesh Chaturthi festivities at another Idgah Maidan of Bengaluru. Trust says same relief be given here #GaneshChaturthi2022
AAG says that the Corporation has the right to use the property as it pleases. Bench asks if this is true.
AAG says there is no dispute to the Title of the Maidan. “#Ganeshotsav2022 is not strictly religious, after all everyone is welcome,” he says
AAG says there is no dispute to the Title of the Maidan. “#Ganeshotsav2022 is not strictly religious, after all everyone is welcome,” he says
The #KarnatakaHighCourt has in a judgment recently observed that “It is primarily the task of the Government to govern and in the guise of judicial review, COURTS SHOULD NOT SEEK TO RUN THE GOVERNMENT.”
A division Bech of Karnataka High Court consisting of Justices Krishna Dixit and Krishna Bhat observed this in a appeal against order of a single judge refusing to entertain a challenge to land acquisition for Upper Krishna Project.
The court, has further observed that when a measure is taken by the government for implementing mega infrastructural project pursuant to policy and expert opinion, courts should REFRAIN FROM ACTING LIKE SUPER-ACCOUNTANT and INTERFERENCE SHOULD BE EXTREMELY RARE
The Supreme Court is hearing a plea by ADGP Seemanth Kumar Singh challenging an order passed by Justice HP Sandesh of Karnataka High Court on July 7 while hearing a bail petition last week.
#SupremeCourt #KarnatakaHighCourt
#SupremeCourt #KarnatakaHighCourt
CJI NV Ramana: the judge has passed a speaking order
SG Tushar Mehta: Even after a mention was entertained by this court. Even then the court proceeded.
CJI: the matter is listen when?
SG: Tomorrow. This could have been avoided
SG Tushar Mehta: Even after a mention was entertained by this court. Even then the court proceeded.
CJI: the matter is listen when?
SG: Tomorrow. This could have been avoided
CJI: let the High court proceed and pass orders. What is the case please tell.
SG: somebody applied for regular bail. He could have been granted or refused bail. The judge went on to observe that dept is not working properly and sought details of de summary report since 2016
SG: somebody applied for regular bail. He could have been granted or refused bail. The judge went on to observe that dept is not working properly and sought details of de summary report since 2016
In #KarnatakaHighCourt the bench headed by CJ Ritu Raj Awasthi is hearing a PIL seeking protection of street dogs. CJ says “When I go for a walk at Cubbon park in #Bengaluru , there are so many street dogs that it gets difficult to walk. People take care of them so well.”
The counsel says “Whenever there is an incident of attack by Street dogs, the authorities come to the area. Take them and completely destroy them. This cannot be done.”
BREAKING: #KarnatakaHighCourt issues notice to the government and ask them to find out if the government has taken steps to implement Animal Birth Control (Birth) Rules, 2001.
BREAKING: #KarnatakaHighCourt in a judgment today has said that "A brutal act of sexual assault on
the wife, against her consent, albeit by the husband, cannot but
be termed to be a rape."
#MaritalRape
the wife, against her consent, albeit by the husband, cannot but
be termed to be a rape."
#MaritalRape
The bench penned that "Such sexual assault by a husband on
his wife will have grave consequences on the mental sheet of the
wife, it has both psychological and physiological impact on her."
his wife will have grave consequences on the mental sheet of the
wife, it has both psychological and physiological impact on her."
"Such acts of husbands scar the soul of the wives. It is, therefore, imperative for the law makers to now “hear the voices of
silence”," the bench added.
silence”," the bench added.
Alright! Time for a controversial thread. Recently #KarnatakaHighCourt released its verdict about the #HijabBan & the status was the ban should persist. What does it really stand for?
I have an anecdote. I don't know which class, but I distinctly remember an illustrative depiction of a conversation between a Sikh & a common man.
Sikh wasn't wearing a helmet & the common man asked why? Wouldn't you be charged? Sikh said as he was wearing a turban, he could not be charged.
Hijab Ban Judgment: LIVE UPDATES from Karnataka High court.
Track this thread.
#HijabControversy #Hijab #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHighCourt
Track this thread.
#HijabControversy #Hijab #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHighCourt
Section 144 (Prohibitory Orders) CRPC imposed in Bangalore City and many parts of Karnataka from today till March 21 by
@CPBlr
in view of the #KarnatakaHijabRow judgment from Karnataka High Court
NO agitation, protests, etc
@CPBlr
in view of the #KarnatakaHijabRow judgment from Karnataka High Court
NO agitation, protests, etc
🚨 Karnataka High Court will shortly commence hearing in the Hijab Row case(s)
Yesterday, Advocate General placed FIR registered for investigating Campus Front of India’s alleged involvement in pushing #hijab at PU Colleges ot Karnataka in a “sealed cover” before bench
#HijabRow
Yesterday, Advocate General placed FIR registered for investigating Campus Front of India’s alleged involvement in pushing #hijab at PU Colleges ot Karnataka in a “sealed cover” before bench
#HijabRow
Yesterday, senior adv AM Dar made submissions for petitioner students who had allegedly been denied entry to a PU College New Horizon school. AG however told court that it is a private school. Dar told Court that Hijab is a matter of life & death in Islam.
lawbeat.in/top-stories/we…
lawbeat.in/top-stories/we…
Further, Sr Adv Kamat for original petitioners told court that the Court must decide basis “Pro-choice” decisions like Sabarimala. He said that right to wear Hijab cannot be restricted as it is a Fundamental Right & an Essential Religious Practice which need not be tested.
The Hijab Hearing is set to commence in Karnataka High Court shortly.
The petitioner(s) have challenged the alleged ban on wearing #Hijab in government PU colleges at Udupi district.
#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow
The petitioner(s) have challenged the alleged ban on wearing #Hijab in government PU colleges at Udupi district.
#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow
Yesterday: “If uniform has been prescribed by college, it has to be followed till disposal of this matter", Karnataka High Court clarified on interim arrangement
Read here 👇
#KarnatakaHijabControversy
lawbeat.in/top-stories/if…
Read here 👇
#KarnatakaHijabControversy
lawbeat.in/top-stories/if…
Furthermore, Senior Advocate Naganand had told Court that the "drum beating for Hijab" was being carried out with pressure from the Campus front of India. CFI is alleged to have affiliations to an org with radical ideologue "Popular Front of India"
lawbeat.in/top-stories/ca…
lawbeat.in/top-stories/ca…
Hijab Row: A full bench of Karnataka High Court will resume hearing at 2.30 pm in case against ban on hijab in certain colleges.
Track this thread for live updates from Day 9 of the hearing.
#HijabRowInKarnataka #KarnatakaHijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC
Track this thread for live updates from Day 9 of the hearing.
#HijabRowInKarnataka #KarnatakaHijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC
The State government concluded its arguments yesterday after which other respondents started their submissions.
#HijabRowInKarnataka #KarnatakaHijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC
#HijabRowInKarnataka #KarnatakaHijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC
Hijab Row: Day 9 of the hearing
#HijabRowInKarnataka #KarnatakaHijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC
Read LIVE UPDATES from Court here: bityl.co/B3T1
#HijabRowInKarnataka #KarnatakaHijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC
Read LIVE UPDATES from Court here: bityl.co/B3T1
A Special Bench of #KarnatakaHighCourt will at 2.30 PM resume hearing plea(s) by girl students challenging alleged ban on wearing #Hijab in government PU colleges in Udupi district. S.S.Naganand,Sr.Adv, is expected to continue making his submissions #HijabRow
Yesterday, AG Prabhuling Navadgi argued that Islam can survive without #Hijab and cited the example of France where it is banned in public places #HijabBan
lawbeat.in/top-stories/is…
lawbeat.in/top-stories/is…
Bench assembles #KarnatakaHijabRow
Hijab Row: Karnataka High Court to resume hearing case at 2.30 pm today.
#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHighCourt #KarnatakaHC #HijabRowInKarnataka
Track this thread for live account from the hearing
#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHighCourt #KarnatakaHC #HijabRowInKarnataka
Track this thread for live account from the hearing
Yesterday, the State government told the Karnataka High Court that the petitioners were claiming that wearing of hijab was an essential religious practice, with a view to bind every Muslim woman to a particular dress code.
#KarnatakaHijabRow
#KarnatakaHijabRow
A plea has also been filed before Karnataka High Court alleging that the controversy is a creation of 'toolkit' to Islamise India, and has sought NIA probe
Read more here: bityl.co/B2LC
Read more here: bityl.co/B2LC
A Special Bench of #KarnatakaHighCourt will at 2.30 PM resume hearing plea(s) by girl students challenging alleged ban on wearing #Hijab in government PU colleges in Udupi district. AG Prabhuling Navadgi is expected to continue making his submissions #HijabRow
On the last date of hearing, Advocate General Prabhuling Navadgi argued that Dr.Ambedkar specifically asked not to let religion enter education institutions #HijabControversy #HijabRow
lawbeat.in/top-stories/te…
lawbeat.in/top-stories/te…
When a counsel mentioned of 'State excess' to implement the interim order being discussed in TV channels, the court asked him to argue before the TV channel #Hijab #HijabControversy
lawbeat.in/top-stories/th…
lawbeat.in/top-stories/th…
Hijab Row: Karnataka High Court full bench to continue hearing batch of petitions against hijab ban in educational institutions
#HijabBan #HijabCircular #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC
LIVE UPDATES -Day 7
#HijabBan #HijabCircular #KarnatakaHijabRow #KarnatakaHC
LIVE UPDATES -Day 7
Hijab Row: During the last hearing the State govt had told the High Court that Hijab must pass Constitutional Morality test in Sabarimala, Triple Talaq rulings of Supreme Court
#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #karnatakahighcourt
Read story: bityl.co/B1Lq
#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #karnatakahighcourt
Read story: bityl.co/B1Lq
Hijab Row: LIVE UPDATES from Karnataka High Court - Day 7
#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #karnatakahighcourt #HijabCircular
Read LIVE ACCOUNT of hearing here: bityl.co/B1Lt
#HijabControversy #KarnatakaHijabRow #karnatakahighcourt #HijabCircular
Read LIVE ACCOUNT of hearing here: bityl.co/B1Lt
A Special Bench of #KarnatakaHighCourt will shorty resume hearing plea(s) by girl students challenging alleged ban on wearing #Hijab in government PU colleges in Udupi district. AG Prabhuling Navadgi is expected to continue making his submissions #HijabRow
On the last date of hearing Navadgi argued that #Hijab will have to stand the test of individual dignity and constitutional morality to constitute an Essential Religious Practice (ERP) #HijabRow
lawbeat.in/top-stories/hi…
lawbeat.in/top-stories/hi…
The Karnataka High Court today declined a plea to stall live streaming of proceedings in the ongoing hijab row controversy. It remarked that the people need to know the stand of the government and college #HijabRow
lawbeat.in/top-stories/le…
lawbeat.in/top-stories/le…
BREAKING: @RashmiDVS approaches Karnataka HC in ongoing #HijabRow case. Inter alia avers “alarmed at purported attempt to introduce symbols widely regarded as tending to promote discrimination & exclusion of women in state-run edu. institutions under garb of Freedom of Religion”
.@RashmiDVS tells Karnataka HC that she herself was once a student of PU College & recalls that she & peers adhered to a strict uniform code which they welcomed as it “fostered sense of sameness & community”, “fulcrum upon which entire student body united” #HijabRowInKarnataka
Despite views expressed by noted scholars & activists such as “Hijab is meant to keep muslim women oppressed” (Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed), “Veil not mandatory in Islam” (Indian muslims for secular democracy) etc, religious chauvinism being pushed: @RashmiDVS to #KarnatakaHC
#HijabRow.
Thread.
Lets go back to basics. What is the core question?
Might be easier to define what it is NOT.
1. It is not whether Hijab is mandated by Islam. You could have a decades-long debate on that Q and still not get universal agreement. It Does NOT matter.
Thread.
Lets go back to basics. What is the core question?
Might be easier to define what it is NOT.
1. It is not whether Hijab is mandated by Islam. You could have a decades-long debate on that Q and still not get universal agreement. It Does NOT matter.
2. It is not whether a Hijab (or for that matter a #Ghunghat, a turban, a #mangalsutra or whatever) is a regressive practice. Women are repressed in all communities. And you could hardly argue that @IlhanMN or Halimah Yacob suffer repression
#Hijab and repression are NOT linked.
#Hijab and repression are NOT linked.
3. The Q is not "Why do some women insist on wearing a #Hijab?". You could, with equal stupidity, ask "Why do some women not wear a Hijab or a Ghunghat?"
