Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #LegitimateInterest
Most recents (3)
I can feel something inside me say
I really don't think (your legitimate interest) is strong enough now
- says @Datatilsynet to Shinigami Eyes browser extension. (Thread while you hum the Cher song in your head) 1/6
#dataprivacy #dataprotection #legitimateinterest
I really don't think (your legitimate interest) is strong enough now
- says @Datatilsynet to Shinigami Eyes browser extension. (Thread while you hum the Cher song in your head) 1/6
#dataprivacy #dataprotection #legitimateinterest
The data subjects’ interests, rights and freedoms precedes Shinigami Eyes’ interest in providing their marking-application 2/6
The individuals had no knowledge of the processing and no way to expect that their messages or behavior on certain social media pages will be processed on the extension or communicated to all who download it 3/6
"#Data: a new direction" - a public consultation by @DCMS on "reforms to the UK’s #DataProtection regime":
gov.uk/government/con…
The consultation ends on 19 Nov 2021, and you can respond by e-mail to DataReformConsultation@dcms.gov.uk or online here:
dcms.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_4P…
gov.uk/government/con…
The consultation ends on 19 Nov 2021, and you can respond by e-mail to DataReformConsultation@dcms.gov.uk or online here:
dcms.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_4P…
A quick sample of initial reactions...
We're clearly going to be hearing a lot about #LegitimateInterests, as well as #commercial and #public ones. The real question being, how do this Government's interests actually align with YOURS?
We're clearly going to be hearing a lot about #LegitimateInterests, as well as #commercial and #public ones. The real question being, how do this Government's interests actually align with YOURS?
140+ pages on a Friday is a lot to digest, but @lilianedwards' "penumbra of often futile determinedly populist ideas largely not evidence-based" seems entirely consistent with @DCMS's Drunkard's Walk through #data and #ID this past year...
Hi, @ICOnews! Your advice to pubs, etc. on #collecting customers' details is (at this point in time) incorrect, where it says they are "#required" 👇 ico.org.uk/global/data-pr…
Until the appropriate Minister issues #Regulations, e.g. under section 45C of #PHA1984, the Government...
Until the appropriate Minister issues #Regulations, e.g. under section 45C of #PHA1984, the Government...
...has "#required" nothing; it is simply making a #request.
In other words, #collecting such details is entirely #voluntary on the part of the pub/bar/whatever - and #providing their details is entirely voluntary on the part of the customer.
Later in your advice, you use...
In other words, #collecting such details is entirely #voluntary on the part of the pub/bar/whatever - and #providing their details is entirely voluntary on the part of the customer.
Later in your advice, you use...
...the phrase "#encouraged to collect", which is (until #Regulations are laid for each nation) more accurate.
However, in listing people's #DataProtection #Rights, you omit to mention the most relevant one, i.e. their #RightToObject to #processing!
That you suggest pubs, etc...
However, in listing people's #DataProtection #Rights, you omit to mention the most relevant one, i.e. their #RightToObject to #processing!
That you suggest pubs, etc...
