Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #NonDravidianStock
Most recents (1)
Okay, seeing blank faces. Here is how the fallacy works in Dravidian - if you work in "Policy" or "India Liberal Intelligentsia" this is go above your head. Hence you will dismiss as 'silly'.
Maalan -> came from Uzbek
Babur -> came from Uzbek
same? purpose of this?
Maalan -> came from Uzbek
Babur -> came from Uzbek
same? purpose of this?
This is to 'reduce' Maalan to Babar. This logic is actually a danger to muslims, but Drav do it anyway.
Similar to reducing UVeSa to Bishop Caldwell.. both are foreigners contributing to Tamil.
Similar to reducing UVeSa to Bishop Caldwell.. both are foreigners contributing to Tamil.
This fallacy ignores the "Time" aspect. Dont contest the steppe part. EVEN if Maalan (A #NonDravidianStock ) and Babur are from same place. Maalan came 3000 years ahead of Babur, or 2500 or whatever. So there are two aspects
1. first possession
2. civilization development
1. first possession
2. civilization development
