Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #OPCWScandal
Most recents (3)
A new round for #OPCWScandal:
The Courage Foundation convened a panel about the OPCW-FFM report on Douma, including a former Director General of the OPCW and a member of the Douma investigation team from the @OPCW.
couragefound.org/2019/10/opcw-p…
The Courage Foundation convened a panel about the OPCW-FFM report on Douma, including a former Director General of the OPCW and a member of the Douma investigation team from the @OPCW.
couragefound.org/2019/10/opcw-p…
The findings are based on the whistleblower’s extensive presentation, including internal emails, text exchanges and suppressed draft reports:
=> Key information about chemical analyses, toxicology consultations, ballistics studies, and witness testimonies was suppressed!
=> Key information about chemical analyses, toxicology consultations, ballistics studies, and witness testimonies was suppressed!
The analytical points are the best summary of the relevant issues, and the fatal flaws, of the official @OPCW report that I have seen:
couragefound.org/2019/10/analyt…
couragefound.org/2019/10/analyt…
Some thoughts on the status of the Engineering Assessment leaked by the
"Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media"
#Douma #OPCWScandal
@PiersRobinson1 @Tracking_Power @Tim_Hayward_
syriapropagandamedia.org/working-papers…
"Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media"
#Douma #OPCWScandal
@PiersRobinson1 @Tracking_Power @Tim_Hayward_
syriapropagandamedia.org/working-papers…
In response to the leak, the OPCW denied Henderson was part of the FFM, and spin doctors were quick to suggest he was just "a consultant" (@ScottLucas_EA ), was working "on the sidelines of the FFM" (@Brian_Whit, -> medium.com/@Brian_Whit/le…), "a disgruntled employee" (Higgins) ...
- but this is not borne out by the leaked report itself, which was written on the *explicit* understanding it presented nothing less than the (authorised) findings of the engineering sub-team of the FFM!
#OPCWScandal
Details of the findings of the suppressed Engineering Assessment explained by @ClimateAudit - basically confirming all doubts concerning the two yellow cylinders arising from analysis of the visual evidence:
Details of the findings of the suppressed Engineering Assessment explained by @ClimateAudit - basically confirming all doubts concerning the two yellow cylinders arising from analysis of the visual evidence:
I'll confine myself to a key point: how on earth could the object that created the hole with such force as to smash apart the metal rebars end up sitting on top of the hole?
There is no attempt to explain this seeming physical impossibility in the official OPCW report!
#OPCWScandal
The Engineering Assessment positively rules this out:
"the observed appearance of the cylinder and the rebar were not consistent"!
#OPCWScandal
The Engineering Assessment positively rules this out:
"the observed appearance of the cylinder and the rebar were not consistent"!
