Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #Placentagate

Most recents (9)

@Jikkyleaks I think so... Can you please explain! Why do you see something different than everyone else? What is your explanation? The vaccine/booster shows a short time effect. Your point is nonsense. Cumulative incidence! Only fresh booster reduces the risk. Why is another question! See……
@Jikkyleaks Also, when you talk about #Placentagate. We need more...

What do you see? I see a rat having a bad day. After reading the docs and substacks you linked, we can see some clearer signals, but come on: it's enough to investigate further (especially since we know that shit is bad!),……
@Jikkyleaks No hate! Just saying. Doesn't mean you're wrong, but it might trigger some of the "real" scientists (who turn a blind eye to this issue) ...
Read 3 tweets
@NarfGb @DoorlessCarp [KNOWINGLY]
Remember why they called it co-miRNA-ty? Image
Well, they sure fixed that loophole quickly! Image
Read 6 tweets
Nanoparticle nepotism.

Did Viki Male, the obstetricians front-person for novel mRNA technology delivery to pregnant women, forget some more conflicts of interest?

Did she forget that nanoparticles get everywhere?
Of course not.

[KNOWINGLY] #placentagate
Read 3 tweets
PSA: I am planning to reduce the activity on this account.

I'll explain why.

Two days ago I released a bombshell tweet exposing the shenanigans that the pharma companies and academia play in order to suppress toxicity data related to novel therapies.

This is the tweet, with the hashtag #placentagate
The #placentagate tweet was then completely suppressed by twitter in a new shadowbanning technique that rendered the tweet invisible even to people who tried to click on it.

There was something special about this, so we dubbed it #placentagategate
Read 21 tweets
More #Placentagate πŸ§€πŸ§€πŸ§€

This could be one of the biggest scandals in medicine.

Check this out.
What do you see?… Image
Can you see that there are fewer fetuses in all the treatment groups compared to saline?

It's not dramatic, because the authors published that figure instead of the number of fetal losses.

Look what the Pfizer BNT162b2 animal study showed:… Image
In that study the fetal loss rate DOUBLED (4.2% to 9.8%) but had little impact on the overall number of fetuses.

This is how this information is hidden. That single slide should have been enough to prompt much more investigation, because it showed fewer fetuses in EVERY GROUP Image
Read 18 tweets
Let's make it a bit more clear.

This thread shows that Viki Male, Ofer Beharier, Leena Mithal and Mary Prahl published results that they KNEW did not show that the COVID vaccine wasn't reachiing the fetus.

Their data was then used to lie to the public.
Paper 1. Prahl.
Falsely presenting a story that mRNA products weren't transferring across the placenta, using inappropriate IgM serology in the fetus.…
Paper 2. Mithal.
Falsely presenting a story that mRNA products weren't transferring across the placenta, using inappropriate IgM serology in the fetus.…
Read 4 tweets
More cheese on #PlacentaGate πŸ§€πŸ§€πŸ§€

.@VikiLovesFACS is relying on the lack of fetal production of IgM to claim that the magical LNP (that we now know gets to the placenta), doesn't get into the fetal circulation.

But the fetus doesn't produce IgM in any meaningful quantity...
This is fetal Immunoglobulin production. The fetus (and baby when born) relies overwhelmingly on maternal IgG transfer for the first 6 months of life.

One of the major reasons to breast feed for at least 6 months! Image
IgG crosses the placenta from the mother but IgM doesn't, because it's a pentamer (so 5x the size) and not actively transported.

Of course, LNPs remove most barriers to size-based transfer of drugs - as we are finding out. So even big molecules can go anywhere.
Read 15 tweets
@VikiLovesFACS @MarchandSurgery @drdrew 1/ I am going to retweet this, just an FYI. For posterity.
"Small non-coding RNAs transfer through mammalian placenta and directly regulate fetal gene expression"
EMA has admitted non coding RNAs exist in the RNA ""vaccines". These are TGA.…
@VikiLovesFACS @MarchandSurgery @drdrew @Jikkyleaks 2/ I can post more studies.
As I posted in anther thread under one of these videos,we have the regulatory lord and master of the UK medicine division, which is pro vaccine and pro RNA (and pro lockdown), that there are noncoding fragments in the vaccine. So that is proven.
@VikiLovesFACS @MarchandSurgery @drdrew @Jikkyleaks 3/ that study I just posted about the fragments, come from plants! We are not even in vaccine world yet! I just posted about a plant. The kind that you eat!
Here is the full report right from the UK website and again, this is not up for debate.…
Read 123 tweets

This tweet is a lie and I'm going to post a new paper that shows it.

Viki Male should not be allowed to post this kind of dangerous disinformation and should be sanctioned.

Viki doesn't actually quote studies showing the vaccine does not cross the placenta but a new study has just come out showing Lipid nanoparticles crossing into the placenta and delivering active mRNA.

This is what luciferase expression in mouse PLACENTAS from LNP-mRNA look like
And this is the paper. I have a feeling there will be pressure put on the authors to retract, by the Pharma companies and their lobbyists.

It's a bombshell
Read 15 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!